You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

GeoHazards

GeoHazards is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on theoretical and applied research across the whole spectrum of geomorphological hazards, namely endogenous and exogenous hazards, as well as those related to climate change and human activity, published quarterly online by MDPI.

Quartile Ranking JCR - Q3 (Geosciences, Multidisciplinary)

All Articles (239)

Establishing quantitative causal relationships between drought indicators and vegetation degradation in the Chad Basin remained challenging due to statistical limitations of applying traditional Transfer Entropy to finite-length remote sensing time series. This study implemented a Machine Learning Enhanced Transfer Entropy structure to quantify directed information flow from primary drought drivers of precipitation and land surface temperature to vegetation dynamics from 2000 to 2023. A feed-forward neural network trained on 10,000 synthetic samples with known theoretical Transfer Entropies enabled causal inference from 24-year MODIS-derived NDVI, land surface temperature, and precipitation. The trained model was applied over 10 million pixels, producing Transfer Entropy maps. Results showed that precipitation and land surface temperature exerted comparable causal influences on NDVI, with mean Transfer Entropy values of 0.064 and 0.063, ranging from 0.041 to 0.388. Spatial analysis revealed distinct causal hotspots exceeding 75th percentile threshold of 0.069, indicating driver-specific vulnerability zones. The decline in mean annual NDVI from 0.225 in 2019 to 0.194 in 2023, together with spatially divergent hotspots, highlighted the need for geographically targeted land management. The study overcame finite-length time-series limitations and provided a replicable pathway for vulnerability assessment and climate adaptation planning in data-constrained drylands in the Chad Basin in Africa.

21 December 2025

Study area (Chad Basin).

Landslides are among the most significant disasters that threaten communities worldwide. This study sampled 384 respondents, using standardized interviews and field observations, to analyze how they perceived the factors influencing the incidence of landslides in the Kivu catchment of Rwanda, especially in landslide-prone areas. This study employs a mixed-methods approach that combines household surveys and interviews with key informants to assess how residents perceive landslide causes, warning signs, and impacts, which were analyzed statistically using SPSS. For further analysis, a binary logistic regression model and chi-square tests were used. The chi-square test findings highlighted that heavy rainfall, inappropriate agricultural practices, steep slopes, deforestation, road construction, earthquakes, and climate change were strongly correlated with landslide occurrence, with a p < 0.05 level of significance, while mining activities were not correlated with landslides. On the other hand, a binary logistic regression model revealed that, among the selected factors influencing landslide occurrence in the Kivu catchment, road construction (B = −0.644; p = 0.014), inappropriate agriculturalpractices (−1.177; p = 0.000), steep slopes (B = −0.648; p = 0.018), deforestation (B = −0.854; p = 0.007), and earthquakes (B = −1.59; p = 0.008) were negatively correlated, while heavy rainfall (B = 1.686; p = 0.000) and climate change (B = 1.784; p = 0.001) were positively correlated, and this was statistically significant for landslide occurrence at a p-value < 0.05. In contrast, mining activities (B = −0.065; p = 0.917) showed a negative coefficient that was statistically insignificant with respect to landslide occurrence in the study area. Future studies should integrate surveys with landslide hazard modeling tools for better spatial prediction of vulnerability and economic losses. Therefore, the findings from this study will contribute to sustainable natural disaster management planning in the western region of Rwanda.

19 December 2025

Study area location: (a) map of the continent of Africa; (b) map of Rwanda; (c) catchment area.

Drought remains one of the most damaging natural hazards to agricultural production and is projected to continue posing substantial risks to food security in the future, particularly in major rice-growing regions. Based on the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios under CMIP5, this study used a process-based crop growth model to simulate the growth of rice in China in different future periods (short-term (2031–2050), medium-term (2051–2070), and long-term (2071–2090)). We fitted rice vulnerability curves to evaluate the rice drought risk quantitatively according to the simulated water stress (WS) and yield. The results showed that the drought hazard in major rice-growing areas in China (MRAC) were low in the middle and high in the north and south. The areas without rice yield loss will decline in the future, while the areas with a high yield loss will increase, especially in southwestern China and the middle and lower Yangtze Plain (MLYP). Owing to the markedly increased evaporative demand and the reduced moisture transport caused by a weakening East Asian summer monsoon, northeastern China will be a high-risk area in the future, with the expected yield loss rates in scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 being 39.75% and 45.5%, respectively. In addition, under the RCP8.5 scenario, the yield loss rate of different return periods in south China will exceed 80%. A significant gap between rice supply and demand affected by drought is expected in the short-term future. The gaps will be 67,770 kt and 78,110 kt under the RCP4.5-SSP2 and RCP8.5-SSP3 scenarios, respectively. The methodology developed in this paper can support the quantitative assessment of drought loss risk in different scenarios using crop growth models. In the context of the future expansion of Chinese grain demand, this study can serve as a reference to improve the capacity for regional drought risk prevention and ensure regional food security.

17 December 2025

The major rice-growing areas in China.

On 19 December 2015 and 21 February 2017, Longyearbyen was hit by major avalanches from the steep hillside of the mountain Sukkertoppen. In this article, we specifically consider the 2015 avalanche that destroyed eleven houses and buried nine people; seven were located and rescued, while two died. We describe the meteorological conditions leading up to the avalanche, the rescue operation, the media coverage, and the immediate aftermath of the catastrophe. Both events came as a result of warming, strong easterly winds, and drifting snow, with the December 2015 event being the most extreme. The 2017 avalanche damaged two houses, but no people were hurt. We analyse the catastrophes in relation to the knowledge of the risks and impacts of avalanches in Longyearbyen, as provided through field-based student courses at the University Centre of Svalbard (UNIS). To protect against further avalanche accidents, parts of Longyearbyen have been restructured, and physical barriers against avalanches have been installed on the hillside of Sukkertoppen. Now there are snow drift fences to reduce snow accumulation in the release areas, avalanche protection fences mounted in the hillside, and a large wall at the foot of the mountain to catch avalanche debris in the future. In hindsight, the accidents have contributed to an increased national awareness of the danger of severe weather events.

17 December 2025

Location (left insert) and overview map of Longyearbyen (N 78° 13′ E 15° 38′), Svalbard, with the Lia area given in the map extract (right insert). The buildings of the city appear in a gold colour and the roads are drawn as grey lines.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction
Reprint

Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction

Volume III
Editors: Stefano Morelli, Veronica Pazzi, Mirko Francioni
Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction
Reprint

Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction

Volume II
Editors: Stefano Morelli, Veronica Pazzi, Mirko Francioni

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
GeoHazards - ISSN 2624-795X