Enhancing Educational Leadership and Management for Effective Education Policy Implementation

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2025 | Viewed by 1384

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Education, University of Lisboa. Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: educational governance; educational policy; educational leadership; school management; evaluation of schools; ILSA; PISA; accountability; school inspection; innovation in education; school improvement; equity in education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Special Issue seeks research contributions that address the intersection between educational leadership and policy implementation, intending to significantly deepening our understanding in this area of study.

Research shows that leaders' actions are influenced by their social and political environment, as well as their knowledge, personal experiences, values, beliefs, and networks. Educational leaders, such as school principals, coordinators, and teachers, face numerous challenges in implementing school-specific improvement projects and public policies. They encounter internal pressures, such as differing opinions on the curriculum and assessment, and external, including inspections, family expectations and exams.

This Special Issue aims to capture how educational leaders interpret, translate, and implement policies. Various leadership approaches, such as those that are transformational, instructional, shared, and distributed, are welcome, along with different conceptual frameworks (e.g., policy enactment perspectives, institutional theory, cognitive and normative perspectives, socio-cognitive approaches, change theory).

The focus is on the relationship between leadership and policy enactment, and empirical papers addressing key issues are sought. These may include exploring how subjective variables influence educational leaders when implementing policies, the crucial management activities for policy enactment, leadership contribution to professional learning networks, how leaders use data for school improvement projects, the impact of specific leadership styles and processes on policy enactment, and how educational leaders interpret and translate policy interventions into practice.

By shedding light on the role of educational leaders in implementing various policies and programs, such as accountability policies, curriculum development, assessment practices, inclusion initiatives and digital education, this Special Issue will provide a comprehensive overview of how educational leadership unfolds when interpreting policies to put them into practice.

Dr. Estela Costa
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • educational leadership
  • educational management
  • educational policy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 243 KiB  
Article
Enacting Fairly or Fearfully? Unpacking the Enactment of Critical Thinking Policies in Chinese Senior High Schools
by Yan Xie, Maree Davies and Joanna Smith
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111157 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 814
Abstract
This study explores the enactment of critical thinking policies in Chinese senior high schools through the lens of Ball et al.’s policy enactment theory and within the broader context of Chinese education reform aimed at enhancing students’ thinking abilities. Employing a case study [...] Read more.
This study explores the enactment of critical thinking policies in Chinese senior high schools through the lens of Ball et al.’s policy enactment theory and within the broader context of Chinese education reform aimed at enhancing students’ thinking abilities. Employing a case study methodology with diverse data types, the research assessed current school-level practices and the effectiveness of Ball et al.’s framework in capturing interactions among objective contexts, policy actors, and cultural artefacts. Findings indicate that the framework captures these complexities when the policy is actively enacted. In one school, a systematic enactment mechanism facilitated diverse policy roles and external connections, thereby promoting schoolwide critical thinking development; however, another school exhibited fragmented practices due to the lack of key policy roles, despite students’ interest in deeper engagement. Challenges were also identified, including deficiencies in the mid-level education bureau and conflicts between a collective-oriented educational paradigm and the promotion of independent thinking. The study unravelled the nuances of the enactment of critical thinking policies in Chinese senior high schools. Future research could test the framework’s applicability for guiding the construction of policy mechanisms across different settings. Full article
Back to TopTop