ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Effects of Public Policies on Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Care Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2026 | Viewed by 3966

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Degnevej 14, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
2. Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, Katerinska 653/17, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Interests: health in all policies; health impact assesment; global health
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Thoughtful public policies can significantly impact health outcomes by both addressing inequalities and promoting well-being. Of the various means by which public policies can affect human health, these are the most important:

  • Reducing Health Inequalities: Public policies can either exacerbate or alleviate health disparities. For instance, food subsidy programs and immunizations have been shown to reduce health inequalities.
  • Welfare State and Social Determinants: By providing services such as education, health care, housing, and social insurance, a welfare state can mitigate the health effects of socio-economic disparities and significantly influence the social determinants of health.
  • Infrastructure and Community Well-Being: Public policies directly impact critical infrastructure, including highways, schools, police forces, and flood control systems.
  • Public Goods and Supportive Environments: Policies create, regulate, and maintain public goods that foster supportive environments for good health.
  • Evidence-Based Policies: Evidence-based public health policies can prevent diseases and promote health.

Public  policy is a very broad concept that includes education, health care, employment, finance, economics, transportation, and all elements of society. Manuscripts need to be related to health.

In summary, the social, environmental, and commercial determinants of health exert a major impact on population health. Health in all policies, as well as whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, are terms often used to describe the means of addressing the impact of public policies on health, in conjunction with what has been termed the “health impact assessment”, which is mostly used to assess the scale of the impact.

Given this background, this Special Issue of IJERPH aims to publish manuscripts addressing any of the aforementioned issues, with a focus on measurements of their effect on human health.

Dr. Gabriel Gulis
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social determinants of health
  • health in all policies
  • whole-of-government approach
  • whole-of-society approach
  • population health
  • health impact assessment
  • health effects

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 687 KiB  
Article
A New Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Health Impact Assessment: Capitalising on a French Case Study with the Literature in Evaluation
by Françoise Jabot, Julie Romagon and Guilhem Dardier
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(9), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091240 - 19 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2232
Abstract
Health impact assessment (HIA) is a prospective approach that aims to identify the potential consequences of policies or projects on health in order to propose measures to make them healthier. Initiated in the late nineties, the approach emerged over ten years ago in [...] Read more.
Health impact assessment (HIA) is a prospective approach that aims to identify the potential consequences of policies or projects on health in order to propose measures to make them healthier. Initiated in the late nineties, the approach emerged over ten years ago in France. However, the evaluation of HIA effectiveness remains seldomly practised and its theoretical background should be deepened. The aim of this article is to generate a discussion on how to evaluate HIA effectiveness and contribute to its methodological tooling, drawing on an evaluative experience of multiple French HIAs. Our work is based on an iterative approach between an analysis of the evaluation literature and a critical look at an HIA evaluation. We first carried out the evaluation of three HIAs in 2017–2018, combining a normative approach and qualitative research in order to explore each HIA as a phenomenon in its own context. Two years later, we conducted a self-assessing expertise on this evaluation, supported by an analysis of the literature in the field of public policy evaluation, in order to refine the theoretical framework for evaluating HIA effectiveness and ultimately to enhance professional practice by evaluators. This work led to the production of a logic model that identifies, through three dimensions (context, implementation and governance), the multiple pathways that HIA may take to bring about change. It also seeks to show the interdependence of these pathways towards change and helps identify the key drivers and mechanisms of HIA success. In this respect, it complements existing HIA evaluation models as it can serve both as a generic framework for evaluating HIA effectiveness and as an instrument for monitoring HIA implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effects of Public Policies on Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 541 KiB  
Article
The Cumulative Effect of Expanding the Breadth and Scope of Coverage for Substance Use Disorder Treatment on Behavioral Health Acute Inpatient Admissions: Evidence from Virginia Medicaid
by Shiva Salehian, Peter Cunningham, Andrew Barnes and Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(6), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060777 - 14 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1093
Abstract
We evaluated the impact of Medicaid policies in Virginia (VA), namely the Addiction and Recovery Treatment Services (ARTS) program and Medicaid expansion, on the number of behavioral health acute inpatient admissions from 2016 to 2019. We used Poisson fixed-effect event study regression and [...] Read more.
We evaluated the impact of Medicaid policies in Virginia (VA), namely the Addiction and Recovery Treatment Services (ARTS) program and Medicaid expansion, on the number of behavioral health acute inpatient admissions from 2016 to 2019. We used Poisson fixed-effect event study regression and compared average proportional differences in admissions over three time periods: (1) prior to ARTS; (2) following ARTS but before Medicaid expansion; (3) post-Medicaid expansion. The number of behavioral health acute inpatient admissions decreased by 2.6% (95% CI [−5.1, −0.2]) in the first quarter of 2018 and this decrease gradually intensified by 4.9% (95% CI [−7.5, −2.4]) in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017 (beginning of ARTS) in VA relative to North Carolina (NC). Following the first quarter of 2019 (beginning of Medicaid expansion), decreases in VA admissions became larger relative to NC. The average proportional difference in admissions estimated a decrease of 2.7% (95% CI, [−4.1, −0.8]) after ARTS but before Medicaid expansion and a decrease of 2.9% (95% CI, [−6.1, 0.4]) post-Medicaid expansion compared to pre-ARTS in VA compared to NC. Behavioral health acute inpatient admissions in VA decreased following ARTS implementation, and the decrease became larger after Medicaid expansion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effects of Public Policies on Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop