Promoting Research, Development and Access to Vaccines to Address Global Inequities—2nd Edition

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "Vaccines and Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 808

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Interests: health development assistance; global health governance; global public goods research and development and accessibility; nutrition and food safety; health emergency response
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Vaccines are a highly effective public health measure for promoting population health. However, the COVID-19 pandemic, monkeypox, and other global public health emergencies have highlighted serious global inequality in the development and accessibility of vaccines, particularly in disadvantaged settings. It is essential to address these issues by understanding the current situation, analyzing its reasons, and exploring potential solutions.

We invite original research articles and reviews on a wide range of topics related to global vaccine equity issues, including routine and emergency vaccines for all age groups. This includes, but is not limited to, vaccine hesitancy, vaccination promotion interventions, relevant economic evaluations, and vaccination for vulnerable populations. We are eagerly looking forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Yangmu Huang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • research and development
  • communicable diseases
  • vulnerable population
  • medical countermeasures
  • vaccine-preventable diseases
  • innovative vaccines
  • vaccine hesitancy
  • health education
  • vaccination coverage rates
  • vaccination strategies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1734 KB  
Article
The Mismatch Between Professionally Produced Vaccine Content and Audience Demand on Chinese Short-Form Video Platforms: A Cross-Platform Content Analysis
by Yuqi Fu, Yuan Dang, Yuming Liu and Yangmu Huang
Vaccines 2026, 14(6), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060491 - 30 May 2026
Viewed by 475
Abstract
Background: Short-form video platforms have become important channels for vaccine science communication, yet whether professionally produced vaccine content aligns with audience demand remains underexplored. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative content analysis of 3752 publicly available vaccine-related videos retrieved from three [...] Read more.
Background: Short-form video platforms have become important channels for vaccine science communication, yet whether professionally produced vaccine content aligns with audience demand remains underexplored. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative content analysis of 3752 publicly available vaccine-related videos retrieved from three major Chinese short-form video platforms between 21 November and 13 December 2024. A coding framework based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD) framework was used to identify key content themes. Multivariate Bayesian negative binomial regression and demand–avoidance analysis were used to examine engagement patterns and supply–demand alignment across account types. Results: Individual users produced the majority of videos (53.17%), whereas medical professionals received the highest level of engagement. Engagement was positively associated with themes related to disease severity (β ≈ 0.19–0.25) and side effects and management (β ≈ 0.31–0.67), but negatively associated with vaccine effectiveness (β ≈ −0.28 to −0.14) and vaccination precautions (β ≈ −0.28 to −0.27). Professional sources showed broader thematic coverage but also the greatest supply–demand mismatch, with mismatch indices of 0.377 for medical institution official media and 0.304 for medical professionals, primarily driven by overrepresentation of themes associated with audience avoidance. Conclusions: Significant structural mismatch exists between professionally produced vaccine content and audience engagement-based demand on short-form video platforms. Optimizing vaccine communication may require prioritizing audience-concerned risk-related information and dynamically adjusting content strategies based on engagement feedback to enhance the effectiveness of vaccine education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop