Early Childhood Education Policy: Impact on Children's Well-Being and Development

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Early Childhood Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 July 2025 | Viewed by 1833

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Interests: secondary data; understanding poverty; evaluation of educational programmes; education in the developing countries

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Interests: reading interventions; learning difficulties; special education; secondary data analysis; research methodology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from around the globe to submit their original research and reviews for a Special Issue focused on early childhood development policies and their impact on children's well-being. This issue will explore the recent policy initiatives implemented by governments to enhance the quality of early childhood education (ECE) and assess the effects of these policies on various outcomes related to children's development and wellbeing. In recent years, many governments have recognised the importance of early childhood development (ECD) as a key factor influencing long-term societal well-being, educational achievement, and workforce readiness. Various policies and interventions have been introduced worldwide to address the quality, accessibility, and equity of early childhood services. These initiatives include, but are not limited to, improving teacher training, developing curriculum standards, increasing public investment, and integrating social and emotional learning. 

This Special Issue aims to explore the impacts of these policies on the following:

  • How have government-led ECD policies impacted cognitive, emotional, social, and physical development in young children?
  • Are children entering formal education better prepared due to new early childhood initiatives? How do policies affect literacy, numeracy, and socio-emotional readiness for school?
  • How do ECE policies influence parental mental health, wellbeing, and participation in the workforce? Do accessible ECE services enable greater parental engagement in economic activities?
  • How are the working conditions, professional development opportunities, and retention of early childhood educators impacted by recent policy changes? 

We invite papers that investigate, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Comparative analysis of national or regional early childhood policies and their effectiveness.
  • Studies examining how specific policy interventions (e.g., universal preschool access, parental leave reforms) have influenced children's developmental outcomes.
  • Longitudinal research on the relationship between early childhood education quality and long-term educational success.
  • Investigations of the role of equity and inclusion in recent policy changes, particularly in underserved communities.
  • Cross-cultural studies that provide insights into how cultural and societal factors influence ECE policy design and implementation.
  • Evaluations of initiatives targeting workforce development for early childhood educators, including professional training and support systems.
  • Research on the role of public-private partnerships in delivering quality early childhood education.

We welcome submissions from a broad range of disciplines, including education, psychology, public policy, sociology, and health. Articles on review synthesis, evaluations, secondary data analysis, and comparative design approaches are encouraged. All submissions must be original research that has not been published elsewhere.

Prof. Dr. Nadia Siddiqui
Dr. Johny Daniel
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • early childhood education
  • early childhood development policies
  • children's well-being

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 783 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Analysis of Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of Reading Instruction and Their Confidence in Supporting Struggling Readers: A Study of India and England
by Johny Daniel, Radhika Misquitta and Sophie Nelson
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 442; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040442 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 460
Abstract
This study examines the knowledge and preparedness of preservice teachers in India and England regarding the teaching of foundational reading skills. Recognising the critical role of teachers in preventing reading difficulties through explicit instruction in phonics, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension strategies, we [...] Read more.
This study examines the knowledge and preparedness of preservice teachers in India and England regarding the teaching of foundational reading skills. Recognising the critical role of teachers in preventing reading difficulties through explicit instruction in phonics, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension strategies, we aimed to compare preservice teachers’ knowledge in these areas between the two countries. A survey was developed for this study and administered to preservice teachers enrolled in teacher education programs in India and England. The survey assessed their phonics knowledge, pedagogical practices across key reading domains, and confidence in supporting students with reading difficulties in inclusive classrooms. Descriptive analyses indicated that English preservice teachers demonstrated greater familiarity with phonics knowledge and were better prepared in pedagogical practices, particularly in phonics instruction, phonological awareness, and reading fluency. Both groups showed low preparedness in teaching vocabulary knowledge. Notably, Indian preservice teachers reported higher confidence levels in supporting students with reading difficulties despite lower performance in knowledge assessments. These findings suggest a need for enhanced focus on explicit phonics instruction in Indian teacher education programs and increased emphasis on vocabulary instruction in both countries. Implications for early childhood education policy are discussed, particularly with regards to preparing teachers to provide high-quality literacy instruction that supports children’s academic success. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 550 KiB  
Article
Leadership for Educational Inclusion: Design and Validation of a Measurement Instrument
by Daniela Zúñiga, Gamal Cerda and Claudio Bustos Navarrete
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020181 - 4 Feb 2025
Viewed by 922
Abstract
This article addresses the validation of an instrument designed to measure organizational leadership practices for inclusion and evaluates the said instrument’s factorial structure and convergent validity. This work responds to the need for quantitative tools to assess how school principals promote inclusion, in [...] Read more.
This article addresses the validation of an instrument designed to measure organizational leadership practices for inclusion and evaluates the said instrument’s factorial structure and convergent validity. This work responds to the need for quantitative tools to assess how school principals promote inclusion, in recognition of its importance for guaranteeing student access to an equitable quality education at all levels, from early childhood education through high school. The above-referenced instrument was developed based on a comprehensive literature review and consultations with experts, resulting in a 36-item scale structured in six key dimensions: D1: Professional Development; D2: Inclusive Vision; D3: Support for the Teaching–Learning Process; D4: Building Networks; D5: Participation and Dialog, and D6: Resource Management. The validation process included a confirmatory factor analysis that supported the existence of a hierarchical structure of a general factor of leadership for inclusion that determines the aforementioned key dimensions, with adequate fit indices (χ2(588) = 1694.624, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.945, TLI = 0.941, RMSEA = 0.060, SRMR = 0.034) and high internal consistency in the general scale (α = 0.98, Ω = 0.96). In terms of convergent validity, the instrument showed significant and consistent correlations with related constructs such as teacher self-efficacy and pedagogical leadership. This study highlights the importance of leadership for inclusion as a central element of fostering participation and learning in diverse school contexts, by providing a reliable tool for continuous improvement of the school management team’s performance of its functions. Also, it is important input for education policymakers charged with formulating student equity, who recognize the enhanced well-being and active participation in the social environment that result from the greater inclusion of students in their educational communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop