jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Vascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2025) | Viewed by 12648

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Interests: endovascular interventions; lower extremity arterial occlusive disease; aortic aneurysm pathophysiology; complex aortic aneurysm repair; vascular care

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, CA 29425, USA
Interests: peripheral arterial disease; aortic aneurysm; aortic dissection; carotid surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Vascular surgery is a subspecialty of surgery focusing on the treatment of the arterial and venous systems of the body outside of the coronary and skull beads. A vascular surgeon is trained to treat every artery and vein, from their patient’s neck to their toes, that lies outside of the brain and heart. This is a wide-ranging field filled with multiple pathologies, from atherosclerotic disease to aneurysmal disease and rheumatologic disease, as well as a vast array of other conditions that can affect the human vascular system. 

Vascular surgery has recently experienced a renaissance in its treatment algorithms with the introduction of minimally invasive and catheter-based techniques. This novel approach to treatment of the vascular system has opened the door for vascular surgeons to offer life-saving and curative procedures to even the most sick and frail of patients. Through this Special Issue, we hope to demonstrate and analyze the current treatment modalities for various vascular pathologies in light of recent technological advances.

Dr. Murray L. Shames
Dr. Adam Tanious
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • vascular history
  • peripheral arterial disease
  • aortic aneurysm
  • aortic dissection
  • carotid disease

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 2533 KB  
Article
Temporary Passive Shunt for Visceral Protection During Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair Under Intraoperative Advanced Hemodynamic and Perfusion Monitoring: Tertiary Hospital Institutional Bundle and Preliminary Mid-Term Results
by Ottavia Borghese, Marta Minucci, Elena Jacchia, Pierfrancesco Antonio Annuvolo, Lucia Scurto, Antonio Luparelli, Andrea Russo, Paola Aceto, Tommaso Donati and Yamume Tshomba
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6064; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176064 - 27 Aug 2025
Viewed by 503
Abstract
Background: The perfusion of viscera, kidney, and spinal cord represents one of the main concerns during open repair (OR) of Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurisms (TAAAs). Passive shunting (PS) has been historically used for intraoperative distal aortic perfusion but has been progressively replaced almost [...] Read more.
Background: The perfusion of viscera, kidney, and spinal cord represents one of the main concerns during open repair (OR) of Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurisms (TAAAs). Passive shunting (PS) has been historically used for intraoperative distal aortic perfusion but has been progressively replaced almost entirely by partial left-sided heart or total cardiopulmonary bypass with extra-corporeal circulation (ECC). Despite several advantages of these methods, PS still has potential in mitigating some drawbacks of long extracorporeal circuits connected with centrifugal or roller pumps, such as the need for cardiac and great vessels cannulation, priming and large intravascular fluid volume shifts, high heparin dose, immunosuppressive effects, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Methods: This study prospectively analyzed data of a cohort of patients who underwent TAAA OR using a PS in a single institution. Outcomes of interest were mortality, rate of mesenteric, renal and spinal cord ischemia, cardiac complications, and intraoperative hemodynamic stability achieved in this setting. Our institutional bundle and a comprehensive literature review about the different configurations and applicability of PS for TAAA OR is also reported. The search was performed based on three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers (LS and AA) from inception to 31 December 2023, and the reported clinical results (visceral, renal, and spinal cord complications and mortality) using PS during TAAAs OR were analyzed. Results: Between March 2021 and December 2023, 51 TAAA repairs were performed and eleven patients (n = 8, 73% male; mean age 67 years, range 63–79) were operated using a PS for a total of one (9%) type I, one (9%) type II, two (18%) type III, five (45%) type IV, and two (18%) type V TAAA. In our early experience, PS was indicated for limited staff resources during the COVID-19 pandemic to treat five non-deferable cases. The sixth and seventh patients were selected for PS as they already had a functioning axillo-bifemoral bypass that was used for this purpose. For the most recent cases, PS was chosen as the primary perfusion method according to a score based on clinical and anatomical factors with ECC as a bailout strategy. Selective renal perfusion with cold (4 °C) Custodiol solution was the method of choice for renal protection in all cases while antegrade perfusion of the coeliac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery was assured by PS through a loop graft (8–10mm) proximally anastomosed to the axillary artery (10 patients, 90.9%) or the descending thoracic aorta (one patient, 9%) and distally anastomosed to the infrarenal aorta (3), common iliac (3), or femoral vessels (5). In-hospital mortality was 9% as one patient died on the 10th postoperative day from mesenteric ischemia following hemodynamic instability; permanent spinal cord ischemia rate was 0% and the rate of AKI stage 3 was 9% (one patient). Bailout shifting to ECC was never required. No cardiac complications, nor a significant increase in serum CK-MB were reported in any patient. No prolonged severe intraoperative hypotension episodes (Mean Arterial Pressure < 50 mmHg) were assessed using the Software Acumen Analytics (Edwards LifeSciences, Irvine CA, USA). No peri-operative coagulopathy nor major bleeding was reported. Conclusions: Our experience showed satisfactory outcomes with the use of PS in specifically selected cases. Current data indicate that PS may represent an alternative to ECC techniques during TAAAs OR in high volume centers where assisted extracorporeal circulation could eventually be applied as a bailout strategy. However, due to the small sample size of this and previously published series, more data are needed to clearly define the potential role of such approach during TAAA OR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3253 KB  
Article
Navigating Challenges in the Endovascular Treatment of Asymptomatic Aortoiliac Aneurysms: A 10-Year Comparative Analysis
by Khamin Chinsakchai, Natcha Ketklin, Kiattisak Hongku, Chumpol Wongwanit, Nattawut Puangpunngam, Suteekhanit Hahtapornsawan, Sasima Thongsai, Tossapol Prapassaro, Nuttawut Sermsathanasawadi, Chanean Ruangsetakit and Pramook Mutirangura
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7000; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227000 - 9 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1403
Abstract
Background: Treating an abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAIA) with endovascular methods can be challenging when the internal iliac artery (IIA) is involved. Embolizing the IIA and extending the limb to the external iliac artery (IIAE + EE) to prevent a type 2 endoleak may [...] Read more.
Background: Treating an abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAIA) with endovascular methods can be challenging when the internal iliac artery (IIA) is involved. Embolizing the IIA and extending the limb to the external iliac artery (IIAE + EE) to prevent a type 2 endoleak may lead to pelvic ischemic complications. To avoid these complications, strategies that preserve the IIA, such as the bell-bottom technique (BBT) and the iliac branch device (IBD), have been proposed. This study aims to compare the outcomes of these three endovascular approaches for AAIA. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2019, 174 patients with asymptomatic AAIA were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. They were divided into two groups: 81 patients underwent non-IIAE procedures, and 93 patients underwent IIAE procedures. The iliac limb study group consisted of 106 limbs treated with the BBT, 113 limbs treated with the IIAE + EE, and 32 limbs treated with the IBD. The primary outcomes included the 30-day mortality rate and intraoperative limb complications. The secondary outcomes included postoperative pelvic ischemia, freedom from reintervention, and the overall 10-year survival rate. Results: There was no significant difference in the perioperative mortality rate between the non-IIAE group (0%) and the IIAE group (2.1%), p = 0.500. The intraoperative limb complications did not differ significantly between the BBT limbs (7.5%), the IIAE + EE limbs (3.5%), and the IBD limbs (3.1%) groups, p = 0.349. The incidence of buttock claudication was significantly greater in the bilateral IIAE + EE group compared to the unilateral IIAE + EE and non-IIAE groups (25%, 11%, and 2.5%, p-value < 0.004), and was similar to the incidence of buttock rest pain with skin necrosis (15%, 0%, and 0%, p < 0.001). During the 10-year follow-up, the BBT limbs group had a significantly lower rate of iliac limb reintervention free time than the IIAE + EE limbs and the IBD limbs groups (88.7%, 98.2%, and 93.8%, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in the overall 10-year survival rate between the non-IIAE and IIAE groups (51.4% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.703). Conclusions: The early and late mortality rates were similar between the non-IIAE and IIAE groups. Preserving the IIA is recommended to avoid pelvic ischemic complications. Considering the higher rate of reintervention in the BBT group, the IBD strategy may be preferred for AAIA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 206 KB  
Article
The Opportunity for Impactful Integration of Vascular and Podiatric Care
by Young Kim and Kevin W. Southerland
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6237; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196237 - 27 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1588
Abstract
Background: The importance of collaboration between vascular and podiatric surgeons has been well-established. High-level partnerships are integral to the development of multidisciplinary programs and wound care centers, ultimately resulting in improved patient outcomes. This vascular–podiatric integration is not universal, however, and podiatric surgery [...] Read more.
Background: The importance of collaboration between vascular and podiatric surgeons has been well-established. High-level partnerships are integral to the development of multidisciplinary programs and wound care centers, ultimately resulting in improved patient outcomes. This vascular–podiatric integration is not universal, however, and podiatric surgery may not be aligned within a vascular surgery division at many institutions. As one such institution, we reviewed our single-center experience in order to identify opportunities for the impactful integration of vascular–podiatric patient care. Methods: Institutional electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all procedures performed by vascular surgeons at a high volume, safety-net academic medical center. Data were collected on all primary and additional procedures, current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, case type (elective, urgent, emergent), surgeon specialty, and date/time of the procedures performed. CPT codes were linked to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Physician Fee Schedule to estimate the work relative value unit (wRVU) per procedure. Results: From 2018 to 2022, vascular surgeons performed a total of 12,206 operations, of which 1102 (9.9%) involved podiatric procedures. The most common vascular-performed podiatry procedures performed were toe amputations (38.1%, n = 420), transmetatarsal foot amputations (20.1%, n = 222), and ankle/foot debridement (16.2%, n = 178). Foot/ankle-specific procedures were identified as the primary procedure in 726 (65.9%) cases and as the adjunct procedure in 376 (34.1%) cases. A substantial proportion of podiatric procedures occurred on an urgent (n = 278, 25.2%) or emergent (n = 28, 2.5%) basis. A total of 163 (14.8%) cases occurred after hours (either before 0600 or after 1800), and 133 (12.1%) cases were performed on a holiday or weekend. Procedure-specific revenue included 4243.39 wRVU for primary procedures and 2108.08 wRVU for additional procedures performed. Conclusions: We report our single-center experience in which vascular surgeons provide a significant proportion of podiatric procedures. Our study underscores the potential for integrating podiatric surgeons within a vascular surgical division and presents opportunities for collaboration and enhanced patient care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)

Review

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 1133 KB  
Review
Novel Interventions to Improve Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Claudicants
by Richard Shi, Nicholas Bulatao and Adam Tanious
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5309; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155309 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 533
Abstract
Intermittent claudication is the most common manifestation of peripheral arterial disease as well as a lifestyle-limiting disease with a favorable prognosis. Despite societal guideline recommendations, most claudicants do not trial optimal medical therapy (OMT) and supervised exercise therapy (SET) or receive a quality-of-life [...] Read more.
Intermittent claudication is the most common manifestation of peripheral arterial disease as well as a lifestyle-limiting disease with a favorable prognosis. Despite societal guideline recommendations, most claudicants do not trial optimal medical therapy (OMT) and supervised exercise therapy (SET) or receive a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment prior to intervention. In this review, we discuss the components of OMT and SET and the trials establishing their clear benefits in claudicants. We assess adherence rates to OMT/SET and qualitative and quantitative studies attempting to understand the barriers to adoption. We also review how patient-reported outcome metrics were developed to assess QoL in claudicants and reasons for their underutilization in daily clinical practice. Last, we describe novel initiatives seeking to improve adherence to OMT, SET, and QoL assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3615 KB  
Review
Hybrid and Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Pathology
by Richard Shi and Mathew Wooster
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6248; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206248 - 19 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2806
Abstract
The advent of endovascular aortic surgery has led to the rise of novel techniques and devices in treating pathologies of the aorta. While endovascular surgery has been well established in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta, the endovascular treatment of the aortic arch [...] Read more.
The advent of endovascular aortic surgery has led to the rise of novel techniques and devices in treating pathologies of the aorta. While endovascular surgery has been well established in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta, the endovascular treatment of the aortic arch represents a new and exciting territory for aortic surgeons. This article will discuss the different aortic diseases amenable to endovascular treatment, currently available aortic arch stent grafts and their limitations, and the future of endovascular aortic arch therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1271 KB  
Review
Revascularization Strategies for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Narrative Review
by Jacob J. Gries, Takashi Sakamoto, Bing Chen, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk, Mahboob Alam and Chayakrit Krittanawong
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1217; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051217 - 21 Feb 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4780
Abstract
Mesenteric ischemia is a challenging condition characterized by insufficient blood perfusion to the mesentery and, consequently, intestinal tissues that continues to perplex clinicians. Despite its low prevalence, the condition’s variable clinical presentation and elusive radiographic diagnosis can delay life-saving interventions in the acute [...] Read more.
Mesenteric ischemia is a challenging condition characterized by insufficient blood perfusion to the mesentery and, consequently, intestinal tissues that continues to perplex clinicians. Despite its low prevalence, the condition’s variable clinical presentation and elusive radiographic diagnosis can delay life-saving interventions in the acute setting and deteriorate the quality of life of patients when left undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. Purpose: Review and summarize recent diagnostic updates and emergent intervention strategies for acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia. Methods: A narrative review of all relevant studies from January 2022 through September 2023. Results: A total of 11 studies from MEDLINE, supplemented with 44 studies from Google Scholar, were included in the review. Conclusions: Both acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia propose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for interventionalists. Computed tomographic angiography remains the diagnostic modality of choice for both. Open surgical intervention remains the gold standard for acute mesenteric ischemia, while endovascular techniques are preferred for chronic mesenteric ischemia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop