Next Article in Journal
Designing Resilient STEM Trajectories: An Ecological Framework for Sustained Participation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Equity for Women’s Leadership in International Schools Through Transformative Action
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics

by
Dimitrios E. Tzimas
* and
Stavros N. Demetriadis
Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 March 2026 / Revised: 11 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 17 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Educational Large Data Analysis)

Abstract

Learning analytics (LA) is an emerging field that has undergone extensive development in K-12 education, focusing on students’ learning processes and tracking their learning trajectories. However, numerous developments remain in the pilot phase without holistic adoption. Despite the growing use of teacher-facing analytics in K-12 education, little is known about the processes through which instructors interpret and negotiate analytics within everyday school practice. This paper presents an interpretive ethnographic study of teacher sensemaking and resistance regarding LA adoption in K-12 schools. Informed by the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), we implemented a small-N ethnographic study with school teachers to explore their perceptions and experiences regarding LA adoption. The research question was “How do teachers interpret, negotiate, and make sense of learning analytics adoption in K-12 school settings?” The findings indicate that teachers’ responses to LA adoption were shaped through complex sensemaking processes involving perceived usefulness, institutional culture, emotional ambivalence, ethical issues, and human-centered understandings of data-driven educational practices.
Keywords: learning analytics adoption; teacher sensemaking; teacher resistance; UTAUT; human-centered design; school culture; K-12 education; ethnography learning analytics adoption; teacher sensemaking; teacher resistance; UTAUT; human-centered design; school culture; K-12 education; ethnography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tzimas, D.E.; Demetriadis, S.N. An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789

AMA Style

Tzimas DE, Demetriadis SN. An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(5):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tzimas, Dimitrios E., and Stavros N. Demetriadis. 2026. "An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics" Education Sciences 16, no. 5: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789

APA Style

Tzimas, D. E., & Demetriadis, S. N. (2026). An Ethnographic Study on Teachers’ Acceptance and Resistance Attitudes to Adopting Learning Analytics. Education Sciences, 16(5), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop