Transforming Educational Leadership

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2025 | Viewed by 16578

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Griffith Institute for Educational Research, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
Interests: educational leadership; educational reform; educational change

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The past fifty years have seen massive changes to the educational provision for schools in many countries. The 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s saw radical transformations to school governance and management, headlined by the move towards self-management. Decentralization meant that many of the decisions previously made at a national head office were now being made by individuals at schools. Suddenly, school leaders now needed to oversee the policy, financial, and practical aspects of schooling, with support from school councils or boards comprising parents, teachers and sometimes students. The previous hierarchical approach to system management was initially replaced by hierarchical approaches to school leadership. Instructional leadership was a managerial approach used in many systems and focused on leading teaching to increase student outcomes in basic school skills. Leithwood (1992) argued that, although IL had served a purpose in the 1980s and early 1990s, it “no longer appears to capture the heart of what school administration will have to become” and proposed transformational leadership instead. By the turn of the millennium, efforts to improve teaching were supplemented by a focus on the role of school leaders in improving learning itself across the school and beyond just student outcomes. Leadership for learning became a popular term, albeit one that was interpreted differently by various scholars.

It has since become clear that there were three main shifts in the way leadership was undertaken in schools over the past few decades. The first is that school leadership became a shared activity rather than the sole responsibility of the school leader. The second is that leadership was now seen as activity rather than something associated with a position (principal, director), and it is understood that what people can do is more important than the position they hold. The third change is that we now recognize that leadership is context-specific—a person that is a good leader in one set of circumstances may not be so good when circumstances are different.

This Special Issue brings together a collection of papers from senior international scholars documenting how school leadership has changed in their own country since the turn of the millennium and how this can impact on our understanding of school leadership. Themes to considered include:

  • How has decentralization impacted school leadership? What new responsibilities do school leaders have? How has this changed decisions that are made at the school level?
  • How have relationships between school leaders, teachers, students, and school families changed?
  • How are school leaders prepared, appointed, and supported?
  • Have these changes impacted the pool of teachers willing to become school leaders?

The Issue will conclude with a paper that synthesizes what we have learned about school leadership and considers how it might change into the future.

Prof. Dr. Tony Townsend
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • school leadership
  • decentralization
  • leadership for learning
  • learning sciences
  • learning research
  • evidence-based teaching
  • myths about learning
  • technology-enhanced learning
  • educational technology
  • barriers and facilitators to implementation
  • emerging learning research

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

7 pages, 167 KiB  
Editorial
Transforming Educational Leadership: A Historical Context
by Tony Townsend
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 890; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080890 - 15 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1195
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a context for this Special Issue, which considers the transformation of school leadership over time, providing some background to the roots of where we are now [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

25 pages, 901 KiB  
Article
Transforming Education Leadership through Multiple Approaches to Develop and Support School Leadership
by Stephan Gerhard Huber and Jane Pruitt
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090953 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 801
Abstract
This article elaborates on the multiple approaches to develop and support school leadership. In a 5-year quasi-experimental longitudinal mixed-methods study based on a sample of 122 schools in three regions in a German state, 75 school leaders and their teams participated in a [...] Read more.
This article elaborates on the multiple approaches to develop and support school leadership. In a 5-year quasi-experimental longitudinal mixed-methods study based on a sample of 122 schools in three regions in a German state, 75 school leaders and their teams participated in a 3-year program using multiple approaches; the rest served as the control group. The multiple approaches covered the school leaders’ (a) professional development, comprising (i) a professional development program, (ii) individual coaching series, and (b) support for them, including (iii) school consultancy and (iv) additional financial resources. The quality of the interventions (regarding both the process and didactic qualities, as well as outcome qualities) and how the quality of both the school leadership and the schools changes over time as a consequence of these interventions are analyzed. The study’s results show a highly positive assessment of the quality and advantages of the multiple approaches and their benefits for the quality of school leadership and further aspects of the school. The regression analyses demonstrate that positively perceived outcome qualities of the interventions are associated with improvements in numerous dimensions of school quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6748 KiB  
Article
Dissecting the School Management Rubric in a Japanese Reform-Oriented Municipality
by Hirokazu Yokota
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 724; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070724 - 3 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1150
Abstract
In Japan, there is almost no national policy that details the attributes and abilities desirable for school management staff. However, in March 2023, Toda City in Saitama prefecture, a city famous for its aggressive education reforms, published the Toda City School Management Rubric [...] Read more.
In Japan, there is almost no national policy that details the attributes and abilities desirable for school management staff. However, in March 2023, Toda City in Saitama prefecture, a city famous for its aggressive education reforms, published the Toda City School Management Rubric (SMR) as perspectives to be referred to in the daily practice of school management through a time-consuming hearing from principals and vice principals. By categorizing each dimension of the rubric itself as well as the documents relating to the creation process with the four school leadership styles, while making a comparison to school leadership standards in the U.S. and U.K., this paper aims to illuminate how the magic words of “school leadership” were turned into concrete perspectives for school leaders to reflect on. As a result, there are similarities and differences among leadership standards in three countries. Moreover, a transformational leadership style seems to be the most frequently mentioned among the four school leadership styles, and many of the principals and vice principals referred to instructional leadership in a sense that they need to take a lead in transforming traditional teacher-led instruction into student-centered learning. Furthermore, a distributed leadership style is considered to be important by many school leaders, especially because they continue to seek an appropriate balance between top-down and bottom-up approaches, and some principals and vice principals take the issue of work style reform seriously, which assumes an aspect of transactional leadership. As an arguably unprecedented attempt to comprehensively analyze the detailed policy documents on school leadership in Japan, this article will provide cross-cultural implications for school leadership policy and practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 256 KiB  
Article
El Cid: Can an Aesthetics Lens Save Transformational Leadership from Itself?
by Fenwick Walter English and Lisa Catherine Ehrich
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 655; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060655 - 17 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2294
Abstract
Countless articles and books have been written about transformational leadership theory since the late 1970s when it first appeared in the literature. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to illustrate that transformational leadership contains both logical and psychological problems when explaining the [...] Read more.
Countless articles and books have been written about transformational leadership theory since the late 1970s when it first appeared in the literature. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to illustrate that transformational leadership contains both logical and psychological problems when explaining the nature of leadership and as an empirically supportable and verifiable construct. It aims to show that its failure to garner evidence from a scientific methodological analysis may not invalidate its efficacy if it is viewed from an alternative lens, such as aesthetics. An aesthetic frame is one that recognizes sensuous ways of knowing since feelings and emotions are just as important as reason and logic. An aesthetic approach to leadership would see leadership as more of an art than a science. This paper is not arguing for the abandonment of transformational leadership theory; rather it is saying that an aesthetic lens is likely to yield a richer, more artistic, and more nuanced account of what is understood and enacted as transformational leadership. This way, the manifestations of transformational leadership may live on in the arts and continue to inspire and motivate us. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
38 pages, 740 KiB  
Article
Enactment of Transformational School Leadership—Insights from Primary School and System Leaders
by Inez Wilson Heenan, Niamh Lafferty and Patricia Mannix McNamara
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 557; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060557 - 22 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2599
Abstract
Transformational leadership has been proposed as an approach that can inspire effective change. How this is manifest in schools is understudied in Irish primary schools, which have undergone significant change in recent years. The focus of this qualitative research study was primary school [...] Read more.
Transformational leadership has been proposed as an approach that can inspire effective change. How this is manifest in schools is understudied in Irish primary schools, which have undergone significant change in recent years. The focus of this qualitative research study was primary school and system leaders’ knowledge of transformational school leadership, perceived benefits, limitations, and feasibility, and how transformational school leadership actually manifests in practice. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. In-depth interviews were carried out with principals, deputy and assistant principals, and former school inspectors, with the interviews aligned to the following research questions: (1) How can we characterize school and system leaders’ knowledge, understanding and perceptions regarding the feasibility of transformational school leadership? (2) How do transformational school leadership behaviours manifest in primary school settings? Data analysis yielded the following themes and sub-themes: (1) Understanding of transformational school leadership: (i) transformation, change and growth, (ii) relationships, (iii) vision, mission, and goals, (iv) leading; (2) Perceptions of feasibility of transformational school leadership: (i) realism, (ii) people and relationships, (iii) practical challenges; (3) Benefits of transformational school leadership: (i) aspiration, (ii) culture, (iii) motivation and modelling, (iv) school community, (v) delivering quality learning; (4) Limitations of transformational school leadership: (i) personality, (ii) pressure, (iii) slow process, (iv) unexpected variables; (5) Manifestations of transformational school leadership: (i) idealised influence, (ii) inspirational motivation, (iii) individualised consideration, (iv) intellectual stimulation, (v) school development, (vi) improving curricular offerings. Participants’ positive disposition to transformational school leadership was encouraging and suggests the need for further research, specifically to examine potential synergy between transformational and distributed school leadership. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 225 KiB  
Article
A Genealogy toward Methodic Doubts in Educational Leadership Research
by Ira Bogotch
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050493 - 4 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 979
Abstract
In this critical narrative essay, titled A Genealogy Toward Methodic Doubts, I ask readers not only how and why educational leadership research(ers) detoured from the rigorous pursuits of truths, but also how and why I had missed the signposts which might have alerted [...] Read more.
In this critical narrative essay, titled A Genealogy Toward Methodic Doubts, I ask readers not only how and why educational leadership research(ers) detoured from the rigorous pursuits of truths, but also how and why I had missed the signposts which might have alerted me and others that our continuing practices, even with recognizing methodological limitations, were flawed. The empirical examples presented here come mostly from US policies, Western theories, and traditional methods, but likely apply to other contexts worldwide. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
13 pages, 558 KiB  
Article
A Typology of Multiple School Leadership
by Yin-Cheong Cheng
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010070 - 8 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2177
Abstract
In facing the challenges of huge transformations in different areas of society, many educators, policy makers, social leaders, researchers and other stakeholders may doubt how schools and their leadership and management remain relevant to and effective for the future of education. Given that [...] Read more.
In facing the challenges of huge transformations in different areas of society, many educators, policy makers, social leaders, researchers and other stakeholders may doubt how schools and their leadership and management remain relevant to and effective for the future of education. Given that multiple school functions are needed to serve society at different levels, the required roles in school leadership are inevitably multiple, diverse and demanding. In past decades, many studies have been conducted with a focus on some aspects of leadership functions and processes. Unfortunately, there is a lack of a typology of school leadership to map out comprehensive leadership profiles and understand their multiple characteristics for leading school development and effectiveness in a fast-changing environment. Based on the framework of multiple school effectiveness, this paper aims to propose a typology of multiple school leadership that can provide a new, comprehensive way to re-conceptualize the multiple nature and characteristics of school leadership in a complicated context. Depending on the rationalities, concerns, actions, outcomes and contexts of leadership in practice, the typology of multiple school leadership may include six models: technological leadership, economic leadership, social leadership, political leadership, cultural leadership, and learning leadership. Within this typology, new possibilities and approaches to school leadership can be drawn for research, practice and development towards the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

28 pages, 343 KiB  
Review
The Challenge to Change: Leading Schools beyond COVID-19
by Tony Townsend
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101064 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 650
Abstract
This paper considers the articles presented in this Special Issue and argues that, in most developed education systems in Western countries, there have been four major shifts in how school education is understood and delivered over the course of human history, from a [...] Read more.
This paper considers the articles presented in this Special Issue and argues that, in most developed education systems in Western countries, there have been four major shifts in how school education is understood and delivered over the course of human history, from a time when only the wealthy and privileged received an education to the present day. It tracks changes in school leadership since the 1980s, when a combination of efforts to improve the effectiveness of schools and efforts to decentralise schools led to self-managing schools and changed responsibilities for school leaders. It reflects on whether the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on school communities may lead to a fifth major shift in school education. This article discusses four different school leadership approaches that have emerged in Western education since the 1980s, instructional leadership, transformational leadership, distributed leadership, and leadership for learning, and argues that of these four, leadership for learning would be the most appropriate leadership approach in a post-COVID-19 future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
14 pages, 796 KiB  
Review
Enhancing Quality Appointment, Preparation and Support System for Malaysian Principals
by Husaina Banu Kenayathulla, Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani and Norfariza Mohd Radzi
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060659 - 18 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 930
Abstract
Educational leaders in the 21st century are under increasing pressure since they need to consistently upskill and reskill themselves so that they can adapt to rapid changes and be prepared to improve the quality of future education, as well as meet the demands [...] Read more.
Educational leaders in the 21st century are under increasing pressure since they need to consistently upskill and reskill themselves so that they can adapt to rapid changes and be prepared to improve the quality of future education, as well as meet the demands of diverse stakeholders. Previous studies in the Malaysian context mostly focused on leadership training for newly appointed school principals, but there has not been much emphasis on continuous professional development for school leaders. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the appointment, preparation, and support system for Malaysian principals. In this study, a qualitative methodology has been applied, which involves document analysis based on policy documents, media, and previously published journal articles. The findings suggest that internal and external supports are currently being provided to principals. However, it proposes a wider framework of support for principals comprising internal and external support, including smart partnerships with diverse stakeholders such as industries, non-profit organizations, and international counterparts. The results provide insights to policymakers on the importance of consistently supporting school leaders to upskill with multifaceted skills to perform multiple functions, such as technological, economic, social, cultural, political, and learning leadership. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

20 pages, 253 KiB  
Essay
The Work Environment of the School Leader in Australia: The Case for Sustained Change in Role and Practice
by Brian J. Caldwell
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020190 - 15 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1307
Abstract
The questions addressed in this essay are (1) how has the work environment of school leaders changed in the early years of the 21st century, (2) how have these changes affected the role of the school leader, (3) what is the association between [...] Read more.
The questions addressed in this essay are (1) how has the work environment of school leaders changed in the early years of the 21st century, (2) how have these changes affected the role of the school leader, (3) what is the association between an evident deterioration in the work environment and the trend to more autonomy for schools and their leaders, and (4) how can school systems be more effective in supporting school leaders? The essay is organised into three domains that emerged from a review of the literature on changes in the work environment: intensification–intimidation, autonomy–accountability and system–support. Six recommendations are derived from the evidence: principals should have greater control over their work environment, system leaders should remove many reporting requirements from schools, there should be “organised abandonment” of outdated practices, the potential benefits of AI should be realised, there should be more engagement in planning for the future, and there should be further research on processes and outcomes through randomised controlled trials of new practices. It is not so much new theories in leadership but rather new roles and new practices within different arrangements for governance, informed by ongoing research as the context changes, amid evidence of deterioration in professional wellbeing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming Educational Leadership)
Back to TopTop