Advances in Dental Diagnostics

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 9889

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 12, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Interests: oral health medicine; dental healthcare research; special care dentistry; interdisciplinary collaboration; oral and systemic disease interaction; oral health-related quality of life
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Interests: endodontics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Diagnostics is a key discipline in dentistry which focuses on detecting, classifying, assessing, and monitoring hard tissue defects, e.g., caries or developmental dental defects, dental restorations, periodontitis, traumatized teeth, malocclusion, and other pathologies in the oral and maxillofacial region. The spectrum of diagnostic methods is broad and includes clinical examination procedures, dental radiography, optical devices, 3D scanners, and histological procedures. Furthermore, AI algorithms may automate diagnostic procedures or potentially enhance diagnostic performance. When considering the importance of diagnostics as well as existing knowledge gaps, this Special Issue offers the opportunity for clinicians, practitioners, epidemiologists, and researchers to present their latest findings in this area of interest. Herewith, I invite the scientific community to submit original manuscripts addressing the proposed topics.

The submission deadline is 31 December 2025. You may send your manuscript at any point from now until the deadline.

I look forward to welcoming your contributions to this Special Issue.

Dr. Dirk Ziebolz
Prof. Dr. Margherita Fontana
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • diagnostic imaging
  • artificial intelligence
  • caries
  • periodontitis
  • stomatognathic diseases

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 5672 KB  
Article
Prevalence of Unfilled MB2 Canals and Their Association with Apical Periodontitis: A CBCT-Based Cross-Sectional Study in a German Population
by Maythem Al Fartousi and Christian Ralf Gernhardt
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050796 - 7 Mar 2026
Viewed by 608
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The presence of untreated second mesio-buccal canals (MB2) in maxillary first molars is usually associated with endodontic treatment failure. Previous CBCT-based investigations have evaluated the quality of root canal fillings and the prevalence of apical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. However, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The presence of untreated second mesio-buccal canals (MB2) in maxillary first molars is usually associated with endodontic treatment failure. Previous CBCT-based investigations have evaluated the quality of root canal fillings and the prevalence of apical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. However, evidence specifically addressing untreated MB2 canals and their association with apical periodontitis remains limited. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the prevalence of unfilled MB2 canals in endodontically treated maxillary first molars and their association with apical periodontitis. Methods: CBCT scans of 75 patients from an endodontic practice were retrospectively analyzed. Maxillary first molars (teeth 16 and 26) were evaluated for the presence and filling status of root canals (MB1, MB2, palatal, distal) and the presence of periapical radiolucency using the CBCT periapical index. Two calibrated examiners independently assessed all images. The association between unfilled MB2 canals and apical periodontitis was analyzed using chi-square tests, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: The mean patient age was 53.4 ± 15.5 years (range: 14–80). An MB2 canal was present in 84% (63/75) of eligible teeth. Among teeth with an MB2 canal, only 20.6% (13/63) were endodontically filled, while 79.4% remained untreated. Apical periodontitis was observed in 65.3% (49/75) of all teeth. A significant association was found between unfilled MB2 canals and apical periodontitis (p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 0.095 (95% CI: 0.022–0.402), indicating that filled MB2 canals significantly reduced the possible risk of periapical pathology. Conclusions: A high prevalence of unfilled MB2 canals was observed in this German population (79.4%). Furthermore, unfilled MB2 canals were strongly associated with apical periodontitis. Therefore, clinicians should utilize all available diagnostic tools, including CBCT and dental microscopes, to maximize MB2 canal identification and improve endodontic treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 600 KB  
Article
Prevalence and Distribution of Apical Periodontitis in Root Canal-Treated Teeth: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study in a Saudi Subpopulation
by Obadah Austah, Lama Alghamdi, Amjad Alshamrani, Taggreed Wazzan, Mohammed Barayan, Mohammed A. Alharbi, Abdullah Bokhary and Loai Alsofi
Diagnostics 2026, 16(4), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040618 - 20 Feb 2026
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Background: Apical periodontitis (AP) is a common inflammatory condition of the periapical tissues, most often associated with persistent endodontic infection. Conventional two-dimensional radiography may underestimate AP because of anatomical superimposition and limited sensitivity. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows three-dimensional visualization of periapical structures [...] Read more.
Background: Apical periodontitis (AP) is a common inflammatory condition of the periapical tissues, most often associated with persistent endodontic infection. Conventional two-dimensional radiography may underestimate AP because of anatomical superimposition and limited sensitivity. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows three-dimensional visualization of periapical structures and has been increasingly used in epidemiological research. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of apical periodontitis, with particular emphasis on apical periodontitis associated with root canal-treated teeth (AP-RCT), in a Saudi subpopulation using CBCT imaging. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed CBCT scans of Saudi patients obtained for routine diagnostic purposes between 2017 and 2021. Apical periodontitis was identified using standardized radiographic criteria requiring the presence of periapical radiolucency in more than one imaging plane. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate prevalence. Associations between demographic factors and AP-RCT counts were evaluated using multivariable negative binomial regression. Regional tooth distribution was analyzed using generalized estimating equation models accounting for within-participant clustering. Results: A total of 320 CBCT scans were analyzed. Apical periodontitis was detected in 231 participants (72.2%) and in 667 teeth (8.3% of examined teeth). Of the affected teeth, 457 (68.5%) were associated with root canal treatment. The mean number of AP-RCT per participant was 1.36 ± 1.81 (median: 1; IQR: 0–2). Multivariable analysis identified age as the only significant predictor of AP-RCT. Compared with individuals aged 21–30 years, higher AP-RCT rates were observed in the 31–40-year and 41–50-year age groups, while participants ≤20 years showed lower rates. Tooth-level analysis demonstrated higher AP-RCT prevalence in maxillary premolars, maxillary molars, and mandibular molars, whereas mandibular anterior teeth showed the lowest prevalence. Conclusions: Apical periodontitis, particularly AP-RCT, was frequently observed in this Saudi subpopulation when assessed using CBCT. Age and tooth location were the primary determinants of disease distribution. These findings provide population-level epidemiological data on the prevalence and anatomical distribution of apical periodontitis in root canal-treated teeth. Clinical Significance: CBCT-based epidemiological assessment enables detailed evaluation of the distribution of apical periodontitis in dentate populations and may assist in characterizing disease patterns in anatomically complex regions, without implying comparative diagnostic accuracy or treatment outcome assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 44941 KB  
Article
Advanced Deep Learning Models for Classifying Dental Diseases from Panoramic Radiographs
by Deema M. Alnasser, Reema M. Alnasser, Wareef M. Alolayan, Shihanah S. Albadi, Haifa F. Alhasson, Amani A. Alkhamees and Shuaa S. Alharbi
Diagnostics 2026, 16(3), 503; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030503 - 6 Feb 2026
Viewed by 649
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Dental diseases represent a great problem for oral health care, and early diagnosis is essential to reduce the risk of complications. Panoramic radiographs provide a detailed perspective of dental structures that is suitable for automated diagnostic methods. This paper aims to investigate [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Dental diseases represent a great problem for oral health care, and early diagnosis is essential to reduce the risk of complications. Panoramic radiographs provide a detailed perspective of dental structures that is suitable for automated diagnostic methods. This paper aims to investigate the use of an advanced deep learning (DL) model for the multiclass classification of diseases at the sub-diagnosis level using panoramic radiographs to resolve the inconsistencies and skewed classes in the dataset. Methods: To classify and test the models, rich data of 10,580 high-quality panoramic radiographs, initially annotated in 93 classes and subsequently improved to 35 consolidated classes, was used. We applied extensive preprocessing techniques like class consolidation, mislabeled entry correction, redundancy removal and augmentation to reduce the ratio of class imbalance from 2560:1 to 61:1. Five modern convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—InceptionV3, EfficientNetV2, DenseNet121, ResNet50, and VGG16—were assessed with respect to five metrics: accuracy, mean average precision (mAP), precision, recall, and F1-score. Results: InceptionV3 achieved the best performance with a 97.51% accuracy rate and a mAP of 96.61%, thus confirming its superior ability for diagnosing a wide range of dental conditions. The EfficientNetV2 and DenseNet121 models achieved accuracies of 97.04% and 96.70%, respectively, indicating strong classification performance. ResNet50 and VGG16 also yielded competitive accuracy values comparable to these models. Conclusions: Overall, the results show that deep learning models are successful in dental disease classification, especially the model with the highest accuracy, InceptionV3. New insights and clinical applications will be realized from a further study into dataset expansion, ensemble learning strategies, and the application of explainable artificial intelligence techniques. The findings provide a starting point for implementing automated diagnostic systems for dental diagnosis with greater efficiency, accuracy, and clinical utility in the deployment of oral healthcare. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 517 KB  
Article
Qualitative Alterations of Mandibular Kinematics in Patients with Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: An Axiographic Study Using the Cadiax Diagnostic System
by Daniel Surowiecki, Malgorzata Tomasik and Jolanta Kostrzewa-Janicka
Diagnostics 2025, 15(23), 3044; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233044 - 28 Nov 2025
Viewed by 571
Abstract
Background: Myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) typically present with pain but without obvious restriction of mandibular motion, making subtle dysfunctions difficult to detect clinically. In this study, we evaluated mandibular kinematics in myogenous TMDs using an electronic axiography system (Cadiax Diagnostic). The specific [...] Read more.
Background: Myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) typically present with pain but without obvious restriction of mandibular motion, making subtle dysfunctions difficult to detect clinically. In this study, we evaluated mandibular kinematics in myogenous TMDs using an electronic axiography system (Cadiax Diagnostic). The specific objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders exhibit qualitative abnormalities in mandibular movements that are not detectable using conventional clinical examination. Methods: Twenty-six patients with myogenous TMD (muscle pain without intra-articular disorders, diagnosed per DC/TMD) and 26 matched controls were examined. Clinical assessment (DC/TMD Axis I) measured mandibular range of motion and deviations. Instrumental recordings of maximal opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion were obtained with Cadiax 4. Quantitative (excursion ranges) and qualitative (movement symmetry and sagittal deviations) parameters were analyzed. Condylar position changes between the reference position and maximum intercuspation were evaluated (Condyle Position Measurement, CPM). Exact χ2 or Fisher tests were applied with effect sizes (φ) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Maximal opening, lateral excursions, and protrusion ranges were statistically similar between groups (mean opening: 47.96 ± 6.5 mm in TMDs vs. 49.46 ± 5.4 mm in controls, p = 0.40; 95% CI of difference −1.8 to 4.8 mm). However, qualitative deviations were more frequent in TMD. Of note, 12/26 (46.2%) patients vs. 6/26 (23.1%) controls showed a ΔY deflection during protrusion (χ2 = 3.06, p = 0.08; φ ≈ 0.24; difference = 23.1%, 95% CI −2.0–48.2%). Identical proportions (46.2% vs. 23.1%) showed a ΔY deflection upon opening (χ2 = 3.06, p = 0.08). Inferior condylar shifts (distractions) on closing into intercuspation occurred only in the mTMD group: 5/26 (19.2%) left condyles vs. 0% (p ≈ 0.05; 95% CI diff 4.1–34.4%) and 2/26 (7.7%) right vs. 0% (p ≈ 0.49; 95% CI −2.5–17.9%). Condylar compressions (superior shifts) were similar between groups. In summary, roughly half of TMD patients exhibited lateral jaw deflections (ΔY) and exclusive condylar “distraction” on closure; upon comparison, these conditions were rare in controls. Conclusions: Despite normal mandibular range of motion, patients with myogenous TMDs exhibited qualitative abnormalities in jaw kinematics, including movement deflections, condylar asymmetries, and centric–intercuspal discrepancies. Axiographic analysis with Cadiax enabled detection of subtle functional changes not identifiable in routine examinations, underscoring its diagnostic value in early dysfunction and potential therapeutic planning. The detection of kinematic abnormalities could influence early diagnosis or treatment planning for myogenous TMDs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1769 KB  
Article
Evaluation of the Proximity of the Maxillary Teeth Root Apices to the Maxillary Sinus Floor in Romanian Subjects: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study
by Vlad Ionuţ Iliescu, Vanda Roxana Nimigean, Cristina Teodora Preoteasa, Lavinia Georgescu and Victor Nimigean
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1741; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141741 - 9 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3992
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Among the paranasal sinuses, the maxillary antrum holds unique clinical relevance due to its proximity to the alveolar process of the maxilla, which houses the teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the position of the root apices of the maxillary canines [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Among the paranasal sinuses, the maxillary antrum holds unique clinical relevance due to its proximity to the alveolar process of the maxilla, which houses the teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the position of the root apices of the maxillary canines and posterior teeth relative to the maxillary sinus floor in Romanian subjects. Methods: Data for the study were retrospectively obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The evaluation considered the pattern of proximity to the sinus floor for each tooth type, comparisons of the sinus relationships of teeth within the same dental hemiarch, as well as those of homologous teeth, and variation in root-to-sinus distance in relation to sex and age. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis, and multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni post hoc correction. Results: The study included 70 individuals aged 20 to 60 years. The distance to the sinus floor decreased progressively from the first premolar to the second molar, with median values of 3.68 mm (first premolar), 1.45 mm (second premolar), 0.50 mm (first molar), and 0.34 mm (second molar) (p < 0.01). Stronger correlations were observed between adjacent teeth than between non-adjacent ones. The distances to the sinus floor were greater on the right side compared to the left; however, these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all teeth). Concordance between left and right dental hemiarches regarding the closest tooth to the sinus floor was found in 70% of cases (n = 49), most frequently involving the second molars (n = 38; 54.3%). On average, the distance from the sinus floor was smaller in males compared to females, with statistically significant differences observed only for the second molar. Increased age was associated with a greater distance to the sinus floor. Conclusions: Of all the teeth investigated, the second molar showed the highest combined prevalence of penetrating and tangential relationships with the maxillary sinus. At the dental hemiarch level, the second molar was most frequently the closest tooth to the sinus floor, and in the majority of cases, at least one posterior tooth was located within 0.3 mm. Accurate preoperative assessment of tooth position relative to the sinus floor is essential when performing non-surgical or surgical root canal therapy and extractions of maxillary molars and premolars. CBCT provides essential three-dimensional imaging that improves diagnostic precision and supports safer treatment planning for procedures involving the posterior maxilla. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

30 pages, 3196 KB  
Systematic Review
Deep Learning-Based Dental Caries Diagnosis: A Modality-Stratified Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN
by Quang Tuan Lam, Minh Huu Nhat Le, Fang-Yu Fan, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le and I-Ta Lee
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050731 - 1 Mar 2026
Viewed by 745
Abstract
Background: Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are increasingly used in computer-aided dental diagnostics. However, the relative diagnostic performance of commonly applied architectures, particularly Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN, has not been systematically synthesized across imaging modalities. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the [...] Read more.
Background: Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are increasingly used in computer-aided dental diagnostics. However, the relative diagnostic performance of commonly applied architectures, particularly Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN, has not been systematically synthesized across imaging modalities. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN for dental caries detection using radiographic and photographic images. Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies published up to 15 June 2025. Studies applying Faster R-CNN and/or Mask R-CNN to dental caries detection were included. Binary diagnostic data were extracted, and pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-AI, and radiomics-based radiographic studies were additionally evaluated using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251074443). Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Across all imaging modalities, Mask R-CNN showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (85.6% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.0244), specificity (94.2% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.00089), and AUC (0.95 vs. 0.84, p = 0.0053) than Faster R-CNN. In radiographic images, Mask R-CNN consistently outperformed Faster R-CNN in sensitivity (86.3% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.0497), specificity (96.5% vs. 85.0%, p = 0.00105), and AUC (0.97 vs. 0.86, p = 0.0067). In photographic images, Mask R-CNN achieved a higher AUC (0.91 vs. 0.83, p = 0.048), whereas differences in pooled sensitivity (83.5% vs. 77.3%, p = 0.435) and specificity (86.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.156) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN both show potential for dental caries detection, but current evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity, predominantly retrospective designs, and variability in imaging and labeling. Across the included studies, Mask R-CNN showed higher pooled performance estimates than Faster R-CNN, with the clearest differences in radiographic applications; however, this comparison is indirect and should be considered suggestive rather than definitive given study-level heterogeneity and uncertainty in the reference standard in a sizable proportion of studies. Prospective, multi-center studies with standardized imaging protocols, rigorous annotation, and independent external validation are required to support reliable clinical implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

4 pages, 806 KB  
Interesting Images
Dilated Composite Odontoma in a Mesiodens
by Aakriti Chandra, Nilima Thosar, Ramakrishna Yeluri, Ishani Rahate and Dhruvi Solanki
Diagnostics 2025, 15(18), 2335; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182335 - 15 Sep 2025
Viewed by 878
Abstract
Dilated Composite Odontoma also known as Dens invaginatus, “dens in dente”, or “tooth within tooth” is a rare dental anomaly resulting from enamel organ infolding during tooth development, often leading to complications like caries and pulp infection. With a prevalence of 7.45%, it [...] Read more.
Dilated Composite Odontoma also known as Dens invaginatus, “dens in dente”, or “tooth within tooth” is a rare dental anomaly resulting from enamel organ infolding during tooth development, often leading to complications like caries and pulp infection. With a prevalence of 7.45%, it commonly affects upper lateral incisors, predominantly as a Type I morphology. Mesiodens, a supernumerary tooth in the anterior maxillary midline, occurs in 89.7% of single cases and 10.3% of bilateral cases. The coexistence of dens invaginatus in a mesiodens is extremely rare, posing diagnostic and treatment challenges. This report presents a unique case of dentin invagination in a mesiodens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4492 KB  
Case Report
Lip Schwannoma—A Rare Presentation in a Pediatric Patient: Case Report and a Literature Review
by Cinzia Casu, Mara Pinna, Andrea Butera, Carolina Maiorani, Girolamo Campisi, Clara Gerosa, Antonella Caiazzo, Andrea Scribante and Germano Orrù
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1825; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141825 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1279
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Schwannoma is a rare tumor, typical in young adults, originating from the myelin sheath that surrounds Schwann cells. It can occur in any part of the Peripheral Nervous System (PNS). It develops in the head and neck region in 25–48% of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Schwannoma is a rare tumor, typical in young adults, originating from the myelin sheath that surrounds Schwann cells. It can occur in any part of the Peripheral Nervous System (PNS). It develops in the head and neck region in 25–48% of cases, and the eighth pair of cranial nerves (vestibulocochlear nerves) are the most hit (vestibular schwannoma). Oral cavity involvement is exceedingly rare, accounting for about 1–2% of all cases. The most affected oral site is the tongue, especially its anterior third, while localization on the lip is one of the least common sites for the development of this lesion. Case Presentation: A lower lip schwannoma on a 17-year-old boy, present for about 7 years, was documented. Material and Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were used as research engines; English scientific works published in the last 20 years (2005–2024) regarding oral cavity involvement, using the keywords “Schwannoma”, “Oral Schwannoma”, “Pediatric Oral Schwannoma”, and “Schwannoma of the lip”, were considered. Results: In total, 805 and 16,890 items were found on PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, respectively. After title, abstract, full text evaluation, and elimination of duplicates, 26 articles were included in the review process. Discussion: Clinically, oral schwannoma presents as an asymptomatic hard–elastic fluctuating mass, often misdiagnosed on the lip as a traumatic or inflammatory lesion (e.g., mucocele). Biopsy is mandatory, and histological examination reveals positivity to the neuronal marker S-100. Conclusions: Complete excision also prevents recurrence. Malignant transformation is extremely rare. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop