Neuroglia

Background/Objective: Parkinson’s disease (PD) has long been viewed from a neurocentric perspective; however, increasing evidence indicates that glial dysfunction also contributes to dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Although neurotoxic glial phenotypes have been described in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease in vivo models, it remains unclear whether similar states arise in the pathological milieu of PD. This study aimed to determine whether glial cells with intrinsic neurotoxic properties emerge in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) in a PD context. Methods: The classical 6-hydroxydopamine rat model was used to obtain glial cultures from the ipsilateral, toxin-damaged SNpc. These cultures were characterized by quantifying cell number and morphology, as well as by assessing the expression of glial markers. Their neurotoxic potential was evaluated in vitro through co-cultures with PC12 cells, and in vivo by transplanting the isolated cells into the SNpc of naïve rats. Assessments included PC12 cell survival, and integrity of the nigrostriatal pathway and motor performance in the cylinder test. Results: Ipsilateral SNpc cultures yielded 25-fold more cells than contralateral controls. Cultured cells co-expressed astrocytic and microglial markers, thus defining a population of damage-derived reactive glia (DDRG). When co-cultured, DDRG reduced PC12 cell survival, whereas control glial cells showed no neurotoxic effects. In vivo, DDRG transplantation induced a dose-dependent loss of dopaminergic neurons and motor impairments, while vehicle and control glia produced no detectable effects. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that glial cells emerging from a neuroinflammatory/neurodegenerative environment in the SNpc may contribute to dopaminergic neuron loss. Within the context of the experimental PD model used, DDRG appears to represent a glial population with potential pathogenic relevance and may constitute a candidate target for further investigation as a therapeutic strategy in Parkinson’s disease.

COVID-19 has raised significant concern regarding its neurological impact, particularly during the early pandemic waves when severe systemic inflammation and neuroimmune dysregulation were more common. Although SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively studied, the precise mechanisms underlying its neurological effects remain incompletely understood, and much of the available evidence is derived from early variants with higher pathogenicity. Current research indicates that neuroinflammatory processes—driven primarily by systemic cytokine elevation, microglial activation, and blood–brain barrier dysfunction—contribute to a wide range of neurological symptoms. Severe complications such as encephalopathy, stroke, and cognitive impairment were predominantly reported in critically ill patients infected with the Wuhan, Alpha, or Delta variants, while such manifestations are considerably less frequent in the Omicron era. Most proposed mechanisms, including ACE2-mediated viral entry into the central nervous system, are supported mainly by experimental or preclinical studies rather than definitive human evidence. Biomarkers such as IL-6 and TNF-α, along with neuroimaging modalities including MRI and PET, offer useful but indirect indicators of neuroinflammation. Therapeutic approaches continue to focus on controlling systemic inflammation through immunomodulatory agents, complemented by targeted non-pharmacological strategies—such as physical rehabilitation, cognitive support, and psychological interventions—for the minority of patients with persistent neurological deficits. Overall, current evidence supports a variant-dependent neuroinflammatory profile and underscores the need for longitudinal, mechanism-focused studies to better characterize long-term neurological outcomes and refine therapeutic strategies.

The microglia, first identified by Pío del Río-Hortega, are resident macrophages in the CNS that aid in immune monitoring, synaptic remodeling, and tissue repair. Microglial biology’s dual functions in maintaining homeostasis and contributing to neurodegeneration are examined in this review, with a focus on neurodegenerative disease treatment targets. Methods: We reviewed microglial research using single-cell transcriptomics, molecular genetics, and neuroimmunology to analyze heterogeneity and activation states beyond the M1/M2 paradigm. Results: Microglia maintains homeostasis through phagocytosis, trophic factor production, and synaptic pruning. They acquire activated morphologies in pathological conditions, releasing proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species via NF-κB, MAPK, and NLRP3 signaling. Single-cell investigations show TREM2 and APOE-expressing disease-associated microglia (DAM) in neurodegenerative lesions. Microglial senescence, mitochondrial failure, and chronic inflammation result from Nrf2/Keap1 redox pathway malfunction in ageing. Microglial interactions with astrocytes via IL-1α, TNF-α, and C1q result in neurotoxic or neuroprotective A2 astrocytes, demonstrating linked glial responses. Microglial inflammatory or reparative responses are influenced by epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming, such as regulation of PGC-1α, SIRT1, and glycolytic flux. Microglia are essential to neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. TREM2 agonists, NLRP3 inhibitors, and epigenetic modulators can treat chronic neuroinflammation and restore CNS homeostasis in neurodegenerative illnesses by targeting microglial signaling pathways.