Religion and the Public Sphere: Revisiting the Boundaries of Theory and Practice in a Postsecular Age

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2025) | Viewed by 4444

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
William Temple Professor of Religion and Public Life, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK
Interests: religion; belief; decolonialism; postsecularity; urban theory; policy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent Scholar, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Interests: human geography; urban futures; critical theory; decoloniality; reflexive secularization; humanism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Our edition explores the rapidly evolving role of religion, spirituality and belief in society from several different critical, theoretical, disciplinary and cultural perspectives. Particular attention gets paid to contemporary debates on religion and intersectionality (Singh 2015) and decoloniality (Yountae 2024) including their framings in historical, spatial, sociological, theological and religious studies disciplines.

A central question therefore posed by this special edition concerns the enduring intellectual purchase, or otherwise, of the notion of postsecularity (Mendieta 2018, Beaumont 2018, Ratti, 2012, Cloke, Baker et al., 2019) for grasping religion in the public sphere.

In the absence of a confident and coherent secular narrative for human and global futures, an emerging consensus indicates that religion, spirituality and belief find themselves re-entering the public spheres of late modernity at different scales, revalorized as much sought after sources of reflexive meaning-making and political solidarity. While characteristic of systems in the West, a question mark hangs over the efficacy of this revalorization outside the colonial, Christian Western nexus.

Our case studies and narratives suggest that religious-inspired actors and institutions are often increasingly confident curators in many areas of emancipatory social change. This progressivism endures despite attempts by other religious and non-religious actors to dismiss, bypass or control these changes through regressive, authoritarian populisms in public spheres around the world.

The implications and geographical articulation of this new visibility of religion in the public sphere are unclear. What’s certain is the need to construct a new theory of social change and political philosophy that critically interrogates and better understands the evolving boundaries between the religious and the secular in more dynamic, reflexive and interconnected ways.

Our special edition seeks clarity on these shifts from the perspective of the following vectors of inquiry.

(1) The unprecedented series of political, economic and social traumas – associated with COVID-19, the rise in violent warfare, growing poverty and inequality, climate change – reconfigure perspectives on religion and belief in public life.

(2) Simple readings of headline statistics of religious growth or decline fail to capture the nuanced and complex ways boundaries between the religious and secular are redrawn at a micro-public and locality level with implications for those margins at other scales.

(3) As the world becomes more urban and global levels of religious affiliation broadly defined remain high, spatial and material relations between the religious and the urban become increasingly central.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References:

Beaumont, J. (ed.) (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity, first hardback edition, 2020 paperback, London/ New York: Routledge.

Cloke, P., Baker, C., Sutherland, C. and A. Williams (2019) Geographies of Postsecularity: Re-envisioning Politics, Subjectivity and Ethics, London: Routledge.

Mendieta. E. (2018) ‘The axial age, social evolution, and postsecular consciousness’, Critical Research on Religion, 6(3): 289-308.

Ratti, M. (2012). The Postsecular Imagination: Postcolonialism, Religion, and Literature (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203071793.

Singh J. (2015) Religious Agency and the Limits of Intersectionality. Hypatia;30(4):657-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12182.

Yountae A. (2024) The Coloniality of the Secular: Race, Religion, and Poetics of World-Making, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Prof. Dr. Christopher Baker
Dr. Justin Beaumont
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion
  • spirituality
  • belief
  • postsecular
  • urbanisation
  • decolonial
  • intersectionality
  • activism
  • solidarity
  • politics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Religion in the Russian National Security System: An Ontological Security Perspective and the Problem of the (De)Secularisation of Putin’s Russia
by Marcin Składanowski
Religions 2025, 16(6), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060762 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 432
Abstract
This article examines the role of religion in Russia’s national security system through the lens of ontological security, assessing whether contemporary Russia is undergoing a process of desecularisation or, conversely, an intensified form of secularisation. Employing the theoretical framework of ontological security, this [...] Read more.
This article examines the role of religion in Russia’s national security system through the lens of ontological security, assessing whether contemporary Russia is undergoing a process of desecularisation or, conversely, an intensified form of secularisation. Employing the theoretical framework of ontological security, this study argues that Russia’s securitisation of religion serves as a mechanism for consolidating state control, legitimising authoritarian governance, and constructing a distinct civilisational identity in opposition to Western liberalism. The Russian Orthodox Church, rather than functioning as an autonomous religious institution, has been absorbed into the state apparatus, where it operates as an instrument of state ideology. Religious rhetoric permeates Russian strategic security documents, reinforcing narratives of national exceptionalism, historical continuity, and moral superiority, particularly in justifying Russia’s geopolitical ambitions and military actions, including its war against Ukraine. The analysis challenges prevailing interpretations of religious resurgence in Russia, arguing that the increasing presence of religion in public life does not necessarily signify desecularisation. Instead, the instrumentalisation of religion for political and security purposes suggests a process of extreme secularisation, wherein religious institutions lose their autonomy and doctrinal substance, becoming tools of state power. Full article
22 pages, 462 KiB  
Article
Sevā as a Postcapitalist Model for Environmental and Collective Well-Being in the Postsecular Age
by Michal Erlich and Ricki Levi
Religions 2025, 16(6), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060761 - 12 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 476
Abstract
This paper analyzes the Hindu concept of sevā—selfless service—as a theo-ethical practice that reconfigures the relationship between religion and economy, offering a snapshot of an Indian perspective on the convergence between postsecularism and postcapitalist discourses. Rather than being reducible to acts of [...] Read more.
This paper analyzes the Hindu concept of sevā—selfless service—as a theo-ethical practice that reconfigures the relationship between religion and economy, offering a snapshot of an Indian perspective on the convergence between postsecularism and postcapitalist discourses. Rather than being reducible to acts of charity, sevā integrates spiritual, ethical, and social dimensions that challenge the neoliberal emphasis on individual self-interest and material accumulation. Rooted in the pursuit of liberation and relational well-being, sevā frames economic and moral agency in terms of embeddedness, reciprocity, and care. To illustrate sevā’s unique attributes, the paper engages with two case studies. The first explores Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy, where sevā is articulated through a non-anthropocentric ethic of nonviolence (ahiṃsā), obliging the reconstruction of eco-economic mechanisms and environmental responsibility. The second examines contemporary guru-bhakti communities in Delhi’s urban peripheries, where sevā functions as spiritual discipline (sādhana), a means for communal uplifting, and the expression of kalyāṇ—holistic well-being that transcends individual boundaries. In both contexts, sevā emerges as a practice that intervenes in and reshapes socio-economic life. By foregrounding sevā as a lived practice, the paper situates Indian religious traditions as a distinctive contribution to broader postcapitalist and postsecular debates. It argues that sevā offers an alternative model of personhood and ethical intentionality—one that contests dominant binaries of spiritual/material, secular/religious, and human/nature, and reimagines human flourishing through the lens of relational ontology and collective responsibility. Full article
25 pages, 512 KiB  
Article
Mapping the Growth of the Nones in Spain: Dynamics, Diversity, and the Porous Boundaries of Non-Religion in the Postsecular Age
by Rafael Ruiz Andrés
Religions 2025, 16(4), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16040417 - 25 Mar 2025
Viewed by 699
Abstract
In recent years, the debate on non-religion has gained prominence in the sociology of religion, making it one of the most interesting areas for further reflection on (post)secularization. Drawing on the key works on the subject, this article adopts a postsecular, religion-related field, [...] Read more.
In recent years, the debate on non-religion has gained prominence in the sociology of religion, making it one of the most interesting areas for further reflection on (post)secularization. Drawing on the key works on the subject, this article adopts a postsecular, religion-related field, constructivist approach, with the main aim of understanding the diverse sector that is included within non-religion. This study uses a multimethod approach, focusing on the preliminary findings of a qualitative fieldwork on non-religion in Spain. The presentation and discussion of the results will be structured around two main axes: (a) an analysis of the growth of non-religion in Spain through three dynamics (irreligion, areligion, and hybridization) and (b) an exploration of the complexity and plurality of non-religion, paying particular attention to the blurred boundaries between religion and non-religion in the Spanish nones. Through both axes, the present research will challenge the idea that the rise of non-religion is merely a confirmation of ’religious decline’ and seek to understand it as a nuanced process in which the redefinition of the religious and spiritual also plays an important role, with implications for the postsecular debate and discussions of secularization, social theory, and sociological analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 568 KiB  
Article
(Re)viewing Postsecularity Through the Pragmatic Pursuits of New Religious Movements in India
by Vikram Kapoor
Religions 2025, 16(2), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020157 - 30 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1178
Abstract
In the contemporary postsecular context, where the influence of religion has become increasingly significant, this study explores the substantial influence of New Religious Movements (NRMs) in India. Focusing on Brahma Kumaris (BKs), a prominent NRM, this study examines their role as proponents of [...] Read more.
In the contemporary postsecular context, where the influence of religion has become increasingly significant, this study explores the substantial influence of New Religious Movements (NRMs) in India. Focusing on Brahma Kumaris (BKs), a prominent NRM, this study examines their role as proponents of social change across various public spheres in modern society. The BKs’ deviation from traditional religious doctrines, their emphasis on self-transformation, and their capacity to adapt to contemporary challenges render them particularly relevant in the postsecular context. This study analyzes the pragmatic approach that BKs employ to engage with and assert their influence in contemporary public life. Specifically, it delineates five critical processes that underpin the organization’s pragmatic pursuits: detraditionalization, synergism, gender sensitization, agro-spiritualism, and digitalization. By subverting varied normativities and contesting the religious/secular dyad through their pragmatic pursuits, the BKs illuminate the shapeshifting edges and fluid integration of religion and secularity within the contemporary postsecular milieu. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop