Meaning-Making Coping, Health and Crisis

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 August 2020) | Viewed by 3078

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Psychology, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Although there is a large body of literature examining how people cope with different serious crises, the effects of contextual parameters, among others culture, and ways of thinking have not been seriously taken into consideration.

In the last two decades, researchers have found significant relations (both negative and positive) between religious and spiritual and existential variables and different crisis. We have also witnessed a growing interest in studying the role of culture in coping. In this regard, attention is directed towards studying not only religious people, but also individuals who are either nonbelievers or who, if they are believers, do not consider themselves as religious people, i.e., religion is not an important part of their life; in other words, the focus is turning to studying people in societies in which the dominant culture and ways of thinking do not leave much scope for religion to play an important role in people’s lives. This issue is rarely taken before into consideration in the research area of coping. An important question to pose in these studies is: What role do meaning-making existential coping and religion and spiritual-oriented coping play in dealing with crisis among theists, non-theists or atheist people? And what is the role of culture and ways of thinking in the choice of these meaning-making coping methods? To answer these questions, there is need for sociologically, psychologically as well as clinically relevant studies to advance research in this area by focusing on the cultural perspective. This Special Issue attempts to meet such a need.

The purpose of this special issue is to present international studies on meaning-making coping among people who have been affected by a crisis; this is in order to understand the influence of culture on the use of these methods. The term “meaning-making coping” is used to describe the coping methods related to existential questions, i.e., the whole spectrum of religious, spiritual (religious–spiritual and not religious–spiritual) and existential coping methods.

The ideal submission will be grounded in key research, close reading, or case studies that opes to broader observations concerning meaning-making coping.

Prof. Fereshteh Ahmadi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 2642 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Survey Study on Meaning-Making Coping among Cancer Patients in Turkey
by Önver A. Cetrez, Fereshteh Ahmadi and Pelin Erbil
Religions 2020, 11(6), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060284 - 10 Jun 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2793
Abstract
(1) Background: The role of culture in secular, spiritual, and religious coping methods is important, but needs more attention in research. The aim has been to (1) investigate the meaning-making coping methods among cancer patients in Turkey and (2) whether there were differences [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The role of culture in secular, spiritual, and religious coping methods is important, but needs more attention in research. The aim has been to (1) investigate the meaning-making coping methods among cancer patients in Turkey and (2) whether there were differences in two separate samples (compared to Study 2, Study 1 had a younger age group, was more educated, and grew up in a big city), (3) paying specific attention to gender, age, education, and area of residence. (2) Methods: Quantitative study using a convenience sampling in two time periods, Study 1 (n = 94) and Study 2 (n = 57). (3) Results: In Study 2, there is a significant increase in several religious and spiritual coping strategies. Additionally, there is a positive correlation between being a woman and using more religious or spiritual coping strategies. Secular meaning-making coping strategies also increase significantly in Study 2. The results confirmed the hypotheses for gender, educational, and age differences in seeking support from religious leaders. The results also confirmed the hypotheses for gender and educational level in a punishing God reappraisal and demonic reappraisal. (4) Conclusions: As Turkey is a country at the junction of strong religiosity and deep-rooted secularism, dividing up the meaning-making coping methods into the religious and spiritual, on one hand, and the secular, on the other, reveals interesting results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Meaning-Making Coping, Health and Crisis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop