- Review
Coevolution Between Three-Finger Toxins and Target Receptors
- Jéssica Lopes de Oliveira and
- Henrique Roman-Ramos
Background: Three-finger toxins (3FTxs) are a major axis of functional diversification in advanced snake venoms, with canonical paralytic activity mediated through muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and a broader set of non-nicotinic targets. This review integrates evidence bearing on coevolution between 3FTxs and target receptors, spanning toxin origin, diversification, receptor evolution, and ecological context. Methods: The synthesis draws on comparative genomic and transcriptomic studies of 3FTx gene-family evolution, codon-model analyses of selection, structural characterisation of toxin–receptor interfaces, and functional assays (including receptor-mimicking peptide binding) that link sequence variation to binding and toxicity. Results: Across lineages, 3FTx diversification is repeatedly structured by strong constraint on the disulphide-rich scaffold with accelerated change concentrated in solvent-exposed loops, alongside birth–death dynamics and exon/segment-level innovation that expand binding specificity. On the receptor side, resistance-associated variation is most intensively characterised for the nAChR α1 orthosteric site and includes convergent, mechanistically distinct solutions such as electrostatic repulsion and glycosylation-mediated steric interference. Within the predominantly elapid systems currently examined, integrative datasets indicate that prey-selective binding and geographically variable susceptibility can arise from modest substitutions at toxin–receptor interfaces, but they also reveal substantial taxonomic and target-specific biases. Conclusions: Current evidence supports adaptive diversification in both toxins and receptors, while broader evolutionary interpretations are limited by uneven sampling and the frequent lack of matched toxin and receptor variants analysed within a common evolutionary framework. Development of predictive models will require joint pipelines linking genomics, structure-informed evolutionary inference, scalable functional assays, and explicit ecological network context.
14 February 2026



![Receptor-binding motifs (RBMs) in the TGEV RBD and their role in pAPN recognition. (A) Ribbon and surface representation of the RBD (PDB ID 4F2M), with pAPN-binding motifs highlighted in magenta (RBM1), red (RBM2), and orange (RBM3). RBM residues were identified with the PISA server based on the PRCV-pAPN crystal structure (PDB ID 4F5C). Receptor-binding residues in PRCV are conserved in TGEV. Side chains of exposed Tyr and Trp residues in the RBM1 and RBM2, respectively, are shown. N-and C-terminal ends are indicated in lower case letters, and selected β-strands are labeled. N-linked glycans are omitted. (B) Alignment of alpha1-CoV RBD sequences generated with Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher, accessed on 23 October 2025): TGEV (Q0PKZ5), CCoV-HuPn-2018 (HuPnCoV) [5], FCoV23 [7], and a canine CoV (CCoV) (Q65984). The sequence of the TGEV RBD is numbered, and β-strand positions are indicated with arrows. Residues in the two turns of the TGEV RBD β-barrel are indicated with a double T, and Cys residues forming disulfide bonds are marked with green numbers at the bottom of the alignment. Figure is prepared with ESPript 3.0 [33]. (C) Receptor-binding activity of RBD mutants in RBMs. pAPN binding was measured by flow cytometry using RBD-Fc proteins and pAPN-expressing cells (see Materials and Methods). Binding shown as the RBD-Fc protein concentration required to stain 50% of the cells (BC50), calculated from data presented in Supplementary Figure S1. Standard deviations for at least three experiments are denoted in parentheses.](https://mdpi-res.com/cdn-cgi/image/w=281,h=192/https://mdpi-res.com/receptors/receptors-05-00006/article_deploy/html/images/receptors-05-00006-ag-550.jpg)

