Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Organizational Behaviors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 May 2025 | Viewed by 25242

Special Issue Editor

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin 150001, China
Interests: work stress and emotion; digital and intelligent organizational behavior; quality of work-life
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid advancement of digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping industries worldwide. As enterprises increasingly integrate digital technologies and AI-driven solutions, understanding their implications for employee behavior becomes paramount. This special column in the Behavioral Sciences journal aims to explore and elucidate the multifaceted dynamics of employee behavior concerning digital-AI transformation.

Scholars have now explored the impact of the use of AI in organizations on employees (Budhwar et al., 2022). For example, current research has identified that AI-driven automation reshapes job roles, leading to a shift in employee responsibilities and skill requirements. This shift tends to affect job satisfaction, motivation, and engagement (Fosslien and Duffy, 2021; Li er al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023). The implementation of AI technologies also affects workplace dynamics, changing interpersonal relationships and communication patterns (Li et al., 2024; Tschang and Almirall, 2021; Wu et al., 2024). Furthermore, leadership and organizational culture play a key role in moderating the impact of AI on employee behavior. Effective leaders who promote transparency and provide adequate support for technology integration can moderate employee resistance and foster acceptance (Huang and Rust, 2018; Raisch and Krakowski, 2021). In summary, the literature has extensively documented the profound effects of digitalization and AI on organizational structures, processes, and strategic initiatives. However, the behavioral aspects of this transformation—particularly how employees perceive, adapt to, and engage with these technologies—remain relatively underexplored. Understanding employee behaviors in the context of digital-AI transformation is crucial for effectively managing change, enhancing productivity, and ensuring sustainable organizational development.

Contributions are encouraged to address, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Impact of digital-AI transformation on employee motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.
  • Skills development and training programs required for employees to effectively utilize AI technologies.
  • Evolution of job roles and responsibilities in response to AI integration.
  • Ethical considerations surrounding AI adoption and their implications for employee behavior and organizational culture.
  • Effects of AI-driven guest interactions on employee–customer relationships and service delivery.

We encourage original research articles, case studies, theoretical perspectives, and empirical studies that contribute to a deeper understanding of how digital-AI transformation influences employee behavior. Submitted manuscripts should be innovative, well-researched, and offer practical insights for both academia and industry.

Reference

Budhwar, P., Malik, A., De Silva, M. T., & Thevisuthan, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence–challenges and opportunities for international HRM: a review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1065-1097.

Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2021). No Hard Feelings: The Secret Power of Embracing Emotions at Work. Penguin Books.

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172.

Li, J. M., Wu, T. J., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2023). Systematic literature review of human–machine collaboration in organizations using bibliometric analysis. Management Decision, 61(10), 2920-2944.

Li, J. M., Zhang, R. X., Wu, T. J., & Mao, M. (2024). How does work autonomy in human-robot collaboration affect hotel employees’ work and health outcomes? Role of job insecurity and person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 117, 103654.

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.

Tschang, F. T., & Almirall, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence as augmenting automation: Implications for employment. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(4), 642-659.

Wu, T. J., Liang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Buffering Role of Workplace Mindfulness: How Job Insecurity of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Impacts Employees’ Work–Life-Related Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-17.

Wu, T. J., Liang, Y., Duan, W. Y., & Zhang, S. D. (2024). Forced shift to teleworking: how after-hours ICTs implicate COVID-19 perceptions when employees experience abusive supervision. Current Psychology, 1-15.

Wu, T. J., Zhang, R. X., & Li, J. M. (2024). How does emotional labor influence restaurant employees’ service quality during COVID-19? The roles of work fatigue and supervisor–subordinate Guanxi. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 136-154.

Dr. Tungju Wu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital-AI transformation
  • employee behavior
  • employee engagement
  • job redesign
  • artificial intelligence
  • organizational culture
  • ethical implications

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (15 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 889 KiB  
Article
The Usage of AI in Teaching and Students’ Creativity: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement and the Moderating Role of AI Literacy
by Min Zhou and Song Peng
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 587; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050587 (registering DOI) - 27 Apr 2025
Viewed by 246
Abstract
With the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, the application of AI in the field of education has gradually become one of the key factors in improving teaching quality and student abilities. Based on the conservation of resources theory, this study explores [...] Read more.
With the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, the application of AI in the field of education has gradually become one of the key factors in improving teaching quality and student abilities. Based on the conservation of resources theory, this study explores how the usage of AI in teaching impacts students’ creativity, exploring the mediating role of learning engagement and the moderating role of AI literacy. The research finds that the usage of AI in teaching significantly enhances students’ creativity, with learning engagement playing a mediating role in this process, thereby promoting creativity improvement. In addition, AI literacy moderates the relationship between the usage of AI in teaching and learning engagement. The results of this study not only expand the application of the conservation of resources theory in the field of education but also emphasize the important role of AI literacy in AI teaching, providing valuable policy suggestions for educational practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 576 KiB  
Article
“Remaining Vigilant” While “Enjoying Prosperity”: How Artificial Intelligence Usage Impacts Employees’ Innovative Behavior and Proactive Skill Development
by Jin Qian, Jiaxi Chen and Shuming Zhao
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040465 - 3 Apr 2025
Viewed by 466
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a crucial element in the competitive advantage of enterprises, it is important to understand how to stimulate employees’ creativity and initiative to cope with AI-driven changes. Drawing from the traditional Chinese wisdom of “remaining vigilant while enjoying [...] Read more.
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a crucial element in the competitive advantage of enterprises, it is important to understand how to stimulate employees’ creativity and initiative to cope with AI-driven changes. Drawing from the traditional Chinese wisdom of “remaining vigilant while enjoying prosperity” and based on the Conservation of Resources Theory, this study explored the impact of AI usage on employees’ innovative behavior and proactive skill development. The results of a three-stage survey of 350 questionnaires showed that (1) AI usage positively influences employees’ innovative behavior and proactive skill development; (2) job absorption partially mediates the relationship between AI usage and employees’ innovative behavior; (3) AI job replacement anxiety partially mediates the relationship between AI usage and proactive skill development; and (4) employees’ learning goal orientation positively moderates the impact of AI usage on innovative behavior through job absorption and on proactive skill development through AI job replacement anxiety. This study provides insights into how individuals respond to AI-driven changes and offers a novel perspective for developing research on AI usage at the individual level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 590 KiB  
Article
AI, How Much Shall I Tell You? Exchange and Communal Consumer–AI Relationships and the Willingness to Disclose Personal Information
by Corina Pelau, Maria Barbul, Irina Bojescu and Miruna Niculescu
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030386 - 19 Mar 2025
Viewed by 313
Abstract
Personal information is an important resource for the optimal functioning of AI and technology. Starting from the different theories that define human relationships and the way information is exchanged within them, we investigate the way in which communal and exchange relationships are formed [...] Read more.
Personal information is an important resource for the optimal functioning of AI and technology. Starting from the different theories that define human relationships and the way information is exchanged within them, we investigate the way in which communal and exchange relationships are formed between consumers and AI and the way they influence consumers’ willingness to disclose personal information to AI. With the help of structural equation modeling, we prove empirically that attachment to AI rather develops communal relationships compared to exchange relationships between consumers and AI. Communal relationships have a stronger influence on both enjoyment and self-disclosing behavior, while exchange relationships do not trigger a self-disclosing behavior unless there is enjoyment. Furthermore, attachment to AI alone does not influence self-disclosing behavior unless a communal relationship is developed. Our structural equation model emphasized the complex nature of relationships between consumers and AI and has important implications for the way AI will be optimally integrated in business processes and society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 963 KiB  
Article
Master or Escape: Digitization-Oriented Job Demands and Crafting and Withdrawal of Chinese Public Sector Employees
by Huan Huang and Jiangyu Li
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030378 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Public sector employees face the profound impact of digital work demands, especially with the advancement of China’s digital government construction. This study explores the dual-edged consequence of digital job demands on the work behaviors of public sector employees in China by constructing a [...] Read more.
Public sector employees face the profound impact of digital work demands, especially with the advancement of China’s digital government construction. This study explores the dual-edged consequence of digital job demands on the work behaviors of public sector employees in China by constructing a dual-path model. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to validate the data of 873 public sector employees. This study found that digital job demands increase civil servants’ thriving at work, facilitating their job-crafting behaviors and increasing their workplace anxiety, leading to their work withdrawal behavior. Furthermore, this study validates the moderating effects of promotion and preventive focus. This study provides managers in the public sector with valuable insights to develop digital job demands managing strategies and for civil servants to adapt their perceptions and behaviors in the digital context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 914 KiB  
Article
How Ambivalence Toward Digital–AI Transformation Affects Taking-Charge Behavior: A Threat–Rigidity Theoretical Perspective
by Xueliang Pei, Jianing Guo and Tung-Ju Wu
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030261 - 24 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 819
Abstract
Digital–AI transformation is revolutionizing the modern workplace, yet its complexity has left many aspects of employee responses underexplored. While previous research has examined some employee reactions to technological change, the nuanced impact of ambivalence toward digital–AI transformation on employees’ proactive behavior remains a [...] Read more.
Digital–AI transformation is revolutionizing the modern workplace, yet its complexity has left many aspects of employee responses underexplored. While previous research has examined some employee reactions to technological change, the nuanced impact of ambivalence toward digital–AI transformation on employees’ proactive behavior remains a largely uncharted area. This is especially significant as proactive behavior is crucial for the successful implementation of digital–AI transformation. While presenting unprecedented opportunities, digital–AI transformation has also triggered intricate psychological responses among employees, with ambivalence toward it being particularly prominent. Building on threat–rigidity theory, this study aims to fill a research gap by exploring the impact of ambivalence on employees’ proactive behavior during digital–AI transformation. Using survey data collected from 343 employees undergoing digital–AI transformation, we tested a structural model linking ambivalence, job engagement, and future work self-salience to taking-charge behavior. The results reveal that ambivalence toward digital–AI transformation negatively affects taking-charge behavior. Furthermore, both future work self-salience and job engagement fully mediate this relationship. Additionally, job engagement and future work self-salience jointly play a chained mediating role in the negative effect of ambivalence toward digital–AI transformation on taking-charge behavior. Our findings provide actionable insights for organizations seeking to mitigate ambivalence and foster proactive employee engagement in digital transformation initiatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 791 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety on Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Quiet Quitting in Turkish Small and Medium Enterprises
by Selen Uygungil-Erdogan, Yaşar Şahin, Aşkın İnci Sökmen-Alaca, Onur Oktaysoy, Mustafa Altıntaş and Vurgun Topçuoğlu
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030249 - 22 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1872
Abstract
The concept of artificial intelligence (AI) refers to technologies that imitate human-like thinking, learning and decision-making abilities. While integrating AI into the workforce offers the potential to increase efficiency in organizational activities, it can lead to negative effects such as anxiety, uncertainty, and [...] Read more.
The concept of artificial intelligence (AI) refers to technologies that imitate human-like thinking, learning and decision-making abilities. While integrating AI into the workforce offers the potential to increase efficiency in organizational activities, it can lead to negative effects such as anxiety, uncertainty, and distrust among employees which results from not being able to understand these technologies, regarding them as alternatives for themselves, and the possibility of losing their organizational position. These effects can reduce employees’ commitment at work and trigger negative organizational behaviors such as quiet quitting and turnover intention. Starting from this point, the present study aims to investigate the effect of AI anxiety on turnover intention and the mediating role of quiet quitting in this relationship. The study was conducted using a cross-sectional design with 457 people working in SMEs in Kırıkkale province. AI Anxiety, Quiet Quitting, and Turnover Intention Scales were utilized during the data collection process. The obtained data were analyzed through structural equation modeling. In addition to detecting significant relationships between concepts as a result of the analysis, it was realized that AI anxiety did not have a considerable effect directly on turnover intention; however, this effect occurred indirectly through quiet quitting. Accordingly, it is predicted that integrating AI technologies into business processes will increase the concerns about job security in employees, and this anxiety triggers the turnover intention by leading to a tendency toward quiet quitting for reasons such as loss of motivation and low organizational commitment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 253 KiB  
Article
The Paradox of AI Empowerment in Primary School Physical Education: Why Technology May Hinder, Not Help, Teaching Efficiency
by Haoran Zha, Wenye Li, Weihao Wang and Jian Xiao
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020240 - 19 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1066
Abstract
This study investigates why artificial intelligence (AI) may hinder rather than enhance teaching efficiency in primary school physical education (PE). Guided by socio-technical systems theory, we conducted focus group interviews with 13 PE teachers (6 from Nanjing and 7 from Chongqing, China) who [...] Read more.
This study investigates why artificial intelligence (AI) may hinder rather than enhance teaching efficiency in primary school physical education (PE). Guided by socio-technical systems theory, we conducted focus group interviews with 13 PE teachers (6 from Nanjing and 7 from Chongqing, China) who had at least three years of teaching experience and two years of AI implementation experience. Participants were purposefully selected through a two-stage sampling strategy: initial screening via open-ended questionnaires to identify teachers reporting negative experiences with AI integration, followed by snowball sampling to recruit additional participants with similar perspectives. Data collection employed a dual-facilitator approach using semi-structured interviews, with one moderator guiding discussions while another observed non-verbal cues. Qualitative content analysis revealed key barriers across four dimensions: technological (interface complexity, infrastructure limitations), employee (professional identity conflicts, interpersonal tensions), task-related (real-time monitoring challenges, reduced pedagogical flexibility), and organizational (inadequate support systems, unclear implementation policies). These findings suggest that successful AI integration in PE requires a holistic approach addressing both technological and human factors, rather than focusing solely on technological advancement. The study contributes to understanding how socio-technical interactions uniquely manifest in physically active learning environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
23 pages, 1598 KiB  
Article
The Impact of AI Negative Feedback vs. Leader Negative Feedback on Employee Withdrawal Behavior: A Dual-Path Study of Emotion and Cognition
by Xinyue Li, Mingpeng Huang, Jialin Liu, Yifan Fan and Min Cui
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020152 - 30 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1658
Abstract
In the workplace, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly widespread, including in employee performance management where AI feedback is gaining importance. Some companies are also using AI to provide negative feedback to employees. Our research compares the impact of AI [...] Read more.
In the workplace, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly widespread, including in employee performance management where AI feedback is gaining importance. Some companies are also using AI to provide negative feedback to employees. Our research compares the impact of AI negative feedback and leader negative feedback on employees. In order to explore the impact of AI negative feedback on employees, we investigated how AI negative feedback impacts employee psychology and behavior and compared these effects to those of human leader negative feedback, within the framework of the feedback process model. To explore these differences, we conducted three experimental studies (n = 772) from two different regions (i.e., China and the United States). The results reveal that leader negative feedback induces greater feelings of shame in employees, leading to work withdrawal behaviors, compared to AI negative feedback. Conversely, AI negative feedback has a more detrimental effect on employees’ self-efficacy, leading to work withdrawal behaviors, compared to leader negative feedback. Furthermore, employees’ AI knowledge moderates the relationship between negative feedback sources and employee withdrawal behavior. Specifically, employees who perceive themselves as having limited AI knowledge are more likely to feel ashamed when receiving leader negative feedback than when receiving AI negative feedback. Conversely, employees who believe they are knowledgeable about AI are more likely to have their self-efficacy undermined by AI negative feedback than leader negative feedback. Our research contributes significantly to the literature on AI versus human feedback and the role of feedback sources, providing practical insights for organizations on optimizing AI usage in delivering negative feedback. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 652 KiB  
Article
Reflection or Dependence: How AI Awareness Affects Employees’ In-Role and Extra-Role Performance?
by Heng Zhao, Long Ye, Ming Guo and Yanfang Deng
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020128 - 25 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2140
Abstract
To address the challenges posed by AI technologies, an increasing number of organizations encourage or require employees to integrate AI into their work processes. Despite the extensive research that has explored AI applications in the workplace, limited attention has been paid to the [...] Read more.
To address the challenges posed by AI technologies, an increasing number of organizations encourage or require employees to integrate AI into their work processes. Despite the extensive research that has explored AI applications in the workplace, limited attention has been paid to the role of AI awareness in shaping employees’ cognition, interaction behaviors with AI, and subsequent impacts. Drawing on self-construal theory, this study investigates how AI awareness influences employees’ in-role and extra-role performance. A multi-time-point analysis of data from 353 questionnaires reveals that employees’ AI awareness affects their perceived overqualification, which subsequently influences reflection on AI usage and dependence on AI usage, ultimately shaping their in-role and extra-role performance. Furthermore, employee–AI collaboration moderates the relationship between AI awareness and perceived overqualification. This study elucidates the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which AI awareness impacts employees’ performance, offering a more comprehensive perspective on AI awareness research and providing practical implications for promoting its positive effects while mitigating its negative consequences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1002 KiB  
Article
The Effects of Hotel Employees’ Attitude Toward the Use of AI on Customer Orientation: The Role of Usage Attitudes and Proactive Personality
by Peng Wang and Yong Hou
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020127 - 24 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1181
Abstract
Along with the development and application of artificial intelligence technology, intelligent services are also emerging in the travel industry. Especially in the tourism and hotel industry, many organizations have started to introduce AI to assist their employees. The purpose of this study is [...] Read more.
Along with the development and application of artificial intelligence technology, intelligent services are also emerging in the travel industry. Especially in the tourism and hotel industry, many organizations have started to introduce AI to assist their employees. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of employees’ perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of AI on customer orientation, and further analyze the mediating role of attitudes toward use and the moderating role of a proactive personality. A questionnaire was administered to hotel employees in Liaoning Province, China, and hypothesis testing was conducted using SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 22.0. It was found that the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly and positively influenced usage attitudes and customer orientation. The usage attitudes mediated between perceived usefulness/perceived ease of use and customer orientation. Proactive personality moderated the effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on usage attitudes. This study not only theoretically enriches the research related to technology acceptance modeling, but also practically provides suggestions for hotel managers to manage their employees after the introduction of AI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 982 KiB  
Article
How Does AI Affect College? The Impact of AI Usage in College Teaching on Students’ Innovative Behavior and Well-Being
by Ke Ma, Yan Zhang and Beihe Hui
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1223; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121223 - 19 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3065
Abstract
Currently, there is a growing trend for college and university teachers to use AI in their teaching work. However, existing research explores the impact of teachers’ usage of AI in the workplace on students. Based on resource preservation theory, this study examined the [...] Read more.
Currently, there is a growing trend for college and university teachers to use AI in their teaching work. However, existing research explores the impact of teachers’ usage of AI in the workplace on students. Based on resource preservation theory, this study examined the mechanism of the usage of AI in teaching on students’ innovative behavior and well-being with a sample of 356 college students from Zhejiang Province. The study found that the usage of AI in teaching significantly and positively affected students’ innovative behavior and well-being, with students’ positive emotion playing a mediating role. Students’ AI trust not only moderated the effect of the usage of AI in teaching on positive emotion, but also moderated the mediating role of positive emotion. The findings have important implications for teachers’ instructional management and practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 513 KiB  
Article
Working with AI: The Effect of Job Stress on Hotel Employees’ Work Engagement
by Yong Hou and Liwei Fan
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111076 - 11 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2549
Abstract
Based on the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and social support theory, this study focuses on the effects of AI-induced stress on hotel employees’ work engagement and examines the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. A [...] Read more.
Based on the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and social support theory, this study focuses on the effects of AI-induced stress on hotel employees’ work engagement and examines the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. A sample of five-star hotels in China was selected for the study, data were analyzed, and hypotheses were tested using SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 7.4 software. The results of the study revealed that AI-induced stress had a significant negative effect on work engagement and psychological capital mediated the relationship between AI-induced stress and work engagement. Perceived organizational support moderated the relationship between work stress and psychological capital. Specifically, the higher the perceived organizational support, the lower the negative effect of work stress on psychological capital; conversely, the lower the perceived organizational support, the higher the negative effect of work stress on psychological capital. The greater the negative impact of work stress on psychological capital, the higher the perceived organizational support, and the smaller the negative impact of work stress on psychological capital. The findings of the study not only enrich the research related to AI in the hotel industry but also have certain reference significance for managers in the hotel industry who introduce AI in managing their employees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 575 KiB  
Article
Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies: Applying the UTAUT Model
by Youngsoo Kim, Victor Blazquez and Taeyeon Oh
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111035 - 4 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4007
Abstract
This study addresses the academic gap in the adoption of generative AI systems by investigating the factors influencing technology acceptance and usage behavior in Korean firms. Although recent advancements in AI are accelerating digital transformation and innovation, empirical research on the adoption of [...] Read more.
This study addresses the academic gap in the adoption of generative AI systems by investigating the factors influencing technology acceptance and usage behavior in Korean firms. Although recent advancements in AI are accelerating digital transformation and innovation, empirical research on the adoption of these systems remains scarce. To fill this gap, this study applies the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, surveying 300 employees from both large and small enterprises in South Korea. The findings reveal that effort expectancy and social influence significantly influence employees’ behavioral intention to use generative AI systems. Specifically, effort expectancy plays a critical role in the early stages of adoption, while social influence, including support from supervisors and peers, strongly drives the adoption process. In contrast, performance expectancy and facilitating conditions show no significant impact. The study also highlights the differential effects of age and work experience on behavioral intention and usage behavior. For older employees, social support is a key factor in technology acceptance, whereas employees with more experience exhibit a more positive attitude toward adopting new technologies. Conversely, facilitating conditions are more critical for younger employees. This study contributes to the understanding of the interaction between various factors in AI technology adoption and offers strategic insights for the successful implementation of AI systems in Korean companies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1347 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Job Skill Demands Under Artificial Intelligence Embeddedness on Employees’ Job Performance: A Moderated Double-Edged Sword Model
by Ningning Chen, Xinan Zhao and Lele Wang
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100974 - 21 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3032
Abstract
With the widespread application of AI technology, the skills and abilities required by employees in their work are undergoing fundamental changes, redefining the roles of employees. This research aims to explore the effect of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on well-being in [...] Read more.
With the widespread application of AI technology, the skills and abilities required by employees in their work are undergoing fundamental changes, redefining the roles of employees. This research aims to explore the effect of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on well-being in organizations and job performance. Based on conservation of resources theory, this research randomly selected 479 employees from 8 companies in China using a time-lag method as samples, and conducted statistical analysis with ordinary least squares (OLS). This research found that, job skill demands under AI embeddedness will both increase employees’ competency needs, promoting their well-being in organizations and job performance and decrease employees’ job embeddedness, inhibiting their well-being in organizations and job performance. Meanwhile, technological anxiety moderated the impact of job skill demands under AI embeddedness on job embeddedness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 743 KiB  
Article
Trust Dynamics in Financial Decision Making: Behavioral Responses to AI and Human Expert Advice Following Structural Breaks
by Hyo Young Kim and Young Soo Park
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100964 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1831
Abstract
This study explores the trust dynamics in financial forecasting by comparing how individuals perceive the credibility of AI and human experts during significant structural market changes. We specifically examine the impact of two types of structural breaks on trust: Additive Outliers, which represent [...] Read more.
This study explores the trust dynamics in financial forecasting by comparing how individuals perceive the credibility of AI and human experts during significant structural market changes. We specifically examine the impact of two types of structural breaks on trust: Additive Outliers, which represent a single yet significant anomaly, and Level Shifts, which indicate a sustained change in data patterns. Grounded in theoretical frameworks such as attribution theory, algorithm aversion, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this research investigates psychological responses to AI and human advice under uncertainty. This experiment involved 157 participants, recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), who were asked to forecast stock prices under different structural break scenarios. Participants were randomly assigned to either the AI or human expert treatment group, and the experiment was conducted online. Through this controlled experiment, we find that, while initial trust levels in AI and human experts are comparable, the credibility of advice is more severely compromised following a structural break in the Level Shift condition, compared to the Additive Outlier condition. Moreover, the decline in trust is more pronounced for human experts than for AI. These findings highlight the psychological factors influencing decision making under uncertainty and offer insights into the behavioral responses to AI and human expert systems during structural market changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employee Behavior on Digital-AI Transformation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop