Intersections of Religiousness/Spirituality and Forgiveness and Implications for Mental Health and Well-Being

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2025 | Viewed by 2618

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland
Interests: religious coping; spiritual well-being; ultimate meaning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Luther College, Decorah, IA 52101, USA
Interests: psychology of forgiveness; psycho-rheumatology; psycho-oncology; chronic illnesses; integrative medicine; rehabilitation psychology and medicine; evidence-based chaplaincy; stress and coping

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, 25-029 Kielce, Poland
Interests: forgiveness; well-being; marital relationship
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue is focused on forgiveness, religiosity, and mental health. The WHO states that mental health enables individuals to realize their potential, manage stress, and be productive. Forgiveness—defined as a prosocial change in thoughts, emotions, motivations, and behaviour—allows us to move from negative states and stress responses to neutral or even positive states that are relevant to mental health (Griffin et al., 2015). However, religiosity is generally acknowledged as an individual's personal perception and attitude towards God and the supernatural, which is demonstrated in their thoughts, beliefs, feelings, and behaviours (Golan, 2006), helping people to cope with stress and find meaning in life.

As previous research has demonstrated, both forgiveness and religiosity may be important for mental health. For example, forgiveness may be one of the predictors associated with greater psychological well-being (Kaleta & Mróz, 2018) and productivity in work (Toussaint et al., 2018), and fewer symptoms associated with depression, anxiety (Wade et al., 2014), and insomnia (Iverno et al., 2022). Moreover, religiosity (conceptualized in different ways) is linked to aspects of mental health, such as fewer post-traumatic stress symptoms (Toussaint et al., 2023), less suicidal tendencies (VanderWeele et al., 2016), substance abuse (Yonker et al., 2012), and higher life satisfaction (Sholihin et al., 2022). Therefore, forgiveness, religiosity, and mental health may be topics of interest for many professionals who seek predictors of optimal psychological functioning.

This Special Issue aims to provide an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical and empirical examples of current research, with an aim to search for links between forgiveness and mental health. 

Potential topics include the following:

  • Forgiveness and well-being;
  • Religiosity and well-being;
  • Trauma and forgiveness;
  • Forgiveness, religiosity, and depression;
  • Self-forgiveness and mental health;
  • Forgiveness therapy;
  • Forgiveness and PTSD;
  • Religious perspectives on forgiveness;
  • Faith as a mediator between forgiveness and mental health;
  • Religious practices, religious commitment, and mental health;
  • Religious coping and PTG;
  • Forgiveness as a mediator between religiousness and mental health;
  • Divine forgiveness, religiousness/spirituality, and mental health;
  • Forgiveness psychoeducation and mental health,
  • Religious aspects of decisional and emotional forgiveness and mental health,
  • Religiousness/spirituality, stress-and-coping theory of forgiveness and mental health,
  • Relational spirituality model of forgiveness and mental health.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Justyna Mróz
Prof. Dr. Loren Toussaint
Dr. Kinga Kaleta
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • forgiveness
  • mental health
  • well-being
  • self-forgiveness
  • personal resources
  • faith
  • religiosity
  • trauma

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 835 KiB  
Article
Association between Religiosity and Forgiveness: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model of Self-Compassion and Adverse Childhood Experiences
by Justyna Mróz, Loren Toussaint and Kinga Kaleta
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091137 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1126
Abstract
(1) Background: Forgiveness is one way to deal with negative experiences. The protective–protective model and the resource-caravan model assume that positive resources come together and support coping. In this study, we tested the association of religiosity, decisional and emotional forgiveness, and the indirect [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Forgiveness is one way to deal with negative experiences. The protective–protective model and the resource-caravan model assume that positive resources come together and support coping. In this study, we tested the association of religiosity, decisional and emotional forgiveness, and the indirect associations running through self-compassion. In addition, negative experiences in childhood were considered as a moderator of the indirect model of associations. (2) Methods: The sample consisted of 309 participants. The measures included the Religious Meaning System Questionnaire, the Decisional Forgiveness Scale, the Emotional Forgiveness Scale, the Self-Compassion Scale, and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. SEM and PROCESS models were applied to test the moderated mediation model. (3) Results: The results partially supported our moderated mediation model. Self-warmth mediated the associations between religiosity and decisional forgiveness and between religiosity and emotional forgiveness—presence of positive emotions. Self-coldness mediated the relationship between religiosity and emotional forgiveness. The relationship between religiosity and forgiveness was fully mediated by self-compassion when ACEs were low. (4) Conclusions: Both religiosity and self-compassion are assets for forgiveness, and their influence is more pronounced in individuals with more negative childhood experiences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 784 KiB  
Article
Pathways to Flourishing: The Roles of Self- and Divine Forgiveness in Mitigating the Adverse Effects of Stress and Substance Use among Adults in Trinidad and Tobago
by Sebastian Binyamin Skalski-Bednarz, Jon R. Webb, Colwick M. Wilson, Loren L. Toussaint, Janusz Surzykiewicz, Sandra D. Reid, David R. Williams and Everett L. Worthington, Jr.
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1060; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091060 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1013
Abstract
The present study focused on the roles of self-forgiveness and feeling divine forgiveness in mitigating the adverse effects of stress on substance use cravings in Trinidad and Tobago. We assessed 869 individuals (62 percent of whom were women) through self-report online questionnaires. A [...] Read more.
The present study focused on the roles of self-forgiveness and feeling divine forgiveness in mitigating the adverse effects of stress on substance use cravings in Trinidad and Tobago. We assessed 869 individuals (62 percent of whom were women) through self-report online questionnaires. A moderation analysis using the PROCESS macro and a bootstrapping strategy (N = 5000) revealed that greater levels of self-forgiveness weakened the positive relationship between stress and substance use cravings, though the relationship remained significant. This moderating effect was evident only when individuals reported high levels of feeling divine forgiveness. The findings suggest that both forms of forgiveness lessen the impact of stress on substance use cravings, highlighting their potential as protective factors and underscoring the importance of incorporating religious and spiritual dimensions into psychological education and intervention. However, the study’s cross-sectional nature makes it difficult to make causal inferences, indicating a need for longitudinal research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop