Islam in South Asia in a Modern Age 1707-1947: Theology and Ethics in Historical Perspective

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 3014

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5677, USA
Interests: global religion and human development; classical and modern Islamic thought

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of History, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Interests: the intersection between religion and peace; Islamic tradition; colonialism and post-colonialism; Islamic theosophy and representations of Muslims in film

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This special edition of Religions calls for papers on modern Islamic thought in South Asia relating to the theme of historical reflections on theology and its entanglement with ethics. In particular, the editors seek scholarly pieces that highlight the diverse and multifaceted ways that Muslims have conceived of their changing relationship with the Islamic tradition before and during the rise of the British presence in South Asia. This will show how Islamic thought was already in flux before colonialism, as well as how colonial modernity virulently transformed and shaped traditional discourses already in motion. These contributions should deal with the diversity of Muslim traditions within the subcontinent, as well as changing conceptions of the self. Contributors should focus on what “Islam” meant for the subjects of their contributions and how—and against whom—did Muslims define their identity and construe ideas related to religion, politics, and society. Of particular interest are the kinds of ethics and traditional mores that inspired Muslims to affirm, protest or debate specific kinds of violence, inequity, and injustice.

Within the theological polemics that form the limits of discourse among Muslim scholars in South Asia, this issue of Religions tries to grapple with the ethical stakes of certain theological arguments. What kind of ethics came into being with the rise of new challenges, and how did scholars theorize the formation of an ideal Muslim deploying theological discourse in addressing those challenges? What kind of new institutions and technologies gave rise to novel ways of conceiving of Muslimness? We ask our contributors to outline the specific historical changes that accompanied what is typically seen as an unchanging “traditional” Islamic thought. We ask authors to think beyond the dichotomy of traditionalist versus modernist. How did Muslims use resources such as legal opinions (fatwa), Prophetic sayings (hadith), Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), Sufism (tasawwuf) and literary discourses to address relevant topics? Authors should pay specific attention to the affirmation or alteration of the discursive tools and methods employed, which in turn impacted their tradition.

Both within their own communities as well as their interactions within a wider socio-political milieu, Muslim conceptions of Islamic knowledge set the framework for their engagement with “Others” in a rapidly globalizing world from the 18th century onwards. At the level of historical analysis, how did differences between Islamic and European conceptions of self, religion, and political theology form the contours of Muslim agency in colonial modernity? This can include the assumption of Orientalist tropes by Muslims themselves, their subversion of and resistance to colonial imposition, or even the development of intra-faith sectarian relations. Muslims in South Asia shaped new intellectual discourses to respond to modern challenges in the intellectual dialects of their own traditions. This Special Issue attempts to trace with historical specificity the actions and reactions of Muslim subjects as they navigated their entrance into broader conversations about the self, other, and their relationship with knowledge.

This Special Issue will try to capture a broad range of Islamic responses to modernity in South Asia that simultaneously feature the diversity of individuals and communities. These responses reckon with many issues such as continuity and change, the revival and reform of tradition, and the coexistence of the categories of traditional, modern and various other permutations of being Muslim.

Prospective contributors please inquire with an abstract under 300 words by 30 November, 2022(The paper submission deadline is 30 June, 2023). Articles should be between 8000 and 10000 words in length. 

Prof. Dr. Ebrahim Moosa
Guest Editor

Khan Shairani
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Islam
  • modernity
  • Deoband
  • Barelvi
  • Salafi
  • feminism
  • Islamic ethics
  • Islamic law
  • tradition
  • Ahl-i-hadith
  • colonialism
  • British India

