Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors The summary of the work is correct,
although the information on the observations made could be more extensive,
explaining the number of individuals of each species studied
or the behaviors observed.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We thank the Editor for the careful evaluation and guidance.

We confirm that we have selected oral presentation as the preferred type for the presenting author.

Additionally, we have downloaded the updated version of the template (Attachment 2) and thoroughly revised the manuscript to ensure full compliance with the guidelines. All required sections and abstract sub-headers have been included, and the format has been corrected accordingly. We have also carefully considered and incorporated the reviewer’s suggestions.

Furthermore, we have clarified the number of individuals for each species studied, as well as the observed behaviors, to improve the transparency and completeness of the methodology and results.

The revised manuscript has been adjusted to meet all the specified requirements and has been attached in the designated submission area.

Best regards,

Miguel Vieira de Melo Neto

Author Response File: Author Response.docx