Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (39)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bat–human contact

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 2323 KiB  
Article
Designing Sandwich ELISA with Broadly Reactive Anti-Nucleocapsid Monoclonal Antibodies to Detect Bat-Borne Merbecoviruses
by Kong Yen Liew, Yaju Wang, Sneha Sree Mullapudi, Dinah binte Aziz, Wenjie Fan, Min Luo, Paul Anantharajah Tambyah and Yee-Joo Tan
Viruses 2025, 17(7), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17070886 - 24 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 406
Abstract
At least three betacoronaviruses have spilled over from bats to humans and caused severe diseases, highlighting the threat of zoonotic transmission. Thus, it is important to enhance surveillance capabilities by developing tools capable of detecting a broad spectrum of bat-borne betacoronaviruses. Three monoclonal [...] Read more.
At least three betacoronaviruses have spilled over from bats to humans and caused severe diseases, highlighting the threat of zoonotic transmission. Thus, it is important to enhance surveillance capabilities by developing tools capable of detecting a broad spectrum of bat-borne betacoronaviruses. Three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the nucleocapsid (N) protein were generated using recombinant N proteins from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). The cross-reactivities of these mAbs were evaluated against a panel of betacoronaviruses. Sandwich ELISAs (sELISAs) were subsequently developed to detect bat-borne betacoronaviruses that have high zoonotic potential. Among the mAbs, 7A7 demonstrated the broadest cross-reactivity, recognizing betacoronaviruses from the Sarbecovirus, Merbecovirus and Hibecovirus subgenera. The first sELISA, based on mAbs 7A7 and 6G10, successfully detected N protein in all clinical swab samples from COVID-19 patients with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25, achieving 75% positivity overall (12/16). Using this as a reference, a second sELISA was established by pairing mAb 7A7 with mAb 8E2, which binds to multiple merbecoviruses. This assay detected the N protein of two merbecoviruses, namely the human MERS-CoV and bat-borne HKU5-CoV, at high sensitivity and has a limit of detection (LOD) that is comparable to the first sELISA used successfully to detect COVID-19 infection. These broadly reactive mAbs could be further developed into rapid antigen detection kits for surveillance in high-risk populations with close contact with wild bats to facilitate the early detection of potential zoonotic spillover events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Microbes, Infections and Spillovers, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1237 KiB  
Article
Serological Surveillance of Betacoronaviruses in Bat Guano Collectors: Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-SARS-CoV-2 Emergence
by Sasiprapa Ninwattana, Spencer L. Sterling, Khwankamon Rattanatumhi, Nattakarn Thippamom, Piyapha Hirunpatrawong, Pakamas Sangsub, Thaniwan Cheun-Arom, Dominic Esposito, Chee Wah Tan, Wee Chee Yap, Feng Zhu, Lin-Fa Wang, Eric D. Laing, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee and Opass Putcharoen
Viruses 2025, 17(6), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17060837 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1110
Abstract
Community-based serosurveillance for emerging zoonotic viruses can provide a powerful and cost-effective measurement of cryptic spillovers. Betacoronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, are known to infect bats and can cause severe respiratory illness in humans, yet remain under-surveyed in high-risk populations. This study [...] Read more.
Community-based serosurveillance for emerging zoonotic viruses can provide a powerful and cost-effective measurement of cryptic spillovers. Betacoronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, are known to infect bats and can cause severe respiratory illness in humans, yet remain under-surveyed in high-risk populations. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of betacoronaviruses in an occupational cohort in contact with bats before and after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Serum samples from pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic were screened using antigen-based multiplex microsphere immunoassays (MMIAs) and a multiplex surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Pre-pandemic samples showed no SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while post-pandemic samples from vaccinated participants displayed binding and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and a related bat CoV. Furthermore, one participant (1/237, 0.43%) had persistent antibodies against MERS-CoV in 2017, 2018 and 2021 but was seronegative in 2023, despite reporting no history of traveling abroad or severe pneumonia. The observed sustained antibody levels indicate a possible exposure to MERS-CoV or a MERS-CoV-like virus, although the etiology and clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear. Ongoing surveillance in high-risk populations remains crucial for understanding virus epidemiology and mitigating zoonotic transmission risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2679 KiB  
Article
Genomic and Clinical Analysis of a Fatal Human Lyssavirus irkut Case: Evidence for a Natural Focus in the Russian Far East
by Ekaterina Klyuchnikova, Anna Gladkikh, Olga Iunikhina, Valeriya Sbarzaglia, Elena Drobot, Margarita Popova, Irina Lyapun, Tatiana Arbuzova, Irina Galkina, Alena Sharova, Svetlana Abramova, Nadezhda Tsyganova, Eva Pugacheva, Edward Ramsay, Elena Poleshchuk, Larisa Somova, Daria Tagakova, Dmitry Pankratov, Gennady Sidorov, Nikolay Rudakov, Vladimir Dedkov and Mikhail Shchelkanovadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Viruses 2025, 17(6), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17060769 - 28 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 603
Abstract
In this report, we document and analyze a case in which the Irkut virus (IRKV) (Mononegavirales: Rhabdoviridae) caused a fatal human case following a bat bite in June 2021. Unfortunately, the available data did not permit a detailed taxonomic classification of the carrier [...] Read more.
In this report, we document and analyze a case in which the Irkut virus (IRKV) (Mononegavirales: Rhabdoviridae) caused a fatal human case following a bat bite in June 2021. Unfortunately, the available data did not permit a detailed taxonomic classification of the carrier bat (Chiroptera). The event occurred in the southwestern part of the Sikhote-Alin mountain region (Russian Far East) covered by the Ussuri taiga forest. The symptoms of the illness began with the following: fever; pronounced psychomotor and motor agitation; tremor of the lower jaw and tongue; aphasia; dyslexia; and dysphagia. These rapidly developed, leading to a severe and fatal encephalitis. The patient was not vaccinated for rabies and did not receive rabies immunoglobulin. Using brain sections prepared from the deceased, molecular diagnostics were performed: immunofluorescence (polyclonal anti-rabies immunoglobulin) indicating the presence of the lyssavirus antigen; and RT-PCR indicating traces of viral RNA. Sectional material (brain) was used for whole-genome sequencing, resulting in a near-complete sequence of the lyssavirus genome. The obtained genomic sequence was identified as the Irkut virus. A comparative analysis of the new sequence and other currently available IRKV sequences (NCBI) revealed differences. Specifically, amino acid differences between antigenic sites in the isolate and those of the rabies vaccine strain used regionally were noted. The patient history and subsequent analysis confirm human IRKV infection following bat contact. Like other fatal cases of IRKV infection described earlier, this case occurred in the southern part of the Russian Far East. Two have occurred in the southwestern part of the Sikhote-Alin mountain region. This indicates the possible existence of an active, natural viral focus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Virology and Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2080 KiB  
Article
One Health Lens on Rabies: Human–Bat Interactions and Genomic Insights of Rabies Virus in Rural Lilongwe, Malawi
by Nathan Singano, Henson Kainga, Elisha Chatanga, Joseph Nkhoma, Gilson Njunga, Julius Chulu, Rabecca Tembo, Hirofumi Sawa and Walter Muleya
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10040095 - 4 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1399 | Correction
Abstract
Rabies, a fatal zoonotic disease, affects humans, domestic animals, and wildlife predominantly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In Malawi, rabies virus (RABV) is primarily transmitted by infected dogs, impacting humans and cattle. Lyssavirus has also been documented in insectivorous bats. A community [...] Read more.
