materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Progress in Metal Additive Manufacturing and Metallurgy (Second Volume)

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Manufacturing Processes and Systems".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 June 2022) | Viewed by 11387

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering Science, Division of Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing, University West, Nohabgatan 18A, Building 73, SE-46153 Trollhattan, Sweden
Interests: future additive manufacturing; powder bed fusion process; directed energy deposition process; hybrid additive manufacturing process; Ni-based superalloys; titanium alloys; steels; aluminium; microstructure; defects; mechanical properties; metallurgy; mechanical testing; simulation; modelling; validation; qualification
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research in additive manufacturing (AM) of metals has witnessed a dramatic rise in global attention during the past decade. Some AM processes have evolved from conventional welding processes, while others, such as powder bed fusion processes, have been developed with the specific intent of enabling the manufacture of complex 3D geometrical objects. One key feature of all AM processes is that material is only added where it is really needed, thereby permitting near net shape manufacture utilizing starting feedstock in powder or wire form, with virtually no residual material waste if all the unmelted material can be fully recycled.

The distinct heating–cooling cycles associated with various AM processes result in different as-built microstructures and varying types of defects, which are additionally governed not only by the process parameters used but also by the geometry of object(s) being built as well as by the local environmental conditions prevailing during processing. Consequently, in-process monitoring of different parameters is important to understand the process parameter–microstructure relationships during layer-on-layer manufacturing. For low-stressed, statically loaded components, the microstructure determines the average mechanical properties. However, for cyclically loaded critical parts, such as aeroengine or turbine components, defects limit the lower bound of the mechanical properties and are, therefore, a major concern as they restrict the loading conditions during operation. In view of the above, post-build treatments such as hot isostatic pressing (HIP) that can minimize certain types of defects such as porosity can become relevant, depending on the material and AM process in question. Other in situ/post-build treatment/hybrid solutions have also been considered, such as inducing residual compressive stresses in built material to reduce the influence of surface topography/defects/residual stresses on properties. From an implementation standpoint, the final quality of finished parts also needs to be ascertained using appropriate non-destructive evaluation (NDE) methods, which represent an area under active development.

It is thus apparent that AM involves a complex manufacturing chain spanning a number of different expert competences that have to be coordinated appropriately to enable successful economical serial production of AM components. Since such a complex knowledge chain is challenging for any single organization to internally complete, establishing collaborative networks that stitch together complementary competences is often a key enabler.

This Special Issue intends to address the latest progress in various facets of metal AM that constitutes the entire value chain. Topics include but are not limited to the following:

  • Directed energy deposition processes (DED);
  • Powder bed fusion processes (PBF, EBM, SLM, and more);
  • Hybrid–AM techniques;
  • Process parameter–microstructure/defects–mechanical property relationships;
  • Advanced characterization of AM utilizing SEM, TEM, synchrotron radiation diffraction, neutron scattering, and more;
  • Post-build/in situ treatments (HIP, HT, machining, shot peening, hybrid manufacturing, and more) and their influence on material properties and quality;
  • In-line monitoring techniques for process-build evaluation and control;
  • AM process modeling, including areas such as temperature history, phase transformation, precipitation kinetics, microstructure, defects, cracks, and residual stress/distortion;
  • Development of alloys customized for AM;
  • Digitalization of AM.

I hope the comprehensive AM-related focus of this Special Issue will encourage submissions of manuscripts incorporating recent research findings in any of the above topics, as well as manuscripts focused on the complex chain of activities required for maturing AM into a serial manufacturing technique.

Prof. Dr. Robert Pederson
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • additive manufacturing
  • metals
  • titanium alloys
  • Ni-base superalloys
  • steels
  • aluminum alloys
  • directed energy deposition processes
  • powder bed fusion processes
  • hybrid processes
  • wire
  • powder
  • recycle
  • process parameters
  • defects
  • porosity
  • lack of fusion
  • microstructure
  • texture
  • characterization techniques
  • microscopy
  • synchrotron-/neutron-scattering measurements
  • residual stress
  • post-build treatments
  • heat treatment
  • hot isostatic pressing
  • shot peening
  • mechanical properties
  • on-line/in-line monitoring
  • process control
  • process regulation system
  • micro-/macro scale material/process modeling
  • simulation
  • validation
  • qualification
  • digitalization
  • sustainability

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2460 KiB  
Article
Multi-Scale Crystal Plasticity Model of Creep Responses in Nickel-Based Superalloys
by Shahriyar Keshavarz, Carelyn E. Campbell and Andrew C. E. Reid
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134447 - 24 Jun 2022
Viewed by 1649
Abstract
The current study focuses on the modeling of two-phase γ-γ nickel-based superalloys, utilizing multi-scale approaches to simulate and predict the creep behaviors through crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) platforms. The multi-scale framework links two distinct levels of the spatial spectrum, [...] Read more.
The current study focuses on the modeling of two-phase γ-γ nickel-based superalloys, utilizing multi-scale approaches to simulate and predict the creep behaviors through crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) platforms. The multi-scale framework links two distinct levels of the spatial spectrum, namely, sub-grain and homogenized scales, capturing the complexity of the system responses as a function of a tractable set of geometric and physical parameters. The model considers two dominant features of γ morphology and composition. The γ morphology is simulated using three parameters describing the average size, volume fraction, and shape. The sub-grain level is expressed by a size-dependent, dislocation density-based constitutive model in the CPFE framework with the explicit depiction of γ-γ morphology as the building block of the homogenized scale. The homogenized scale is developed as an activation energy-based crystal plasticity model reflecting intrinsic composition and morphology effects. The model incorporates the functional configuration of the constitutive parameters characterized over the sub-grain γ-γ microstructural morphology. The developed homogenized model significantly expedites the computational processes due to the nature of the parameterized representation of the dominant factors while retains reliable accuracy. Anti-Phase Boundary (APB) shearing and, glide-climb dislocation mechanisms are incorporated in the constitutive model which will become active based on the energies associated with the dislocations. The homogenized constitutive model addresses the thermo-mechanical behavior of nickel-based superalloys for an extensive temperature domain and encompasses orientation dependence as well as the loading condition of tension-compression asymmetry aspects. The model is validated for diverse compositions, temperatures, and orientations based on previously reported data of single crystalline nickel-based superalloy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5389 KiB  
Article
Elevated-Temperature Tensile Properties of Low-Temperature HIP-Treated EBM-Built Ti-6Al-4V
by Karthikeyan Thalavai Pandian, Magnus Neikter, Fouzi Bahbou, Thomas Hansson and Robert Pederson
Materials 2022, 15(10), 3624; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103624 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1596
Abstract
Evaluation of the high-temperature tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) and subjected to a low-temperature hot isostatic pressing (HIP) treatment (800 °C) was performed in this study. The high-temperature tensile properties of as-built and standard HIP-treated (920 °C) materials [...] Read more.
Evaluation of the high-temperature tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) and subjected to a low-temperature hot isostatic pressing (HIP) treatment (800 °C) was performed in this study. The high-temperature tensile properties of as-built and standard HIP-treated (920 °C) materials were studied for comparison. Metallurgical characterization of the as-built, HIP-treated materials was carried out to understand the effect of temperature on the microstructure. As the HIP treatments were performed below the β-transus temperature (995 °C for Ti-6Al-4V), no significant difference was observed in β grain width between the as-built and HIP-treated samples. The standard HIP-treated material measured about 1.4×–1.7× wider α laths than those in the modified HIP (low-temperature HIP)-treated and as-built samples. The standard HIP-treated material showed about a 10–14% lower yield strength than other tested materials. At 350 °C, the yield strength decreased to about 65% compared to the room-temperature strength for all tested specimens. An increase in ductility was observed at 150 °C compared to that at room temperature, but the values decreased between 150 and 350 °C because of the activation of different slip systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 10958 KiB  
Article
Strain Rate-Dependent Compressive Properties of Bulk Cylindrical 3D-Printed Samples from 316L Stainless Steel
by Michaela Neuhäuserová, Petr Koudelka, Tomáš Fíla, Jan Falta, Václav Rada, Jan Šleichrt, Petr Zlámal, Anja Mauko and Ondřej Jiroušek
Materials 2022, 15(3), 941; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030941 - 26 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1742
Abstract
The main aim of the study was to analyse the strain rate sensitivity of the compressive deformation response in bulk 3D-printed samples from 316L stainless steel according to the printing orientation. The laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) method of metal additive manufacturing was [...] Read more.
The main aim of the study was to analyse the strain rate sensitivity of the compressive deformation response in bulk 3D-printed samples from 316L stainless steel according to the printing orientation. The laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) method of metal additive manufacturing was utilised for the production of the samples with three different printing orientations: 0, 45, and 90. The specimens were experimentally investigated during uni-axial quasi-static and dynamic loading. A split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus was used for the dynamic experiments. The experiments were observed using a high-resolution (quasi-static loading) or a high-speed visible-light camera and a high-speed thermographic camera (dynamic loading) to allow for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the deformation processes. Digital image correlation (DIC) software was used for the evaluation of displacement fields. To assess the deformation behaviour of the 3D-printed bulk samples and strain rate related properties, an analysis of the true stress–true strain diagrams from quasi-static and dynamic experiments as well as the thermograms captured during the dynamic loading was performed. The results revealed a strong strain rate effect on the mechanical response of the investigated material. Furthermore, a dependency of the strain-rate sensitivity on the printing orientation was identified. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 8565 KiB  
Article
Wire Laser Metal Deposition Additive Manufacturing of Duplex Stainless Steel Components—Development of a Systematic Methodology
by Amir Baghdadchi, Vahid A. Hosseini, Maria Asuncion Valiente Bermejo, Björn Axelsson, Ebrahim Harati, Mats Högström and Leif Karlsson
Materials 2021, 14(23), 7170; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237170 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2765
Abstract
A systematic four-stage methodology was developed and applied to the Laser Metal Deposition with Wire (LMDw) of a duplex stainless steel (DSS) cylinder > 20 kg. In the four stages, single-bead passes, a single-bead wall, a block, and finally a cylinder were produced. [...] Read more.
A systematic four-stage methodology was developed and applied to the Laser Metal Deposition with Wire (LMDw) of a duplex stainless steel (DSS) cylinder > 20 kg. In the four stages, single-bead passes, a single-bead wall, a block, and finally a cylinder were produced. This stepwise approach allowed the development of LMDw process parameters and control systems while the volume of deposited material and the geometrical complexity of components increased. The as-deposited microstructure was inhomogeneous and repetitive, consisting of highly ferritic regions with nitrides and regions with high fractions of austenite. However, there were no cracks or lack of fusion defects; there were only some small pores, and strength and toughness were comparable to those of the corresponding steel grade. A heat treatment for 1 h at 1100 °C was performed to homogenize the microstructure, remove nitrides, and balance the ferrite and austenite fractions compensating for nitrogen loss occurring during LMDw. The heat treatment increased toughness and ductility and decreased strength, but these still matched steel properties. It was concluded that implementing a systematic methodology with a stepwise increase in the deposited volume and geometrical complexity is a cost-effective way of developing additive manufacturing procedures for the production of significantly sized metallic components. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 16045 KiB  
Article
Tensile Properties of 21-6-9 Austenitic Stainless Steel Built Using Laser Powder-Bed Fusion
by Magnus Neikter, Emil Edin, Sebastian Proper, Phavan Bhaskar, Gopi Krishna Nekkalapudi, Oscar Linde, Thomas Hansson and Robert Pederson
Materials 2021, 14(15), 4280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154280 - 31 Jul 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2573
Abstract
Alloy 21-6-9 is an austenitic stainless steel with high strength, thermal stability at high temperatures, and retained toughness at cryogenic temperatures. This type of steel has been used for aerospace applications for decades, using traditional manufacturing processes. However, limited research has been conducted [...] Read more.
Alloy 21-6-9 is an austenitic stainless steel with high strength, thermal stability at high temperatures, and retained toughness at cryogenic temperatures. This type of steel has been used for aerospace applications for decades, using traditional manufacturing processes. However, limited research has been conducted on this alloy manufactured using laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF). Therefore, in this work, a design of experiment (DOE) was performed to obtain optimized process parameters with regard to low porosity. Once the optimized parameters were established, horizontal and vertical blanks were built to investigate the mechanical properties and potential anisotropic behavior. As this alloy is exposed to elevated temperatures in industrial applications, the effect of elevated temperatures (room temperature and 750 °C) on the tensile properties was investigated. In this work, it was shown that alloy 21-6-9 could be built successfully using LPBF, with good properties and a density of 99.7%, having an ultimate tensile strength of 825 MPa, with an elongation of 41%, and without any significant anisotropic behavior. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop