Applied Sciences Exceptional Reviewers List 2024
We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List 2024. This program was designed to recognize and honor scholars who have delivered consistently exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting knowledge exchange, Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2076-3417) recognizes the significant role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to surveys conducted in 2023, 91% of our authors rated the peer review as good or excellent, thanks to our pool of excellent reviewers.
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have generously volunteered their time and expertise to assist in Applied Sciences’ peer-review process. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering valuable feedback, and contributing to academic rigor are truly commendable.
The Exceptional Reviewers List was introduced in May 2024. Each quarter, we will be selecting a group of outstanding reviewers and introduce them here.
Q1
Prof. Dr. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski, AGH University of Krakow, Poland
Interests: underground mining methods; rock bolting; non-destructive testing; backfilling; rock mass monitoring; model test; computer-aided design in mining and geoengineering
“The review process is always very reliable and effective. A big advantage is the editor's care, who ensures punctuality and decision-making.”
Dr. Jozef Krajňák, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
Interests: flexible coupling; vibrations; noisiness; gaseous medium
“I think that the articles in MDPI are of high quality, as well as the process of processing submitted articles or creating reviews. I like this idea and I will support it in the future as well.”
Dr. Jacek Abramczyk, Associate Professor, Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Interests: buildings; structural systems
Q2
Dr. Tao Wang, China University of Mining and Technology, China
Dr. Jimmie Miller, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA
“A reviewer is a sifter. A reviewer is a refiner. A reviewer is an examiner. A reviewer is an appraiser. A reviewer is an illuminator. A reviewer is a teacher. A reviewer is a mentor.”
Dr. Keshav Bhattarai, University of Central Missouri, USA
“As a reviewer, I evaluate papers with respect and care, focusing on writing quality, relevance, and research credibility. My goal is to provide constructive feedback that aids both authors and editors.”
Q3
Dr. Carlos Marcuello, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain
“The reviewing activity was pleasant and the website platform treasures of an intuitive interface that makes an excellent experience.”
Dr. Aristeidis Karras, University of Patras, Greece
“I have really enjoyed reviewing for Applied Sciences, enabling this meaningful discourse alongside many who engage in impactful research in our field.”
Dr. Itzhak Aviv, MTA and University of Haifa, Israel
“Reviewing for Applied Sciences has been enriching and rewarding. The review allowed me to be on top of the latest in my research work and stimulate research worldwide. Thanks to contributing to the peer-review process, I have helped consign colleagues and make sure that the best of the scientific work is elevated. I have enjoyed collaborating with the editorial team, who have created a collaborative and professional review environment. It is a privilege to be chosen to the 2024 Exceptional Reviewers List, and I'm excited to continue my efforts in the development of our scientific community by using MDPI's exceptional platform.”
Q4
Prof. Dr. Giorgio Sonnino, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
"Reviewing for Applied Sciences has been an enriching experience, offering the opportunity to engage with innovative research while supporting the journal's commitment to academic excellence”.
Dr. Robert Oleniacz, AGH University of Krakow, Poland
Dr. Andrew D. Cartmill, Massey University, New Zealand