Engineering Education Addressing Professional Challenges

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "STEM Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 15498

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CIETI (Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology or Institute), Polytechnic of Porto-School of Engineering (ISEP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
Interests: engineering education; physics didactics; professional development; active learning; contextualized learning practices; students’ involvement in professional contexts; lifelong learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Polythecnic of Porto, School of Engineering, Physics Department / CIETI - Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
Interests: engineering education; remote labs; STEM education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Superior Institute of Engineering of Porto (ISEP), Porto Polytechnic Institute (IPP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
Interests: remote labs; online learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Computer Science Department, Research Institute for Educational Sciences, GRIAL Research Group, University of Salamanca, Faculty of Sciences, Plaza de los Caídos S/N, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
Interests: STEM; computational thinking
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Presently, the challenges young graduates must overcome in professional engineering are gigantic. These are not only the natural barriers of becoming a part of the working society, but also the need to be particularly expert in several domains to be socially competent and technologically up-to-date.

The academic staff in most universities, who are typically in their forties or fifties, has happily lived through a period when the advances in technology were enormous. From the first computer they ever used (which was probably once a week…) to their personal computers and other personal digital devices,

we are talking of a period of approximately forty years. This technology growth is exponential, so one can only dream of what is to come in the next forty years! This is the world for which engineering students must be prepared. The challenges they will be facing have nothing to do with the ones previous generations overcame. As in Darwin’s Natural Selection, the ones more equipped to survive will probably be the ones who scientifically grew up developing competences while learning the subjects. This, however, requires scientific and personal maturity.

The question is: How can we help them to get better prepared for that?

Undoubtedly, students should prepare themselves during their higher education in order to face the upcoming challenges. Teachers acknowledge students must comprehend and establish the necessary links between topics in order to mobilize the pertinent expertise to solve complex problems. This implies that students must think about each situation per se and be able to holistically put into practice what they have learned. Most likely, in the end, it comes down to solving the problem by applying a “simple” solution. However, as we all know, this pursued simplicity requires time and hard work to achieve. When facing a new problem, students must be scientifically and socially competent in knowing which paths to take to be successful. Professionally, this also includes being able to seek the necessary help from colleagues in other fields or the ability to lead a team towards finding the solution for a specific problem. That is essentially what engineering is about!

 The focus of this Special Issue is to enhance the discussion on any particular aspect regarding engineering students’ academic preparation. Even small cases representing small steps towards this bigger objective are welcomed. As long as these experiences are well described, properly grounded in engineering education pillars, tested (preferably), and scientifically analyzed, they are worth being acknowledged.

We intend to diversify our emphasis towards studies dedicated to teachers’ experiences, students’ learning, recent graduated engineering professional issues or even mindsets from within the professional world. 

Dr. Clara Viegas
Dr. Arcelina Marques
Dr. Gustavo Alves
Dr. Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Engineering internships
  • Engineering professional contexts
  • Engineering competences
  • PBL cases in engineering
  • Project management
  • Engineering classroom practices

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

16 pages, 4999 KiB  
Article
Measuring Experiential Learning: An Approach Based on Lessons Learned Mapping
by Marco Bertoni and Alessandro Bertoni
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010011 - 30 Dec 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5624
Abstract
Fostering ‘experiential learning’ in real-life situations is a critical task for engineering educators when creating constructively aligned learning activities. The paper proposes an approach to measure the students’ perception of learning in Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate activities conducted outside the classroom. The approach is based on [...] Read more.
Fostering ‘experiential learning’ in real-life situations is a critical task for engineering educators when creating constructively aligned learning activities. The paper proposes an approach to measure the students’ perception of learning in Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate activities conducted outside the classroom. The approach is based on the opportunity of gathering and analyzing lessons learned from the student reflection reports at the end of a team-based innovation project performed in collaboration with company partners. The approach is intended to provide a basis for the future development of innovation projects with engineering students, supporting the definition of learning outcomes that are relevant for the CDIO Syllabus 2.0, and of constructively aligned learning experiences. The paper exemplifies the approach with regards to a master course named Value Innovation and presents the findings obtained at the third and second level of the CDIO Syllabus 2.0. The results of the course implementation show how short team-based innovation projects largely contributed in developing social and communication-related skills in engineering students, going beyond the mere application of their technical skills. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineering Education Addressing Professional Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 993 KiB  
Article
Challenges for Teaching Wireless Communications Standards at the Graduate Level
by Laura Pierucci
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(4), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040298 - 15 Dec 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4087
Abstract
Telecom operators and companies ask for graduates with a specific education on the standards of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) or the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), and the University curricula must consider these needs. The standards are written [...] Read more.
Telecom operators and companies ask for graduates with a specific education on the standards of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) or the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), and the University curricula must consider these needs. The standards are written in a technical form, in a language understandable only by experts, and the technical details and algorithms are not often outlined. Therefore, a new educational methodology must be applied because the teachers have to bridge the gap between the basic knowledge (and the poor technical language) of students and the technical specifics of the standards. The paper presents a structured methodology to provide innovative teaching of the wireless standards for the Engineering Master’s degree, according to the Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate (CDIO) initiative and project based learning. The methodology is organized in three learning phases to understand the standardization process and improve students’ skills to implement standard compliant communications systems. This challenge can be only won with laboratory activities to assist students in understanding wireless standards and with hands-on experiences during the internship period at telecom operators with the vision of a close cooperation between universities and telecom operators. Only in this way can the students achieve a solid background in designing and developing prototypes compliant with wireless communications standards and working skills for their future professional engineering careers. The effectiveness of the adopted educational methodology to provide innovative learning of wireless standards is evaluated by questionnaires filled in online by students and by the achieved skills implemented as confirmed by telecom operators. In this vision, the paper provides decision support to leaders in educational organizations to teach wireless standards effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineering Education Addressing Professional Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 5684 KiB  
Case Report
Integrating CAD/CAE/CAM in Engineering Curricula: A Project-Based Learning Approach
by Fábio A. O. Fernandes, Nilo Fuchter Júnior, Anderson Daleffe, Daniel Fritzen and Ricardo J. Alves de Sousa
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(5), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050125 - 28 Apr 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5263
Abstract
Problem-based learning (PBL) approaches are well-accepted and disseminated and have been intensively employed in several engineering programs. This article aims to present a teaching experience in which PBL was applied in one course of a mechanical engineering graduation program. The PBL approach applied [...] Read more.
Problem-based learning (PBL) approaches are well-accepted and disseminated and have been intensively employed in several engineering programs. This article aims to present a teaching experience in which PBL was applied in one course of a mechanical engineering graduation program. The PBL approach applied is described step-by-step as well as the goals and constraints related to Computer-Aided Design, Engineering and Manufacturing (CAD/CAE/CAM) technologies employed in this particular case. The evaluation process is described, as well as the quantitative results, and also the results obtained from questionnaires answered by the students at the end of the PBL experience. Additionally, the team’s technical success in solving the proposed CAD/CAE/CAM problems was also taken into account. This PBL approach provided the students with the required autonomy to develop their argumentative skills within the team, defending their ideas, and at the same time, promoting self-criticism and ethical and impartial judgment among the other team members. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineering Education Addressing Professional Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop