- Systematic Review
IPOS-Dem Scale in the Assessment of Patients with Dementia in Palliative Care—Potential for Adaptation: A Systematic Review
- Fernanda Quartilho,
- Joana Brandão Silva and
- Daniela Cunha
- + 5 authors
Background: Dementia is a chronic, multifactorial syndrome with a high incidence and prevalence worldwide. The clinical assessment of these patients is challenging, imposing several barriers related to the system, the healthcare professional and the patient. While numerous assessment tools exist for dementia, few are specifically validated or widely used in palliative care. This study evaluates the relevance of using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) in Portugal. The primary objective is to synthesize evidence on the implementation and clinical performance of IPOS-Dem in people with dementia receiving palliative care—including feasibility, acceptability, validity, reliability, and clinical applicability—while the secondary objective is to assess the instrument’s relevance and potential for cultural/linguistic adaptation to context. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out, with research in evidence-based medicine databases on the use of the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) in palliative care, using the terms “dementia”, “alzheimer”, “lewy body”, “cognitive impair”, “outcome”, “IPOS-Dem”, “patient outcome assessment”, “outcome assessment”, “scale”, “palliative care”, and “palliative outcome scale”. Results: The IPOS-Dem was considered to be a useful tool for monitoring patients with dementia while receiving palliative care, allowing for a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of symptoms, as well as involving family members in the care process. It facilitates the identification of previously unknown symptoms and issues, particularly emotional and social concerns. Its use led to an improvement in symptom control and greater family involvement in care. The reduction in missing response rates and the time required to complete the scale with repeated use indicated good adaptation to the scale’s implementation. Difficulties were reported in assessing patients with communication impairments. Some staff also highlighted the need for training in using the scale. The Swiss Easy-Read IPOS-Dem showed significant variation in scores between evaluators, which raises concerns about the reliability and consistency of the scale, indicating that the tool requires further validation. Digital models, although they may present some inconveniences, were suggested as a potential improvement in acceptability. Conclusions: Our review suggests that IPOS-Dem provides initial evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical usefulness in dementia palliative care, making its implementation beneficial for the Portuguese population. Translation and adaptation to the Portuguese population and culture will be necessary, but the scale is promising, and we recommend its national use.
11 December 2025



![PRISMA 2020 flow diagram [15] for Process of selecting articles included in the review. * Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). ** If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.](/_ipx/b_%23fff&f_webp&q_100&fit_outside&s_470x317/https://mdpi-res.com/jdad/jdad-02-00047/article_deploy/html/images/jdad-02-00047-g001-550.jpg)