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

30 pages, 363 KiB  
Article
Monotheistic Hindus, Idolatrous Muslims: Muḥammad Qāsim Nānautvī, Dayānanda Sarasvatī, and the Theological Roots of Hindu–Muslim Conflict in South Asia
by Fuad S. Naeem
Religions 2025, 16(2), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020256 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 950
Abstract
Contrary to popular notions of a perpetual antagonism between ‘Hinduism’ and ‘Islam’, played out on Indian soil over the centuries, this article examines the relatively recent origins of a Hindu–Muslim conflict in South Asia, situating it in the reconfigurations of ‘religion’ and religious [...] Read more.
Contrary to popular notions of a perpetual antagonism between ‘Hinduism’ and ‘Islam’, played out on Indian soil over the centuries, this article examines the relatively recent origins of a Hindu–Muslim conflict in South Asia, situating it in the reconfigurations of ‘religion’ and religious identity that occurred under British colonial rule in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The multivalent and somewhat fluid categories of religious identification found in pre-modern India gave way to much more rigid and oppositional modern and colonial epistemic categories. While much has been written on how colonial policies and incipient Hindu and Muslim nationalisms shaped the contours of modern Hindu–Muslim conflict, little work has been done on the important role religious actors like Muslim and Hindu scholars and reformers played in shaping the discourse around what constituted Hinduism and Islam, and the relationship between the two, in the modern period. This study examines the first-known public theological debates between a Hindu scholar and a Muslim scholar, respectively, Swami Dayānanda Sarasvatī (1824–1883), founder of the reformist Arya Samaj and first exponent of a Hindu polemic against other religions, and Mawlānā Muḥammad Qāsim Nānautvī (1832–1880), co-founder of the seminary at Deoband and an important exponent of Islamic theological apologetics in modern South Asia, and how they helped shape oppositional modern Hindu and Muslim religious theologies. A key argument that Nānautvī contended with was Dayānanda’s claim that Islam is idolatrous, based on the contention that Muslims worship the Ka’ba, and thus, it is not a monotheistic religion, Hinduism alone being so. The terms of this debate show how polemics around subjects like monotheism and idolatry introduced by Christian missionaries under colonial rule were internalized, as were broader colonial epistemic categories, and developed a life of their own amongst Indians themselves, thus resulting in new oppositional religious identities, replacing more complex and nuanced interactions between Muslims and followers of Indian religions in the pre-modern period. Full article
13 pages, 675 KiB  
Article
Shāh Walī Allāh Dihlawi (d. 1762): The Hajj Journey and Intellectual Scholarship Between India and Arabia
by Khan Shairani
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1378; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111378 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1272
Abstract
Rather than simply claiming the “unorthodox” or “pluralistic” mindset of an early modern Muslim thinker, this intellectual micro-history aims to show the complexity of Shāh Walī Allāh’s (d. 1762) thought-world. This article follows him to Mecca and Medina for the Hajj pilgrimage. While [...] Read more.
Rather than simply claiming the “unorthodox” or “pluralistic” mindset of an early modern Muslim thinker, this intellectual micro-history aims to show the complexity of Shāh Walī Allāh’s (d. 1762) thought-world. This article follows him to Mecca and Medina for the Hajj pilgrimage. While pilgrimage is traditionally included in the fundaments of Islamic practice, it is also important to realize that the majority of Muslims have not historically participated in this pilgrimage. Due to the physical limitations of travelling as the Muslim community rapidly expanded in the 7th century onwards, we have nearly a thousand years until the 18th century where only a select few Muslims, usually wealthy enough to make the arduous journey, participated in the yearly practice. This created a complex culture of pilgrims in the Holy Cities with the cities functioning as informal circles of scholarship. Shāh Walī Allāh Dihlawī engages in this knowledge production process while carrying out the mandatory rituals associated with the Hajj pilgrimage. Thus, this article shows that the complex interplay of Walī Allāh with Meccan and Medinan scholars is a highly dynamic process with unexpected outcomes as specific sacred geography interacts with the conceptual (and genealogical) categories that scholarly pilgrims bring with them to this intellectual encounter. In doing so, we catch a glimpse of the 18th century through a very particular set of Indian Sufi eyes. Full article
Back to TopTop