Healing the Earth: Spirituality and Planetary Health

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (16 March 2026) | Viewed by 3469

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Religion and Theology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Interests: imagination; spiritual transformation; planetary health

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Interests: planetary health; sacred nature; indigenous knowledge
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will focus on a necessary ‘worldview-shift’ regarding the way in which we inhabit the Earth, which is urgent in light of the moral imperative to safeguard the health and survival of living species. With this imperative in mind, the development of planetary health, a ‘new scientific field that focuses on the consequences of global environmental change for the health and survival of all species living on Earth’ (KNAW, 2023, p.4), offers promise. We are especially interested in expertise from scholars of religion in a broad, multidisciplinary sense (including philosophers, social scientists, and anthropologists) to address how existential questions relate to planetary health. Responding to ecological crises requires an existential and spiritual worldview shift regarding the fundamental precarity of life, personal and shared values, sources of inspiration, and experiences of connectedness and engagement (e.g., Christie, 2012; Grim & Tucker, 2014; Ivakhiv, 2018; Keller, 2022; Martens, 2023; Plumwood, 1993; Rose, 2013).

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this Special Issue from the perspective of your own research. First of all, we want to develop the field of planetary health beyond an anthropocentric focus on human health, as this is part of a problematic worldview of human dominance that obstructs the transformation that is needed. Therefore, we will study ecocentric worldviews as can be found in, for example, indigenous wisdom, mystical traditions, deep ecology, and certain philosophical or spiritual movements. How do they move beyond the anthropocentrism that is dominant in Western culture, and how might they contribute to a change in paradigm? In connection with this question, we aim to develop an environmental humanities’ view on planetary health, with a focus on transformation at an existential level with regard to our value and belief systems. Planetary health cannot be achieved without taking into account cultural modes of imagining and evaluating the relations between humans and the more-than-human that impact our ways of interacting with Earth. We welcome contributions that address the question of how new concepts and images (or the re-interpretation of existing ones) can stimulate the imagination and create possibilities with regard to a change in our value and belief systems. What perspectives do concepts and imaginaries open up, and what do they obscure? Arguably, we need an ecological imagination (Fesmire, 2010) that makes use of key metaphors, images, and symbols used not only in ecology but also in philosophical and religious traditions, as they allow us to reflect on fundamental existential questions. Finally, we aim to develop ways of fostering spiritual health and transformation that do justice to the existential dimension of planetary health. The distress that people may feel with regard to the ecological crisis is not a sign of psychological vulnerability but a healthy response to an unhealthy situation. Existential experiences of loss and grief should be taken seriously and addressed at the spiritual level, along with people’s deepest values, concerns, and commitments. Understanding spiritual health as being related to feelings of connectedness, a sense of meaning, and the motivation to act (Smit, 2015), we want to explore how spiritual care—understood as a value-driven, research-based profession that supports people facing existential challenges (Alma, 2021; Hvidt et al., 2020; VGVZ, 2016)—can help foster spiritual health and transformation. We strive to understand this while avoiding terms such as coping or agency that suggest that we can be in control and that easily conform to anthropocentric worldviews. We welcome contributions that explore spirituality and spiritual care from ecocentric perspectives.

For this Special Issue, we welcome original research articles and reviews related to the three themes mentioned (ecocentric worldviews, ecological imagination, and spiritual health and transformation). We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200-300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send these to the Guest Editors, Professor Hans Alma at h.a.alma@vu.nl and Professor Pim Martens at p.martens@maastrichtuniversity.nl, or to the Assistant Editor of Religions, Ms. Clare Chai, at clare.chai@mdpi.com. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purpose of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References

Alma, Hans. 2021. Waar mogelijk en onmogelijk elkaar raken: Reflecties op geestelijke zorg en religieus humanisme. Inaugural Professorial Speech, Vrije Universiteit.

Christie, Douglas E. 2012. The blue sapphire of the mind: Notes for a contemplative ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fesmire, Steven. 2010. Ecological imagination. Environmental Ethics, 32: 183–203.

Grim, John., and Mary Evelyn Tucker. 2014. Ecology and religion. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Hvidt, N. C., Kristina Tomra Nielsen, Alex K. Kørup, Christina Prinds, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Dorte Toudal Viftrup, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Elisabeth Rokkjær Hammer, Erik Falkø, Flemming Locher, et al. 2020. What is spiritual care? Professional perspectives on the concept of spiritual care identified through group concept mapping. BMJ Open, 10:e042142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042142.

Ivakhiv, Adrian. 2018. Shadowing the anthropocene: Eco-realism for turbulent times. Santa Barbara: Punctum Books.

Keller, Catherine. 2022. Facing apocalypse: Climate, democracy and other last chances.Canopy Forum, April 29. https://canopyforum.org/2022/04/29/facing-apocalypse-climate-democracy-and-other-last-chances/.

KNAW. 2023. Planetary health: An emerging field to be developed. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Martens, Pim. 2023. Planetary Health: the recipe for a sustainable future. Inaugural professorial speech, Maastricht University.

Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.

Rose, Deborah Bird. 2013. Val Plumwood's philosophical animism: Attentive interactions in the sentient world. Environmental Humanities, 3: 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611248.

Smit, J.D. 2015. Antwoord geven op het leven zelf: Een onderzoek naar de basismethodiek van de geestelijke verzorging. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Eburon.

VGVZ 2016. Beroepsstandaard geestelijk verzorger 2015. VGVZ.

Prof. Dr. Hans Alma
Prof. Dr. Pim Martens
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • planetary health
  • existential concern
  • ecocentric worldview
  • ecological imagination
  • ecological distress
  • spiritual health
  • spiritual transformation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 311 KB  
Article
Planetary Health and Spiritual Transformation
by Ji-yeon Im and Yunho Seo
Religions 2026, 17(4), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040428 - 1 Apr 2026
Viewed by 388
Abstract
This article examines planetary health in the Anthropocene through a relational ontology that recognizes nonhuman agency and conceptualizes ecological spirituality as a relational and practice-oriented mode of ethical responsiveness within planetary entanglements. Although recent ecological discourses increasingly acknowledge the agency of nonhuman beings, [...] Read more.
This article examines planetary health in the Anthropocene through a relational ontology that recognizes nonhuman agency and conceptualizes ecological spirituality as a relational and practice-oriented mode of ethical responsiveness within planetary entanglements. Although recent ecological discourses increasingly acknowledge the agency of nonhuman beings, planetary health debates have developed sophisticated scientific and policy-oriented frameworks, yet often remain oriented toward material causality or technocratic governance, while comparatively underarticulating relational, more-than-human, and practice-oriented ethical and spiritual dimensions. This study argues that an adequate response to the planetary crisis requires clarifying how nonhuman agency becomes perceptible and actionable within everyday ethical practice. Methodologically, the article adopts a comparative theoretical approach. First, it engages Jane Bennett’s concept of “thing-power” to reinterpret spirituality as an immanent sensitivity arising from material vitality. Second, drawing on Catherine Keller’s theology of planetary entanglement, it reframes planetary ethics as “response-ability” grounded in interdependence rather than mastery. Third, it examines the Donghak’s practice of gyeongmul (revering all beings) as a non-Western model of embodied ethical reverence. By placing new materialism, ecological theology, and Korean indigenous thought in dialogue, the article reconceptualizes ecological spirituality as a relational mode of responsiveness. It concludes by reinterpreting planetary health as a relational and practice-oriented condition that gestures toward a broader horizon of planetary well-being, rather than environmental stability alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healing the Earth: Spirituality and Planetary Health)
30 pages, 7105 KB  
Article
The Blessing of the Monkeys, the Whisper of Enchanted Stones: A Case Study of Indigenous Ecology in the Sacred Groves of Kerala (India) and Nagarkot (Nepal)
by Maciej Karasinski and Prasad Erancheri
Religions 2026, 17(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020224 - 12 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1133
Abstract
This comparative study sheds light on the agency of nature and provides a lens through which to examine the intersection of ritual, ecology, and indigenous environmental consciousness in South Asia. The paper argues that the sacred groves are not just passive backdrops for [...] Read more.
This comparative study sheds light on the agency of nature and provides a lens through which to examine the intersection of ritual, ecology, and indigenous environmental consciousness in South Asia. The paper argues that the sacred groves are not just passive backdrops for human rituals, but dynamic spaces in which fauna, flora, rocks and other natural entities are actively involved in spiritual practices and ecological processes. We compare two case studies: one from South India (Kerala), the Vallikāṭṭu sacred grove (kāvu), and one from Nepal, the shamanic forests of Nagarkot. While the beliefs and rituals connect people with the environment and impose certain restrictions as to the mode of conduct in the groves, we point to the agency of non-human animals In the case of Vallikāṭṭu we show that while the worshippers and priests of the groves may be inclined to restructure the groves or ritual patterns, the groves’ monkeys are perceived as emissaries of the spiritual-natural forces who preserve the ecosystem of the grove. Similarly, the trees and stones at the sacred sites of Nepal are seen as spiritual guides of the shamans or physical manifestations of the spirit of nature. This ethnographic study, combined with botanical research on plant animal interactions in the groves and philological study of sacred texts of the priests and shamans, highlights the existing indigenous ecological knowledge systems that are inextricably linked to and transmitted through ritual practices, spirit possession, trance and visionary journeys. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healing the Earth: Spirituality and Planetary Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 281 KB  
Article
The Wounding of the Earth: The Presence of the Ontological Rift and Eco-Dissonant Spiritualities
by Ryan Williams LaMothe
Religions 2025, 16(12), 1571; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121571 - 14 Dec 2025
Viewed by 616
Abstract
In this article, I argue that the climate crisis is a symptom of dissonant eco-subjects and relations that are, in part, produced by Abrahamic religious/spiritual traditions—traditions that function as apparatuses of the ontological rift between human and other-than-human animals. The argument begins by [...] Read more.
In this article, I argue that the climate crisis is a symptom of dissonant eco-subjects and relations that are, in part, produced by Abrahamic religious/spiritual traditions—traditions that function as apparatuses of the ontological rift between human and other-than-human animals. The argument begins by addressing the relation between Abrahamic traditions and apparatuses of the ontological rift. This sets the stage for explicating what is meant by spiritualities of eco-dissonant subjects. To further understand the features of eco-dissonant spiritualities, I turn to the philosophical notion of self-deception and the psychoanalytic notion of weak dissociation, which help explain our resistance to becoming aware of our contributions to the sufferings of other species and the wounding of the Earth, as well as our resistance to change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healing the Earth: Spirituality and Planetary Health)
Back to TopTop