Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

19 CO2 eq. for kg of -->CO2 eq. for 1 kg of

80 According to [7]and -->According to [7] and  

102 Fig. 1: Should waste also be considered for upstream and core?

Table 2: the caption should mention tons.

There is 4% overlap with this work; doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100871

Proper citation is needed, and similarity must be reduced.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See the attachment.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comment: In this manuscript, Chiara Rossi et.al. Start by evaluating dairy products using life cycle assessment methods and discuss some strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy products throughout their life cycle, i.e. carbon sinks. Dairy farm capacity is the main means of mitigating climate change in the dairy supply chain. Overall, there are some issues that need to be addressed before going any further. Some opinions are listed below: 1. Figure 2 Figure 3 The ordinate value is not clearly expressed. Please correct. 2. The article mentioned that 63 consumers participated in the study. Whether the data collected from these 63 consumers is reasonable and whether the number of consumers has a great impact on the consumer research. Please explain accordingly. 3. As shown in Figure 2, the production and consumption stages of one kilogram of aged cheese account for a large proportion of more than 14% of the total carbon emissions, which does not meet the figures. Please confirm the results, and if there is no objection, please explain the situation.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx