Next Article in Journal
On the Communication–Key Rate Region of Hierarchical Vector Linear Secure Aggregation
Previous Article in Journal
Exact Response Theory for Delay Equations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Information Thermodynamics: From Physics to Neuroscience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Can Information and Entropic Dynamics Bridge the Gap Between Biology and the Physical Sciences?

by
Richard L. Summers
1,* and
Melvin M. Vopson
2
1
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
2
School of Mathematics & Physics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2026, 28(3), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030349
Submission received: 1 February 2026 / Revised: 10 March 2026 / Accepted: 10 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy and Information in Biological Systems)
This Special Issue, entitled Entropy and Information in Biological Systems, comprises several unique contributions that attempt to bridge the gap between the fields of biology and the physical sciences. The methods used in these investigations are facilitated by our modern-day understanding of information and entropic dynamics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The proposed use of entropy and information to advance our understanding of neuroscience in two of the featured articles highlights the importance of this area of study for both developing our understanding of cognition and also for the future of artificial intelligence [9,10]. Entropy and information dynamics are explored as driving genetic mechanisms in the featured studies of mutation and evolution [11,12], with such a perspective potentially reflecting a fundamental biological principle [13]. Another study takes a broad look at the role of information in the spatial patterns of biological systems [14]. Of particular interest is a study on the role of entropy and information for understanding the complexity of the clinical presentation of stroke in a practical systems analysis [15].
Until the 20th century, the physical and biological sciences were very distinct disciplines, with biology being highly dependent on qualitative descriptions of mechanisms with a somewhat teleonomic perspective. These differences were in part due to an inherent conflicting paradox in which physics describes the universe as moving toward an increase in entropy with maximum randomness, while life maintains local systems of order. In 1943, Erwin Schrödinger proposed that an understanding of the true nature of living systems first requires an apprehension of their ability to control entropy dynamics within their environment [16]. Subsequently, the development of information theory for communications by Claude Shannon was linked to the concept of entropy [17]. Living organisms utilize and exchange information as a form of biological currency during the process of maintaining their organizational structure and adapting to their environmental conditions. A deeper understanding of biological systems from the information/entropy perspective could provide considerable insights into the fundamental nature of their entropy dynamics and provide a foundation for a comprehensive theoretical biology [6,13].
Furthermore, a better comprehension of the role of information and entropic dynamics in biology could also provide greater insight into the machinations of the physical sciences [6,8], as, after all, biological systems are an integral part of the universe and must also obey the laws of physics. Understanding the complex mechanisms taking place in biological systems provides a unique feedback loop through which to elucidate physical processes that are inaccessible and non-testable in inorganic systems.
From the conception of entropy as a consequence of energy transitions, its qualifications, based on notions of certainty, order, predictability, usefulness, and knowability, have been naturally dependent on the inclusion of an observer. Uncertainty also implies a limitation in the capacity for discernment and prediction as determined through the lens of a living system. If the observer is to hold a central place in our modern comprehension of entropy, then it is important to incorporate biological principles into that description. Such an approach could broaden our understanding of physical entropic dynamics, including a determination of the meaning of information as a biological fundamental [18,19,20]. This Special Issue makes a small but important contribution in this regard. Moreover, with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence, new tools are becoming available to the scientific community that will likely see our understanding of physical entropic dynamics in physics and biology advance at an accelerated pace.
“Observer participancy gives rise to information; and information gives rise to physics.”
—John Archibald Wheeler
“…general relativity, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics are actually derivable, and from the same ultimate foundation: the interplay between computational irreducibility and the computational boundedness of observers.”
—Stephen Wolfram
“But if the ultimate aim of the whole of Science is indeed, as I believe, to clarify man’s relationship to the Universe, then biology must be accorded a central position.”
—Jacques Monod
“It is the quality, not the mere existence, of information that is the real mystery here.”
—Paul Davies

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Baez, J.C.; Pollard, B.S. Relative Entropy in Biological Systems. Entropy 2016, 18, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Caticha, A.; Cafaro, C. From Information Geometry to Newtonian Dynamics. arXiv 2007, arXiv:0710.1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Cafaro, C.; Ali, S.A. Information Geometric Measures of Complexity with Applications to Classical and Quantum Physical Settings. Foundations 2021, 1, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Wolfram, S. The Second Law: Resolving the Mystery of the Second Law of Thermodynamics; Wolfram Media, Inc.: Champaign, IL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. Šafránek, D.; Aguirre, A.; Schindler, J.; Deutsch, J.M. A Brief Introduction to Observational Entropy. Found. Phys. 2021, 51, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Summers, R.L. Entropic Dynamics in a Theoretical Framework for Biosystems. Entropy 2023, 25, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Rovelli, C. Relative information at the foundation of physics. In It from Bit or Bit from It? On Physics and Information; Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, Z., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vopson, M.M.; Lepadatu, S. Second law of information dynamics. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 075310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Bardella, G.; Franchini, S.; Pan, L.; Balzan, R.; Ramawat, S.; Brunamonti, E.; Pani, P.; Ferraina, S. Neural Activity in Quarks Language: Lattice Field Theory for a Network of Real Neurons. Entropy 2024, 26, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Karbowski, J. Information Thermodynamics: From Physics to Neuroscience. Entropy 2024, 26, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Phillips, J.D. Embedded Complexity of Evolutionary Sequences. Entropy 2024, 26, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Favretti, M. Entropic Dynamics of Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Sequences. Entropy 2024, 26, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Vopson, M.M.; Robson, S.C. A new method to study genome mutations using the information entropy. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2021, 584, 126383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Wang, H.; Singh, S.; Trappenberg, T.; Nunes, A. An Information-Geometric Formulation of Pattern Separation of Existing Indices. Entropy 2024, 26, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Romano, F.; Formenti, D.; Cardone, D.; Francesco Russo, E.; Castiglioni, P.; Merati, G.; Merla, A.; Perpetuini, D. Data-Driven Identification of Stroke through Machine Learning Applied to Complexity Metrics in Multimodal Electromyography and Kinematics. Entropy 2024, 26, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Schrödinger, E. What Is Life? Reprint ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shannon, C. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Cárdenas-García, J.F. The Process of Info-Autopoiesis—The Source of all Information. Biosemiotics 2020, 13, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Rovelli, C. Meaning = Information + Evolution. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1611.02420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Summers, R.L. Lyapunov Stability as a Metric for the Meaning of Information in Biological Systems. Biosemiotics 2023, 16, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Summers, R.L.; Vopson, M.M. Can Information and Entropic Dynamics Bridge the Gap Between Biology and the Physical Sciences? Entropy 2026, 28, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030349

AMA Style

Summers RL, Vopson MM. Can Information and Entropic Dynamics Bridge the Gap Between Biology and the Physical Sciences? Entropy. 2026; 28(3):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Summers, Richard L., and Melvin M. Vopson. 2026. "Can Information and Entropic Dynamics Bridge the Gap Between Biology and the Physical Sciences?" Entropy 28, no. 3: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030349

APA Style

Summers, R. L., & Vopson, M. M. (2026). Can Information and Entropic Dynamics Bridge the Gap Between Biology and the Physical Sciences? Entropy, 28(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop