Evangelical Theology Today: Exploring Theological Perspectives

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 August 2024) | Viewed by 3962

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Evangelische Theolgische Faculteit, Leuven, Belgium
Interests: postconservative evangelical theology; postmodern theological impulses; deconstruction and Christian theology; postmodern hermeneutics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Evangelical theology may no longer be reduced to evangelical conservative fundamentalism, nor restricted to right-wing American Republican politics. Some works question whether or not evangelicalism has come to an end (Gushee, After Evangelicalism, 2019; Fitch, The End of Evangelicalism, 2011); others look at the deconstruction of evangelicalism (Hübner, Deconstructing Evangelicalism, 2020); while others still consider revisions to, developments of, and diversity among evangelical perspectives (Sharp, The Evangelicals, 2023; Decolonizing Evangelicalism, Woodley and Sanders, 2020; Evangelical Theological Method: Five Views, ed. Porter and Studebaker, 2018; and How to be Evangelical Without Being Conservative, Olson, 2008). These aforementioned titles only scratch the surface of this diversity. Perhaps Stanley J. Grenz spearheaded some of this in his Revisioning Evangelical Theology in 1993. Since the publication of John R. Franke’s, The Character of Theology: A Postconservative Evangelical Approach, 2005 and Roger Olson’s Reformed and Always Reforming: The Postconservative Approach to Evangelical Theology, 2007, the term “evangelical” has become detached from its restricted association to fundamentalist Christianity.

With this diversity, what sense can one make of the term “evangelical” as a description of a distinct theological method today? Or, is the term too broad to be of any descriptive use? Are the various and (at times) divergent perspectives drawing upon the term “evangelical” so vast as to render the term “evangelical” meaningless? Have “evangelical” right-wing politics maligned the term from its usefulness for contemporary theological description?

With the above questions in mind, we invite your contributions to this Religions Special Issue on the relevance, purpose, and diversity of perspectives within evangelical theology today. Your contributions may reflect on the above questions, problems, concerns, or developments of evangelical theology from a critically interactive theological or hermeneutical framework or tradition. Original research articles or journal-length critical review articles are both welcome. All submissions must be between 4000 and 20,000 words.

References

David, P.G. After Evangelicalism: The Path to a New Christianity; Westminster John Knox: Louisville, KY, USA, 2019.

Jamin, A.H. Deconstructing Evangelicalism: A Letter to a Friend and a Professor's Guide to Escaping Fundamentalist Christianity; Hills Publishing Group: Rapid City, SD, USA, 2020.

David, E.F. The End of Evangelicalism? Discerning a New Faithfulness for Mission; Wipf and Stock/Cascade: Eugene, OR, USA, 2011.

John R.F. The Character of Theology: A Postconservative Evangelical Approach; Baker Academic: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2005.

Stanley, J.G. Revisioning Evangelical Theology: A Fresh Agenda for the 21st Century; IVP Academic: Downers Grove, IL, USA, 1993.

Roger, E.O. Reformed and Always Reforming: The Postconservative Approach to Evangelical Theology; Baker Academic: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2007.

Roger, E.O. How to Be Evangelical Without Being Conservative; Zondervan: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2008.

Stanley, E.P., Steven M.S. (Eds.) Evangelical Theological Method: Five Views; IVP: Downers Grove, IL, USA, 2018.

Isaac, B.S. The Evangelicals; Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2023.

Randy, S.W.; Bo, C.S. Decolonizing Evangelicalism: An 11:59 p.m. Conversation; Wipf and Stock/Cascade: Eugene, OR, USA, 2020.

Potential topics of research may include:

  • Evangelical theology and deconstruction;
  • Postconservative evangelicalism and phenomenology;
  • Biblical hermeneutics and postconservative theology;
  • Postliberal theology and evangelical theology;
  • The relevance or meaning of the term “evangelical” for global Christianity.

Prior to submitting a manuscript or review, interested authors are asked to provide a proposal of their intended contribution with an abstract of 150-200 words. Please send it to the Guest Editor, Prof. Dr. Ronald T. Michener ([email protected]), with a CC to the Assistant Editor, Ms. Violet Li ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions. Thank you for your consideration.

Prof. Dr. Ronald T. Michener
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • evangelicalism
  • evangelical theological method
  • postconservative evangelicalism
  • postconservative theology
  • post-modern evangelicalism
  • theological interpretation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 224 KiB  
Article
The Barthian Revolt or the New Modernism: Karl Barth and the Limits of American Evangelical Theology
by Isaac B. Sharp
Religions 2024, 15(12), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121491 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 431
Abstract
Throughout the twentieth century, U.S. American evangelicals engaged in an ongoing series of definitional debates over the contours and limits of a distinctly evangelical approach to theology. Developed as an explicit counter to theological liberalism—and often signaled by strict adherence to biblical inerrancy—American [...] Read more.
Throughout the twentieth century, U.S. American evangelicals engaged in an ongoing series of definitional debates over the contours and limits of a distinctly evangelical approach to theology. Developed as an explicit counter to theological liberalism—and often signaled by strict adherence to biblical inerrancy—American evangelical theology might conceivably have made common cause with Karl Barth, whose infamous rebellion against his liberal teachers became one of the founding events in the story of twentieth-century Christian theology. Despite Barth’s putative anti-liberalism, evangelical theologians never fully embraced Barthian theology, consistently vilifying it as un-evangelical and beyond the pale. In this essay, I recover the history of U.S. American evangelical theologians wrestling with Karl Barth and his legacy, highlighting how an enduring aversion to Barthianism became a key feature of evangelical theology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evangelical Theology Today: Exploring Theological Perspectives)
10 pages, 219 KiB  
Article
There is Hope in the Incarnation—Challenging the Bibliological Docetism of Today’s Evangelicalism
by Dănuț Mănăstireanu and Dănuț Jemna
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1256; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101256 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 917
Abstract
The authors argue that the future existence of evangelicalism as an ecclesial tradition depends on its ability and courage to re-imagine the dual nature, human and divine, of the Bible as written revelation and, consequently, to renew the way that this community engages [...] Read more.
The authors argue that the future existence of evangelicalism as an ecclesial tradition depends on its ability and courage to re-imagine the dual nature, human and divine, of the Bible as written revelation and, consequently, to renew the way that this community engages with it. Such an endeavour requires a new way of understanding and engaging with the Bible that can be built around the model of the Incarnation. As mainline Protestants, who ministered for many years in evangelical ecclesial communities and who have conducted extensive doctoral and post-doctoral research in patristic and contemporary theological studies, the authors are convinced that if evangelicalism is to survive and flourish in the complexities of the contemporary world, it requires a new hermeneutic. It should move away from a dominating docetic view of the Scripture, which overemphasises its divine nature, to the detriment, and sometimes the total neglect, of its human authorship, to give a full account of its dual nature, equally divine and human. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evangelical Theology Today: Exploring Theological Perspectives)
21 pages, 272 KiB  
Article
The 1977 Chicago Call: Debating Evangelical Identity
by Melanie C. Ross
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1227; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101227 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 805
Abstract
In 1977, a diverse group of forty-five leaders and scholars drafted the “Chicago Call”, urging evangelicals to reconnect with historic Christianity and embrace a richer understanding of worship and sacrament. The Call highlighted tensions between those who understood evangelicalism as a movement within [...] Read more.
In 1977, a diverse group of forty-five leaders and scholars drafted the “Chicago Call”, urging evangelicals to reconnect with historic Christianity and embrace a richer understanding of worship and sacrament. The Call highlighted tensions between those who understood evangelicalism as a movement within the broader Church and those who prioritized Reformation principles and scriptural authority. This article begins by exploring the origins of the conference, key leaders, and its historical context. It then moves to a comparison of primary documents, revealing points of friction that arose between conference participants as they worked to draft the statement. I conclude by assessing the Chicago Call’s limitations, emphasizing the inherent fragility of the evangelical coalition and the ongoing challenge of negotiating a theological consensus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evangelical Theology Today: Exploring Theological Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 252 KiB  
Article
The Church Amidst the War of Attrition: Ukrainian Evangelical Community in Search of a New Mission Paradigm
by Roman Soloviy
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091136 - 20 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1184
Abstract
The article is a comprehensive analysis of the struggles and challenges faced by Ukrainian evangelicals in the wake of the Russian aggression against Ukraine between 2022 and 2024. This analysis focuses on how the ongoing war has impacted the church’s overall mission and [...] Read more.
The article is a comprehensive analysis of the struggles and challenges faced by Ukrainian evangelicals in the wake of the Russian aggression against Ukraine between 2022 and 2024. This analysis focuses on how the ongoing war has impacted the church’s overall mission and how it has adapted to a rapidly changing political and social environment. The author argues that with Ukrainian society experiencing significant social and existential challenges due to the ongoing war, the traditional model of mission work that solely focuses on evangelism and promoting Christian values as a counter to “neo-Marxist gender ideology” is gradually being replaced by a more holistic and inclusive approach to missionary theology and practice. This new approach emphasizes compassion, solidarity, social responsibility, and a prophetic vision for Ukrainian society after the war. Through this article, the author hopes to deepen understanding of how the role and mission of the Ukrainian Evangelical Church have evolved recently and outline a concept of missional theology that can be relevant for other communities facing significant social, economic, and political challenges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evangelical Theology Today: Exploring Theological Perspectives)
Back to TopTop