Religionizing Confucianism: Ritual, Transcendence, and Social Formations in East Asia

A Special Issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444) belonging to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 6888

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Interests: Confucianism and religiosity; Chinese philosophy; intellectual history of the 20th century

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE)—PSL, 75014 Paris, France
Interests: history of Daoism; Chinese religions
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue proposes reframing Confucianism through the conceptual toolkit of Religious Studies. We believe that Confucianism marks a living sacred presence of its own and a general enquiry of life itself. In this Special Issue, therefore, instead of rehearsing the binary question, “Is Confucianism a religion?”, we take as our starting point the analytical act of religionizing Confucianism: asking what becomes visible, and what is distorted, when Confucian texts, practices, institutions, and imaginaries are examined in terms of ritual, transcendence, sacralization, social organization, and material culture. Our agenda is twofold: first, to produce historically and ethnographically grounded case studies that treat Confucianism as a religious formation in its own right; second, to use these cases to reflect critically on the category of “religion” and its applicability to East Asian traditions.

Within this broad agenda, this Special Issue focuses on four interrelated priorities:

  1. The debate between rujia (Confucian “school”) and rujiao (Confucian “religion”).
  2. Inner transcendence and modes of sacrality in Confucian self-cultivation and ethics.
  3. Confucianism’s interactions with Daoism and Buddhism, especially under the rubric of sanjiao heyi (the unity of the three teachings).
  4. The embedding of Confucianism within local cults, popular practices, civic ritual, art, and materiality.

The first theme revisits the modern and late-imperial negotiations between rujia and rujiao. Rather than treating the distinction as merely terminological, we invite contributions that show how it is tied to missionary critique, statecraft, May Fourth iconoclasm, and contemporary cultural nationalism. How, when, and by whom has Confucianism been framed as a moral philosophy, a state ideology, a civil religion, or a full-fledged “religion” with doctrines, rites, and institutions? By reconstructing these shifting regimes of classification, we hope to clarify how “religionizing” or “de-religionizing” Confucianism has shaped both scholarly discourse and lived practice.

The second theme concerns inner transcendence. Confucianism has often been portrayed as this-worldly and immanent, yet classical, Song–Ming, and modern New Confucian thinkers articulate powerful visions of transformation that exceed ordinary ethical life. We welcome studies of how practices such as ritual propriety, affective attunement, self-reflection, and cosmological resonance generate forms of sacrality without positing a radically otherworldly realm. This invites a reconsideration of transcendence as something that can be enacted within, rather than beyond, the human and social order.

Third, this Special Issue foregrounds the entanglement of Confucianism with Daoism and Buddhism, including doctrinal syntheses and practical accommodations subsumed under sanjiao heyi. Contributions may examine shared ritual repertoires, overlapping pantheons, hybrid temple spaces, and the cross-training of ritual specialists. By following these inter-traditional negotiations, we seek to understand how “Confucian religion” emerges not in isolation but through ongoing exchange, competition, and mutual translation among the three teachings.

Finally, we turn to Confucianism, and its appropriations in local cults, art, and materiality. Here we are interested in lineage and community temples, examination rituals, commemorative shrines, ancestral halls, village altars, and contemporary civic ceremonies that mobilize Confucian symbols, images, and objects. We especially invite studies of visual and material culture: temple architecture, statuary, spirit tablets, ritual implements, sacrificial vessels, didactic murals, calligraphy, printed portraits and sculptures of sages, and digital media that materialize Confucian authority and virtue. How do such material forms and artistic practices transmit Confucian values, structure social relationships, and inscribe sacred geographies in everyday space? Case studies from China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and the global diaspora are especially welcome.

By bringing these four themes into dialogue, the aim of this Special Issue is to refine our understanding of Confucianism as a religious formation and to contribute to broader debates on religion, civil religion, and the interface of ethics, ritual, materiality, and political order.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200–300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors, Prof. Qiyong Guo (qiyong.guo@outlook.com) or Prof. Vincent Goossaert (vincent.goossaert@ephe.psl.eu), and CC the Assistant Editor, Margaret Liu (margaret.liu@mdpi.com), of Religions. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

A tentative deadline:

Deadline for abstract submission: 31 March 2026
Deadline for full manuscript submission: 30 June 2026

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Qiyong Guo
Prof. Dr. Vincent Goossaert
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Confucianism as religion
  • rujia and rujiao
  • inner transcendence
  • sanjiao heyi (unity of three teachings)
  • ritual and social organization
  • local cults and popular religion
  • art, materiality, and sacred space

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 268 KB  
Article
Between Materiality and Sanctity: The Social Construction of the Object System in Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals
by Rongming Hu, Jiangping Liu and Na Jiang
Religions 2026, 17(9), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091065 - 11 Sep 2026
Abstract
This article examines how Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals organizes ritual objects into a relational material system. Focusing on ritual vessels, attire, documents, offerings, ancestral tablets, and domestic spaces, it analyzes how their prescribed positions, uses, relations, and trajectories structure ritual practice. Rather than [...] Read more.
This article examines how Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals organizes ritual objects into a relational material system. Focusing on ritual vessels, attire, documents, offerings, ancestral tablets, and domestic spaces, it analyzes how their prescribed positions, uses, relations, and trajectories structure ritual practice. Rather than treating these objects as passive accessories or isolated symbols, the article argues that their significance emerges from their coordination with bodies, spaces, kinship positions, and sequences of action. Through this coordination, distinctions of kinship, status, obligation, and ritual role become materially perceptible and practically enforceable. The article further argues that the material organization prescribed in Family Rituals was not merely an expression or representation of Confucian ritual order, but one of the mechanisms through which that order was produced, enacted, and reproduced. By reading these heterogeneous objects as an interconnected system, the study shifts attention from the symbolic meaning of individual things to the material relations that made Confucian ethical and ritual order practicable in domestic life. Full article
13 pages, 334 KB  
Article
From “Li (理)–Mind/Nature (心/性)” to “Qi (气)–History (史)”: The Religious Dimension of Wang Fuzhi’s Qi (气)-Centered Confucianism
by Minbo Sun and Zhiwen Zheng
Religions 2026, 17(9), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091036 - 3 Sep 2026
Viewed by 205
Abstract
Contemporary debates over whether Confucianism should be regarded as a religion are often constrained by the Western binary opposition between philosophy and religion. Rather than remaining within this classificatory framework, this article shifts attention to the question of how the religious dimension of [...] Read more.
Contemporary debates over whether Confucianism should be regarded as a religion are often constrained by the Western binary opposition between philosophy and religion. Rather than remaining within this classificatory framework, this article shifts attention to the question of how the religious dimension of Confucianism is concretely grounded and sustained. By comparing the “li (理)–mind/nature (心/性)” paradigm of Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism with Wang Fuzhi’s “qi (气)–history (史)” paradigm, the article argues that the former relies primarily on inward moral experience and the self-cultivation of mind and nature, a mode that can effectively uphold a meaningful order under relatively stable historical conditions. By contrast, in response to the rupture of the Ming-Qing transition, Wang Fuzhi relocates ultimate normativity within the dynamic process of qi (气) transformation and historical practice. Through four interrelated formulations—“li (理) resides in qi (气),” “nature (性) is the principle of life,” “principle is to be pursued in concrete affairs,” and “historical reflection as verification”—he provides moral and value judgments with a stronger grounding in lived reality and historical testing. In this way, Wang effects a significant transformation in the religious dimension of Confucianism, shifting it from a mode of inward justification to one of worldly verification. His thought thus offers a more historically resilient account of how Confucian meaning can endure amid times of profound upheaval. Full article
15 pages, 282 KB  
Article
Jia (家) as a Primordial Phenomenon of Chinese Culture: Confucianism from the Perspective of Philosophical Anthropology
by Sihan Wu
Religions 2026, 17(9), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091021 - 28 Aug 2026
Viewed by 262
Abstract
Faced with the crisis of self-orientation brought about by modernity, some Chinese scholars in recent years have taken jia 家 (family/home) as a core element of Confucian thought to construct a philosophy. This outlook seeks to open a possible path out of the [...] Read more.
Faced with the crisis of self-orientation brought about by modernity, some Chinese scholars in recent years have taken jia 家 (family/home) as a core element of Confucian thought to construct a philosophy. This outlook seeks to open a possible path out of the predicament supported by Chinese cultural tradition. In this paper, we employ philosophical anthropology as a methodological platform, using the concept of the primordial phenomenon as its primary analytical tool to demonstrate that jia is the primordial phenomenon in Confucian thought, thereby articulating the fundamental differences between Chinese and Western cultures. By comparing Heidegger’s and Levinas’s discussions of the home, this paper shows that jia as a primordial phenomenon overturns the presupposition of mineness (Jemeinigkeit) in fundamental ontology and re-conceives the human being as a non-punctiform structural being, namely Jia-sein. Moreover, the two fundamental kinds of experience within jia, intimate experience and transcendental experience, reveal jia as a unified field of tension that transcends the opposition between interiority and exteriority, whereby sheng-sheng 生生 (life begetting life) is interpreted as a principle of transcendence. The world disclosed by jia is an affective cosmos grounded in the primordial trust inherent in qinqin 亲亲 (familial love) and situated in a positive fundamental mood—thus, it is an existential space that remains open to the Other and to the co-existence of the self and Other. This paper concludes that jia is a primordial phenomenon of Chinese culture; its emphasis on integration means it has never appeared in the Western intellectual tradition, which begins with separation; therefore, jia is an untranslatable concept. Full article
10 pages, 310 KB  
Article
Moral Vigilance Before Heaven: Sindok and Moral Responsibility in Jeong Yak-yong’s Confucian Thought
by Yunjeong Lee
Religions 2026, 17(9), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091011 - 26 Aug 2026
Viewed by 207
Abstract
This article examines Jeong Yak-yong’s reinterpretation of sindok 愼獨 as moral responsibility before Heaven. It argues that hidden intention, Heaven’s scrutiny, admonition through the moral mind, human response, sincerity, and conduct form a single structure of responsibility. Comparison with Zhu Xi shows that [...] Read more.
This article examines Jeong Yak-yong’s reinterpretation of sindok 愼獨 as moral responsibility before Heaven. It argues that hidden intention, Heaven’s scrutiny, admonition through the moral mind, human response, sincerity, and conduct form a single structure of responsibility. Comparison with Zhu Xi shows that Jeong does not discover an inward meaning of du 獨 absent from Neo-Confucianism. His distinctiveness lies in the personal and sovereign character given to Heaven and in the way Heaven’s admonition is mediated through the moral mind. Heaven is presented not as an abstract norm but as a spiritually lucid presence that sees hidden intention, commands and cautions, and is served with reverence; yet its demand becomes known within the agent and does not determine the response. This double structure exemplifies inner transcendence: moral authority exceeds the empirical self while becoming inwardly accessible in cultivation. The article thereby distinguishes Jeong’s account from secular moral self-regulation and from a modern notion of conscience. It also acknowledges possible Christian resonances without equating Sangje 上帝 with the Christian God or reducing Jeong’s argument to Catholic influence. Full article
15 pages, 362 KB  
Article
Jigan and Jizhao: The Convergence of Yi Learning of Song Dynasty and Sinicized Buddhism
by Menghang Yang and Kuifeng Zhai
Religions 2026, 17(8), 968; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17080968 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 327
Abstract
Jigan (寂感), derived from the Book of Changes, which states “when remaining in serene stillness without stirring, it attains universal penetration once stirred by resonance (jiran budong ganer suitong 寂然不動感而遂通).” It describes the profound subtlety of the Zhouyi. On the [...] Read more.
Jigan (寂感), derived from the Book of Changes, which states “when remaining in serene stillness without stirring, it attains universal penetration once stirred by resonance (jiran budong ganer suitong 寂然不動感而遂通).” It describes the profound subtlety of the Zhouyi. On the other hand, Jizhao (寂照) is a Sinicized Buddhist interpretation denoting the non-dual integration of true suchness and prajñā wisdom. Jigan developed into an ontological framework during the Song Dynasty (960–1279), while jizhao took shape during the Wei-Jin period. Philosophically, both manifest a non-dual substance-function structure “quiescence as resonance” and “quiescence as illumination.” They jointly serve as the foundational model for mind-nature cultivation and spiritual transcendence. From this theory of cultivation, however, divergent spiritual aspirations of Confucianism and Buddhism. Confucianism elucidates the principle of universal oneness of all things through quietude-resonance, pursuing the spiritual realm of sagehood. By contrast, Buddhism penetrates through self-attachment and dharma-attachment via quiescent illumination, thereby detaching from all karmic conditions, and manifests Prajñā. Confucianism integrates the practice of jigan into its ritual education, sacrificial ceremonies and daily disciplinary norms, rendering it a practical pathway for sustaining the cosmic-ethical order and generating ritual authority. Buddhism implements jizhao in meditation, precepts, and monastic life, constructing an enlightenment-oriented sacred community. Jigan and jizhao represent two distinct paths of religious transformation and spiritual attainment. This paper compares how both emanate from the ontological state of “serene stillness without stirring” into practical cultivation manifested as “resonance penetrating all things” or “simultaneity of illumination and function”, and ultimately shape divergent modes of sacredness and forms of social integration. While jigan and jizhao reveal a structural convergence in the cultivation theories of Confucianism and Buddhism, they also demonstrate disparate orientations in their spiritual aspirations. Full article
21 pages, 548 KB  
Article
The Evolution of Confucian Belief in Ghosts, Spirits, and Sacrificial Culture: The Pre-Qin and Song–Ming Periods
by Han Lu and Peng Peng
Religions 2026, 17(8), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17080888 - 26 Jul 2026
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Belief in ghosts, spirits, and sacrificial culture is important in the Confucian tradition. Across different periods, Confucian interpretations have changed. Pre-Qin Confucianism distanced itself from earlier wu-shi 巫史 (shaman) culture, remaining agnostic about whether ghosts and spirits possess supernatural powers to govern national [...] Read more.
Belief in ghosts, spirits, and sacrificial culture is important in the Confucian tradition. Across different periods, Confucian interpretations have changed. Pre-Qin Confucianism distanced itself from earlier wu-shi 巫史 (shaman) culture, remaining agnostic about whether ghosts and spirits possess supernatural powers to govern national prosperity or personal fate. In governance and social practice, it prioritized human agency over the authority of ghosts and spirits, marginalizing their influence. While affirming the didactic function of sacrifice, Pre-Qin Confucians venerated ghosts and spirits but insisted on “ji er bu qi” (祭而不祈, “sacrificing without supplication”). Song–Ming Confucianism, responding to challenges from Buddhism and Daoism, reinterpreted these concepts and understood ghosts and spirits in terms of qi (氣, ether), framing them as the contraction and expansion of “qi” (“qi zhi qu shen”, 氣之屈伸). They did not recognize the independent existence, sentience, or supernatural powers of ghosts and spirits. Because the qi of ancestors and the living are identical, communication with ghosts and spirits could be established during ancestral worship. They favored sacrifice to ghosts and spirits but criticized the Buddhist practice of making images of them. In summary, Pre-Qin and Song–Ming Confucianism offered different explanations for why ghosts and spirits should be venerated and the relationship between sacrifice and blessings. These interpretations, shaped by efforts to distinguish themselves from wu-shi traditions and Buddhist–Daoist doctrines, reveal differences and contradictions between the two major phases of Confucian thought. Both, however, shared the aim of negating shamanistic practices and countering heterodoxy. Full article
22 pages, 439 KB  
Article
Ancestral Belief and Deification of Fishermen in the Taihu Lake Region of China: The Case of Xianfeng Belief
by Zhaoyuan Qiu and Qianwei He
Religions 2026, 17(8), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17080883 - 25 Jul 2026
Viewed by 600
Abstract
This article examines the ancestral belief system of fishermen in the Taihu Lake region through the worship of Xianfeng 先锋 (lit. “forerunner”). Existing studies of Taihu fishermen’s beliefs have primarily provided general descriptions of fishing communities, while the formation, transmission, social functions, and [...] Read more.
This article examines the ancestral belief system of fishermen in the Taihu Lake region through the worship of Xianfeng 先锋 (lit. “forerunner”). Existing studies of Taihu fishermen’s beliefs have primarily provided general descriptions of fishing communities, while the formation, transmission, social functions, and contemporary transformation of Xianfeng belief remain insufficiently examined. Drawing on textual analysis and ethnographic fieldwork, this article addresses this gap by exploring how Xianfeng belief has been sustained through the tradition of ritual specialists (Tangmen Taibao 堂门太保) and transformed from family-based ancestor worship into a community-wide protective practice through rituals such as incense pilgrimages and incense association rites. In doing so, it reconstructs the developmental trajectory of Xianfeng belief and provides a representative case for understanding the religious transformation of the rapidly disappearing fishing communities in the Taihu Lake region, while contributing to a broader discussion of religious change in China’s waterborne societies. Full article
17 pages, 409 KB  
Article
Ontological Actuality and Sacred Actualization: Reconstructing Cheng (誠/成) and the Limits of “Religionizing” Confucianism in the Republican-Era Zhengshi Corpus
by Yixuan Jin
Religions 2026, 17(7), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17070833 - 13 Jul 2026
Viewed by 456
Abstract
The Republican-era Zhengshi 證釋 corpus, comprising the Yijing, Zhongyong, and Daxue Zhengshi produced through the spirit-writing of the Jiushi Xinjiao 救世新教 community, arose from the institutional, epistemological, and existential collapse of classical Confucian learning under modernity. At its center is a [...] Read more.
The Republican-era Zhengshi 證釋 corpus, comprising the Yijing, Zhongyong, and Daxue Zhengshi produced through the spirit-writing of the Jiushi Xinjiao 救世新教 community, arose from the institutional, epistemological, and existential collapse of classical Confucian learning under modernity. At its center is a reconstruction of Cheng (誠/成 ontological actuality and sacred actualization) as the identity between the primordial generative ground (Qianyuan 乾元) and its actualization in the return of all things to their source. What Tu Weiming’s inner transcendence leaves open, and what the dominant Song-Ming trajectories did not supply, is a concrete ontological mechanism by which transcendence is encountered not as a philosophical postulate but as a ground within the practitioner’s own existence. The Zhengshi reconstruction supplies it. The Jiushi Xinjiao community’s distinction between transformative teaching (jiao 教化) and institutional religion constitutes an implicit critique of the “religionizing Confucianism” framework: the sacrality at work here arises from the practitioner’s encounter with the primordial ground rather than from religion, an encounter that belongs to the very constitution of human existence. Full article
19 pages, 402 KB  
Article
Religionizing and De-Religionizing Confucianism—Joseph Levenson’s Conceptual Framing in Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy
by Zhenhao Zhong and Chaoyong Zhao
Religions 2026, 17(7), 747; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17070747 - 23 Jun 2026
Viewed by 495
Abstract
This article reconsiders Joseph Levenson’s Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy (hereafter Trilogy) as a modern site for the classification of Confucianism within, against, and alongside the category of religion. Rather than revisiting the question of whether Confucianism “is” a [...] Read more.
This article reconsiders Joseph Levenson’s Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy (hereafter Trilogy) as a modern site for the classification of Confucianism within, against, and alongside the category of religion. Rather than revisiting the question of whether Confucianism “is” a religion, we ask how Levenson’s account makes Confucianism legible through a double movement of de-religionization and partial religionization. On the one hand, Levenson presents Confucianism as an ethical, political, and civilizational order rather than a religion in the doctrinal or ecclesiastical sense; on the other hand, his analysis repeatedly invokes forms of sacralized authority, symbolic centrality, and moral transcendence that complicate any simple secularization of the Confucian tradition. Through a close reading of Levenson’s conceptual vocabulary and historical framing, this article argues that his interpretation does not merely deny Confucianism religious status; it reveals the instability of the modern classificatory boundary between moral philosophy, civil religion, and religious formation. By treating Levenson not simply as an interpreter of Confucian China but also as a producer of modern categories, the article contributes to current debates on rujia (Confucian “school”, 儒家) and rujiao (Confucian “religion”, 儒教) and reflects more broadly on what becomes visible, and what is distorted, when Confucianism is examined through the conceptual toolkit of religious studies. Full article
35 pages, 37044 KB  
Article
Ethnic Interaction and Cultural Integration: The Migration History of the Liuyang Kong Clan and the Construction of the Consciousness of the Community of the Chinese Nation
by Chenyue Zhu, Hao Yuan, Ruoyu Wang and Xubin Xie
Religions 2026, 17(6), 727; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17060727 - 17 Jun 2026
Viewed by 1250
Abstract
Taking the Liuyang branch of the Kong Clan in Hunan as a case study, this article examines how a migrant lineage associated with Confucian orthodoxy adapted to a heterogeneous local society and gradually transformed lineage identity into a broader sense of communal and [...] Read more.
Taking the Liuyang branch of the Kong Clan in Hunan as a case study, this article examines how a migrant lineage associated with Confucian orthodoxy adapted to a heterogeneous local society and gradually transformed lineage identity into a broader sense of communal and national belonging. Drawing on fieldwork, genealogies, local gazetteers, temple inscriptions, and interviews, this study traces three connected processes. First, the clan used its recognized status as descendants of Confucius to obtain institutional protection, including tax and corvée exemptions, which helped stabilize population growth and local authority. Second, the Dahu Family Temple, sacrificial music, ritual dance, genealogy-airing practices, and modern clan activities show how Qufu-centered ritual codes were reworked through Huxiang architectural, musical, agricultural, and social rhythms. Third, in the modern period, practical statecraft, education, and revolutionary memory redirected lineage ethics from exclusive descent toward public responsibility. The case demonstrates that the consciousness of the Chinese national community can be generated at the grassroots level through the interaction of state institutions, local cultural adaptation, embodied ritual practice, and the reorientation of kinship memory toward inclusive patriotism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 357 KB  
Article
Reproducing Confucian Patriarchy in Korean Mask Dance (Gamyeon-Geuk): Critical Discourse and Gender Analysis of Hahoe and Bongsan Talchum
by Chia-I Hou
Religions 2026, 17(6), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17060656 - 29 May 2026
Viewed by 657
Abstract
This article examines how Confucianism becomes religionized through ritual performance in Korean mask dance drama (gamyeon-geuk), focusing on Hahoe Byeolsingut Talnori and Bongsan Talchum. It argues that these performances should not be understood only as folk entertainment or carnivalesque satire, but [...] Read more.
This article examines how Confucianism becomes religionized through ritual performance in Korean mask dance drama (gamyeon-geuk), focusing on Hahoe Byeolsingut Talnori and Bongsan Talchum. It argues that these performances should not be understood only as folk entertainment or carnivalesque satire, but as ritualized forms that mediate divine and ancestral witnessing, communal publicity, and gendered moral evaluation. Within this ritual horizon, laughter, music, embodied movement, masks, props, and stage choreography distribute authority, visibility, speaking positions, and standards of judgment. Methodologically, the study employs multimodal critical discourse analysis of contemporary full-length performance recordings, treating language, movement, staging, costume, props, and audience response as an integrated semiotic field. Across both repertoires, female figures are repeatedly configured as silent or constrained speaking subjects, as visible carriers of moral disorder, or as expendable intermediaries within marital and status hierarchies, while male characters more consistently occupy positions of interpretation, judgment, and ritual agency. By foregrounding ritualized spectatorship as a process of moral common-sense production, the article contributes to debates on Confucianism as lived religion and shows how performance can stage critique while reauthorizing Confucian patriarchal order. Full article
Back to TopTop