Rabies, a fatal zoonotic disease, affects humans, domestic animals, and wildlife predominantly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In Malawi, rabies virus (RABV) is primarily transmitted by infected dogs, impacting humans and cattle. Lyssavirus has also been documented in insectivorous bats. A community survey near bat roosts assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding bat-borne zoonoses. Bat samples were tested for lyssavirus using RT-PCR, and RABV genomes from humans and domestic animals were sequenced and analysed phylogenetically. The survey revealed that 50% of participants consumed bat meat, and 47% reported bats entering their homes. Reduced bat presence indoors significantly lowered contact risk (aOR: 0.075, p = 0.021). All 23 bat samples tested negative for lyssavirus. Malawian RABV genomes, 11,801 nucleotides long, belonged to the Africa 1b lineage, showing >95% similarity with GenBank sequences. Phylogenetic analysis indicated close clustering with strains from Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. Human and cattle strains shared 99% and 92% amino acid similarity with dog strains, respectively, with conserved critical sites and unique substitutions across all five RABV genes. Frequent human–bat interactions pose zoonotic risks. While no lyssavirus was detected in bats, ongoing surveillance is crucial. This first comprehensive genome analysis of Malawian RABVs highlights their regional transmission and signifies the need for regional collaboration in rabies control, community education, and further study of genetic adaptations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Epidemiology, Control and Prevention Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2957 KiB  
Review
Nipah Virus: A Zoonotic Threat Re-Emerging in the Wake of Global Public Health Challenges
by Francesco Branda, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Marta Giovanetti, Mattia Albanese, Erica Binetti, Massimo Ciccozzi and Fabio Scarpa
Microorganisms 2025, 13(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13010124 - 9 Jan 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7700
Abstract
The re-emergence of the Nipah virus (NiV) in Kerala, India, following the tragic death of a 14-year-old boy, underscores the persistent threat posed by zoonotic pathogens and highlights the growing global public health challenge. With no vaccine or curative treatment available, and fatality [...] Read more.
The re-emergence of the Nipah virus (NiV) in Kerala, India, following the tragic death of a 14-year-old boy, underscores the persistent threat posed by zoonotic pathogens and highlights the growing global public health challenge. With no vaccine or curative treatment available, and fatality rates as high as 94% in past outbreaks, the Nipah virus is a critical concern for health authorities worldwide. Transmitted primarily through contact with fruit bats or consumption of contaminated food, as well as direct human-to-human transmission, NiV remains a highly lethal and unpredictable pathogen. The World Health Organization has classified Nipah as a priority pathogen due to its alarming potential to cause widespread outbreaks and even trigger the next pandemic. Recent outbreaks in India and Bangladesh, occurring with seasonal regularity, have once again exposed the vulnerability of public health systems in containing this virus. This study explores the epidemiology, ecological factors driving transmission, and the public health response to NiV, emphasizing the role of zoonotic spillovers in pandemic preparedness. As the global community grapples with an increasing number of emerging infectious diseases, the Nipah virus stands as a stark reminder of the importance of coordinated surveillance, rapid containment measures, and the urgent development of novel strategies to mitigate the impact of this re-emerging threat. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Human Infections and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 655 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Human Contact with Bats in Northern Tanzania
by Emmanuel Kulwa Bunuma, Julius Keyyu, Joseph Maziku, Stella Bitanyi, Robert Fyumagwa, Katendi Changula, Benjamin Mubemba, Edgar Simulundu, Simbarashe Chitanga, Daniel L. Horton, Abel Bulamu Ekiri and Walter Muleya
Zoonotic Dis. 2024, 4(4), 293-309; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis4040025 - 12 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2111
Abstract
Background: Environmental changes impact bat–human interactions, heightening concerns of pathogen spillover and highlighting the need to understand human–bat interactions in the context of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with human contact with bats in communities living near [...] Read more.
Background: Environmental changes impact bat–human interactions, heightening concerns of pathogen spillover and highlighting the need to understand human–bat interactions in the context of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with human contact with bats in communities living near bat roosts in Northern Tanzania. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to investigate the factors associated with human contact with bats. Utilizing a standardized questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews, relevant data were collected from respondents living in or near regions characterized by high bat density. Descriptive analyses followed by bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between the investigated factors and the outcome variable of interest, contact with bats. Results: Data were collected from 325 respondents. Of the respondents, 57.5% (187/325) reported bat contact, and only 4% believed bats can transmit rabies. The following factors were significantly associated with human–bat contact: being unaware that bats can transmit diseases like rabies (AOR = 8.63, CI = 1.04, 71.43, p = 0.045), feeling safe to handle bats with bare hands (AOR = 3.47, CI = 1.71, 7.05, p < 0.001), not washing hands thoroughly after bat bite or scratch (AOR = 2.43, CI = 1.29, 4.59, p = 0.006), using water from ponds, rivers or wells (AOR = 5.58, CI = 3.17, 9.79, p <0.001), age > 45 years (AOR = 1.77, CI = 1.0, 3.14, p = 0.047) and a low level of education (AOR = 5.86, CI = 2.97, 11.57, p <0.001). Conclusion: The study findings highlight the key factors to be targeted when developing strategies aimed at improving the community’s knowledge of the potential risks of zoonotic infectious diseases associated with bats and reducing the likelihood of human–bat contact and the related public health risks in communities living near bat roosting sites in Tanzania. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 567 KiB  
Conference Report
Conference Report: LPMHealthcare Emerging Viruses 2023 (EVOX23): Pandemics—Learning from the Past and Present to Prepare for the Future
by Fern Jenkins, Tobias Mapulanga, Gauri Thapa, Kelly A. S. da Costa and Nigel J. Temperton
Pathogens 2024, 13(8), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13080679 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1969
Abstract
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has meant that pandemic preparedness has become a major focus of the global scientific community. Gathered in the historic St Edmund Hall college in Oxford, the one-day LPMHealthcare conference on emerging viruses (6 September 2023) sought to review and [...] Read more.
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has meant that pandemic preparedness has become a major focus of the global scientific community. Gathered in the historic St Edmund Hall college in Oxford, the one-day LPMHealthcare conference on emerging viruses (6 September 2023) sought to review and learn from past pandemics—the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the Mpox outbreak—and then look towards potential future pandemics. This includes an emphasis on monitoring the “traditional” reservoirs of viruses with zoonotic potential, as well as possible new sources of spillover events, e.g., bats, which we are coming into closer contact with due to climate change and the impacts of human activities on habitats. Continued vigilance and investment into creative scientific solutions is required for issues including the long-term physical and psychological effects of COVID-19, i.e., long COVID. The evaluation of current systems, including environmental monitoring, communication (with the public, regulatory authorities, and governments), and training; assessment of the effectiveness of the technologies/assays we have in place currently; and lobbying of the government and the public to work with scientists are all required in order to build trust moving forward. Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has shown how many sectors can work together to achieve a global impact in times of crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Emerging Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1015 KiB  
Article
Bat Bites and Rabies PEP in the Croatian Reference Centre for Rabies 1995–2020
by Radovan Vodopija, Ivana Lojkić, Daniela Hamidović, Jelena Boneta and Dora Primorac
Viruses 2024, 16(6), 876; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16060876 - 30 May 2024
Viewed by 3720
Abstract
Seroprevalence of lyssaviruses in certain bat species has been proven in the Republic of Croatia, but there have been no confirmed positive bat brain isolates or human fatalities associated with bat injuries/bites. The study included a retrospective analysis of bat injuries/bites, post-exposure prophylaxis [...] Read more.
Seroprevalence of lyssaviruses in certain bat species has been proven in the Republic of Croatia, but there have been no confirmed positive bat brain isolates or human fatalities associated with bat injuries/bites. The study included a retrospective analysis of bat injuries/bites, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and geographic distribution of bat injuries in persons examined at the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic, the Croatian Reference Centre for Rabies. In the period 1995–2020, we examined a total of 21,910 patients due to animal injuries, of which 71 cases were bat-related (0.32%). Of the above number of patients, 4574 received rabies PEP (20.87%). However, for bat injuries, the proportion of patients receiving PEP was significantly higher: 66 out of 71 patients (92.95%). Of these, 33 received only the rabies vaccine, while the other 33 patients received the vaccine with human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG). In five cases, PEP was not administered, as there was no indication for treatment. Thirty-five of the injured patients were biologists or biology students (49.29%). The bat species was confirmed in only one of the exposure cases. This was a serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus), a known carrier of Lyssavirus hamburg. The results showed that the bat bites were rather sporadic compared to other human injuries caused by animal bites. All bat injuries should be treated as if they were caused by a rabid animal, and according to WHO recommendations. People who come into contact with bats should be strongly advised to be vaccinated against rabies. Entering bat habitats should be done with caution and in accordance with current recommendations, and nationwide surveillance should be carried out by competent institutions and in close collaboration between bat experts, epidemiologists and rabies experts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Virus: Treatment and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1214 KiB  
Review
Global Distribution and Molecular Evolution of Bat Coronaviruses
by Mohamed El Sayes, Rebecca Badra, Mohamed A. Ali, Rabeh El-Shesheny and Ghazi Kayali
Zoonotic Dis. 2024, 4(2), 146-161; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis4020014 - 14 May 2024
Viewed by 3081
Abstract
Bat coronaviruses cause a wide range of illnesses in humans and animals. Bats are known to harbor a wide diversity of Alphacoronaviruses and Betacoronaviruses. Betacoronaviruses have been linked to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and other diseases such [...] Read more.
Bat coronaviruses cause a wide range of illnesses in humans and animals. Bats are known to harbor a wide diversity of Alphacoronaviruses and Betacoronaviruses. Betacoronaviruses have been linked to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and other diseases such as gastroenteritis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. In the last 20 years, three betacoronaviruses emerged and caused widespread outbreaks in humans, including two deadly betacoronavirus epidemics, SARS-CoV, with mortality rate of 10%, and MERS-CoV, with mortality rate of 34.7%, and SARS-CoV-2, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic, with mortality rate of 3.4%. Studies have shown that bats are the main natural reservoirs for these viruses or their ancestral viruses. Observed variations in bat coronavirus genomes indicate that these viruses may have a potential to transmit to other hosts in close contact with humans and subsequently transmit to humans. As of today, there are no reported cases of direct coronavirus transmission from bats to humans. One reason for this might be that intermediate hosts are required for the transmission of bat coronaviruses to humans. Further studies are needed to map the amino acids and genomic regions responsible for the interactions between the spike of coronavirus and its receptors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 9013 KiB  
Article
Indoor Human Action Recognition Based on Dual Kinect V2 and Improved Ensemble Learning Method
by Ruixiang Kan, Hongbing Qiu, Xin Liu, Peng Zhang, Yan Wang, Mengxiang Huang and Mei Wang
Sensors 2023, 23(21), 8921; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218921 - 2 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2119
Abstract
Indoor human action recognition, essential across various applications, faces significant challenges such as orientation constraints and identification limitations, particularly in systems reliant on non-contact devices. Self-occlusions and non-line of sight (NLOS) situations are important representatives among them. To address these challenges, this paper [...] Read more.
Indoor human action recognition, essential across various applications, faces significant challenges such as orientation constraints and identification limitations, particularly in systems reliant on non-contact devices. Self-occlusions and non-line of sight (NLOS) situations are important representatives among them. To address these challenges, this paper presents a novel system utilizing dual Kinect V2, enhanced by an advanced Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and sophisticated ensemble learning techniques, tailor-made to handle self-occlusions and NLOS situations. Our main works are as follows: (1) a data-adaptive adjustment mechanism, anchored on localization outcomes, to mitigate self-occlusion in dynamic orientations; (2) the adoption of sophisticated ensemble learning techniques, including a Chirp acoustic signal identification method, based on an optimized fuzzy c-means-AdaBoost algorithm, for improving positioning accuracy in NLOS contexts; and (3) an amalgamation of the Random Forest model and bat algorithm, providing innovative action identification strategies for intricate scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments, and our results show that the proposed system augments human action recognition precision by a substantial 30.25%, surpassing the benchmarks set by current state-of-the-art works. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intelligent Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2147 KiB  
Hypothesis
The Food-Crushing Reflex and Its Inhibition
by Lauri H. Vaahtoniemi
Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2(4), 550-564; https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2040035 - 18 Oct 2023
Viewed by 2666
Abstract
Anterior tooth (ANT) contacts induce a short-latency reflex inhibition of the human jaw-closing muscles. The jaw is a rigid class 1 lever for pinpoint targeting muscle force into a single bite point, the pivoting food particle. Seesaw reflex movements around the food particle [...] Read more.
Anterior tooth (ANT) contacts induce a short-latency reflex inhibition of the human jaw-closing muscles. The jaw is a rigid class 1 lever for pinpoint targeting muscle force into a single bite point, the pivoting food particle. Seesaw reflex movements around the food particle fulcrum multiply the food-crushing force. Unpredictable jolts of reaction force caused by food crushing are subjected to the rostral ANT and caudally to the two articulate ends of the jaw triangle. The compression/distraction strains of food crushing must be monitored and inhibited by withdrawal reflexes. The mesencephalic ganglion (Vmes), neural myelin sheath, and muscle stretch receptors evolved subsequently to the advent of jaws to improve the velocity of proprioceptive and withdrawal reflexes. In mammalians, the spindles of the taut motor units, stretched by the food fulcrum, send excitatory monosynaptic feedback for the efferent neurons of the respective ipsilateral muscle units via the Vmes. In the Vmes, the spindle-input-mediating afferent neurons are coupled with another source of afferent feedback, which is also excitatory, from the back tooth (BAT) mechanoreceptors. The two sources of excitatory pulses are summated and targeted for the efferent neurons to boost the stretched and taut motor units. Likewise, the afferent feedback from the ANT mechanoreceptors is also coupled in the Vmes with concomitant feedback from spindles. The ANT output, however, is inhibitory to negate the excitatory feedback from the stretched jaw muscle units. The inhibitory feed from the anterior teeth temporarily blocks the excitatory potential of the masticatory motor efferent neurons to protect the anterior teeth and jaw joints from inadvertent strains. The inhibitory inputs from the anterior teeth alternate with the excitatory inputs from the BAT to determine which jaw-closing muscle units are activated or inhibited at any given instant of food crushing. The Vmes exists in all jawed vertebrates, and its evolution was probably motivated by demands for the control of bite force. The monosynaptic unilateral food-crushing excitatory and inhibitory reflexes (UFCRs) override the coexisting bilaterally executed feed for the jaw muscles from the central nervous system. The hypothesis proposed in this study is that the Vmes-mediated UFCRs combine neural inputs from tooth contacts with concomitant feedback from the muscle stretch receptors for the control of the mammalian food-crushing bite force. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1627 KiB  
Review
Phylogeographic Aspects of Bat Lyssaviruses in Europe: A Review
by Heliana Dundarova, Nadya Ivanova-Aleksandrova, Sarka Bednarikova, Irina Georgieva, Krasimir Kirov, Kalina Miteva, Boyko Neov, Peter Ostoich, Jiri Pikula, Jan Zukal and Peter Hristov
Pathogens 2023, 12(9), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091089 - 27 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4018
Abstract
During the last few decades, bat lyssaviruses have become the topic of intensive molecular and epidemiological investigations. Since ancient times, rhabdoviruses have caused fatal encephalitis in humans which has led to research into effective strategies for their eradication. Modelling of potential future cross-species [...] Read more.
During the last few decades, bat lyssaviruses have become the topic of intensive molecular and epidemiological investigations. Since ancient times, rhabdoviruses have caused fatal encephalitis in humans which has led to research into effective strategies for their eradication. Modelling of potential future cross-species virus transmissions forms a substantial component of the recent infection biology of rabies. In this article, we summarise the available data on the phylogeography of both bats and lyssaviruses in Europe and the adjacent reg ions, especially in the contact zone between the Palearctic and Ethiopian realms. Within these zones, three bat families are present with high potential for cross-species transmission and the spread of lyssaviruses in Phylogroup II to Europe (part of the western Palearctic). The lack of effective therapies for rabies viruses in Phylogroup II and the most divergent lyssaviruses generates impetus for additional phylogenetic and virological research within this geographical region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 282 KiB  
Brief Report
Lack of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA Detection among a Convenience Sampling of Ohio Wildlife, Companion, and Agricultural Animals, 2020–2021
by Margot Ehrlich, Christopher Madden, Dillon S. McBride, Jacqueline M. Nolting, Devra Huey, Scott Kenney, Qiuhong Wang, Linda J. Saif, Anastasia Vlasova, Patricia Dennis, Dusty Lombardi, Stormy Gibson, Alexis McLaine, Sarah Lauterbach, Page Yaxley, Jenessa A. Winston, Dubraska Diaz-Campos, Risa Pesapane, Mark Flint, Jaylene Flint, Randy Junge, Seth A. Faith, Andrew S. Bowman and Vanessa L. Haleadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Animals 2023, 13(16), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162554 - 8 Aug 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2292
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in humans in late 2019 and spread rapidly, becoming a global pandemic. A zoonotic spillover event from animal to human was identified as the presumed origin. Subsequently, reports began emerging regarding spillback events resulting in [...] Read more.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in humans in late 2019 and spread rapidly, becoming a global pandemic. A zoonotic spillover event from animal to human was identified as the presumed origin. Subsequently, reports began emerging regarding spillback events resulting in SARS-CoV-2 infections in multiple animal species. These events highlighted critical links between animal and human health while also raising concerns about the development of new reservoir hosts and potential viral mutations that could alter the virulence and transmission or evade immune responses. Characterizing susceptibility, prevalence, and transmission between animal species became a priority to help protect animal and human health. In this study, we coalesced a large team of investigators and community partners to surveil for SARS-CoV-2 in domestic and free-ranging animals around Ohio between May 2020 and August 2021. We focused on species with known or predicted susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, highly congregated or medically compromised animals (e.g., shelters, barns, veterinary hospitals), and animals that had frequent contact with humans (e.g., pets, agricultural animals, zoo animals, or animals in wildlife hospitals). This included free-ranging deer (n = 76 individuals), free-ranging mink (n = 57), multiple species of bats (n = 59), and other wildlife in addition to domestic cats (n = 275) and pigs (n = 184). In total, we tested 792 individual animals (34 species) via rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in any of the tested animals despite a major peak in human SARS-CoV-2 cases that occurred in Ohio subsequent to the peak of animal samplings. Importantly, we did not test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in this study, which limited our ability to assess exposure. While the results of this study were negative, the surveillance effort was critical and remains key to understanding, predicting, and preventing the re-emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in humans or animals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Wildlife)
15 pages, 4500 KiB  
Article
Establishment of a Nipah Virus Disease Model in Hamsters, including a Comparison of Intranasal and Intraperitoneal Routes of Challenge
by Stephen Findlay-Wilson, Lucy Flett, Francisco J. Salguero, Ines Ruedas-Torres, Susan Fotheringham, Linda Easterbrook, Victoria Graham and Stuart Dowall
Pathogens 2023, 12(8), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12080976 - 26 Jul 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2751
Abstract
Nipah virus (NiV) is an emerging pathogen that can cause severe respiratory illness and encephalitis in humans. The main reservoir is fruit bats, distributed across a large geographical area that includes Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa. Incursion into humans is widely reported through [...] Read more.
Nipah virus (NiV) is an emerging pathogen that can cause severe respiratory illness and encephalitis in humans. The main reservoir is fruit bats, distributed across a large geographical area that includes Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa. Incursion into humans is widely reported through exposure of infected pigs, ingestion of contaminated food, or through contact with an infected person. With no approved treatments or vaccines, NiV poses a threat to human public health and has epidemic potential. To aid with the assessment of emerging interventions being developed, an expansion of preclinical testing capability is required. Given variations in the model parameters observed in different sites during establishment, optimisation of challenge routes and doses is required. Upon evaluating the hamster model, an intranasal route of challenge was compared with intraperitoneal delivery, demonstrating a more rapid dissemination to wider tissues in the latter. A dose effect was observed between those causing respiratory illness and those resulting in neurological disease. The data demonstrate the successful establishment of the hamster model of NiV disease for subsequent use in the evaluation of vaccines and antivirals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Viruses and Viral Zoonoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2046 KiB  
Review
Immunopathogenesis of Nipah Virus Infection and Associated Immune Responses
by Brent Brown, Tanya Gravier, Ingo Fricke, Suhaila A. Al-Sheboul, Theodor-Nicolae Carp, Chiuan Yee Leow, Chinua Imarogbe and Javad Arabpour
Immuno 2023, 3(2), 160-181; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno3020011 - 27 Apr 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 8988
Abstract
Pandemics in the last two centuries have been initiated by causal pathogens that include Severe Acute Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Influenza (e.g., the H1N1 pandemic of 2009). The latter is considered to have initiated two prior pandemics in 1918 and 1977, known as [...] Read more.
Pandemics in the last two centuries have been initiated by causal pathogens that include Severe Acute Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Influenza (e.g., the H1N1 pandemic of 2009). The latter is considered to have initiated two prior pandemics in 1918 and 1977, known as the “Spanish Flu” and “Russian Flu”, respectively. Here, we discuss other emerging infections that could be potential public health threats. These include Henipaviruses, which are members of the family Paramyxoviridae that infect bats and other mammals. Paramyxoviridae also include Parainfluenza and Mumps viruses (Rubulavirus) but also Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV) (Pneumovirus). Additionally included is the Measles virus, recorded for the first time in writing in 1657 (Morbillivirus). In humans and animals, these may cause encephalitis or respiratory diseases. Recently, two more highly pathogenic class 4 viral pathogens emerged. These were named Hendra Henipavirus (HeV) and Nipah Henipavirus (NiV). Nipah virus is a negative-sense single-stranded ribonucleic acid ((−) ssRNA) virus within the family Paramyxoviridae. There are currently no known therapeutics or treatment regimens licensed as effective in humans, with development ongoing. Nipah virus is a lethal emerging zoonotic disease that has been neglected since its characterization in 1999 until recently. Nipah virus infection occurs predominantly in isolated regions of Malaysia, Bangladesh, and India in small outbreaks. Factors that affect animal–human disease transmission include viral mutation, direct contact, amplifying reservoirs, food, close contact, and host cell mutations. There are different strains of Nipah virus, and small outbreaks in humans limit known research and surveillance on this pathogen. The small size of outbreaks in rural areas is suggestive of low transmission. Person-to-person transmission may occur. The role that zoonotic (animal–human) or host immune system cellular factors perform therefore requires analysis. Mortality estimates for NiV infection range from 38–100% (averaging 58.2% in early 2019). It is therefore critical to outline treatments and prevention for NiV disease in future research. The final stages of the disease severely affect key organ systems, particularly the central nervous system and brain. Therefore, here we clarify the pathogenesis, biochemical mechanisms, and all research in context with known immune cell proteins and genetic factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunological Defects and Infectious Disease in Emergency)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop