Impacts of Employee–AI Collaboration on Work Behavior—Second Edition

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Organizational Behaviors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 April 2026 | Viewed by 2873

Special Issue Editor

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin 150001, China
Interests: work stress and emotion; digital and intelligent organizational behavior; quality of work-life
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) continue to transform workplaces at an unprecedented pace, the interaction between employees and AI systems is becoming an increasingly central component of modern organizational life (Li et al., 2025; Wu et al., 2024). While AI tools promise enhanced productivity, accuracy, and efficiency, their integration also poses significant implications for employee behavior, job design, workplace dynamics, and organizational culture (Huang & Rust, 2018; Wu et al., 2025).

While prior studies have examined the organizational impacts of AI implementation (Budhwar et al., 2022), there remains a pressing need to investigate the human side of AI integration. For instance, AI-driven automation is not only transforming tasks but also redefining the skills and mindsets employees need to thrive (Fosslien & Duffy, 2021; Li et al., 2023). The success of AI collaboration often hinges on employees’ trust in technology, their readiness for change, and the support systems provided by organizational leadership (Raisch & Krakowski, 2021; Wu & Zhang, 2024).

This Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences invites contributions that explore the evolving nature of employee–AI collaboration and its behavioral consequences. We aim to deepen the understanding of how employees adapt to, work alongside, and are influenced by AI technologies in the workplace. We welcome original research, theoretical papers, empirical studies, case analyses, and interdisciplinary perspectives that examine the behavioral dimensions of employee–AI collaboration. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Employee perceptions, attitudes, and adaptation toward working with AI systems;
  • Impact of AI–human collaboration on job satisfaction, engagement, and motivation;
  • Trust-building mechanisms and psychological safety in AI-augmented work environments;
  • New skill requirements and continuous learning in AI-integrated roles;
  • The role of leadership, communication, and organizational culture in shaping effective AI collaboration.
  • Ethical implications and behavioral responses to AI surveillance, decision making, and bias.
  • Effects of AI in service industries: employee–customer interactions and frontline behavior.
  • Case studies of successful or failed employee–AI collaborations and lessons learned

We encourage submissions that offer both practical insights and theoretical advancements, contributing to a richer understanding of how employees and AI can work together to achieve organizational success.

References

  1. Budhwar, P., Malik, A., De Silva, M. T., & Thevisuthan, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence–challenges and opportunities for international HRM: a review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1065-1097.
  2. Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2021). No Hard Feelings: The Secret Power of Embracing Emotions at Work. Penguin Books.
  3. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172.
  4. Li, J. M., Wu, T. J., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2023). Systematic literature review of human–machine collaboration in organizations using bibliometric analysis. Management Decision, 61(10), 2920-2944.
  5. Li, J. M., Wu, H. Y., Zhang, R. X., & Wu, T. J. (2025). How employee-generative AI collaboration affects employees work and family outcomes? The relationship instrumentality perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2025.2512555
  6. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.
  7. Wu, T. J., Liang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Buffering Role of Workplace Mindfulness: How Job Insecurity of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Impacts Employees’ Work–Life-Related Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-17.
  8. Wu, T. J., & Zhang, R. X. (2024). Exploring the impacts of intention towards human-robot collaboration on frontline hotel employees’ positive behavior: An integrative model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 123, 103912.
  9. Wu, T. J., Zhang, R. X., & Li, J. M. (2025). When employees meet digital-intelligence transformation: Unveiling the role of employee intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 84, 102912.

Dr. Tungju Wu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • employee–AI collaboration
  • work behavior
  • artificial intelligence
  • digital transformation
  • human–machine interaction
  • job redesign
  • employee adaptation
  • trust in AI
  • organizational change
  • employee motivation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 2710 KB  
Article
AI-Augmented Co-Design in Healthcare: Log-Based Markers of Teamwork Behaviors and Collective Intelligence Outcomes
by Yue Jiang, Jing Chen, Zhaoqi Li, Long Liu and P. John Clarkson
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 1704; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121704 - 9 Dec 2025
Viewed by 250
Abstract
Co-design in healthcare settings requires teams to utilize each other’s knowledge effectively, but practical guidance and simple methods for observing collaboration are often lacking. We tested whether a lightweight AI assistant that guides the process—and automatically logs who speaks, when, and how work [...] Read more.
Co-design in healthcare settings requires teams to utilize each other’s knowledge effectively, but practical guidance and simple methods for observing collaboration are often lacking. We tested whether a lightweight AI assistant that guides the process—and automatically logs who speaks, when, and how work progresses—can make teamwork easier to manage and easier to track. Six four-person teams completed the same five-phase session. The assistant nudged timing, turn-taking, and artifact hand-offs; all interactions were recorded in a shared workspace. We assessed usability and acceptance, expert-rated product quality (technical performance), perceived team performance, and self-rated technical contribution, and we summarized basic log signals of participation and pacing (e.g., turn-taking balance, average turn duration). Analyses were descriptive. All teams finished the protocol with complete logs. Outcomes were favorable (expert ratings averaged 4.18/5; perceived performance 6.14/7; self-rated contribution 4.08/5). Teams with more balanced participation and clearer pacing tended to report better performance, whereas simply having more turns did not. A process-guiding AI assistant can quantify teamwork behaviors as markers of collective intelligence and support reflection in everyday clinical co-design; future work will examine the generalizability of these findings across different sites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1216 KB  
Article
How AI-Related Task Complexity Shapes Innovative Work Behavior: A Coping Theory Perspective
by Hongyi Cai, Yuhui Ge and Heng Zhao
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111467 - 28 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1551
Abstract
As technological revolutions continue to advance, AI increasingly emerges as a focal driver for enhancing innovation quality. Grounded in coping theory, this study develops a moderated dual-pathway model to examine the mechanisms through which AI-related task complexity influences innovative work behavior. A three-wave [...] Read more.
As technological revolutions continue to advance, AI increasingly emerges as a focal driver for enhancing innovation quality. Grounded in coping theory, this study develops a moderated dual-pathway model to examine the mechanisms through which AI-related task complexity influences innovative work behavior. A three-wave field survey was conducted among 353 employees from high-tech enterprises in Beijing and Shanghai. Hypotheses are tested via structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that AI-related task complexity significantly promotes innovative work behavior by fostering problem-focused coping while simultaneously suppressing it by triggering emotion-focused coping. Moreover, AI opportunity perception is found to moderate these relationships, strengthening the positive effect of problem-focused coping and attenuating the negative effect of emotion-focused coping on innovation. This study advances theoretical understanding of employee behavioral responses in AI-integrated work contexts and offers practical insights into how organizations can leverage AI to stimulate innovation among their workforce. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop