Environments

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 177 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Preface: Special Issue on Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism

by Ronda J. Green, David B. Croft and Isabelle D. Wolf

Environments 2019, 6(10), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6100112 - 15 Oct 2019

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5005

Abstract

Tourism is growing rapidly throughout the world, including nature-based tourism, but natural habitats are shrinking [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

17 pages, 5112 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Image Analysis to Monitor Experimental Trampling and Vegetation Recovery in Icelandic Plant Communities

by Micael C. Runnström, Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, Jan Blanke and Bastian Berlin

Environments 2019, 6(9), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6090099 - 21 Aug 2019

Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7055

Abstract

With growing tourism in natural areas, monitoring recreational impacts is becoming increasingly important. This paper aims to evaluate how different trampling intensities affect some common Icelandic plant communities by using digital photographs to analyze and quantify vegetation in experimental plots and to monitor [...] Read more.

With growing tourism in natural areas, monitoring recreational impacts is becoming increasingly important. This paper aims to evaluate how different trampling intensities affect some common Icelandic plant communities by using digital photographs to analyze and quantify vegetation in experimental plots and to monitor vegetation recovery rates over a consecutive three-year period. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate the use of image analysis for monitoring recreational impact in natural areas. Experimental trampling was conducted in two different sites representing the lowlands and the highlands in 2014, and the experimental plots were revisited in 2015, 2016, and 2017. The results show that moss has the highest sensitivity to trampling, and furthermore has a slow recovery rate. Moss-heaths in the highlands also show higher sensitivity and slower recovery rates than moss-heaths in the lowlands, and grasslands show the highest resistance to trampling. Both methods tested, i.e., Green Chromatic Coordinate (GCC) and Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), showed significant correlation with the trampling impact. Using image analysis to quantify the status and define limits of use will likely be a valuable and vital element in managing recreational areas. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will add a robust way to collect photographic data that can be processed into vegetation parameters to monitor recreational impacts in natural areas. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 916 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Perceptions of Multiple Stakeholders about Environmental Issues at a Nature-Based Tourism Destination: The Case of Yakushima Island, Japan

by Ifeoluwa Bolanle Adewumi, Rie Usui and Carolin Funck

Environments 2019, 6(8), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6080093 - 7 Aug 2019

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 8797

Abstract

The success of nature-based tourism destinations depends on the sustainable use of common pool resources (CPRs). More often than not, tourism demands compete for these resources, exerting pressure on them, resulting in decline of the CPRs. Managing tourism and environmental resources has become [...] Read more.

The success of nature-based tourism destinations depends on the sustainable use of common pool resources (CPRs). More often than not, tourism demands compete for these resources, exerting pressure on them, resulting in decline of the CPRs. Managing tourism and environmental resources has become extremely important, but also more complex, as the interests of different stakeholders are intertwined across international, national, and local levels. Hence, this study aimed to investigate how stakeholder groups perceive the issues relating to the environment using Yakushima Island, Japan for a case study. Quantitative data were collected by administering a questionnaire to residents and tourism practitioners, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews conducted with organizations involved with tourism and environmental management in Yakushima. The study reveals that the underlying environmental issues in Yakushima result from an increase in tourists and controversial management of deer populations. Both residents and tourism practitioners indicated that more trash in the community was the most significant impact of tourism on the environment. Some perceptions were contradictory. Management authorities noted an increase in the deer population, which needs to be controlled to prevent damage to natural vegetation. Most tour guides reported a decrease in the sighting of deer along hiking trails, frustrating the genuine expectations of the tourist. The connection of the deer issue to tourism turned out to be very complex, as an overabundance of deer endangers parts of the vegetation tourists come to enjoy, while at the same time deer are an important part of the tourists’ experience. Different perceptions on deer by different stakeholders add to this complexity, which needs to be taken into consideration for proper management of tourists and deer in the future. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1558 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Recreational Ecology: A Review of Research and Gap Analysis

by Daminda Sumanapala and Isabelle D. Wolf

Environments 2019, 6(7), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6070081 - 8 Jul 2019

Cited by 31 | Viewed by 10370

Abstract

Recreational ecology is an internationally evolving research field addressing the high demand for nature-based tourism and recreation, and its environmental impacts. This review aimed to analyze the research effort of recreational ecology studies published in four renowned journals in the field, the Journal [...] Read more.

Recreational ecology is an internationally evolving research field addressing the high demand for nature-based tourism and recreation, and its environmental impacts. This review aimed to analyze the research effort of recreational ecology studies published in four renowned journals in the field, the Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Tourism Management, the Journal of Environmental Management, and Environmental Management. Between 1976 and 2017, this review identified 145 papers focused on recreational ecology. The majority of research investigated the direct impacts of terrestrial activities in protected areas, in particular the impacts of walking and hiking on vegetation and trail conditions, and the impacts of wildlife viewing. A conceptual model was developed to describe the varied relationships between nature-based tourists and recreationists and the environment. Future research in recreational ecology should broaden its agenda to increase knowledge on indirect and long-term impacts; including on cryptic or less popular species; establish more specifically how the intensity of impacts depends on the amount of use other than in trampling studies; extend to other geographic areas such as developing countries, and nature-based spaces that are less protected and exposed to high visitation such as urban environments. Importantly, a much stronger focus needs to be on interdisciplinary approaches incorporating both environmental and social science techniques to determine ways of how visitor experiential needs can be reconciled with environmental conservation concerns in a rapidly increasing tourism and recreation economy. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 423 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Adventure Races in Brazil: Do Stakeholders Take Conservation into Consideration?

by Carolina Bartoletti, Teresa Cristina Magro-Lindenkamp and Gabriel Adrián Sarriés

Environments 2019, 6(7), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6070077 - 3 Jul 2019

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5014

Abstract

This case study used exploratory and descriptive research to look into how stakeholders involved in the organization and practice of adventure races in Brazil perceive impacts related to this outdoor activity. Additionally, questions were posed about whether such impacts have been taken into [...] Read more.

This case study used exploratory and descriptive research to look into how stakeholders involved in the organization and practice of adventure races in Brazil perceive impacts related to this outdoor activity. Additionally, questions were posed about whether such impacts have been taken into consideration when planning these sporting events. Finally, the research aimed to understand why racers and adventure race organizers choose a certain time of year and venue to partake and organize a race: whether for more logistical purposes or also considering conservation. Online surveys were set up to target adventure race organizers, racers, and national park managers. Overall, there seems to be very little knowledge among racers and race organizers about social and environmental impacts associated with adventure races. This has led to the organization of events with very few or no specific concerns to the environment. Moreover, racers and adventure race organizers seem to perceive certain ecological issues—i.e., erosion—as challenges to the sport and not a problem to be addressed or avoided. National park managers were the group surveyed with more knowledge about the negative impacts adventure races might have on the environment. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2747 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Role of Tourism Impacts on Cultural Ecosystem Services

by B. Derrick Taff, Jacob Benfield, Zachary D. Miller, Ashley D’Antonio and Forrest Schwartz

Environments 2019, 6(4), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6040043 - 9 Apr 2019

Cited by 32 | Viewed by 9638

Abstract

Parks and protected areas are recognized for the important ecosystem services, or benefits, they provide society. One emerging but understudied component is the cultural ecosystem services that parks and protected areas provide. These cultural ecosystem services include a variety of benefits, such as [...] Read more.

Parks and protected areas are recognized for the important ecosystem services, or benefits, they provide society. One emerging but understudied component is the cultural ecosystem services that parks and protected areas provide. These cultural ecosystem services include a variety of benefits, such as cultural heritage, spiritual value, recreation opportunities, and human health and well-being. However, many of these services can only be provided if people visit these parks and protected areas through tourism opportunities. However, with this tourism use comes a variety of inevitable resource impacts. This current research connects potential impacts from tourism in parks and protected areas to the health and well-being aspect of cultural ecosystem services. We used an MTurk sample to record affective responses across a range of resource conditions. Results demonstrate that as tourism-related ecological impacts increased, positive affect decreased. Decreases in positive affect were more severe for park and protected area scenes featuring informal and/or undesignated social trails when compared to scenes with increasing levels of trampling/vegetation loss. Collectively, the results show that managing tourism in parks and protected areas in a manner that reduces impact is essential to providing beneficial cultural ecosystem services related to human health and well-being. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

22 pages, 2813 KiB

Open AccessReview

Nature Conservation and Nature-Based Tourism: A Paradox?

by Isabelle D. Wolf, David B. Croft and Ronda J. Green

Environments 2019, 6(9), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6090104 - 6 Sep 2019

Cited by 83 | Viewed by 18990

Abstract

Throughout the world, areas have been reserved for their exceptional environmental values, such as high biodiversity. Financial, political and community support for these protected areas is often dependent on visitation by nature-based tourists. This visitation inevitably creates environmental impacts, such as the construction [...] Read more.

Throughout the world, areas have been reserved for their exceptional environmental values, such as high biodiversity. Financial, political and community support for these protected areas is often dependent on visitation by nature-based tourists. This visitation inevitably creates environmental impacts, such as the construction and maintenance of roads, tracks and trails; trampling of vegetation and erosion of soils; and propagation of disturbance of resilient species, such as weeds. This creates tension between the conservation of environmental values and visitation. This review examines some of the main features of environmental impacts by nature-based tourists through a discussion of observational and manipulative studies. It explores the disturbance context and unravels the management implications of detecting impacts and understanding their causes. Regulation of access to visitor areas is a typical management response, qualified by the mode of access (e.g., vehicular, ambulatory). Managing access and associated impacts are reviewed in relation to roads, tracks and trails; wildlife viewing; and accommodations. Responses to visitor impacts, such as environmental education and sustainable tour experiences are explored. The review concludes with ten recommendations for further research in order to better resolve the tension between nature conservation and nature-based tourism. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4185 KiB

Open AccessReview

Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?

by David B. Croft

Environments 2019, 6(7), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6070083 - 15 Jul 2019

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 7069

Abstract

Modern humans, and other hominins before them, have walked across the landscapes of most continents for many millennia. They shared these landscapes with other large animals, especially mammalian herbivores and their predators, whose footsteps defined trails through the vegetation. Most of the diversity [...] Read more.

Modern humans, and other hominins before them, have walked across the landscapes of most continents for many millennia. They shared these landscapes with other large animals, especially mammalian herbivores and their predators, whose footsteps defined trails through the vegetation. Most of the diversity in the wild species is now concentrated in protected areas and visited by large numbers of tourists who may walk amongst them. This review examines the literature about medium-large animal and tourist trampling impacts to uncover any marriage between animal ecology and nature-based tourism research. Methodology is comparable. Animal ecology has focused on the propagation of grazing and trampling effects from a point source (usually water). Tourism research has focused on trail structure (formal/informal, hardened, wide/narrow) and the propagation of effects (especially weeds) into the hinterland and along the trail. There is little research to substantiate an evolutionary view of trampling impacts. At least tourists venturing off formed trails may reduce impacts by following animal trails with caveats, such as risk of encounters with dangerous animals and disruption of animal behavior. This is an under-studied topic but a fertile ground for research, aided by modern tools like trail cameras and geographically enabled devices borne by tourists. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (8 papers)

Editorial

Research

Review

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI