Topic Editors

Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations, WSB University, 80-266 Gdańsk, Poland
Dr. Maciej Kardas
The London Academy of Science and Business, London, UK

Integrating Economy, Environment and Society for Systemic Sustainability: Dynamics, Thresholds and Power Relations

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
30 November 2026
Viewed by
815

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainable development today, much like democracy in political systems, remains the most viable and forward-looking strategy humanity has yet devised. There is simply no better framework for balancing growth, equity, and ecological integrity. Managing this development, however, requires a profound diffusion of understanding across disciplines—a genuine interdisciplinarity that transcends traditional academic boundaries.

This Topic seeks to explore the thresholds, feedback loops, and power relations that determine the resilience and adaptability of complex socio-ecological systems. We invite multidisciplinary contributions addressing a central question: “What defines sufficiency for system sustainability, and which factors are truly decisive?”

Topics of interest include sustainable resource management models, ecological–economic trade-offs, governance and policy integration, the social dimensions of green transitions, and holistic approaches to assessing sustainability.

By integrating perspectives from economics, ecology, environmental science, sociology, and systems theory, this collection aims to identify leverage points for steering society toward equilibrium, justice, and long-term resilience. We welcome theoretical, empirical, and modeling studies that advance the understanding of sustainability as an interconnected, evolving, and shared system—one that demands cooperation among all disciplines to chart sustainable futures.

Prof. Dr. Aleksy Kwilinski
Dr. Maciej Kardas
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • systemic sustainability
  • socio-ecological systems
  • environmental–economic interactions
  • resilience and adaptability
  • power relations and governance
  • resource thresholds
  • sustainable development policy
  • multidisciplinary modeling
  • circular economy and ecosystems
  • sustainable transitions

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Administrative Sciences
admsci
3.1 5.6 2011 21.3 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Economies
economies
2.1 4.7 2013 23.1 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Energies
energies
3.2 7.3 2008 16.8 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Forests
forests
2.5 4.6 2010 16.8 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Land
land
3.2 5.9 2012 17.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 7.7 2009 17.9 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
31 pages, 1306 KB  
Article
Governing Forest Rights Mortgage Loans Through Hybrid Governance: Institutional Innovation and Organizational Mediation in China’s Collective Forest Regions
by Liushan Fan, Wenlan Wang, Yuanzhu Wei, Yongbo Lai and Xingwei Ye
Forests 2026, 17(4), 464; https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040464 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Forest Rights Mortgage Loans (FRMLs) have grown quickly in China’s collective forest areas, even though the basic conditions for this type of lending remain far from ideal. In many places, forest holdings are small and scattered, property rights are complex and not fully [...] Read more.
Forest Rights Mortgage Loans (FRMLs) have grown quickly in China’s collective forest areas, even though the basic conditions for this type of lending remain far from ideal. In many places, forest holdings are small and scattered, property rights are complex and not fully consolidated, and channels for disposing of collateral are limited. Under these circumstances, the Fulin Loan Model (FLM) in Fujian provides a useful case for understanding how forest-rights lending can still function in practice. Drawing on fieldwork, semi-structured interviews, and process tracing, this study explores both how the model was established and how it has been sustained over time. The analysis suggests that the FLM is neither a straightforward market-based lending tool nor merely a top-down policy arrangement. Rather, it relies on a more mixed form of governance in which local government support, banking procedures, and village-level social relations are brought together through specific organizational arrangements. These arrangements help lower the costs of early institutional experimentation, distribute and manage lending risks, and translate locally rooted trust into a form of credit support that formal financial institutions can recognize. As a single-case study, the FLM points to one possible way in which rural finance can be made workable under conditions of incomplete markets and strong social embeddedness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop