remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP)

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 January 2025) | Viewed by 6174

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Astronomical and Physical Geodesy, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Interests: GNSS orbit modeling; precise GNSS orbit determination; GNSS signal biases; PPP-AR; LEO satellite orbit determination, and the combination of space techniques (GNSS, DORIS, SLR, VLBI)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Astronomical and Physical Geodesy, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Interests: precise applications of GNSS such as positioning, precise orbit determination, reference frame realization, time transfer, and other space techniques, such as DORIS, SLR, and VLBI

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Royal Observatory of Belgium,3 Avenue Circulaire, B1180 Brussels, Belgium
Interests: high-precision GNSS positioning; real-time satellite clock and multi-frequency phase bias determination; multi-GNSS and multi-frequency ambiguity resolution; GNSS time transfer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) is a technique that allows users to achieve centimetre- and millimetre-level positioning accuracy based on a single GNSS receiver. This is of central importance for many applications (i.e., plate tectonics, surface loading, earthquake monitoring) and also has a massive uptick in interest across multiple industries (i.e., surveying, precise agriculture, autonomous vehicles/drones, low-cost and dual-frequency chipsets for the mass-market, smartphone). Currently, PPP is typically combined with ambiguity resolution or RTK (Real Time Kinematic) technique and evolved to PPP-AR and PPP-RTK. To support this, Galileo and BDS satellite systems start the provisioning of HAS (high-accuracy service) and PPP-B2b service, respectively.

Multi-GNSS, multi-frequency, and multi-signal adopt more measurements and enable more new options in the linear combination than using the legacy dual-frequency measurements in PPP. On the other hand, this also makes it more challenging to handle different types of biases in ambiguity resolution. This Special Issue aims to discuss advances in using Multi-GNSS, multi-frequency, and multi-signal in PPP/PPP-AR/PPP-RTK, as well as in the computation of atmospheric parameters. New updates and assessments of HAS, PPP-B2b, or other services in smartphone, ground station, and low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite positioning are welcome, too.

Dr. Bingbing Duan
Prof. Dr. Urs Hugentobler
Dr. Jiang Guo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multi-GNSS
  • multi-frequency
  • multi-signal
  • PPP-AR
  • PPP-RTK
  • high-accuracy service
  • real-time PPP-AR

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 1898 KiB  
Article
Improving Performance of Uncombined PPP-AR Model with Ambiguity Constraints
by Yichen Liu, Urs Hugentobler and Bingbing Duan
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4537; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234537 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1075
Abstract
With the advancement of multi-frequency and multi-constellation GNSS signals and the introduction of observable-specific bias (OSB) products, the uncombined precise point positioning (PPP) model has grown more prevalent. However, this model faces challenges due to the large number of estimated parameters, resulting in [...] Read more.
With the advancement of multi-frequency and multi-constellation GNSS signals and the introduction of observable-specific bias (OSB) products, the uncombined precise point positioning (PPP) model has grown more prevalent. However, this model faces challenges due to the large number of estimated parameters, resulting in strong correlations between state parameters, such as clock errors, ionospheric delays, and hardware biases. This can slow down the convergence time and impede ambiguity resolution. We propose two methods to improve the triple-frequency uncombined PPP-AR model by integrating ambiguity constraints. The first approach makes use of the resolved ambiguities from dual-frequency ionosphere-free combined PPP-AR processing and incorporates them as constraints into triple-frequency uncombined PPP-AR processing. While this approach requires the implementation of two filters, increasing computational demands and thereby limiting its feasibility for real-time applications, it effectively reduces parameter correlations and facilitates ambiguity resolution in post-processing. The second approach incorporates fixed extra-wide-lane (EWL) and wide-lane (WL) ambiguities directly, allowing for rapid convergence, and is well suited for real-time processing. Results show that, compared to the uncombined PPP-AR model, integrating N1 and N2 constraints reduces averaged convergence time from 8.2 to 6.4 min horizontally and 13.9 to 10.7 min vertically in the float solution. On the other hand, integrating EWL and WL ambiguity constraints reduces the horizontal convergence to 5.9 min in the float solution and to 4.6 min for horizontal and 9.7 min for vertical convergence in the fixed solution. Both methods significantly enhance the ambiguity resolution in the uncombined triple-frequency PPP model, increasing the validated fixing rate from approximately 80% to 89%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP))
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 8896 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Signal Distortion Bias Using Geometry-Free Linear Combinations
by Mohammed Abou Galala and Wu Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4463; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234463 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 572
Abstract
Signal distortion bias (SDB) in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data processing, defined as the time difference between the distorted chip and the ideal rectangular chip, leads to systematic biases in pseudoranges, affecting satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs). The stability of [...] Read more.
Signal distortion bias (SDB) in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data processing, defined as the time difference between the distorted chip and the ideal rectangular chip, leads to systematic biases in pseudoranges, affecting satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs). The stability of SDBs, allowing them to be treated as constant values, highlights the importance of investigating both their stability and estimation accuracy. Two different methods are used to estimate SDBs: (1) the hybrid method and (2) the geometry-free method. Data from approximately 430 stations, spanning the entire year of 2021, were analyzed to evaluate the estimation accuracy and the short-term and long-term stability of GPS SDBs. The analysis focused on two code signals: C1C (L1 Coarse/Acquisition) and C2W (L2 P(Y)). The results show that the short-term and long-term stability of GPS C1C and C2W SDBs is comparable for both methods, with only minor variations between them. Additionally, one month of data were used to validate the accuracy of estimated SDBs across different receiver groups. The results demonstrate that geometry-free SDBs provide stable satellite DCB estimates with an average bias below 0.15 ns and minimal residual biases, while hybrid SDBs provide satellite DCB estimates with an average bias below 0.20 ns. Overall, the comparison underscores the superior performance of geometry-free SDBs in achieving consistent satellite DCB estimates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 6683 KiB  
Article
Affordable Real-Time PPP—Combining Low-Cost GNSS Receivers with Galileo HAS Corrections in Static, Pseudo-Kinematic, and UAV Experiments
by Grzegorz Marut, Tomasz Hadas, Kamil Kazmierski and Jaroslaw Bosy
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4008; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214008 - 28 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1644
Abstract
The Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) is a free of charge Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) augmentation service provided by the European Union. It is designed to enable real-time Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with a target accuracy (at the 95% confidence level) of [...] Read more.
The Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) is a free of charge Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) augmentation service provided by the European Union. It is designed to enable real-time Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with a target accuracy (at the 95% confidence level) of 20 cm and 40 cm in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively, to be achieved within 300 s. The performance of the service has been confirmed with geodetic-grade receivers. However, mass market applications require low-cost GNSS receivers connected to low-cost antennae. This paper focuses on the performance of the real-time static and kinematic positioning achieved with Galileo HAS and low-cost GNSS receivers. The study is limited to GPS + Galileo dual-frequency positioning, thus exploiting the full potential of Galileo HAS SL1. We demonstrate that the target accuracy of Galileo HAS SL1 is reached with both geodetic-grade and low-cost receivers in dual-frequency static and kinematic applications in open-sky conditions. Precision of a few centimeters is reached for static positioning, while kinematic positioning results in subdecimeter precision. Vertical accuracy is limited by missing phase center offset models for low-cost antennas. In general, the performance of low-cost hardware using Galileo HAS for real-time PPP is comparable to that of geodetic-grade hardware. Therefore, combining low-cost GNSS receivers with Galileo HAS is feasible and justified. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP))
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6884 KiB  
Article
Carrier Phase Common-View Single-Differenced Time Transfer via BDS Penta-Frequency Signals
by Wei Xu, Wenbin Shen, Lei Liang, Chao Yan, Pengfei Zhang, Lei Wang and Jia Song
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 3955; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16213955 - 23 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1078
Abstract
The BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) has officially provided services worldwide since July 2020. BDS-3 has added new signals for B1C, B2a and B2b based on old BDS-2 B1I and B3I signals, which brings opportunities for achieving high-precision time transfer. In this research, [...] Read more.
The BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) has officially provided services worldwide since July 2020. BDS-3 has added new signals for B1C, B2a and B2b based on old BDS-2 B1I and B3I signals, which brings opportunities for achieving high-precision time transfer. In this research, the BDS-3/BDS-2 combined penta-frequency common-view (CV) single-differenced (SD) precise time transfer model is established with B1I, B3I, B2I, B1C, B2a and B2b signals, including dual-, triple-, quad- and penta-frequency (abbreviated as DF, TF, QF and PF) ionosphere-free (IF) combination CV SD models. Taking four long baseline time links (from 637.6 km to 1331.6 km) as examples, the accuracy and frequency stability of the BDS-3/BDS-2 combined DF, TF, QF and PF SD time transfer models were evaluated. The experimental results show that the frequency stability of the TF, QF and PF SD models were improved by 2.5%, 5.3% and 8.5%, on average, over the DF SD model. Compared with the traditional DF (B1I/B3I IF combination) SD model, the standard deviation (STD) of the multi-frequency SD model was reduced by 5.9%, on average, and the frequency stability was improved by 4.0% on average, which had the most apparent effect on the improvement of short-term frequency stability. Specifically, the DF1 (B1C and B2a DF IF combination), TF1 (B1C, B2a and B2b TF IF combination), QF1 (B1C, B1I, B2a and B2b QF IF combination) and PF4 (B1C, B1I, B2a, B2b and B3I PF IF combination) SD models had better performance in timing, and the PF4 SD model had the best performance. Considering that the PF4 (one PF signal IF combination) SD model does not require an estimated inter-frequency bias and that its noise factor is minor compared with the PF1 (four DF signal IF combination), PF2 (three TF signal IF combination) and PF3 (two QF signal IF combination) SD models, we recommend the PF4 SD model for multi-frequency time transfer and the use of the PF2, PF2 or PF3 SD model to supplement the PF4 SD model in cases of penta-frequency observation loss. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP))
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4629 KiB  
Article
A Method for Constructing an Empirical Model of Short-Term Offshore Ocean Tide Loading Displacement Based on PPP
by Hai Wang, Xingyuan Yan, Meng Yang, Wei Feng and Min Zhong
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 2998; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162998 - 15 Aug 2024
Viewed by 972
Abstract
The ocean tide loading (OTL) can result in displacements of centimeters or even decimeters at nearshore stations. Global ocean tide models exhibit errors in nearshore regions, which limit the accuracy of maintaining the coordinates of these stations. GNSS positioning can obtain tidal load [...] Read more.
The ocean tide loading (OTL) can result in displacements of centimeters or even decimeters at nearshore stations. Global ocean tide models exhibit errors in nearshore regions, which limit the accuracy of maintaining the coordinates of these stations. GNSS positioning can obtain tidal load displacements in nearshore areas, but it often requires long-term observation data and cannot provide timely correction models for newly established reference stations. This paper proposes a method for an empirical correction model of short-term OTL displacements using GNSS observations, where the kinematic coordinate sequences are first obtained by multi-GNSS precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR), and then the OTL corrections are obtained by window-sliding forecast based on random forest modeling. Through experiments conducted in the Hong Kong region, the empirical model with a window of 15 days is established by the proposed method. After applying the empirical model, root mean square errors of the residuals are reduced by 1.5 (30.6%), 3.7 (53.6%), and 3.7 mm (37.8%) in the East, North, and Up (ENU) components, respectively. When using the global ocean tide model FES2014, the RMSE values are reduced by 1.2 (24.5%), 0.3 (4.3%), and 3.7 mm (37.8%) in the ENU components, respectively. The empirical model shows better effects for the OTL displacement compared to FES2014, especially in the N component, with an improvement ratio of about 49.3%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning (MGPPP))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop