Picturing Morality from Multidisciplinary Perspectives—Third Edition

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 June 2026 | Viewed by 4609

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Interests: behavioral ethics; moral decision-making; behavioral public administration; civic education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

From 2022 to 2025, we published the first and second editions of the Special Issue entitled “Picturing Morality from Multidisciplinary Perspectives.” For the first edition, we collected twelve papers that provided fascinating insights into various ethical and moral topics, such as civic–moral education, ethical decision-making with AI, cheating behavior, fairness norms, social responsibility ethics, moral dilemma decision-making, moral hypocrisy, moral emotion attributions, and human identity. Due to the significant attention that these papers received, we embarked upon the creation of a second edition. Due to its continued and far-reaching influence, the second edition attracted over 30 submissions. The accepted papers discussed topics such as moral reasoning, character virtues, ethical citizenship, moral judgment, moral foundations, environmentally friendly behavior, moral disengagement, moral justification, moral pragmatism, immoral behavior, and conscientiousness.

We are encouraged to see that so many scholars are exploring the complex, multidimensional nature of human morality and, in an era of spreading AI technology that pushes us to reflect on human morality, we are excited to announce the third edition of our Special Issue on developing a deeper understanding of these themes. This latest installment is open to a diverse array of submissions, including empirical studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and brief reports, and we welcome contributions from all methodologies and disciplines as long as they align with our overarching theme of exploring the role of morality in human life.

Our commitment to fair and rigorous peer review ensures that all submissions receive the attention they deserve. Seize this opportunity to contribute to the field of moral studies and help us deepen our understanding of morality’s far-reaching influence on our world.

Dr. Chuanjun Liu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • behavioral ethics
  • moral dilemma
  • moral judgment
  • health ethics
  • business ethics
  • organizational ethics
  • moral sociology
  • moral psychology
  • civic moral education
  • justice
  • AI ethics
  • responsibility
  • technological ethics
  • virtue ethics
  • moral behavior
  • unethical behavior
  • cheating
  • harming
  • lying
  • prosocial behavior
  • corruption
  • rule breaking
  • extra-role behavior

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issues

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1032 KB  
Article
Change in the Air: How Shifting Federal Guidance Related to DEI Influences Teachers’ Use of Culturally Responsive Practices
by Kate M. Morman, Laura M. Brady, Cong Wang and Stephanie A. Fryberg
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030390 - 9 Mar 2026
Viewed by 690
Abstract
Culturally responsive practices (CRPs) (i.e., practices that affirm students’ cultural backgrounds) can reduce educational inequities, but these practices have yet to become normative within U.S. education. A national study of K-12 teachers conducted in late 2023 found that teachers’ use of CRPs depended [...] Read more.
Culturally responsive practices (CRPs) (i.e., practices that affirm students’ cultural backgrounds) can reduce educational inequities, but these practices have yet to become normative within U.S. education. A national study of K-12 teachers conducted in late 2023 found that teachers’ use of CRPs depended not only on their individual moral frameworks regarding diversity (i.e., endorsement of multiculturalism and colorblindness) but also on their communities’ and administrators’ support for efforts to increase equitable educational outcomes among students (i.e., equity work). Since 2023, federal guidance has shifted, and educational equity work is now discouraged. We conducted a second national survey of K-12 teachers (N = 980) in early 2025 to examine whether contextual influences on teachers’ decisions regarding CRP use have also shifted in light of changes to federal guidance. While the 2023 study found that teachers with weaker multiculturalism beliefs were more likely to use CRPs when their administrators supported equity work, findings from the 2025 study revealed that administrator support only predicted greater CRP use when these teachers worked in politically liberal (but not conservative) communities. The shift suggests that recent federal policy changes have weakened the influence of district and school leadership on teachers’ decisions to use CRPs, particularly among teachers who are not individually inclined to use these practices. This study offers timely insights into teachers’ use of CRPs after new federal guidance on educational equity efforts and reaffirms that teachers’ practices are not solely shaped by their personal beliefs, but are instead responsive to the broader contexts in which they work. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 988 KB  
Article
A Psychoanalytically Informed Pilot Study of Moral Competence in German Young Adults Linked to Personality Structure and Parenting Experiences
by Aslı Akın, Holger von der Lippe, Jonathan Henssler, Inge Seiffge-Krenke, Stephan Doering and Stefan Gutwinski
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030341 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 365
Abstract
The present pilot study explored associations between moral competence, personality structure and perceived parenting experiences. While previous research on moral competence has mainly emphasized educational and cognitive determinants, this work represents a novel psychoanalytically informed investigation of this ability. A sample of 88 [...] Read more.
The present pilot study explored associations between moral competence, personality structure and perceived parenting experiences. While previous research on moral competence has mainly emphasized educational and cognitive determinants, this work represents a novel psychoanalytically informed investigation of this ability. A sample of 88 young adults aged 18 to 21 completed an online survey including the Moral Competence-Test, OPD-Structure-Questionnaire, and Zurich Brief Questionnaire for the Assessment of Parental Behaviors. Exploratory analyses revealed a positive association between moral competence and overall integration of personality structure. Perceived parenting behaviors showed observable relationships with both constructs: warm and supportive parenting was associated with higher structural integration and greater moral competence, whereas parental control, particularly psychological control, was linked to lower personality structural and moral abilities. An exploratory mediation analysis further suggested that paternal warmth may indirectly affect moral competence via personality structure. This finding aligns with psychoanalytic theory proposing that father–child experiences, conceptualized as triangulation, create a cognitive and emotional space that fosters reflection and the development of moral competence. Overall, these exploratory findings underscore the need for longitudinal research examining the interplay between parenting experiences, personality structure, and moral development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 773 KB  
Article
Moderating Effects of Telework Intensity on the Relationship Between Ethical Climate, Affective Commitment and Burnout in the Colombian Electricity Sector Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Carlos Santiago-Torner
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1409; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101409 - 16 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 853
Abstract
Background: Ethical leadership and ethical climate are generally considered protective factors against burnout, while affective commitment has traditionally been understood as a personal resource that enhances employee well-being. However, recent evidence suggests that, under specific contextual conditions, these variables may also operate as [...] Read more.
Background: Ethical leadership and ethical climate are generally considered protective factors against burnout, while affective commitment has traditionally been understood as a personal resource that enhances employee well-being. However, recent evidence suggests that, under specific contextual conditions, these variables may also operate as demands that intensify emotional strain. Objective: This study examines how telework intensity moderates the relationships between ethical leadership, affective commitment, principle-based ethical climate, and burnout. Methods: Data were drawn from a doctoral study conducted in the Colombian electricity sector. Moderation analyses were performed to assess whether the number of telework days per week altered the strength and direction of associations between organizational variables and the dimensions of burnout. Results: Telework intensity did not moderate the relationship between ethical leadership and affective commitment, but it strengthened the positive association between affective commitment and emotional exhaustion. Moreover, it reversed the role of a principle-based ethical climate: from being positively associated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization to acting as a protective factor under medium to high telework intensity. Conclusions: The findings challenge conventional assumptions about affective commitment and ethical climate, highlighting the ambivalent role of telework. They underscore the need for more nuanced theoretical frameworks and management practices that are sensitive to emerging psychosocial risks in virtual work environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 259 KB  
Article
No Detectable Effects of Chronic Stress on Moral Decision-Making Are Found: A Data Reanalysis and a Pre-Registered Replication and Extension
by Lemei Zou, Junhong Wu and Chuanjun Liu
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(8), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081068 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2103
Abstract
According to the dual-process model of moral cognition, individuals tend to refuse the proposal of killing some to save more innocents under stressful conditions compared to non-stressful states, which has been demonstrated in previous studies. However, this effect might be unreliable according to [...] Read more.
According to the dual-process model of moral cognition, individuals tend to refuse the proposal of killing some to save more innocents under stressful conditions compared to non-stressful states, which has been demonstrated in previous studies. However, this effect might be unreliable according to the General Adaptation Syndrome theory and the Stress Process Model. To test this speculation, we reanalyzed the raw data on the effect of chronic stress on moral choice from a previous study (Study 1) and conducted a pre-registered replication and extension study (Study 2). Both results demonstrated no detectable effect of chronic stress on moral decisions, which is inconsistent with the original results. This study calls for caution regarding this effect and has important theoretical and practical implications. Full article
Back to TopTop