Completeness of Quantum Theory: Still an Open Question
A special issue of Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300). This special issue belongs to the section "Quantum Information".
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 October 2022) | Viewed by 21349
Special Issue Editor
Interests: foundations of quantum mechanics; quantum information; violation of Bell inequalities; completeness of quantum mechanics; high-energy particle physics; optical theorem; statistical analysis of the experimental data; stochastic processes
Special Issue Information
Dear Colleagues,
The success of quantum information and computer technologies is not dependent on quantum magic and or nonlocality, which are both misleading notions, but on the correct understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) and its foundations. It is a relatively easy task, on a paper, to manipulate entangled states of qubits, switch on and off interactions, apply a sequence of unitary operators, or perform a particular measurement leading to the instantaneous collapse of a quantum state. To do so in a meaningful and controllable way in experiments and in industry is far more difficult, because the quantum states are only mathematical entities, which are not the attributes of individual quantum systems, and may be changed instantaneously.
QM has led to spectacular technological developments. However, there is still no consensus regarding its interpretation and limitations. It provides abstract probabilistic descriptions of physical phenomena. Bohr claimed that quantum probabilities are irreducible, and that more detailed locally causal subquantum description of quantum phenomena is impossible, though this has not been proven. Einstein disagreed with this idea: "Is there really any physicist who believes that we shall never get any insight into these important changes in the single systems, in their structure and their causal connections... To believe this is logically possible without contradiction; but, it is so very contrary to my scientific instinct that I cannot forego the search for a more complete description". It has been incorrectly believed that the violation of various Bell inequalities (BI) allows closure of the Bohr–Einstein quantum debate. However, it has been demonstrated that the violation of (BI) has little to say about the completeness of QM and nonlocality of Nature. Imperfect correlations in Bell Tests may be explained using a locally causal contextual probabilistic model in which setting-dependent parameters describing measuring device are correctly introduced. This Special Issue aims to act as a forum for the presentation of articles of physicists and philosophers who believe that quantum probabilities are emergent and who have been searching for a more intuitive and detailed explanation of quantum phenomena. As Bohr wisely said, no theory can claim to be complete or definite: “Knowledge presents itself within a conceptual framework adapted to previous experience and . . . any such frame may prove too narrow to comprehend new experiences”.
Contributors should share their ideas, experimental results, beliefs, untested conjectures, and doubts, without unnecessary mathematical details. This Special Issue will accept unpublished original papers and comprehensive reviews focused on (but not limited to) the following areas:
- Which sense models, which we create to quantitatively describe our observations and experiments, may be considered as a complete description of the physical reality?
- Quantum phenomena and experiments produce time series of data. We should answer an important question: Is QM is predictably complete (whether quantum probabilities grasp all reproducible fine details of these time-series of data)?
- Despite erroneous belief, the violation of BI does not justify speculations about nonlocality, super-determinism, or retro-causality in nature.
- Contextuality is the key to understanding quantum paradoxes and is a resource for quantum information.
- Two slit experiments with larger and larger molecules suggest that to explain these experiments in an intuitive way we need both waves and particles.
- Recent experiments with bouncing droplets, the continuation of pioneering research of Couder et al., provide an intuitive understanding of various quantum phenomena.
- There are successful subquantum theoretical causal models and computer simulations of some quantum phenomena.
- In QM and in the standard model, semi-empirical inputs containing several free parameters are often needed in order to explain experimental data. In some sense quantum theory becomes unfalsifiable!
Prof. Dr. Marian Kupczynski
Guest Editor
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Entropy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.