Energies

Research

17 pages, 5074 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Intensification of Gas Hydrate Formation Processes by Renewal of Interfacial Area between Phases

by Anatoliy M. Pavlenko and Hanna Koshlak

Energies 2021, 14(18), 5912; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185912 - 17 Sep 2021

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1515

This paper presents the analysis of the main reasons for a significant decrease in the intensity of diffusion processes during the formation of gas hydrates; solutions to this problem are proposed in a new process flow diagram for the continuous synthesis of gas [...] Read more.

This paper presents the analysis of the main reasons for a significant decrease in the intensity of diffusion processes during the formation of gas hydrates; solutions to this problem are proposed in a new process flow diagram for the continuous synthesis of gas hydrates. The physical processes, occurring at the corresponding stages of the process flow, have been described in detail. In the proposed device, gas hydrate is formed at the boundary of gas bubbles immersed in cooled water. The dynamic effects arising at the bubble boundary contribute to the destruction of a forming gas hydrate structure, making it possible to renew the contact surface and ensure efficient heat removal from the reaction zone. The article proposes an assessment technique for the main process parameters in the synthesis of hydrates based on the criterion of thermodynamic parameters optimization. The optimization criterion determines the relationship of intensity of heat and mass transfer processes at the phase contact interface of reacting phases, correlating with the maximum GH synthesis rate, and makes it possible to determine optimum thermodynamic parameters in the reactor zone. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 5035 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Hydrate Phase Transition Kinetic Modeling for Nature and Industry–Where Are We and Where Do We Go?

by Bjørn Kvamme and Matthew Clarke

Energies 2021, 14(14), 4149; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144149 - 9 Jul 2021

Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1757

Abstract

Hydrate problems in industry have historically motivated modeling of hydrates and hydrate phase transition dynamics, and much knowledge has been gained during the last fifty years of research. The interest in natural gas hydrate as energy source is increasing rapidly. Parallel to this, [...] Read more.

Hydrate problems in industry have historically motivated modeling of hydrates and hydrate phase transition dynamics, and much knowledge has been gained during the last fifty years of research. The interest in natural gas hydrate as energy source is increasing rapidly. Parallel to this, there is also a high focus on fluxes of methane from the oceans. A limited portion of the fluxes of methane comes directly from natural gas hydrates but a much larger portion of the fluxes involves hydrate mounds as a dynamic seal that slows down leakage fluxes. In this work we review some of the historical trends in kinetic modeling of hydrate formation and discussion. We also discuss a possible future development over to classical thermodynamics and residual thermodynamics as a platform for all phases, including water phases. This opens up for consistent thermodynamics in which Gibbs free energy for all phases are comparable in terms of stability, and also consistent calculation of enthalpies and entropies. Examples are used to demonstrate various stability limits and how various routes to hydrate formation lead to different hydrates. A reworked Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) is utilized to illustrate that nucleation of hydrate is, as expected from physics, a nano-scale process in time and space. Induction times, or time for onset of massive growth, on the other hand, are frequently delayed by hydrate film transport barriers that slow down contact between gas and liquid water. It is actually demonstrated that the reworked CNT model is able to predict experimental induction times. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 2134 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Promoting Effect of Ultra-Fine Bubbles on CO₂ Hydrate Formation

by Tsutomu Uchida, Hiroshi Miyoshi, Kenji Yamazaki and Kazutoshi Gohara

Energies 2021, 14(12), 3386; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123386 - 8 Jun 2021

Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2240

Abstract

When gas hydrates dissociate into gas and liquid water, many gas bubbles form in the water. The large bubbles disappear after several minutes due to their buoyancy, while a large number of small bubbles (particularly sub-micron-order bubbles known as ultra-fine bubbles (UFBs)) remain [...] Read more.

When gas hydrates dissociate into gas and liquid water, many gas bubbles form in the water. The large bubbles disappear after several minutes due to their buoyancy, while a large number of small bubbles (particularly sub-micron-order bubbles known as ultra-fine bubbles (UFBs)) remain in the water for a long time. In our previous studies, we demonstrated that the existence of UFBs is a major factor promoting gas hydrate formation. We then extended our research on this issue to carbon dioxide (CO₂) as it forms structure-I hydrates, similar to methane and ethane hydrates explored in previous studies; however, CO₂ saturated solutions present severe conditions for the survival of UFBs. The distribution measurements of CO₂ UFBs revealed that their average size was larger and number density was smaller than those of other hydrocarbon UFBs. Despite these conditions, the CO₂ hydrate formation tests confirmed that CO₂ UFBs played important roles in the expression of the promoting effect. The analysis showed that different UFB preparation processes resulted in different promoting effects. These findings can aid in better understanding the mechanism of the promoting (or memory) effect of gas hydrate formation. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 938 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Influence of Hydrate-Forming Gas Pressure on Equilibrium Pore Water Content in Soils

by Daria Sergeeva, Vladimir Istomin, Evgeny Chuvilin, Boris Bukhanov and Natalia Sokolova

Energies 2021, 14(7), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071841 - 26 Mar 2021

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1910

Abstract

Natural gas hydrates (primarily methane hydrates) are considered to be an important and promising unconventional source of hydrocarbons. Most natural gas hydrate accumulations exist in pore space and are associated with reservoir rocks. Therefore, gas hydrate studies in porous media are of particular [...] Read more.

Natural gas hydrates (primarily methane hydrates) are considered to be an important and promising unconventional source of hydrocarbons. Most natural gas hydrate accumulations exist in pore space and are associated with reservoir rocks. Therefore, gas hydrate studies in porous media are of particular interest, as well as, the phase equilibria of pore hydrates, including the determination of equilibrium pore water content (nonclathrated water). Nonclathrated water is analogous to unfrozen water in permafrost soils and has a significant effect on the properties of hydrate-bearing reservoirs. Nonclathrated water content in hydrate-saturated porous media will depend on many factors: pressure, temperature, gas composition, the mineralization of pore water, etc. In this paper, the study is mostly focused on the effect of hydrate-forming gas pressure on nonclathrated water content in hydrate-bearing soils. To solve this problem, simple thermodynamic equations were proposed which require data on pore water activity (or unfrozen water content). Additionally, it is possible to recalculate the nonclathrated water content data from one hydrate-forming gas to another using the proposed thermodynamic equations. The comparison showed a sufficiently good agreement between the calculated nonclathrated water content and its direct measurements for investigated soils. The discrepancy was ~0.15 wt% and was comparable to the accuracy of direct measurements. It was established that the effect of gas pressure on nonclathrated water content is highly nonlinear. For example, the most pronounced effect of gas pressure on nonclathrated water content is observed in the range from equilibrium pressure to 6.0 MPa. The developed thermodynamic technique can be used for different hydrate-forming gases such as methane, ethane, propane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, various gas mixtures, and natural gases. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3340 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Amphiphilic Block Copolymers with Vinyl Caprolactam as Kinetic Gas Hydrate Inhibitors

by Faraz Rajput, Milan Maric and Phillip Servio

Energies 2021, 14(2), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020341 - 9 Jan 2021

Cited by 14 | Viewed by 1813

Abstract

Macrosurfactants consisting of water-soluble poly(vinylcaprolactam) (PVCap) or poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) segments with comparatively shorter hydrophobic poly(styrene) (PS) or poly(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) (PPFS) segments were used as kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs). These were synthesized with 2-cyanopropan-2-yl N-methyl-N-(pyridin-4-yl)dithiocarbamate switchable reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent [...] Read more.

Macrosurfactants consisting of water-soluble poly(vinylcaprolactam) (PVCap) or poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) segments with comparatively shorter hydrophobic poly(styrene) (PS) or poly(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) (PPFS) segments were used as kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs). These were synthesized with 2-cyanopropan-2-yl N-methyl-N-(pyridin-4-yl)dithiocarbamate switchable reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent at 60 °C or 90 °C for 1-P(S/PFS) or 1-PVCap, respectively, followed by chain extension at 90 °C or 70 °C with PVCap or PVP, respectively. The addition of PVCap to the pure methane-water system resulted in a 53% reduction of methane consumption (comparable to PVP with 51% inhibition) during the initial growth phase. A PS-PVCap block copolymer comprised of 10 mol% PS and 90 mol% PVCap improved inhibition to 56% compared to the pure methane-water system with no KHIs. Substituting PS with a more hydrophobic PPFS segment further improved inhibition to 73%. By increasing the ratio of the hydrophobic PS- to PVCap- groups in the polymer, an increase of its inhibition potential was measured. For PPFS-PVCap, an increase of PPFS ratio from 5% to 10% decreased the methane formation rate by 6%. However, PPFS-PVCap block copolymers with more than 20 mol% PPFS were unable to dissolve in water due to increase in hydrophobicity and the attendant low critical micelle concentration (CMC). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6050 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Comparative Study of Tetra-N-Butyl Ammonium Bromide and Cyclopentane on the Methane Hydrate Formation and Dissociation

by Warintip Chanakro, Chutikan Jaikwang, Katipot Inkong, Santi Kulprathipanja and Pramoch Rangsunvigit

Energies 2020, 13(24), 6518; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246518 - 10 Dec 2020

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1715

Abstract

Two widely investigated methane hydrate promoters, tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) and cyclopentane (CP), for methane hydrate formation and dissociation were comparatively investigated in the quiescent reactor at 2.5 °C and 8 MPa. The results indicated that the increase in the mass fraction TBAB [...] Read more.

Two widely investigated methane hydrate promoters, tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) and cyclopentane (CP), for methane hydrate formation and dissociation were comparatively investigated in the quiescent reactor at 2.5 °C and 8 MPa. The results indicated that the increase in the mass fraction TBAB decreased the induction time. However, it did not significantly affect the methane uptake. In the presence of CP, the increase in the CP concentration resulted in an increase in the induction time due to the increasing thicknesses of the CP layer in the unstirred reactor. Moreover, the methane uptake was varied proportionally with the CP concentration. The addition of TBAB resulted in a higher methane uptake than that of CP, since the presence of TBAB provided the cavities in the hydrate structure to accommodate the methane gas during the hydrate formation better than that of CP. On the contrary, the presence of CP significantly increased the induction time. Although the methane recovery remained relatively the same regardless of TBAB and CP concentrations, the recovery was higher in the presence of TBAB. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 810 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate

by Kayode I. Adeniyi, Connor E. Deering and Robert A. Marriott

Energies 2020, 13(23), 6295; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236295 - 29 Nov 2020

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2860

Abstract

In order to prevent solids from forming during the transportation and handling of liquid propane, C₃H₈(l), the fluid is dehydrated to a level below the water dew point concentration for the coldest operating temperature. Thus, accurate calculation [...] Read more.

In order to prevent solids from forming during the transportation and handling of liquid propane, C₃H₈(l), the fluid is dehydrated to a level below the water dew point concentration for the coldest operating temperature. Thus, accurate calculation of the saturation water content for C₃H₈ is important to determine the designed allowable concentration in liquid C₃H₈. In this work, we measured the water content of liquid C₃H₈ in the presence of the structure II hydrate from p = 1.081 to 40.064 MPa and T = 241.95 to 276.11 K using a tunable diode absorption spectroscopy technique. The water content results were modelled using the reference quality reduced Helmholtz equations and the Sloan et al. model for the non-hydrate and hydrate phases, respectively. Calculations show a good agreement (an average difference of less than 12 ppm) when compared to our measurements. Furthermore, the model was also used for calculating the dissociation temperatures for three phase loci, where a relative difference greater than 5 K was observed compared to the literature, hence our previously model reported by Adeniyi et al. is recommended for three phase loci calculations. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5761 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Methane Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Sand Media: Effect of Water Saturation, Gas Flowrate and Particle Size

by Fatima Doria Benmesbah, Livio Ruffine, Pascal Clain, Véronique Osswald, Olivia Fandino, Laurence Fournaison and Anthony Delahaye

Energies 2020, 13(19), 5200; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195200 - 6 Oct 2020

Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2855

Abstract

Assessing the influence of key parameters governing the formation of hydrates and determining the capacity of the latter to store gaseous molecules is needed to improve our understanding of the role of natural gas hydrates in the oceanic methane cycle. Such knowledge will [...] Read more.

Assessing the influence of key parameters governing the formation of hydrates and determining the capacity of the latter to store gaseous molecules is needed to improve our understanding of the role of natural gas hydrates in the oceanic methane cycle. Such knowledge will also support the development of new industrial processes and technologies such as those related to thermal energy storage. In this study, high-pressure laboratory methane hydrate formation and dissociation experiments were carried out in a sandy matrix at a temperature around 276.65 K. Methane was continuously injected at constant flowrate to allow hydrate formation over the course of the injection step. The influence of water saturation, methane injection flowrate and particle size on hydrate formation kinetics and methane storage capacity were investigated. Six water saturations (10.8%, 21.6%, 33%, 43.9%, 55% and 66.3%), three gas flowrates (29, 58 and 78 mLn·min⁻¹) and three classes of particle size (80–140, 315–450 and 80–450 µm) were tested, and the resulting data were tabulated. Overall, the measured induction time obtained at 53–57% water saturation has an average value of 58 ± 14 min minutes with clear discrepancies that express the stochastic nature of hydrate nucleation, and/or results from the heterogeneity in the porosity and permeability fields of the sandy core due to heterogeneous particles. Besides, the results emphasize a clear link between the gas injection flowrate and the induction time whatever the particle size and water saturation. An increase in the gas flowrate from 29 to 78 mLn·min⁻¹ is accompanied by a decrease in the induction time up to ~100 min (i.e., ~77% decrease). However, such clear behaviour is less conspicuous when varying either the particle size or the water saturation. Likewise, the volume of hydrate-bound methane increases with increasing water saturation. This study showed that water is not totally converted into hydrates and most of the calculated conversion ratios are around 74–84%, with the lowest value of 49.5% conversion at 54% of water saturation and the highest values of 97.8% for the lowest water saturation (10.8%). Comparison with similar experiments in the literature is also carried out herein. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI