Beyond the Bottom Line: Systemic Pathways to Identity-Responsive STEM Learning

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "STEM Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 6542

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance, Augusta, ME 04330, USA
Interests: STEM identity; afterschool STEM education; family engagement; caregiver mattering; rural education; research practice partnerships; place-based education; validity; critical studies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Education researchers and practitioners recognize that supporting learners in seeing themselves as capable, valued participants in STEM and its disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) is critical in broadening participation and advancing equity. Identity-affirming STEM pedagogies have shown promise in transforming what “counts” as STEM participation and identifying as a “STEM person”. However, the true costs of training and supporting educators in facilitating this identity work remain underexplored, often hidden in budgets, policy gaps, or professional learning programs that are maintained across diverse funding sources.

We invite empirical, theoretical, and methodological contributions that address the systemic conditions needed to nurture identity-affirming work in STEM learning environments. These include, but are not limited to, administrative support, funding structures, policy conditions, curriculum flexibility, and cross-sector partnerships. We especially welcome studies that acknowledge diversity in learning contexts, whether formal, informal, or community-based, and highlight transferable lessons across educator preparation, policy, and learner outcomes. We invite work that considers identity-affirming support for young people, educators, and community members outside of traditional learning institutions.

Submissions should explicitly engage with the question of how concepts like “cost”, “investment”, and “value” are defined, measured, and communicated when implementing and evaluating identity-affirming STEM practices. We welcome contributions that challenge the capitalistic use of these terms in discussing youth outcomes and offer alternative discourses.

Dr. Heidi Cian
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • STEM identity
  • scale
  • policy
  • funding

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 1117 KB  
Article
Investing in the Lynchpin: Design Principles for Professional Development to Support Youth-Led STEM Programming
by Jessica Sickler, Andria Parrott, Breanna Jones and Robert Kloos
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040569 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 411
Abstract
Youth-led STEM programming depends on skilled adult facilitators who can support authentic teen leadership, yet professional learning for developing these specialized skills remains understudied. Through three cycles of design-based research, we iteratively developed and studied a professional development model that trained informal educators [...] Read more.
Youth-led STEM programming depends on skilled adult facilitators who can support authentic teen leadership, yet professional learning for developing these specialized skills remains understudied. Through three cycles of design-based research, we iteratively developed and studied a professional development model that trained informal educators from museums, libraries, afterschool programs, and schools to launch Teen Science Café programs—a youth-led model where teens organize STEM events. Analysis of data from trainer reflections, trainee interviews, trainee surveys, and implementation tracking across three iterative design cycles revealed six interconnected principles essential for effective professional development: focusing on a committed adult leader; personalized training characterized by mutual respect; learning by doing; establishing accountability that builds momentum; enabling learning from peers and near-peers; and recognizing success to nurture professional pride. Implementing these principles to prepare educators to center youth voice requires substantial, coordinated investment across stakeholders—commensurate with the complexity of developing youth agency and STEM identity in informal settings. From our findings, we contrast this approach with the “efficiency trap,” in which scaled training without sustained support wastes resources when many educators are trained but youth-centered programs fail to materialize. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 711 KB  
Article
It Takes a Village: A Case Study on Leveraging Community Strengths, Assets, and Investment to Support a Pathway into STEMM for K-12 Youth Residing in a Low-SES Area
by Kyeorda Kemp, Nedi Affas, Mackenzie Farrow, Nooraldin Kamalaldin, Savanna Lavendar, Paige Pistotti, Lucia Spera, Aeshah Tawfik and Michele Wogaman
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030459 - 17 Mar 2026
Viewed by 502
Abstract
The economic and societal advantages of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEMM) occupations are considerable; however, access to STEMM education and training opportunities is unequal, especially for youth from low-socioeconomic-status (SES) areas. Young people from low-SES areas may experience sustained structural, financial, [...] Read more.
The economic and societal advantages of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEMM) occupations are considerable; however, access to STEMM education and training opportunities is unequal, especially for youth from low-socioeconomic-status (SES) areas. Young people from low-SES areas may experience sustained structural, financial, and social barriers that limit their ability to develop identities as STEMM practitioners and to persist in pursuing these fields. This case study describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of a community-based mini-medical summer camp held in a low-SES area to support the development of STEMM identities and to increase 6th–11th-grade students’ biomedical and medical knowledge and career interests. The program utilized partnerships with local entities to provide access to biomedical and medical content. Nineteen students completed the program; fifteen consented to and assented to assessment using pre- and post-tests of STEMM-related knowledge and self-efficacy, and completed all measurements. Students’ STEMM knowledge levels increased significantly; however, their STEMM self-efficacy did not change, possibly due to high initial confidence and the short duration of participation. Students reported high engagement and increased interest in the sciences and medicine. Overall, this study suggests that community-centered outreach programs can increase STEMM engagement and learning in low-SES environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5376 KB  
Article
Grounding Systemic Changes in Museum Visitors’ Identities and Agendas: Lessons Learned from an Engineering Design Exhibition
by Susan M. Letourneau, Katherine Ziff and Dana Schloss
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 444; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030444 - 16 Mar 2026
Viewed by 272
Abstract
As museums and science centers work to reach broad and diverse public audiences, staff face challenges in aligning learner-centered educational approaches with the needs and motivations of audiences with varying identities and agendas. This article synthesizes several years of practitioner-driven work, in which [...] Read more.
As museums and science centers work to reach broad and diverse public audiences, staff face challenges in aligning learner-centered educational approaches with the needs and motivations of audiences with varying identities and agendas. This article synthesizes several years of practitioner-driven work, in which science center staff revised an engineering design exhibition in response to visitor feedback and observations in practice. Analyses examine practitioners’ perspectives about the unanticipated challenges within the original design of the exhibition, and the ways in which museum staff updated their expectations and pedagogical strategies. Analyses are grounded in two theoretical models: (1) Falk’s Museum Visitor Experience Model, which describes how people use museum visits to affirm specific aspects of their identities; and (2) Dawson’s Access and Equity Framework, which describes structural forms of inaccessibility and exclusion that become embedded within museum spaces. These frameworks are used to examine the systemic changes that staff made to multiple facets of the visitor experience, including signage, framing and facilitation of activities, curation and preparation of materials, and the design of adjacent exhibits. This ever-expanding process was a necessary investment to realize the exhibition’s original intention of building on visitors’ existing knowledge, identities, and lived experiences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 471 KB  
Article
Exploring the Community Cultural Wealth and Science Capital of Parents in a Family STEM Program
by Megan Ennes, M. Gail Jones, Emily Cayton and Katherine Chesnutt
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020331 - 18 Feb 2026
Viewed by 733
Abstract
While parents and caregivers are seen as an important factor in the development of science identity building, few studies have explored the contextual and capacity-based factors that influence parents’ support of their children in STEM. Parental STEM resources can be explored through the [...] Read more.
While parents and caregivers are seen as an important factor in the development of science identity building, few studies have explored the contextual and capacity-based factors that influence parents’ support of their children in STEM. Parental STEM resources can be explored through the community cultural wealth framework which describes the types of knowledge, connections, and capabilities a community possesses. This study explored the impacts of a year-long, museum-based family STEM program on the parents’ community cultural wealth and science capital through surveys and interviews. The results suggest that the program was able to have a positive impact on the capital and habitus of the parent participants. Having access to parents who promote career awareness and encourage career exploration has emerged as an important type of cultural capital. By engaging families as a whole, rather than youth as individuals, programs may be able to more effectively support youth science identity and career aspirations. Sustained, engaging, family-based programs out-of-school, and potentially in schools, are one way to approach the need for more youth, particularly women and those from underrepresented groups, to pursue STEM careers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 482 KB  
Article
The Differential Impact of Informal Experiences on Teachers’ Identity and Career Aspirations
by M. Gail Jones, Emma Refvem, K. Rende Mendoza, Sarah J. Carrier, Julianna Nieuwsma, Tammy Lee and Amy Taylor
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020218 - 2 Feb 2026
Viewed by 462
Abstract
This explanatory mixed-methods study explored the relationship of teachers’ early informal teaching and facilitation experiences on the development of a teacher identity and decisions to pursue careers in teaching. Science teachers were surveyed (n = 160) about informal experiences they had prior [...] Read more.
This explanatory mixed-methods study explored the relationship of teachers’ early informal teaching and facilitation experiences on the development of a teacher identity and decisions to pursue careers in teaching. Science teachers were surveyed (n = 160) about informal experiences they had prior to teaching that influenced their decision to enter a teaching career. Ten teachers were randomly selected to participate in a follow-up interview designed to gain insight into the context and nature of the experiences. Results showed that activities involving facilitation, such as tutoring, camp counselling, and volunteering at museums, were perceived as significant influences on career choice more than participatory experiences. Facilitating roles allowed individuals to practice and develop leadership and teaching skills. Experiences such as museum volunteering were reported as particularly impactful. The results suggest that some types and contexts of experiences play differential roles in the development of science teachers’ career aspirations. The findings underscore the potential of informal, facilitation-based experiences as tools to cultivate future science educators. This study examined reported experiences that contribute to science teachers’ identity and career aspirations, and the results can inform our understanding of the teacher pipeline by supporting opportunities for youth to be engaged in experiences where they can facilitate learning for others. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 630 KB  
Article
Impact Framework for Transforming STEAM Education: A Multi-Level Approach to Evidence-Based Reform
by Natalia Spyropoulou, Michalis Ioannou and Achilles Kameas
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1552; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111552 - 18 Nov 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1451
Abstract
This paper presents the development of an Impact Framework for STEAM education created as part of a project to support systemic, evidence-based reform. The framework was derived from an extensive synthesis of data collected through policy mapping, national and European strategy reviews, comparative [...] Read more.
This paper presents the development of an Impact Framework for STEAM education created as part of a project to support systemic, evidence-based reform. The framework was derived from an extensive synthesis of data collected through policy mapping, national and European strategy reviews, comparative case studies, and three stakeholder consultations with educators, industry representatives, and policymakers. The analysis used thematic synthesis, root cause analysis, and impact mapping to link the identified challenges with their causes, proposed actions, and measurable indicators. The resulting framework is organised into four interconnected domains: Policy and Governance, Institutional Conditions and Infrastructure, Educator Competence and Resources, and Collaboration Ecosystem, each linked to specific stakeholders, proposed solutions, and anticipated benefits. By consolidating diverse evidence into a coherent logic chain, the framework provides a practical and adaptable tool for guiding reforms that strengthen the coherence, inclusivity, and sustainability of STEAM education across various contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 237 KB  
Article
The End of a STEM Identity Pathway: A Girls in Science Program Falls Prey to Current Ideology
by Roxanne Hughes, Maati McKinney and Kim Kelling
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1402; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101402 - 19 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1121
Abstract
This article provides a compelling argument using qualitative analysis for the longitudinal impact of an all-girls’ summer camp that was recently canceled due to an Executive Order from the Federal government. This paper will discuss: (1) the history of the program, including its [...] Read more.
This article provides a compelling argument using qualitative analysis for the longitudinal impact of an all-girls’ summer camp that was recently canceled due to an Executive Order from the Federal government. This paper will discuss: (1) the history of the program, including its changing funding sources over time; (2) the support of the local community that sustained this program; and (3) the ways in which the program influenced girls long after they graduated from middle and high school. Since 2006, 611 girls have participated in the Girls in STEM (GIS) summer camp. Surveys to alumnae were sent in 2022 and 2024, and 81 GIS alumnae responded. Many of these women explained how the camp helped them to see STEM career options that they were not aware of; improved their confidence that they could pursue careers that were male-dominated; and provided them with peers and mentors who became part of their network. The article concludes with a discussion of the cancellation of the program and the potential consequences of that decision. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 446 KB  
Commentary
What It Really Takes: The Costs and Commitments Behind a Successful Coaching Model for Afterschool STEM Educators
by Heidi Cian
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020326 - 18 Feb 2026
Viewed by 342
Abstract
Out-of-school-time (OST) programs in the United States offer significant opportunities for youth to engage with and develop their identities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, professional learning that supports OST educators in developing identity-affirming STEM facilitation remains chronically underfunded and undervalued. [...] Read more.
Out-of-school-time (OST) programs in the United States offer significant opportunities for youth to engage with and develop their identities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, professional learning that supports OST educators in developing identity-affirming STEM facilitation remains chronically underfunded and undervalued. Dominant approaches to measuring program “costs”—often centered on per-participant expenditures or short-term cost-effectiveness—obscure the systemic, relational, and capacity-building investments required to sustain high-quality OST STEM practices. This commentary examines how available cost frameworks shape what is rendered visible as “value” in OST STEM professional learning and where they fall short. To ground this analysis, I draw on the Afterschool Coaching for Reflective Educators in STEM (ACRES) program, a long-running national coaching initiative, as an illustrative case through which to examine how investments unfold over time and across contexts. Using ACRES, I demonstrate how costs are more productively understood as multidimensional investments in infrastructure, human capacity, relationships, and knowledge—forms of value that resist per-participant or short-horizon accounting. I offer an alternative tool, the Capacity-Based Cost Assessment (CBCA), to facilitate reflection on the outcomes of these investments. I include recommendations for how to define, document, and evaluate investments in OST STEM professional learning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop