Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (460)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Locoregional therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 406 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advances in Bidirectional Therapy for Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy
by Manuela Robella, Marco Vitturini, Andrea Di Giorgio, Matteo Aulicino, Martin Hubner, Emanuele Koumantakis, Felice Borghi, Paolo Catania, Armando Cinquegrana and Paola Berchialla
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152580 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze the study design, characteristics, and timing of the treatments administered—including the type of systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal agents used in PIPAC, and interval between administrations—as well as the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and overall methodological quality of the available literature on bidirectional treatment for peritoneal metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2025. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bidirectional treatment. Data extraction focused on survival, response assessment (PRGS, PCI), adverse events, systemic and intraperitoneal regimens, treatment interval, and study methodology. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 1015 patients (742 treated with bidirectional therapy) were included. Median overall survival ranged from 2.8 to 19.6 months, with the most favorable outcomes observed in gastric and colorectal cancer cohorts. PRGS improvement after multiple PIPAC cycles was reported in >80% of evaluable cases. High-grade adverse events (CTCAE ≥ 3) occurred in up to 17% of patients in most studies, with only one study reporting treatment-related mortality. However, methodological quality was generally moderate, with considerable heterogeneity in treatment protocols, response criteria, systemic regimens, and toxicity attribution. Conclusions: Bidirectional therapy with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy appears to be a feasible and potentially effective strategy for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Despite encouraging outcomes, definitive conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of available studies. Prospective standardized trials are needed to confirm efficacy, clarify patient selection, and optimize treatment protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 815 KiB  
Article
Oxygen-Enhanced R2* Weighted MRI and Diffusion Weighted MRI of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Lymph Nodes in Prediction of 2-Year Outcome Following Chemoradiotherapy
by Harbir Singh Sidhu, David Price, Tim Beale, Simon Morley, Sola Adeleke, Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki, Martin Forster, Dawn Carnell, Ruheena Mendes, Stuart Andrew Taylor and Shonit Punwani
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142333 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the utility of HNSCC LN R2* relaxation times to infer the oxygenation status of LN non-invasively at baseline and when breathing air and 100% oxygen to predict chemoradiotherapeutic locoregional response at 2 years. Hypoxia within LNs has been associated with [...] Read more.
Background: We evaluated the utility of HNSCC LN R2* relaxation times to infer the oxygenation status of LN non-invasively at baseline and when breathing air and 100% oxygen to predict chemoradiotherapeutic locoregional response at 2 years. Hypoxia within LNs has been associated with poorer outcomes following CRT. Deoxyhaemoglobin decreases MRI transverse relaxation time (T2*) (lengthening inverse, R2*). Methods: A total of 54 patients underwent 1.5T-MRI before CRT. Conventional MR sequences were supplemented with T2* sequences breathing both air and 100% oxygen; pathological nodes identified in consensus were volumetrically contoured to T2* parametric maps. Results: Patients followed-up with for >2 years were categorised by multidisciplinary consensus into post-therapy complete local response (CR; n = 32/54) and local nodal disease relapse (RD; n = 22/54). Our data demonstrated, by R2*, that nodes that sustained post-therapy CR are significantly more hypoxic compared with relapsing nodes and paradoxically demonstrate a significant increase in hypoxia on 100% oxygen. Pre-treatment LN short axis diameter, various qualitative descriptors of malignancy, and quantitative DWI were not useful in discriminating successful response to CRT. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a significant differential response to 100% oxygen and higher baseline R2* LN measurements could be exploited in risk stratification prior to CRT, and future work could be directed towards understanding the contrast mechanisms of R2* imaging, underpinning the observed differences in the context of hypoxia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Head and Neck Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 401 KiB  
Systematic Review
TACE Versus TARE in the Treatment of Liver-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
by Charalampos Lalenis, Alessandro Posa, Valentina Lancellotta, Marcello Lippi, Fabio Marazzi, Pierluigi Barbieri, Patrizia Cornacchione, Matthias Joachim Fischer, Luca Tagliaferri and Roberto Iezzi
Tomography 2025, 11(7), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11070081 - 12 Jul 2025
Viewed by 467
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Liver metastases are common among patients with breast cancer and have a poor prognosis if left untreated. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare chemoembolization (TACE) versus radioembolization (TARE) treatments in patients with breast cancer liver-dominant metastases [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Liver metastases are common among patients with breast cancer and have a poor prognosis if left untreated. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare chemoembolization (TACE) versus radioembolization (TARE) treatments in patients with breast cancer liver-dominant metastases in terms of overall survival (OS), local tumor control (LC), and toxicity. Methods: The S.P.I.D.E.R framework was used to address the clinical question. A systematic literature search using PubMed and Scopus was performed to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of TACE and TARE in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Results: The literature search resulted in 10 articles for TACE, 13 articles for TARE and 1 for combined TACE/TARE, totaling 462 patients for the TACE group and 627 for the TARE group. The median LC was 68.7% for TACE and 78.9% for TARE. The median OS was 15.3 months for TACE and 11.9 for TARE. Progression at three months was 32.5% for TACE and 20.6% for TARE. Conclusions: The included studies were heterogeneous, varying widely in design, patient selection, and therapeutic protocols. Nonetheless, this systematic review suggests that locoregional therapies are effective in the treatment of liver metastases in patients with breast cancer and may improve tumor burden, alleviate symptoms and extend overall survival. The median LC of the liver metastases at three months was higher in the TARE group compared to TACE. However, the TARE group showed lower OS rates after treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1656 KiB  
Article
Transarterial Chemoembolization Outperforms Radioembolization in Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
by Faisal M. Sanai, Adnan Alzanbagi, Mohammed Arabi, Sarah S. Alfawaz, Khalid I. Bzeizi, Mohammed Almatrafi, Abdulmalik M. Alsabban, Jameel Bardesi, Hamdan S. Alghamdi, Mohamed Shawkat, Talal M. Alotaibi, Khairat H. Alameer, Shadi Saleem, Saad Abualganam, Abdulaziz M. Tashkandi, Noha H. Guzaiz, Nesreen H. Abourokbah, Hassan O. Alfakieh, Majed Almaghrabi, Abeer A. Alabdullah, Lujain H. Aljohani, Nuwayyir A. Alqasimi, Saad Aldosari, Azzam Khankan, Dieter Broering and Saleh A. Alqahtaniadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2254; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132254 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 574
Abstract
Background: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 microspheres is an established therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its clinical efficacy compared to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 279 consecutive patients undergoing TARE (n = 104) or TACE (n = [...] Read more.
Background: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 microspheres is an established therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its clinical efficacy compared to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 279 consecutive patients undergoing TARE (n = 104) or TACE (n = 175) at four tertiary centers. Patients with metastatic disease, locally advanced HCC, or Child–Pugh (CP) C were excluded. Data on treatment, adverse events, survival outcomes (median overall survival [mOS], and objective response rates [by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; mRECIST]) were collected. Results: The median follow-up of the cohort was 27 months (IQR 13–50), the mean age was 67.6 ± 10.1 years, and 207 (74.2%) were male. The cohort was balanced in age, performance status, CP class, and HCC etiology. Maximum tumor diameter was significantly larger in the TARE cohort compared to the TACE cohort (4.4 vs. 3.1 cm, p < 0.001), including within the BCLC 0/A (4.2 vs. 2.7 cm, p = 0.001) and BCLC B (5.0 vs. 4.0 cm, p = 0.049) subgroups. The mOS was longer with TACE (37 vs. 22 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% CI: 1.19–2.29, p = 0.002). In BCLC 0/A patients, TACE yielded longer mOS (60 vs. 25 months; HR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.17–4.69; p = 0.016). In BCLC B, mOS was longer with TACE (32 vs. 20 months), but was not statistically significant (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 0.96–2.03, p = 0.080). In BCLC 0/A, complete response rates were higher with TACE (43.2% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.012). Hepatic decompensation was more frequent with TARE- (26.0%) than with TACE-treated patients (13.7%, p = 0.010). Conclusions: TACE demonstrated superior survival outcomes over TARE, particularly in early-stage disease. These results advocate for a more nuanced selection of embolization therapies in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3589 KiB  
Review
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
by Nisar Amin, Javaria Anwar, Abdullahi Sulaiman, Nadia Nikolaeva Naumova and Nadeem Anwar
Diseases 2025, 13(7), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13070207 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1150
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy globally and remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. Its incidence continues to rise worldwide, and it is currently the fastest-growing cancer by incidence in the United States. HCC most often arises [...] Read more.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy globally and remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. Its incidence continues to rise worldwide, and it is currently the fastest-growing cancer by incidence in the United States. HCC most often arises in the context of chronic liver disease, particularly cirrhosis. While chronic viral hepatitis (hepatitis B and C) has traditionally been the primary etiologic factor, recent advances in antiviral therapies and prevention strategies have shifted the epidemiological landscape. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-related liver disease are increasingly prominent risk factors, especially in Western populations. This shift underscores the need for targeted risk factor modification, improved early detection, and enhanced surveillance protocols. The management of HCC necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating locoregional therapies, surgical resection, liver transplantation, and systemic therapies for advanced-stage disease. Recent advances in systemic treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination therapies, have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Despite these developments, significant challenges persist in optimizing treatment, identifying predictive biomarkers, and personalizing therapy. Ongoing research is focused on refining molecular classifications and advancing precision medicine strategies to improve outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the etiology, surveillance strategies, diagnostic approaches, molecular features, and current treatment modalities for HCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Hepatitis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1111 KiB  
Article
HCC in MASLD and ALD: Biochemical Pathways, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
by Sheel Patel, Fares Kasem, Dylan Flaherty and Ashutosh Barve
BioChem 2025, 5(3), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/biochem5030019 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 614
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) emerging as major etiologies. This review explores the epidemiological trends, pathogenesis, and clinical management of HCC arising from MASH and ALD, highlighting both [...] Read more.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) emerging as major etiologies. This review explores the epidemiological trends, pathogenesis, and clinical management of HCC arising from MASH and ALD, highlighting both the shared and distinct mechanisms. MASH-HCC is driven by metabolic dysregulation, including obesity, insulin resistance, and lipotoxicity, with genetic polymorphisms such as PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 playing critical roles in disease progression. ALD-HCC, in contrast, is propelled by the toxic byproducts of ethanol metabolism, including acetaldehyde and reactive oxygen species, which induce chronic inflammation, and fibrosis. Both conditions also involve immune dysregulation, gut dysbiosis, and increased intestinal permeability, contributing to hepatic carcinogenesis. The review emphasizes that, while there is consensus regarding the screening of HCC in cirrhosis patients, there is lack of consensus on screening strategies for non-cirrhotic MASH patients who are also at risk for HCC. This underscores the importance of the early detection of cirrhosis using advanced diagnostic tools such as transient elastography and fibrosis scores. Current therapeutic approaches, ranging from surgical resection, liver transplantation, and locoregional therapies to systemic therapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors, are discussed, with an emphasis on the need for personalized treatment strategies. Finally, the review highlights future research priorities, including the development of novel biomarkers, exploration of the gut–liver axis, and deeper investigation of the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental factors. By synthesizing these insights, the review aims to inform multidisciplinary approaches to reduce the global burden of MASH- and ALD-related HCC and improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in BioChem, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 242 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Dual Hormonal Therapy with Fulvestrant and Aromatase Inhibitors as Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
by Ana Majić, Žarko Bajić, Marija Ban, Ivana Tica Sedlar, Dora Čerina Pavlinović, Branka Petrić Miše, Ante Strikić, Snježana Tomić and Eduard Vrdoljak
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2083; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132083 - 21 Jun 2025
Viewed by 616
Abstract
Background: The role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in patients with luminal tumors is still not well defined in everyday clinical practice. To assess the efficacy of combination NET, we analyzed the outcomes of fulvestrant and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in combination in [...] Read more.
Background: The role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in patients with luminal tumors is still not well defined in everyday clinical practice. To assess the efficacy of combination NET, we analyzed the outcomes of fulvestrant and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in combination in a real-world population. Methods: This was a single-arm, retrospective longitudinal study of the total population of patients diagnosed with locoregionally advanced, clinical stage II-III, HR+ HER2-, luminal-type eBC, who were treated with the neoadjuvant combination of fulvestrant and AI between 2019 and 2024 at the Clinical University Hospital of Split, Croatia. Results: We enrolled 44 patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, while 34 completed NET and surgery (per-protocol population; PPP). The median duration of NET was 11 months (interquartile range [IQR] of 9–16 months). The best radiological objective response rate (partial or complete response) was achieved by 30 (68.2%) in ITT, and 26 (76.5%) in PPP, defined by radiological examination, breast ultrasound, or MR. In the PPP, the minimal or moderate pathological response according to residual cancer burden (I or II) was observed in 29 (85.3%) patients. The median of absolute changes in Ki-67 was −5 (95% CI: −9 to 0), and the median of relative Ki67 changes was −40% (95% CI: −72% to 0%). Post-surgical Ki-67 was significantly predicted by initial Ki-67, positive lymph nodes, and time from diagnosis to the initiation of NET. Treatment was well tolerated, with no therapy discontinuation or dose reductions needed due to toxicity. The most commonly reported side effects included musculoskeletal pain (45.5%), asthenia (34.1%), and hot flashes (29.5%). Conclusions: Dual hormonal therapy with fulvestrant and AI is an active, easily given, non-toxic, promising neoadjuvant treatment in real-world patients with locally advanced luminal-type eBC who are not candidates for chemotherapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
16 pages, 1361 KiB  
Systematic Review
Supraclavicular Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer with Synchronous Supraclavicular Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
by George Shiyao He, Jolene Li Ling Chia, Emmeline Elaine Cua-De Los Santos, Wong Hung Chew, Wee Yao Koh, Qin Xiang Ng, Samuel Ow and Serene Si Ning Goh
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2081; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132081 - 21 Jun 2025
Viewed by 509
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases (sISLMs) in breast cancer are rare and associated with poor prognosis. The optimal locoregional treatment strategy remains unclear, particularly regarding the role of supraclavicular lymph node dissection (SLND). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases (sISLMs) in breast cancer are rare and associated with poor prognosis. The optimal locoregional treatment strategy remains unclear, particularly regarding the role of supraclavicular lymph node dissection (SLND). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, including studies published up to end December 2023, to compare the outcomes of SLND combined with radiotherapy (RT) and systemic therapy (ST), SLND with ST alone, and ST alone, using RT + ST as the reference. Results: Ten studies involving 3346 patients were included for overall survival (OS) analysis, and six studies were included for disease-free survival (DFS). SLND + RT + ST showed similar OS and DFS compared to RT + ST. Sensitivity analyses revealed that SLND limited to level V improved OS (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29–0.77), while more extensive dissections (level V+) worsened outcomes (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.10–1.80). Conclusions: These findings suggest that selective SLND may benefit certain patients, but broader application should be approached with caution pending results from future randomized trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Challenges in Breast Cancer Surgery: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1040 KiB  
Article
High-Risk Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Role of Adjuvant Therapy and Prognostic Factors Affecting Survival
by Ji Hyun Hong, Jun Kang, Sung Jong Lee, Keun Ho Lee, Soo Young Hur and Yeon-Sil Kim
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2056; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122056 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 687
Abstract
Background/Objectives: High-grade endometrial cancer, including non-endometrioid and grade 3 endometrioid histologies, is associated with poor prognosis despite early-stage diagnosis. This study assessed the prognosis of early-stage high-grade endometrial cancer, identified prognostic factors, and evaluated the optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy. Methods: We retrospectively [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: High-grade endometrial cancer, including non-endometrioid and grade 3 endometrioid histologies, is associated with poor prognosis despite early-stage diagnosis. This study assessed the prognosis of early-stage high-grade endometrial cancer, identified prognostic factors, and evaluated the optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients with 2018 FIGO stage I–II high-grade endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomies between 2008 and 2022. Adjuvant therapy was determined by a multidisciplinary team. Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression model. Results: Of 106 patients, 60 had non-endometrioid, and 46 had grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma; 69 (65.1%) received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 48.8 months, 37 patients experienced disease progression, and 21 died. Non-endometrioid histology was significantly associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.002). Lack of lymph node dissection, deeper invasion, and the omission of adjuvant therapy were additional adverse prognostic factors. Adjuvant therapy improved the overall survival (p = 0.009), disease-free survival (p = 0.021), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (p = 0.034) in patients with one or two risk factors. Conclusions: Non-endometrioid histology, deep invasion, and the lack of lymph node dissection are associated with worse survival in early-stage high-grade endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with these risk factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1256 KiB  
Article
A Pragmatic Grouping Model for Bone-Only De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer (MetS Protocol MF22-03)
by Berk Goktepe, Berkay Demirors, Kazim Senol, Serdar Ozbas, Efe Sezgin, Anthony Lucci and Atilla Soran
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2033; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122033 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 689
Abstract
De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) accounts for 3–10% of newly diagnosed cases, with 20–40% presenting as a bone-only metastatic disease, which can achieve survival outcomes exceeding 10 years with multimodal therapy. However, the role of multimodal therapy remains controversial in the guidelines. [...] Read more.
De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) accounts for 3–10% of newly diagnosed cases, with 20–40% presenting as a bone-only metastatic disease, which can achieve survival outcomes exceeding 10 years with multimodal therapy. However, the role of multimodal therapy remains controversial in the guidelines. Objective: This study aims to identify dnBOMBC subgroups to develop a pragmatic staging system for guiding locoregional therapy decisions. Materials and Methods: Data from the MF07-01 phase III randomized trial (2021, median follow-up time (mFT): 40 months (range 1–131)) and the BOMET prospective multi-institutional registry trial (2021, mFT: 34 months (range 25–45)) were combined for analysis, including only patients who presented with bone-only metastases. Exclusion criteria were patients under 18 and those with a history of prior cancer or cancer metastases. Patients with missing data and positive surgical margins were excluded. Out of 770 patients, 589 were included. Survival analyses were first conducted according to molecular subgroups, after which patients were further stratified by hormone receptor status, human epidermal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, tumor grade, and clinical T (cT) stage. Group A (GrA) included hormone receptor (HR)-positive, low- or intermediate-grade tumors at any cT; HR-positive, high-grade tumors with cT0–3; or any HER2-positive tumors. Group B (GrB) included HR-positive, high-grade tumors with cT4 disease or any triple-negative (TN) tumors. Results: The hazard of death (HoD) was 43% lower in GrA than in GrB. Median OS was 65 months (39–104) for GrA patients and 44 months (28–72) for GrB patients (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41–0.78, p = 0.0003). Primary tumor surgery (PTS) significantly improved OS in GrA patients, regardless of the number of metastases (solitary: HR, 0.375, 95% CI 0.259–0.543, p < 0.001; multiple: HR 0.435, 95% CI 0.334–0.615, p < 0.001). Conversely, GrB patients did not experience a significant benefit from PTS. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that GrA patients have better OS than GrB patients, and PTS reduces the HoD in GrA patients compared to systemic therapy alone. These findings support using a modified staging system in dnBOBMC to identify patients who may benefit from multimodal therapy including PTS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2685 KiB  
Review
SIU-ICUD: Management of Lymph Node–Positive Prostate Cancer
by Haitham Shaheen, Mack Roach and Eman Essam Elsemary
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(3), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030046 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 779
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The management of localized prostate cancer with regional lymph node involvement (N1M0) presents significant clinical challenges. While once considered indicative of systemic disease, improved imaging and evolving treatment paradigms have redefined node-positive disease as potentially curable. This systematic review aims to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The management of localized prostate cancer with regional lymph node involvement (N1M0) presents significant clinical challenges. While once considered indicative of systemic disease, improved imaging and evolving treatment paradigms have redefined node-positive disease as potentially curable. This systematic review aims to assess current evidence regarding treatment modalities and outcomes for patients with localized N1M0 prostate cancer. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating therapeutic strategies for N1M0 prostate cancer. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective analyses, and consensus guidelines. Treatment approaches reviewed included radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT), prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Key outcomes included overall survival (OS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Multimodal approaches—particularly the combination of ADT with WPRT or adjuvant radiotherapy following RP—were associated with improved survival outcomes. Patients with limited nodal burden and undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels derived the most benefit. The use of prostate-specific antigen membrane positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) enhanced detection and guided MDT in oligorecurrent disease. SBRT, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), and hypofractionated regimens demonstrated promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity profiles. Conclusions: Node-positive localized prostate cancer is optimally managed with individualized, multidisciplinary strategies. Combining systemic and locoregional treatments improves outcomes in selected patients. Ongoing prospective studies are warranted to refine patient selection, optimize treatment sequencing, and integrate novel imaging and systemic agents. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1176 KiB  
Article
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Resection—Experience of a Tertiary Oncology Center
by Beatriz Gonçalves, Beatriz Costeira, Filipa Fonseca, Francisco Cabral, André Caiado, Daniela Cavadas, João Maciel and Manuel Limbert
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4097; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124097 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a possible approach for rectal anterior resection (RAR). However, evidence supporting this technique remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of HALS for RAR at a single tertiary oncology center. Methods [...] Read more.
Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a possible approach for rectal anterior resection (RAR). However, evidence supporting this technique remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of HALS for RAR at a single tertiary oncology center. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction and rectum who underwent HALS for RAR between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022 were included. All surgeries were performed by a dedicated colorectal team composed of three surgeons. Results: Among the 1911 surgeries for primary colorectal cancer performed, 469 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 (57–74) years and 63% of the patients were male. Most tumors were cT3-4 (78.9%) and cN+ (71.2%), and neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 70.0% of cases. Low RAR was performed in 73.1% of cases, and an anastomosis was constructed in 95% of cases. The median operative time was 152 (135–180) min, and the conversion rate was 3.8%. Major morbidity occurred in 10.0% of cases, with 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.1%, with 9.0% early leaks and 3.1% late leaks. A complete/near-complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 89.6% of cases and an R0 resection in 96.2% of cases. With a median follow-up of 87 months, the locoregional recurrence rate was 2.5%, whereas the distant recurrence rate was 5.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 82.6%. Conclusions: When performed by experienced teams, HALS for RAR is safe and feasible and is associated with a short operative time, low conversion rate, minimal morbidity, and optimal oncologic performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 920 KiB  
Review
Perineural Invasion in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Hisham F. Bahmad, Carter Wegner, Joana Nuraj, Rima Avellan, Jeffrey Gonzalez, Teresita Mendez, Diana Jabbour and Carmen Gomez-Fernandez
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1900; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121900 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1283
Abstract
Perineural invasion (PNI) is a well-recognized histopathologic feature in multiple malignancies; however, its significance in breast cancer remains relatively underexplored. This review provides a synopsis of the current knowledge on PNI in breast cancer, discussing its histopathologic features, molecular mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and [...] Read more.
Perineural invasion (PNI) is a well-recognized histopathologic feature in multiple malignancies; however, its significance in breast cancer remains relatively underexplored. This review provides a synopsis of the current knowledge on PNI in breast cancer, discussing its histopathologic features, molecular mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and clinical relevance. PNI is most frequently observed in high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), particularly in triple-negative and HER2-positive subtypes. It is also seen in special histological subtypes such as mixed, metaplastic, and invasive micropapillary carcinomas. Mechanistically, PNI involves tumor–neural interactions, including neurotrophic factor signaling and epithelial–mesenchymal transition, contributing to tumor progression and potential locoregional recurrence (LRR). While PNI is linked to adverse prognosis in other tumors, its independent role remains unclear in breast cancer due to limited large-scale studies. Therefore, further investigation into its prognostic significance and potential therapeutic implications is needed. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic criteria and assessing targeted therapies to mitigate PNI-associated progression. This review summarizes the current knowledge on perineural invasion (PNI) in breast cancer, addressing its histological features, molecular mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and clinical implications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Pathophysiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 8298 KiB  
Communication
Twice as Effective? Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy: New Frontiers in Pleural Mesothelioma
by Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Elena Guerrini, Raffaele Guerrieri, Gianmarco Elia, Alessandra Lenzini, Vittorio Aprile, Greta Alì, Stylianos Korasidis, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi and Marco Lucchi
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020072 - 2 Jun 2025
Viewed by 827
Abstract
Pressurized intra-thoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising strategy for the treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). PITAC enables effective pleurodesis while potentially exerting an antineoplastic effect by delivering chemotherapeutic agents as a therapeutic aerosol into the thoracic cavity via a [...] Read more.
Pressurized intra-thoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising strategy for the treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). PITAC enables effective pleurodesis while potentially exerting an antineoplastic effect by delivering chemotherapeutic agents as a therapeutic aerosol into the thoracic cavity via a nebulizer. Our preliminary study involved nine patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM) treated with PITAC. Among them, one case was particularly emblematic for demonstrating notable oncological improvements in addition to well-known palliative benefits. This patient underwent two PITAC procedures, one year apart, without perioperative complications. Redo pleural biopsies from both previous and new sites revealed only fibrous tissue and inflammatory cells, with no evidence of malignancy. Beyond achieving pleurodesis, PITAC—by combining cytotoxic and sclerosing effects—may offer effective local antineoplastic control and represent a promising avenue for enhancing loco-regional therapy in PM. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7667 KiB  
Systematic Review
Holmium-166 Radioembolization Is a Safe and Effective Locoregional Treatment for Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Petra Sólymos, Mátyás Rédei, Caner Turan, Bence Szabó, Alexandra Ádám, Zsolt Molnár, Gábor Duray, Péter Hegyi and Dénes B. Horváthy
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111841 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 717
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and the safety of transarterial radioembolization using Holmium-166 microspheres (Ho-166-TARE) for the treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. The aim of the study was to offer a detailed analysis of clinical outcomes and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and the safety of transarterial radioembolization using Holmium-166 microspheres (Ho-166-TARE) for the treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. The aim of the study was to offer a detailed analysis of clinical outcomes and the potential benefits of this innovative therapy. Methods: The study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The systematic search was performed in five databases in November 2023 and updated in June 2024. All 16 eligible studies were original research that evaluated Ho-166-TARE. The endpoints analyzed were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinical and laboratory adverse events, healthy-liver- and tumor-liver-absorbed doses. The risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS checklist. Results: The pooled overall disease control rate (DCR) was 72% (95% CI, 46–89%); by mRECIST, it was 93% (95% CI, 71–99%); and by RECIST 1.1, it was 54% (95% CI, 22–83%) at 3-month follow-up. Overall survival (OS) at 3, 6, 12, and 30 months was 98%, 89%, 74%, and 39%, respectively. Severe clinical adverse events were minimal, although some patients showed elevated GGT levels and lymphocytopenia. Tumor-absorbed doses were nearly three times higher than those in healthy liver tissue. Conclusions: These findings suggest that Ho-166-TARE is a safe and effective locoregional treatment option for liver tumors, especially in cases where systemic therapy alone is insufficient or surgical resection is not feasible. Further studies are needed to investigate tumor-specific response, optimize dosimetry strategies, and establish standardized protocols for long-term outcome assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop