After the Global Turn: Current Colonial, Decolonial and Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture

A Special Issue of Architecture (ISSN 2673-8945).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2026) | Viewed by 4053

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Media and Cultural Studies Department, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Interests: race, gender and identity; history of colonial architecture; postcolonial and decolonial theory; publics and counterpublics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

What is the status of postcolonial and decolonial discourse in architecture? How has the “global turn” in architectural discourse evolved from histories of contact, conquest and colonization? Forty years ago, the influential essays of “‘Race,’ Writing and Difference” appeared in Critical Inquiry (Gates, 1985, 1986). Essays by Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Hazel Carby, Jacques Derrida, Abdul R. JanMohamed, and others created new critical models that interrogated how difference had been inscribed as “race” and explored the complex interactions of race, writing and difference, which influenced architectural history and theory for several decades. That same year, Spiro Kostof’s textbook A History of Architecture (1985) spurred a “global turn” in architecture that has complicated the field’s canon. The new global discourse seeks to understand contemporary globalization as manifested in the built environment, exemplified by the foundation of the Global Architectural History Teaching Collaborative (GAHTC) and the publication of multiple volumes on global architecture. The global turn has attempted to close the dichotomies of East and West, North and South imposed by earlier colonial and postcolonial theories, such as Edward Said’s formulation of Orientalism as the Occident’s “other” (Said, 1978). Perspectives from the “Global South” have emerged as important correctives to the hegemony of Northern Hemisphere-centered scholarship and practice. What has resulted from this “turn” has been ambiguous, however, as it often focuses on architects from the Global North operating in the Global South or developments modeled after Western architecture and urban design, without a concomitant innovation in truly global approaches and subject matter.

This Special Issue aims to explore the field’s development from colonial, decolonial and postcolonial theory to the global turn and beyond. We encourage papers that take innovative approaches to the colonial, postcolonial, decolonial and global in architecture, including such topics as:

  • Transnational connections and flows in excess of political boundaries;
  • Decentered models of global architecture;
  • Race and architecture;
  • Feminist, subaltern and minor perspectives on architecture,
  • Empire and decolonization;
  • Migration;
  • Indigenous architecture;
  • Informal architecture;
  • Landscapes of extraction and dispossession;
  • Modernization and development;
  • Other perspectives.

References

Critical Inquiry: Autumn 1985 (vol. 12, no. 1) and Autumn 1986 (vol. 13, no. 1); Henry Louis Gates, ed. “Race,” Writing, and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Global Architectural History Teaching Collaborative https://www.gahtc.org/.

Kostof, Spiro. A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.

Said, Edward. Orientalism: Western Representations of the Orient. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.

Dr. Patricia Morton
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Architecture is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • colonialism
  • colonization
  • settler colonialism
  • empire
  • decolonial
  • postcolonial
  • global history 
  • transnational 
  • race 
  • migration 
  • gender 
  • indigenous

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

32 pages, 7967 KB  
Article
‘Utilitarian’ Architecture over ‘Streamlined Buildings’: Decolonisation, Nation-Building and Development Aid at the University of Nigeria (1955–1967)
by Adefolatomiwa Toye
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030147 - 24 Aug 2026
Viewed by 343
Abstract
Recent scholarship on twentieth century West African architecture examines the intersections of decolonisation, nation formation, and development aid. While this shift highlights a transnational body of architects, the role of indigenous actors and building professionals remain under-researched. Using the University of Nigeria, Nsukka [...] Read more.
Recent scholarship on twentieth century West African architecture examines the intersections of decolonisation, nation formation, and development aid. While this shift highlights a transnational body of architects, the role of indigenous actors and building professionals remain under-researched. Using the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) as a case study, this paper analyses how architecture reflects Nigeria’s transition from a colonial entity to an independent state. It employs a transnational and multi-institutional archival research approach. Government, academic and architectural archives in Nigeria, the UK and the USA were examined. Non-institutional sources like newspapers and biographical accounts of students and building professionals were also analysed. The research reveals that the Eastern Nigerian political class envisioned UNN’s architecture as a nationalist and utilitarian alternative to the elitist and expensive colonial University College Ibadan (1948). The university was designed in three stages by the British firm James Cubitt & Partners; Nigerian contractors like Eastern General Contractors; and American architects through technical assistance. The stages illustrate how the architecture of universities and state projects in early independence Nigeria were impacted by decolonisation, nation-building and development aid. Furthermore, the research introduces local figures—Nigerian political elites and contractors—who are often overlooked in commonly used architectural records. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 240 KB  
Article
Reworking Power Geometries: South–South Exchanges and the Transformation of Global Architectural Flows
by Amit Srivastava, Vladimir Kulić and Peter Scriver
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030112 - 11 Jul 2026
Viewed by 513
Abstract
How did exchanges between the architecture, engineering, and construction sectors of postcolonial states challenge dominant patterns of North–South technology transfer, and actively begin to construct the substantive scaffolding of an alternative international order? This article proposes a theoretical framework for understanding South–South exchange [...] Read more.
How did exchanges between the architecture, engineering, and construction sectors of postcolonial states challenge dominant patterns of North–South technology transfer, and actively begin to construct the substantive scaffolding of an alternative international order? This article proposes a theoretical framework for understanding South–South exchange as a distinct spatial practice in postcolonial architectural history, recovering previously unexplored patterns of circulation—construction technologies, professional expertise, contracting capacity—that connected allegedly peripheral geographies spanning from Southeast Asia and Africa to the Caribbean and Southeast Europe. It draws on Doreen Massey’s concept of ‘power geometry’, Anna Tsing’s theorization of ‘friction’, and Édouard Glissant’s ‘archipelagic thinking’ to develop three analytical movements: Geometries, Powers, and Archipelagic Relations. Together these map the lateral circulation of expertise, technology, and labor among postcolonial nations operating outside the North-South and East–West axes around which twentieth-century architectural history has largely been organized. The paper argues that the prevailing diffusionist model resembles a two-body gravitational system that forecloses the possibility of lateral force, and treats South–South exchanges instead as orbital anomalies, persistent deviations from predicted paths that reveal an unseen distributed gravitational field. Rather than organizing around a metropolitan vertex, this field constitutes what computational geometry calls an ‘unstructured mesh’: contingent, uncentered, and variable in its local density. The mesh’s topology traces across a range of exchanges drawn from the forthcoming edited volume South–South: Non-Alignment and Cooperation in the Construction of the Global South, which brings together contributions from a dozen scholars of postcolonial architecture. The case studies include triangulations in which prefabrication technology traveled between Yugoslavia, Cuba, and Angola, and professional expertise looped between India, Africa and Europe. The motivational fields and frictions that drove and transformed each exchange are examined in turn. The article culminates in a reading of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the Afro-Asian Housing Organisation (AAHO) through Glissant’s concepts of relation and opacity—the right of postcolonial actors to participate in exchange without becoming fully legible to Cold War systems that demanded every alignment be declared. By challenging prevailing narratives that position the ‘Global South’ primarily as recipient rather than generator of innovation, the article contributes to a decolonial architectural historiography that shows how the political project of Non-Alignment was substantively materialized in the production of the built environment. Recovering these alternate forms of architectural flow demands a South–South historiographical orientation as a corrective to the field’s persistent centeredness, and offers historical insight no less relevant today for rethinking the potential, and the challenges, of contemporary transnational cooperation. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 282 KB  
Essay
The Location of Theory: Settler Colonial Knowledge Production, Among Other Interstices of Empire, and South–South Exchange
by Ayala Levin
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030137 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 648
Abstract
This essay complicates the distinction between of “North” and “South” as spaces of knowledge production—which usually entails the privileging of the South as an emancipatory space—by directing attention to Southern actors’ imbrication with forms of colonialism. It calls for situating both Northern and [...] Read more.
This essay complicates the distinction between of “North” and “South” as spaces of knowledge production—which usually entails the privileging of the South as an emancipatory space—by directing attention to Southern actors’ imbrication with forms of colonialism. It calls for situating both Northern and Southern actors within networks of global knowledge exchanges by critically examining their positionality vis-à-vis colonial relations domestically and internationally. More specifically, it asks how interstitial colonial positions gave rise to new centers of knowledge production and expertise in the postcolonial world. It considers these positions not as static identities but as strategic, adaptative, dynamic, relational, and contingent upon geopolitically determined itineraries of global exchange. Full article
12 pages, 6971 KB  
Essay
Reluctant Biography, or the Visual and Spatial Revision of Key Colonial/Imperial Narratives
by Finola O’Kane
Architecture 2026, 6(3), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6030136 - 14 Aug 2026
Viewed by 267
Abstract
Imperial and colonial history has mostly been founded on the tradition of writing biographies of great men, and more rarely, great women. These lean inherently towards the aggrandizement or hagiography of individuals who, particularly in the early decades of life, may deserve no [...] Read more.
Imperial and colonial history has mostly been founded on the tradition of writing biographies of great men, and more rarely, great women. These lean inherently towards the aggrandizement or hagiography of individuals who, particularly in the early decades of life, may deserve no such attention. Yet for postcolonial and decolonial progression, the unattractive necessity of revising the lives of such influential individuals remains. We cannot now change or eliminate the archive’s overwhelming propensity to amplify (and thereby value and embolden) elite voices and experiences, but we can turn down the volume by placing key episodes firmly within an individual’s relevant or entire life experience, by reading the other less explicit motives for travel or collecting and by focusing on silent absences rather than noisy presences. Sara E. Johnson’s 2023 book ‘Encyclopédie Noire: The making of Moreau de Saint-Méry’s intellectual world’, is presented as a ‘communal biography’ of one such great imperialist, by intentionally, and sometimes creatively, adding in the actors, voices and narratives missing from the sources and archives of European colonial history. In trying to methodologically undermine how imperial biography has traditionally sidestepped complicity or guilt, Johnson attempted to paint a more complete picture of the societies, enslaved or not, in which such elite men operated. Landscape history and architectural history play important roles in such essential revisionism because they can add provocatively spatial dimensions to colonial lives and experiences. As people are profoundly affected by the environment(s) in which they operate, particularly at key tipping points in their lives, spatial and environmental analysis can undermine traditional biography by focusing on where key life decisions were made, leading to a broader cognizance of why they were made. An individual’s spatial position, whether resident or absentee, at home or abroad, with family or without, reveals nuances in mentality that traditional analysis can miss. Taking the life and letters of Pierce Butler, Irishman, US Senator, signatory of the US constitution and the owner of a substantial estate of land and enslaved people in Georgia, as a case study, this article argues for the creative reimagining of biography as a fundamental postcolonial corrective to colonial and imperial history. Butler’s transnational identity, sometimes Irish, sometimes not, collapses any neat mapping of a grand national narrative onto one man’s life. The extraordinary level of detail provided by the correspondence also demands a more conventional or traditional history, one focused on individual identity, motive and relationships, that cannot be effectively discounted because of a landscape or architectural focus. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop