Consideration of Critical and Strategic Raw Materials in Life Cycle Management

A special issue of Resources (ISSN 2079-9276).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 2761

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Cracow, Poland
Interests: circular economy; LCA; LCC; eco-innovation; management; raw materials
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Raw materials, including metals, minerals, and ores, are crucial for green and digital transformation, including energy storage and conversion and transport. The prosperity and economic competitiveness of many countries depends on safe and secure access to raw materials. Concerns have emerged regarding the availability of minerals, raising questions about the need to open new mining frontiers to meet the demand for these minerals. In the EU, the Critical Raw Materials list has been published since 2011 and is updated every three years. The overall policy, promoting the sustainable production and consumption of raw materials, began in 2000 (Communication (2000) 265 Promoting sustainable development in the EU non-energy extractive industry). In 2008, the Raw Materials Initiative was launched, outlining a strategy aimed at reducing dependencies on non-energy raw materials for industrial value chains and societal well-being. This initiative was structured around three pillars: ensuring a level playing field in accessing resources in developing countries, fostering a sustainable supply of raw materials from European sources, and promoting resource efficiency and recycling, particularly for raw materials identified as critical. After over 15 years, the EU's Critical Raw Materials Act was adopted, with the goal of ensuring a stable supply of minerals crucial for the EU's green and digital transitions and reducing dependency on Chinese supplies. The strategic and critical raw materials are defined not only in the EU but in many other countries, i.e., the US and Canada.

From the Global Resource Outlook 2024 (https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook-2024), there  is a 60% projected growth in resource use by 2060, which could derail efforts to achieve not only climate, biodiversity, and pollution targets but could also impact economic prosperity and human well-being. It was underlined that increasing resource use is the main driver for the triple planetary crisis.  Therefore,  to increase sustainable and responsible sourcing of primary and secondary raw materials, a holistic approach based on a life cycle perspective is needed. This Special Issue is focused on (but not restricted to) innovative research papers and original reviews covering the latest advances in theories, methodologies and applications in the fields of the assessment, mining, and processing of mineral resources, and we welcome submissions from any researcher who is interested in mineral resource management.

Prof. Dr. Joanna Kulczycka
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Resources is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • critical raw materials
  • decoupling
  • SDG
  • LCA
  • recycling
  • substitution
  • mineral policy
  • raw materials management
  • circular economy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

22 pages, 724 KiB  
Article
Identifying Hotspots and Most Relevant Flows for Red and White Wine Production in Brazil through Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study
by Tiago Panizzon, Gregório Bircke Salton, Vania Elisabete Schneider and Matheus Poletto
Resources 2024, 13(7), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13070088 - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1351
Abstract
This study undertakes a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of red and white wine production in Brazil, focusing on a leading winery in the Serra Gaúcha region. Given the notable lack of similar research in this area, our study employs LCA methodologies to evaluate [...] Read more.
This study undertakes a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of red and white wine production in Brazil, focusing on a leading winery in the Serra Gaúcha region. Given the notable lack of similar research in this area, our study employs LCA methodologies to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the winery stage. Our results indicate that although white wine generally exhibits a lower environmental impact than red wine, the specific impacts differ substantially across various environmental categories, highlighting the necessity for context-specific assessments. We also find that electricity consumption, sugar usage, and liquid CO2 production are the primary drivers of environmental impacts, especially in toxicity-related categories. Moreover, our research critically examines the suitability of the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) within the Brazilian context and proposes a revised set of impact categories. This revision enhances the accounted impacts from 55% in the existing PEFCR 2.0 to 80% in our recommended framework, suggesting the need for more tailored environmental impact assessment tools in regional settings. Through these findings, our study not only addresses a significant gap in LCA research within the Brazilian wine industry but also sets the stage for improved environmental management practices across Brazilian wine industries. These enhancements are crucial for aligning local production processes with global sustainability standards and advancing the environmental stewardship of the wine sector in Brazil. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 1859 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Literature Review of Existing Methods and Tools for the Criticality Assessment of Raw Materials: A Focus on the Relations between the Concepts of Criticality and Environmental Sustainability
by Daniele Perossa, Paolo Rosa and Sergio Terzi
Resources 2024, 13(9), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13090131 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1003
Abstract
Critical raw materials have significant economic and social impacts across numerous sectors. Numerous artifacts have been developed to assess their criticality. However, there is no univocity around the factors determining criticality. A systematic literature review was conducted to consider all academic works and [...] Read more.
Critical raw materials have significant economic and social impacts across numerous sectors. Numerous artifacts have been developed to assess their criticality. However, there is no univocity around the factors determining criticality. A systematic literature review was conducted to consider all academic works and official reports on criticality assessment. The review aimed to classify these artifacts to provide a clear picture of the heterogenous literature, with a focus on the relationship between criticality and environmental sustainability. Works proposing or updating criticality assessment artifacts were included according to the eligibility criteria. Academic sources were drawn from the Scopus Database in 2023. Official reports included those considered seminal by academic literature. The risk of bias in the selection and classification of the 162 works was low, as the review sought to be comprehensive. The included artifacts are systematically classified. A mapping of the identified criticality assessment tools and methods has been developed. The review found that while environmental impacts are considered in several works, the theoretical connection between criticality and environmental sustainability is weak. Three perspectives on this relationship are identified and discussed. The main limitation of this study is the inability to analyze undisclosed artifacts. It was conducted under the Horizon Europe Programme (Grant Number 101091490). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop