Background: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) often leads to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) that requires aggressive management. Inducing burst suppression with deep sedation is an established therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension. Traditionally, barbiturate coma has been used to achieve burst-suppression EEG in TBI patients, but alternative sedative agents (propofol, midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine) are increasingly utilized in modern neurocritical care. This review compares barbiturates with these alternatives for inducing burst suppression in adult TBI, focusing on protocols, mechanisms, efficacy in controlling ICP, safety profiles, and impacts on neurological outcomes. Methods: A search of the literature was performed, including clinical trials, observational studies, and guidelines on deep sedation for ICP control in adult TBI. Studies comparing high-dose barbiturates to other sedatives (propofol, midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine) in the context of burst suppression or severe TBI management were included. Data on sedative protocols (dosing and EEG targets), mechanisms of action, ICP-lowering efficacy, complications, and patient outcomes were extracted and analyzed qualitatively. Results: High-dose barbiturates (e.g., pentobarbital or thiopental) and propofol are both effective at inducing burst-suppression EEG and reducing ICP via cerebral metabolic suppression. Barbiturate coma remains a third-tier intervention reserved for ICP refractory to other treatments. Propofol infusion has become first-line for routine ICP control due to rapid titratability and shorter half-life, though it can also achieve burst suppression at high doses. Midazolam infusions provide sedation and seizure prophylaxis but yield less metabolic suppression and ICP reduction compared to barbiturates or propofol, and are associated with longer ventilation duration and delirium. Ketamine, once avoided for fear of raising ICP, has shown neutral or lowering effects on ICP when used in ventilated TBI patients, thanks to its analgesic properties and maintenance of blood pressure; however, ketamine alone does not reliably produce burst-suppression patterns. Dexmedetomidine offers sedative and anti-delirium benefits with minimal respiratory depression, but it is generally insufficient for deep burst-suppressive sedation and has only a modest effect on ICP. In comparative clinical evidence, propofol and barbiturates both effectively lower ICP, but neither has demonstrated clear improvement in long-term neurological outcome when used prophylactically. Early routine use of barbiturate coma may increase complications (hypotension, immunosuppression), and thus, current practice restricts it to refractory cases. Modern sedation protocols emphasize using the minimal necessary sedation to maintain ICP < 22 mmHg, with continuous EEG monitoring to titrate therapy to a burst-suppression target (commonly 2–5 bursts per minute) when deep coma is employed. Conclusions: In adult TBI patients with intracranial hypertension, propofol-based sedation is favored for first-line ICP control and can achieve burst suppression if needed, whereas high-dose barbiturates are reserved for ICP crises unresponsive to standard measures. Compared to barbiturates, alternative agents (propofol, midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine) offer differing advantages: propofol provides potent, fast-acting metabolic suppression; midazolam adds anticonvulsant sedation for prolonged use at the cost of slower wake-up; ketamine supports hemodynamics and analgesia; dexmedetomidine aids lighter sedation and delirium control. The choice of agent is guided by the clinical scenario, balancing ICP reduction needs against side effect profiles. While all sedatives can transiently reduce ICP, careful monitoring and a tiered therapy approach are essential, as no sedative has conclusively improved long-term neurological outcomes in TBI. EEG monitoring for burst suppression and meticulous titration is required when employing barbiturate or propofol coma. Ongoing research into optimal combinations and protocols may further refine sedation strategies to improve safety and outcomes in severe TBI.
