Machine Learning in Educational Large Data Analysis

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 September 2026 | Viewed by 466

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Cato College of Education, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
Interests: educational research method; program evaluation; educational assessment; educational psychology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China
Interests: language education and assessment; educational psychology; quantitative methods

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The growing availability of large-scale educational data has catalyzed a surge in the application of machine learning (ML) in educational research (Ersozlu et al., 2024). Institutions routinely collect vast amounts of information through enrollment records, learning management systems, national assessments and digital learning platforms such as MOOCs (Du et al., 2020). These data sources have created new opportunities to investigate patterns in student learning, behavior and outcomes at an unprecedented scale. Machine learning offers a set of tools well-suited to this data-rich environment. Over the past decade, it has been increasingly used to model complex relationships and generate predictive insights that complement or extend traditional statistical approaches (Delen, 2010; Sghir et al., 2023). Applications have ranged from forecasting academic performance and identifying at-risk students to classifying engagement patterns and automating assessment tasks. More recently, ML techniques have also been applied to qualitative data, such as open-ended survey responses, discussion threads, student writing and course evaluations, enabling researchers to detect themes and sentiment at scale (Kastrati et al., 2021; Nawaz et al., 2022).

This Special Issue calls for proposals that use ML techniques to address educational issues with or without comparison to statistical procedures. The ML techniques include, but are not limited to, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, semi-supervised learning, reinforcement learning, large language models (LLMs), support vector machine (SVM), decision trees (DTs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), Naïve Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), Random Forests (RFs), Gradient boosting, XGBoost, SHAP, LightGBM and TensorFlow.

References

  • Ersozlu, Z., Taheri, S., & Koch, I. (2024). A review of machine learning methods used for educational data. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 22125-22145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12704-0.
  • Du, Chuanjun, Ruoying He, Zhiyu Liu, Tao Huang, Lifang Wang, Zhongwei Yuan, Yanping Xu, Zhe Wang, and Minhan Dai. (2020). Composited temperature-salinity-dissolved inorganic phosphate relationships in the South China Sea of fall season. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.921708.
  • Delen, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 498-506. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167923610001041.
  • Sghir, N., Adadi, A., & Lahmer, M. (2023). Recent advances in Predictive Learning Analytics: A decade systematic review (2012–2022). Education and information technologies, 28(7), 8299-8333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11536-0.
  • Kastrati, Z., Dalipi, F., Imran, A. S., Pireva Nuci, K., & Wani, M. A. (2021). Sentiment Analysis of Students’ Feedback with NLP and Deep Learning: A Systematic Mapping Study. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093986.
  • Nawaz, R., Sun, Q., Shardlow, M., Kontonatsios, G., Aljohani, N. R., Visvizi, A., & Hassan, S.-U. (2022). Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for National Student Survey: Actionable Insights from Textual Feedback to Enhance Quality of Teaching and Learning in UK’s Higher Education. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010514.

Prof. Dr. Chuang Wang
Prof. Dr. Yuyang Cai
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • machine learning
  • educational research
  • large data
  • data analysis
  • statistical procedure
  • large language model

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 300 KB  
Article
An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics
by Dimitrios E. Tzimas and Stavros N. Demetriadis
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789 (registering DOI) - 17 May 2026
Abstract
Learning analytics (LA) is an emerging field that has undergone extensive development in K-12 education, focusing on students’ learning processes and tracking their learning trajectories. However, numerous developments remain in the pilot phase without holistic adoption. Despite the growing use of teacher-facing analytics [...] Read more.
Learning analytics (LA) is an emerging field that has undergone extensive development in K-12 education, focusing on students’ learning processes and tracking their learning trajectories. However, numerous developments remain in the pilot phase without holistic adoption. Despite the growing use of teacher-facing analytics in K-12 education, little is known about the processes through which instructors interpret and negotiate analytics within everyday school practice. This paper presents an interpretive ethnographic study of teacher sensemaking and resistance regarding LA adoption in K-12 schools. Informed by the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), we implemented a small-N ethnographic study with school teachers to explore their perceptions and experiences regarding LA adoption. The research question was “How do teachers interpret, negotiate, and make sense of learning analytics adoption in K-12 school settings?” The findings indicate that teachers’ responses to LA adoption were shaped through complex sensemaking processes involving perceived usefulness, institutional culture, emotional ambivalence, ethical issues, and human-centered understandings of data-driven educational practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Educational Large Data Analysis)
Back to TopTop