Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (31)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = NEXRAD radar

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 9620 KB  
Article
Data-Driven Non-Precipitation Echo Removal of NEXRAD Radars Based on a Random Forest Classifier Using Polarimetric Observations and GOES-16 Data
by Munsung Keem, Bong-Chul Seo, Witold F. Krajewski and Sangdan Kim
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(5), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050827 - 7 Mar 2026
Viewed by 437
Abstract
In this paper, the authors developed a data-driven model to classify radar measurements into precipitation (P) and non-precipitation (NP) echoes using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm. Dual-polarimetric radar variables and their local variability exhibit distinctive characteristics between P and NP echoes. The [...] Read more.
In this paper, the authors developed a data-driven model to classify radar measurements into precipitation (P) and non-precipitation (NP) echoes using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm. Dual-polarimetric radar variables and their local variability exhibit distinctive characteristics between P and NP echoes. The authors found that using larger search window sizes generally improves classification accuracy, though it involves a trade-off: while it helps eliminate small clusters of NP echoes, it may also suppress weak precipitation signals near storm edges. Incorporating multiscale local variability estimates computed with varying window sizes further enhances classification performance by capturing spatial-scale-dependent features characteristic of P and NP echoes. The main model uses radar variables obtained from a single scan and demonstrates consistent performance across all distances from the radar. This consistency allows reliable use of the model out to 230 km—the maximum range at which dual-polarimetric variables are used for rainfall estimation from NEXRAD radars—without significant degradation in accuracy due to range effects. Supplementing the model with independent information from GOES-16 infrared channel products further improves classification by helping to eliminate localized NP echoes remaining after the main model, particularly those caused by wind turbines that mimic precipitation in dual-polarimetric signatures. This is based on the tendency of water vapor and/or raindrops to absorb terrestrial radiation, thereby lowering brightness temperatures. A practical challenge remains near the radar, where the sampling volume is small and signal processing (e.g., sidelobe impact and ground clutter suppression) can distort radar measurements. The under-detection of precipitation in these regions is likely due to such corrupted data. This issue may be mitigated by adopting a hybrid scan strategy—such as a Constant Altitude Plan Position Indicator (CAPPI)—specifically for regions close to the radar. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 3819 KB  
Article
Assessing Orographic Cloud Seeding Impacts Through Integration of Remote Sensing from Multispectral Satellite, Radar Data, and In Situ Observations in the Western United States
by Ghazal Mehdizadeh, Frank McDonough and Farnaz Hosseinpour
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(18), 3161; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183161 - 12 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3905
Abstract
Cloud seeding is a targeted weather modification strategy aimed at enhancing precipitation, particularly in regions facing water scarcity. This study evaluates the impacts of wintertime cloud seeding events in the western United States, focusing on three regions: the Lake Tahoe area, the Santa [...] Read more.
Cloud seeding is a targeted weather modification strategy aimed at enhancing precipitation, particularly in regions facing water scarcity. This study evaluates the impacts of wintertime cloud seeding events in the western United States, focusing on three regions: the Lake Tahoe area, the Santa Rosa Range, and the Ruby Mountains, using an integrated remote sensing approach. Ground-based AgI generators were deployed to initiate seeding, and the atmospheric responses were assessed using multispectral observations from the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) aboard the GOES-R series satellites and regional radar reflectivity mosaics derived from NEXRAD data. Satellite-derived cloud microphysical properties, including cloud top brightness temperatures, optical thickness, and phase indicators, were analyzed in conjunction with radar reflectivity to evaluate microphysical changes associated with seeding. The analysis revealed significant regional variability: Tahoe events consistently exhibited strong seeding signatures, such as droplet-to-ice phase transitions, cloud top cooling, and thickened cloud structures, often followed by increased radar reflectivity. These outcomes were linked to favorable atmospheric conditions, including colder temperatures, elevated mid-to-upper tropospheric moisture, and sufficient supercooled liquid water. In contrast, events in the Santa Rosa Range generally showed weaker responses due to warmer, drier conditions and limited cloud development, while the Ruby Mountains presented mixed outcomes. This study improves the detection of seeding impacts by characterizing microphysical changes and precipitation development, capturing the progression from initial cloud phase transitions to hydrometeor development. The results highlight the importance of aligning seeding strategies with local atmospheric conditions and demonstrate the practical value of satellite-based tools for evaluating seeding effectiveness, particularly in data-sparse regions. Overall, this work contributes to advancing both the scientific insight and operational practices of weather modification through remote sensing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6453 KB  
Article
Influence of Assimilation of NEXRAD-Derived 2D Inner-Core Structure Data from Single Radar on Numerical Simulations of Hurricane Charley (2004) near Its Landfall
by Junkai Liu, Zhaoxia Pu, Wen-Chau Lee and Zhiqiu Gao
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(8), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081351 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2550
Abstract
This study presents the first research that assimilates the ground-based NEXRAD observations-derived two-dimensional (2D), azimuthally averaged radar radial velocity and reflectivity within 60 km of radius from the hurricane center to examine their influence on the analysis and prediction of a hurricane near [...] Read more.
This study presents the first research that assimilates the ground-based NEXRAD observations-derived two-dimensional (2D), azimuthally averaged radar radial velocity and reflectivity within 60 km of radius from the hurricane center to examine their influence on the analysis and prediction of a hurricane near and after its landfall. The mesoscale community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and its four-dimensional variational (4D-VAR) data assimilation system are utilized to conduct data assimilation experiments for Hurricane Charley (2004). Results show that assimilation of the radar inner-core data leads to better forecasts of hurricane tracks, intensity, and precipitation. The improved forecast outcomes imply that the changes in dynamical, thermal, and moisture structures from data assimilations made more reasonable conditions for the hurricane development near and after its landfall. Overall results indicate that the assimilation of the radar-derived 2D inner-core structure could be a feasible way to utilize the radar data for improved hurricane prediction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for High Impact Weather and Extremes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1750 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Polarimetric Radio Occultation Technique Using NEXRAD Weather Radars
by Antía Paz, Ramon Padullés and Estel Cardellach
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1118; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071118 - 22 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2154
Abstract
Currently, it remains a challenge to effectively monitor areas experiencing intense precipitation and the associated atmospheric conditions on a global scale. This challenge arises due to the limitations on both active and passive remote sensing methods. Apart from the lack of observations in [...] Read more.
Currently, it remains a challenge to effectively monitor areas experiencing intense precipitation and the associated atmospheric conditions on a global scale. This challenge arises due to the limitations on both active and passive remote sensing methods. Apart from the lack of observations in remote areas, the quality of some observations deteriorates when heavy precipitation is present, making it difficult to obtain highly accurate measurements of the thermodynamic parameters driving these weather events. However, there is a promising solution in the form of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Polarimetric Radio Occultation (PRO) technique. This approach provides a way to assess the large-scale bulk-hydrometeor characteristics of regions with heavy precipitation and the meteorological conditions associated with them. PRO offers vertical profiles of atmospheric variables, including temperature, pressure, water vapor pressure, and information about hydrometeors, all in a single fine-vertical resolution observation. To continue validating the PRO technique, we make use of polarimetric weather data from Next Generation Weather Radars (NEXRAD), focusing on comparing specific differential phase shift (Kdp) structures to PRO observable differential phase shift (ΔΦ). We have seen that PAZ and NEXRAD exhibit a good agreement on the vertical structure of the observable ΔΦ and that their combination could be useful for enhancing our understanding of the microphysics underlying heavy precipitation events. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

31 pages, 14821 KB  
Article
The Role of Fuel Characteristics and Heat Release Formulations in Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Simulation
by Kasra Shamsaei, Timothy W. Juliano, Matthew Roberts, Hamed Ebrahimian, Neil P. Lareau, Eric Rowell and Branko Kosovic
Fire 2023, 6(7), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6070264 - 2 Jul 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3499
Abstract
In this study, we focus on the effects of fuel bed representation and fire heat and smoke distribution in a coupled fire-atmosphere simulation platform for two landscape-scale fires: the 2018 Camp Fire and the 2021 Caldor Fire. The fuel bed representation in the [...] Read more.
In this study, we focus on the effects of fuel bed representation and fire heat and smoke distribution in a coupled fire-atmosphere simulation platform for two landscape-scale fires: the 2018 Camp Fire and the 2021 Caldor Fire. The fuel bed representation in the coupled fire-atmosphere simulation platform WRF-Fire currently includes only surface fuels. Thus, we enhance the model by adding canopy fuel characteristics and heat release, for which a method to calculate the heat generated from canopy fuel consumption is developed and implemented in WRF-Fire. Furthermore, the current WRF-Fire heat and smoke distribution in the atmosphere is replaced with a heat-conserving Truncated Gaussian (TG) function and its effects are evaluated. The simulated fire perimeters of case studies are validated against semi-continuous, high-resolution fire perimeters derived from NEXRAD radar observations. Furthermore, simulated plumes of the two fire cases are compared to NEXRAD radar reflectivity observations, followed by buoyancy analysis using simulated temperature and vertical velocity fields. The results show that while the improved fuel bed and the TG heat release scheme have small effects on the simulated fire perimeters of the wind-driven Camp Fire, they affect the propagation direction of the plume-driven Caldor Fire, leading to better-matching fire perimeters with the observations. However, the improved fuel bed representation, together with the TG heat smoke release scheme, leads to a more realistic plume structure in comparison to the observations in both fires. The buoyancy analysis also depicts more realistic fire-induced temperature anomalies and atmospheric circulation when the fuel bed is improved. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5792 KB  
Article
Cross-Evaluation of Reflectivity from NEXRAD and Global Precipitation Mission during Extreme Weather Events
by Melisa Acosta-Coll, Abel Morales, Ronald Zamora-Musa and Shariq Aziz Butt
Sensors 2022, 22(15), 5773; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155773 - 2 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3188
Abstract
During extreme events such as tropical cyclones, the precision of sensors used to sample the meteorological data is vital to feed weather and climate models for storm path forecasting, quantitative precipitation estimation, and other atmospheric parameters. For this reason, periodic data comparison between [...] Read more.
During extreme events such as tropical cyclones, the precision of sensors used to sample the meteorological data is vital to feed weather and climate models for storm path forecasting, quantitative precipitation estimation, and other atmospheric parameters. For this reason, periodic data comparison between several sensors used to monitor these phenomena such as ground-based and satellite instruments, must maintain a high degree of correlation in order to issue alerts with an accuracy that allows for timely decision making. This study presents a cross-evaluation of the radar reflectivity from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) onboard the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) and the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) Next-Generation Radar (NEXRAD) ground-based instrument located in the Caribbean island of Puerto Rico, USA, to determine the correlation degree between these two sensors’ measurements during extreme weather events and normal precipitation events during 2015–2019. GPM at Ku-band and Ka-band and NEXRAD at S-band overlapping scanning regions data of normal precipitation events during 2015–2019, and the spiral rain bands of four extreme weather events, Irma (Category 5 Hurricane), Beryl (Tropical Storm), Dorian (Category 1 hurricane), and Karen (Tropical Storm), were processed using the GPM Ground Validation System (GVS). In both cases, data were classified and analyzed statistically, paying particular attention to variables such as elevation angle mode and precipitation type (stratiform and convective). Given that ground-based radar (GR) has better spatial and temporal resolution, the NEXRAD was used as ground-truth. The results revealed that the correlation coefficient between the data of both instruments during the analyzed extreme weather events was moderate to low; for normal precipitation events, the correlation is lower than that of studies that compared GPM and NEXRAD reflectivity located in other regions of the USA. Only Tropical Storm Karen obtained similar results to other comparative studies in terms of the correlation coefficient. Furthermore, the GR elevation angle and precipitation type have a substantial impact on how well the rain reflectivity correlates between the two sensors. It was found that the Ku-band channel possesses the least bias and variability when compared to the NEXRAD instrument’s reflectivity and should therefore be considered more reliable for future tropical storm tracking and tropical region precipitation estimates in regions with no NEXRAD coverage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rain Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 7389 KB  
Article
A Comparative Evaluation of Using Rain Gauge and NEXRAD Radar-Estimated Rainfall Data for Simulating Streamflow
by Syed Imran Ahmed, Ramesh Rudra, Pradeep Goel, Alamgir Khan, Bahram Gharabaghi and Rohit Sharma
Hydrology 2022, 9(8), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9080133 - 26 Jul 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4549
Abstract
Ascertaining the spatiotemporal accuracy of precipitation is a challenge for hydrologists and planners for flood protection measures. The objective of this study was to compare streamflow simulations using rain gauge and radar data from a watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada, using the Hydrologic [...] Read more.
Ascertaining the spatiotemporal accuracy of precipitation is a challenge for hydrologists and planners for flood protection measures. The objective of this study was to compare streamflow simulations using rain gauge and radar data from a watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada, using the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s event-based distributed Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS). The model was run using the curve number (CN) and the Green and Ampt infiltration methods. The results show that the streamflow simulated with rain gauge data compared better with the observed streamflow than the streamflow simulated using radar data. However, when the Mean Field Bias (MFB) corrections were applied, the quality of the streamflow results obtained from radar rainfall data improved. The results showed no significant difference between the simulated streamflow using the SCS and the Green and Ampt infiltration approach. However, the SCS method is reasonably more appropriate for modeling the runoff at the sub-basin-scale than the Green and Ampt infiltration approach. With the SCS method, the simulated and observed runoff amount obtained using rain gauge rainfall showed an R2 value of 0.88 and 0.78 for MFB-corrected radar and 0.75 for radar only. For the Green and Ampt modeling option, the R2 value for the simulated and observed runoff amounts were 0.87 with rain gauge, 0.66 with radar only, and 0.68 with MFB-corrected radar rainfall inputs. The NSE values for rain gauge input ranged from 0.65 to 0.35. Overall, three values were less than 0.5 for streamflow for both the methods. For seven radar rainfall events, the NSE was greater than 0.5, with a range of very good to satisfactory. The analysis of RSR showed a very good comparison of stream flow using the SCS curve number method and Green and Ampt method using different rainfall inputs. Only one value, the 2 November 2003 event, was above 0.7 for rain gauge-based streamflow. The other RSR values were in the range of “very good”. Overall, the study showed better results for the simulated runoff with the MFB-corrected radar rainfall when compared with the simulations obtained using radar rainfall only. Therefore, MFB-corrected radar could be explored as a substitute rainfall source. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3196 KB  
Article
High Spatial-Temporal PM2.5 Modeling Utilizing Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) as a Supplementary Weather Source
by Xiaohe Yu, David J. Lary, Christopher S. Simmons and Lakitha O. H. Wijeratne
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(3), 495; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030495 - 21 Jan 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3432
Abstract
PM2.5, a type of fine particulate with a diameter equal to or less than 2.5 micrometers, has been identified as a major source of air pollution, and is associated with many health issues. Research on utilizing various data sources, such as [...] Read more.
PM2.5, a type of fine particulate with a diameter equal to or less than 2.5 micrometers, has been identified as a major source of air pollution, and is associated with many health issues. Research on utilizing various data sources, such as remote sensing and in situ sensors, for PM2.5 concentrations modeling remains a hot topic. In this study, the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) is used as a supplementary weather data source, along with European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), solar angles, and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES16) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) to model high spatial-temporal PM2.5 concentrations. PM2.5 concentrations as well as in situ weather condition variables are collected from the 31 sensors that are deployed in the Dallas Metropolitan area. Four machine learning models with different predictor variables are developed based on an ensemble approach. Since in situ weather observations are not widely available, ECMWF is used as an alternative data source for weather conditions in studies. Hence, the four established models are compared in three groups. Both models in this first group use weather variables collected from deployed sensors, but one uses NEXRAD and the other does not. In the second group, the two models use weather variables retrieved from ECMWF, one using NEXRAD and one without. In the third group, one model uses weather variables from ECMWF, and the other uses in situ weather variables, both without NEXRAD. The first two environmental groups investigate how NEXRAD can enhance model performances with weather variables collected from in situ observations and ECMWF, respectively. The third group explores how effective using ECMWF as an alternative source of weather conditions. Based on the results, the incorporation of NEXRAD achieves an R2 score of 0.86 and 0.83 for groups 1 and 2, respectively, for an improvement of 2.8% and 9.6% over those models without NEXRAD. For group three, the use of ECMWF as an alternative source of in situ weather observations results in a 0.13 R2 drop. For PM2.5 estimation, weather variables including precipitation, temperature, pressure, and surface pressure from ECMWF and deployed sensors, as well as NEXRAD velocity, are shown to be significant factors. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 6313 KB  
Article
Application of an Optimization/Simulation Model for the Real-Time Flood Operation of River-Reservoir Systems with One- and Two-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Modeling
by Hasan Albo-Salih, Larry W. Mays and Daniel Che
Water 2022, 14(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010087 - 4 Jan 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4695
Abstract
An application is presented of a new methodology for the real-time operations of river-reservoir systems. The methodology is based upon an optimization/simulation modeling approach that interfaces optimization with a one and/or two-dimensional unsteady flow simulation model (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS). The [...] Read more.
An application is presented of a new methodology for the real-time operations of river-reservoir systems. The methodology is based upon an optimization/simulation modeling approach that interfaces optimization with a one and/or two-dimensional unsteady flow simulation model (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS). The approach also includes a model for short-term rainfall forecasting, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-HMS model for rainfall-runoff modeling. Both short-term forecasted rainfall in addition to gaged streamflow data and/or NEXRAD (Next-Generation Radar) can be implemented in the modeling approach. The optimization solution methodology is based upon a genetic algorithm implemented through MATLAB. The application is based upon the May 2010 flood event on the Cumberland River system in the USA, during which releases from Old Hickory dam caused major flooding in the downstream area of Nashville, TN, USA, and allowed the dam to be placed in an emergency operational situation. One of the major features of the modeling effort and the application presented was to investigate the use of different unsteady flow modeling approaches available in the HEC-RAS, including one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and the combined (1D/2D) approach. One of the major results of the application was to investigate the use the different unsteady flow approaches in the modeling approach. The 2D unsteady flow modeling, based upon the diffusion wave approach, was found to be superior for the application to the Cumberland River system. The model application successfully determined real-time operations that would have maintained the flood water surface elevations at the downstream control point in Nashville below the 100-year return period river water surface and maintaining the gate openings at the Old Hickory Dam from reaching an emergency operational situation, which could have caused major losses at the dam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Water Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 10005 KB  
Article
Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics of the 2017 Great Hunan Flood Observed with a Parsivel2 Disdrometer
by Li Luo, Ling Wang, Tao Huo, Mingxuan Chen, Jianli Ma, Siteng Li and Jingya Wu
Atmosphere 2021, 12(12), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121556 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3701
Abstract
Disdrometer observations obtained by an OTT Parsivel2 during the 2017 Great Hunan Flood from 1:00 a.m. LST 23 June 2017 to 4:00 a.m. LST 2 July 2017 in Changsha, Hunan Province, southern China, are analyzed to diagnose characteristics of raindrop size distribution [...] Read more.
Disdrometer observations obtained by an OTT Parsivel2 during the 2017 Great Hunan Flood from 1:00 a.m. LST 23 June 2017 to 4:00 a.m. LST 2 July 2017 in Changsha, Hunan Province, southern China, are analyzed to diagnose characteristics of raindrop size distribution (DSD). This event was characterized by a large number of small- to medium-sized raindrops (diameters smaller than 1.5 mm) and the mean median volume diameter (D0) is about 1.04 mm. The median values of rain rate R (1.57 mm h−1), liquid water content W (0.10 g m−3), and radar reflectivity Z (25.7 dBZ) are smaller than that of the 2013 Great Colorado Flood. This event was composed of two intense rainfall periods and a stratiform period, and notable distinctions of rainfall microphysics among the three rainfall episodes are observed. Two intense rainfall periods were characterized by widespread and intense convection rains with a surface reflectivity of 48.8~56.7 dBZ. A maximum diameter of raindrops up to 7.5 mm was observed, as well as high concentrations of small and midsize drops, resulting in large rainfall amounts during the two intense rainfall episodes. The mean radar reflectivity of 22.6 dBZ, total rainfall of 17.85 mm and the maximum raindrop of approximately 4.25 mm were observed during the stratiform rainfall episode. The composite DSD for each rainfall episode peaked at 0.56 mm but higher concentrations of raindrops appeared in the two intense rainfall episodes. The Z-R relationships derived from the disdrometer measurements reflect the unusual characteristics of DSD during the flood. As a result, the standard NEXRAD Z-R relationship (Z = 300R1.4) strongly underestimated hourly rainfall by up to 27.5%. In addition, the empirical relations between rainfall kinetic energy (KE) versus rainfall intensity (R) and mean mass diameter (Dm) are also derived using DSDs to further investigate the impacts of raindrop properties on the rainfall erosivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Meteorological Extremes in China)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2442 KB  
Article
An Investigation of NEXRAD-Based Quantitative Precipitation Estimates in Alaska
by Brian R. Nelson, Olivier P. Prat and Ronald D. Leeper
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(16), 3202; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163202 - 12 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4041
Abstract
Precipitation estimation by weather radars in Alaska is challenging. In this study, we investigate National Weather Service (NWS) precipitation products that are produced from the seven NEXRAD radar sites in Alaska. The NWS precipitation processing subsystem generates stages of data at each NEXRAD [...] Read more.
Precipitation estimation by weather radars in Alaska is challenging. In this study, we investigate National Weather Service (NWS) precipitation products that are produced from the seven NEXRAD radar sites in Alaska. The NWS precipitation processing subsystem generates stages of data at each NEXRAD site which are then input to the weather forecast office to generate a regionwide precipitation product. Data from the NEXRAD sites and the operational rain gauges in the weather forecast region are used to produce this regionwide product that is then sent to the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to be included in the NCEP Stage IV distribution. The NCEP Stage IV product for Alaska has been available since 2017. We use the United States Climate Reference Network (USCRN) data from Alaska to compare to the NCEP Stage IV data. Given that the USCRN can be used in the production of the NCEP Stage IV data for Alaska, we also used the NEXRAD Digital Precipitation Array (DPA) that is generated at the site for comparison of the radar-only products. Comparing the NEXRAD-based data from Alaska to the USCRN gauge estimates using the USCRN site information on air temperature, we are able to condition the analysis based on the hourly or 6-hourly average air temperature. The estimates in the frozen phase of precipitation largely underestimate as compared to the gauge, and the correlation is low with larger errors as compared to other phases of precipitation. In the mixed phase the underestimation of precipitation improves, but the correlation is still low with relatively large errors as compared to the rain phases of precipitation. The difficulties in precipitation estimation in cold temperatures are well known and we show the evaluation for the NCEP Stage IV regional data for Alaska and the NEXRAD site specific Digital Precipitation Array (DPA) data. Results show the challenges of estimating mixed-phase and frozen precipitation. However, the DPA data shows somewhat better performance in the mixed precipitation phase, which suggests that the NWS Precipitation Processing Subsystem (PPS) is tuned to the climatology as it relates to precipitation in Alaska. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation at the Mid- to High-Latitudes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5284 KB  
Article
Development and Assessment of High-Resolution Radar-Based Precipitation Intensity-Duration-Curve (IDF) Curves for the State of Texas
by Dawit T. Ghebreyesus and Hatim O. Sharif
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(15), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152890 - 23 Jul 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4108
Abstract
Conventionally, in situ rainfall data are used to develop Intensity Duration Frequency (IDF) curves, which are one of the most effective tools for modeling the probability of the occurrence of extreme storm events at different timescales. The rapid recent technological advancements in precipitation [...] Read more.
Conventionally, in situ rainfall data are used to develop Intensity Duration Frequency (IDF) curves, which are one of the most effective tools for modeling the probability of the occurrence of extreme storm events at different timescales. The rapid recent technological advancements in precipitation sensing, and the finer spatio-temporal resolution of data have made the application of remotely sensed precipitation products more dominant in the field of hydrology. Some recent studies have discussed the potential of remote sensing products for developing IDF curves. This study employs a 19-year NEXRAD Stage-IV high-resolution radar data (2002–2020) to develop IDF curves over the entire state of Texas at a fine spatial resolution. The Annual Maximum Series (AMS) were fitted to four widely used theoretical Extreme Value statistical distributions. Gumble distribution, a unique scenario of the Generalized Extreme Values (GEV) family, was found to be the best model for more than 70% of the state’s area for all storm durations. Validation of the developed IDFs against the operational Atlas 14 IDF values shows a ±27% difference in over 95% of the state for all storm durations. The median of the difference stays between −10% and +10% for all storm durations and for all return periods in the range of (2–100) years. The mean difference ranges from −5% for the 100-year return period to 8% for the 10-year return period for the 24-h storm. Generally, the western and northern regions of the state show an overestimation, while the southern and southcentral regions show an underestimation of the published values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Use of Remote Sensing for High Impact Weather)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 4698 KB  
Proceeding Paper
Detecting Birds and Insects in the Atmosphere Using Machine Learning on NEXRAD Radar Echoes
by Precious Jatau, Valery Melnikov and Tian-You Yu
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 8(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2021-10352 - 22 Jun 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3878
Abstract
NEXRAD radars detect biological scatterers in the atmosphere, i.e., birds and insects, without distinguishing between them. A method is proposed to discriminate these bird and insect echoes. Multiple scans are collected for mass migration of birds (insects) and coherently averaged along their different [...] Read more.
NEXRAD radars detect biological scatterers in the atmosphere, i.e., birds and insects, without distinguishing between them. A method is proposed to discriminate these bird and insect echoes. Multiple scans are collected for mass migration of birds (insects) and coherently averaged along their different aspects to improve the data quality. Additional features are also computed to capture the dependence of bird (insect) echoes on the observed aspect, range, and local regions of space. Next, ridge classifier and decision tree machine learning algorithms are trained on the collected data. For each method, classifiers are trained, first with the averaged dual pol inputs and then different combinations of the remaining features are added. The performance of both methods, are analyzed using metrics computed on a held-out test data set. Further case studies on roosting birds, bird migration, and insect migration cases, are conducted to investigate the performance of the classifiers when applied to new scenarios. Overall, the ridge classifier using only dual polarization variables was found to perform consistently well on both the test data and in the case studies. This classifier is recommended for operational use on the US Next-Generation Radars (NEXRAD) in conjunction with the existing Hydrometeor Classification Algorithm (HCA). The HCA would be used first to separate biological from non-biological echoes, then the ridge classifier could be applied to categorize biological echoes into birds and insects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to train a machine learning classifier that can detect diverse patterns of bird and insect echoes, based on dual polarization variables at each range gate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6668 KB  
Article
Microphysical Characteristics of Rainfall Observed by a 2DVD Disdrometer during Different Seasons in Beijing, China
by Li Luo, Jia Guo, Haonan Chen, Meilin Yang, Mingxuan Chen, Hui Xiao, Jianli Ma and Siteng Li
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(12), 2303; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122303 - 12 Jun 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4317
Abstract
The seasonal variations of raindrop size distribution (DSD) and rainfall are investigated using three-year (2016–2018) observations from a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) located at a suburban station (40.13° N, 116.62° E, ~30 m AMSL) in Beijing, China. The annual distribution of rainfall presents [...] Read more.
The seasonal variations of raindrop size distribution (DSD) and rainfall are investigated using three-year (2016–2018) observations from a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) located at a suburban station (40.13° N, 116.62° E, ~30 m AMSL) in Beijing, China. The annual distribution of rainfall presents a unimodal distribution with a peak in summer with total rainfall of 966.6 mm, followed by fall. Rain rate (R), mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm), and raindrop concentration (Nt) are stratified into six regimes to study their seasonal variation and relative rainfall contribution to the total seasonal rainfall. Heavy drizzle/light rain (R2: 0.2~2.5 mm h−1) has the maximum occurrence frequency throughout the year, while the total rainfall in summer is primarily from heavy rain (R4: 10~50 mm h−1). The rainfall for all seasons is contributed primarily from small raindrops (Dm2: 1.0~2.0 mm). The distribution of occurrence frequency of Nt and the relative rainfall contribution exhibit similar behavior during four seasons with Nt of 10~1000 m−3 registering the maximum occurrence and rainfall contributions. Rainfall in Beijing is dominated by stratiform rain (SR) throughout the year. There is no convective rainfall (CR) in winter, i.e., it occurs most often during summer. DSD of SR has minor seasonal differences, but varies significantly in CR. The mean values of log10Nw (Nw: mm−1m−3, the generalized intercept parameter) and Dm of CR indicate that the CR during spring and fall in Beijing is neither continental nor maritime, at the same time, the CR in summer is close to the maritime-like cluster. The radar reflectivity (Z) and rain rate (R) relationship (Z = aRb) showed seasonal differences, but were close to the standard NEXRAD Z-R relationship in summer. The shape of raindrops observed from 2DVD was more spherical than the shape obtained from previous experiments, and the effect of different axis ratio relations on polarimetric radar measurements was investigated through T-matrix-based scattering simulations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance of Radar Meteorology and Hydrology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 6028 KB  
Article
Validation of the High-Altitude Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler during the Tampa Bay Rain Experiment
by Jonathan Coto, W. Linwood Jones and Gerald M. Heymsfield
Climate 2021, 9(6), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060089 - 29 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3531
Abstract
This paper deals with the validation of rain rate and wind speed measurements from the High-Altitude Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler (HIWRAP), which occurred in September 2013 when the NASA Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle passed over an ocean rain squall line in [...] Read more.
This paper deals with the validation of rain rate and wind speed measurements from the High-Altitude Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler (HIWRAP), which occurred in September 2013 when the NASA Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle passed over an ocean rain squall line in the Gulf of Mexico near the North Florida coast. The three-dimensional atmospheric rain distribution and the associated ocean surface wind vector field were simultaneously measured by two independent remote sensing and two in situ systems, namely the ground-based National Weather Service Next-Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD); the European Space Agency satellite Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), and two instrumented weather buoys. These independent measurements provided the necessary data to calibrate the HIWRAP radar using the measured ocean radar backscatter and to validate the HIWRAP rain and wind vector retrievals against NEXRAD, ASCAT and ocean buoys observations. In addition, this paper presents data processing procedures for the HIWRAP instrument, including the development of a geometric model to collocate time-morphed rain rates from the NEXRAD radar with HIWRAP atmospheric rain profiles. Results of the rain rate intercomparison are presented, and they demonstrate excellent agreement with the NEXRAD time-interpolated rain volume scans. In our analysis, we find that HIWRAP produces wind and rain rates that are consistent with the supporting ground and satellite estimates, thereby providing validation of the geolocation, the calibration, and the geophysical retrieval algorithms for the HIWRAP instrument. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modelling and Forecasting Extreme Climate Events)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop