Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 December 2023) | Viewed by 8869

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Regenerative NanoMedicine, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), UMR_S U1260 INSERM, University of Strasbourg, 67085 Strasbourg, France
Interests: renal cell carcinoma; bladder cancer; prostate cancer; therapy; pathways; experimental model
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 67200 Strasbourg, France
Interests: renal cell carcinoma; immunotherapy; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; urothelial carcinoma, immune-based combination therapies; drug development in GU
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Reims, France
2. Inserm UMR-S 1250, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, URCA, Reims, France
Interests: mechanisms of epithelial cell plasticity in homeostasis and diseases
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
Interests: renal cell carcinoma; immunotherapies; metabolism; mechanism of resistance; tumor microenvironment; product quality attributes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Kidney cancer accounts for 403 000 new cases and 175 000 deaths per year worldwide. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents around 90% of kidney cancers in adults. Approximately one-third of patients will have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and an additional 20% will ultimately develop metastatic disease. The recent development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic approaches of multiple types of cancer, including metastatic (mRCC). Immune checkpoints are key regulators of the immune system and protect the host from autoimmune responses. Immune checkpoints can also be expressed on the surface of tumor cells and promote an immunosuppressive microenvironment that supports tumor growth. The blockade of immune checkpoints restores the activation of the immune system towards tumor cells. Multiple ICIs have been approved by the FDA for RCC therapies, including monoclonal antibodies that target the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-A4) or the programmed death-1 (PD-1). These antibodies are efficient and safe as monotherapy, in combination with other ICIs or with anti-angiogenic therapeutic compounds (the therapeutic references for 15 years). Thus, therapies based on ICIs are now recommended as the first-line therapy in clear-cell cancers with the observation of long-lasting disease control. However there is still a lack of understanding of who will benefit from these therapies, and the development of predictive biomarkers of efficacy or adverse events are urgently needed. The duration of treatment, new therapeutic strategies and the therapeutic sequence for patients receiving ICI-based therapies, including the role of surgery, are also far from being well defined. There is also a need to develop therapeutic approaches for patients resistant to the first generation of ICIs, and to understand whether some quality attributes of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies might play a role in their efficacy or the development of adverse events. Consequently, complete remissions remain rare events. Overall, a new era evolved from the arrival of ICIs, but we are only at the beginning of this era. In this Special Issue, we are inviting research articles, reviews, as well as opinion papers supporting the understanding of ICIs’ mechanism of action, developing biomarkers of efficacy/resistance or biomarkers of adverse events, developing bioassays to assess the efficacy of ICIs, investigating the effect of therapeutic antibodies’ quality attributes on therapeutic efficacy or adverse events, as well as studies investigating the therapeutic sequence of ICIs and developing therapeutic approaches for patients with tumors resistant to ICIs. The scope is deliberately broad to allow contributions on diverse aspects of the topic.

Dr. Thierry Massfelder
Dr. Philippe Barthélémy
Dr. Valerian Dormoy
Dr. Mamatha Garige
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • renal cell carcinoma
  • immunotherapy
  • immune checkpoints
  • immune-checkpoint inhibitors
  • biomarkers
  • therapeutic monoclonal antibody
  • quality attributes
  • nephrectomy

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 1928 KiB  
Article
Progression-Free and Overall Survival of First-Line Treatments for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Indirect Comparison of Six Combination Regimens
by Andrea Ossato, Daniele Mengato, Marco Chiumente, Andrea Messori and Vera Damuzzo
Cancers 2023, 15(7), 2029; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072029 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1699
Abstract
Background: Recently, numerous combination therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have been proposed as first-line treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of these combination regimens by the [...] Read more.
Background: Recently, numerous combination therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have been proposed as first-line treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of these combination regimens by the application of an innovative method that reconstructs individual patient data. Methods: Six phase III studies describing different combination regimens for aRCC were selected. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves through the “Shiny method”. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among combination treatments and sunitinib. Results were summarized as multi-treatment KM curves. Standard statistical testing was used, including hazard ratio and likelihood ratio tests for heterogeneity. Results: In the overall population of aRCC patients, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib showed the longest median PFS and was expected to determine the longest OS. Pembrolizumab + axitinib, nivolumab + cabozantinib and nivolumab + ipilimumab were similar in terms of PFS, but pembrolizumab + axitinib also demonstrated a better OS. Our subgroup analysis showed that sunitinib is still a valuable option, whereas, in intermediate-poor risk patients, pembrolizumab + axitinib and nivolumab + ipilimumab significantly improve OS compared to sunitinib. Conclusion: The Shiny method allowed us to perform all head-to-head indirect comparisons between these agents in a context in which “real” comparative trials have not been performed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 692 KiB  
Review
Combinations of Anti-Angiogenic Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Best Option?
by Estelle Granet-Vaissiere, Félix Lefort, Charlotte Domblides, Mathieu Larroquette, Alain Ravaud, Jean-Christophe Bernhard and Marine Gross-Goupil
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1048; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041048 - 07 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2051
Abstract
Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinomas, specifically clear cell carcinomas. For many years the optimal approach was sequential; thus, monotherapies [principally tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)] targeting angiogenesis until toxicity or [...] Read more.
Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinomas, specifically clear cell carcinomas. For many years the optimal approach was sequential; thus, monotherapies [principally tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)] targeting angiogenesis until toxicity or progressive disease developed. The rationale was the common mechanisms of action of the targeting agents and avoidance of the risk of overlapping toxicities. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective monotherapies, and combinations thereof with anti-angiogenic agents were thus later considered. Synergistic interactions were reported in vitro. Clinical efficacy was evident in three pivotal phase III trials with axitinib-pembrolizumab, cabozantinib-nivolumab, and lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combinations. Two other combinations showed interesting results but did not improve overall survival. However, the data aided our understanding of the new therapeutic approaches. A combination of the ICIs nivolumab and ipilimumab was the first to evidence better progression-free and overall survival compared to sunitinib in patients with intermediate or unfavourable prognoses as evaluated by the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Here we focus on the TKI-ICI combinations, emphasising the rationale of their use and the clinical results. To date, no biomarker facilitating the selection of an optimal treatment by disease and patient status has been reported. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 291 KiB  
Review
Complete Response in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: Remission or Healing? How to Improve Patients’ Outcomes?
by Jonathan Thouvenin, Claire Masson, Philippe Boudier, Denis Maillet, Sabine Kuchler-Bopp, Philippe Barthélémy and Thierry Massfelder
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030793 - 27 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2288
Abstract
Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2% of cancer diagnoses and deaths worldwide. Clear-cell RCCs represent the vast majority (85%) of kidney cancers and are considered morphologically and genetically as immunogenic tumors. Indeed, the RCC tumoral microenvironment comprises T cells and myeloid cells in [...] Read more.
Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2% of cancer diagnoses and deaths worldwide. Clear-cell RCCs represent the vast majority (85%) of kidney cancers and are considered morphologically and genetically as immunogenic tumors. Indeed, the RCC tumoral microenvironment comprises T cells and myeloid cells in an immunosuppressive state, providing an opportunity to restore their activity through immunotherapy. Standard first-line systemic treatment for metastatic patients includes immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD1, in combination with either another ICI or with antiangiogenic targeted therapy. During the past few years, several combinations have been approved with an overall survival benefit and overall response rate that depend on the combination. Interestingly, some patients achieve prolonged complete responses, raising the question of whether these metastatic RCC patients can be cured. This review will focus on recent therapeutic advances in RCC and the clinical and biological aspects underpinning the potential for healing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma)
12 pages, 1855 KiB  
Review
Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events from Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Katharina Leucht, Nalyan Ali, Susan Foller and Marc-Oliver Grimm
Cancers 2022, 14(18), 4369; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184369 - 08 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2024
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now, among other cancers, routinely used for the treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In mRCC various combinations of ICIs and inhibitors of the vascular epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (VEGFR-TKIs) as well as [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now, among other cancers, routinely used for the treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In mRCC various combinations of ICIs and inhibitors of the vascular epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (VEGFR-TKIs) as well as dual checkpoint inhibition (nivolumab + ipilimumab), the latter for patients with intermediate and poor risk according to IMDC only (international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium), are now standard of care in the first line setting. Therefore, a profound understanding of immune-related adverse events (irAE) and the differential diagnosis of adverse reactions caused by other therapeutic agents in combination therapies is of paramount importance. Here we describe prevention, early diagnosis and clinical management of the most relevant irAE derived from ICI treatment focusing on the new VEGFR-TKI/ICI combinations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop