Next Issue
Volume 8, September
Previous Issue
Volume 8, March
 
 

Int. J. Neonatal Screen., Volume 8, Issue 2 (June 2022) – 15 articles

Cover Story (view full-size image): Newborn screening has the potential to detect several rare conditions in asymptomatic children, enabling early treatment and significantly better outcomes. Nevertheless, newborn screening programmes vary considerably across Europe. To help improve the equity of the provision of newborn screening; to ensure that all children can be offered high-quality screening regardless of race, nationality, and socio-economic status; and to spark innovations to achieve these goals, a technical meeting endorsed by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union was held in October 2021. View this paper
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
4 pages, 2947 KiB  
Obituary
William Harry Hannon—A Life Well Lived
by Bradford L. Therrell, Robert F. Vogt and Joanne V. Mei
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020037 - 17 Jun 2022
Viewed by 1692 Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 239 KiB  
Commentary
The Burden and Benefits of Knowledge: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Population-Based Newborn Genome Screening for Hearing
by Calli O. Mitchell, Greysha Rivera-Cruz, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau, Zirui Dong, Kwong Wai Choy, Jun Shen, Sami Amr, Anne B. S. Giersch and Cynthia C. Morton
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020036 - 27 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2212
Abstract
Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies have expanded practitioners’ utilization of genetic information in a timely and efficient manner for an accurate diagnosis. With an ever-increasing resource of genomic data from progress in the interpretation of genome sequences, clinicians face decisions about how [...] Read more.
Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies have expanded practitioners’ utilization of genetic information in a timely and efficient manner for an accurate diagnosis. With an ever-increasing resource of genomic data from progress in the interpretation of genome sequences, clinicians face decisions about how and when genomic information should be presented to families, and at what potential expense. Presently, there is limited knowledge or experience in establishing the value of implementing genome sequencing into newborn screening. Herein we provide insight into the complexities and the burden and benefits of knowledge resulting from genome sequencing of newborns. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethical and Psychosocial Aspects of Genomics in the Neonatal Period)
18 pages, 304 KiB  
Article
Experiences of Families Caring for Children with Newborn Screening-Related Conditions: Implications for the Expansion of Genomics in Population-Based Neonatal Public Health Programs
by Lynn Bush, Hannah Davidson, Shani Gelles, Dawn Lea and Laura M. Koehly
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020035 - 23 May 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2794
Abstract
With the expansion of newborn screening conditions globally and the increased use of genomic technologies for early detection, there is a need for ethically nuanced policies to guide the future integration of ever-more comprehensive genomics into population-based newborn screening programs. In the current [...] Read more.
With the expansion of newborn screening conditions globally and the increased use of genomic technologies for early detection, there is a need for ethically nuanced policies to guide the future integration of ever-more comprehensive genomics into population-based newborn screening programs. In the current paper, we consider the lived experiences of 169 family caregivers caring for 77 children with NBS-related conditions to identify lessons learned that can inform policy and practice related to population-based newborn screening using genomic technologies. Based on caregiver narratives obtained through in-depth interviews, we identify themes characterizing these families’ diagnostic odyssey continuum, which fall within two domains: (1) medical management implications of a child diagnosed with an NBS-related condition and (2) psychological implications of a child diagnosed with an NBS-related condition. For Domain 1, family caregivers’ experiences point to the need for educational resources for both health care professionals that serve children with NBS-related conditions and their families; empowerment programs for family caregivers; training for providers in patient-centered communication; and access to multi-disciplinary specialists. For Domain 2, caregivers’ experiences suggest a need for access to continuous, long-term counseling resources; patient navigator resources; and peer support programs. These lessons learned can inform policy recommendations for the benefit of the child, the family, the healthcare system, and society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethical and Psychosocial Aspects of Genomics in the Neonatal Period)
8 pages, 704 KiB  
Article
Use of Online Newborn Screening Educational Resources for the Education of Expectant Parents: An Improvement in Equity
by Kristen Thompson, Shelby Atkinson and Mary Kleyn
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020034 - 11 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1967
Abstract
Educating parents about the newborn screening (NBS) process is critical in ensuring that families are aware of their child’s NBS, which could contribute to better outcomes for the baby and experiences for the family. Successful education efforts result in expecting parents understanding the [...] Read more.
Educating parents about the newborn screening (NBS) process is critical in ensuring that families are aware of their child’s NBS, which could contribute to better outcomes for the baby and experiences for the family. Successful education efforts result in expecting parents understanding the importance of NBS, feeling comfortable with the NBS process, and being aware of their choices after NBS is complete. Educating parents prenatally is challenging for many NBS programs for a variety of reasons. The COVID-19 pandemic added additional barriers to NBS programs’ ability to educate parents prenatally about NBS. By initiating a department-wide partnership among other programs with a similar target audience, Michigan’s NBS Program was able to host a virtual baby fair. Since the inaugural event, Michigan’s NBS Program has hosted seven virtual fairs with 15 participating programs. A total of 692 participants registered for the baby fair and received a resource packet, over 157 participants joined one of the live presentations, and 211 have viewed the YouTube videos of recorded fairs. Virtual baby fairs are a cost-effective and convenient approach to education that could be implemented in any NBS program to educate parents prenatally about NBS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening Follow-Up and Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 364 KiB  
Article
Introducing Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency—The New Zealand Experience
by Natasha Heather, Mark de Hora, Shannon Brothers, Pippa Grainger, Detlef Knoll and Dianne Webster
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020033 - 10 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3576
Abstract
Screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) was added to the New Zealand national newborn screening programme in December 2017. Documentation pertaining to the application to add SCID to the panel and screening results over the first three years were reviewed. Screening evaluation metrics [...] Read more.
Screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) was added to the New Zealand national newborn screening programme in December 2017. Documentation pertaining to the application to add SCID to the panel and screening results over the first three years were reviewed. Screening evaluation metrics were shown to differ according to site of collection (babies in a neonatal intensive care unit vs. the community), definition of a positive test (out-of-range result vs. result leading to a further action on baby), and screening target/case definition (primary SCID vs. non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia). Our experience demonstrates both the value of close clinical involvement during the implementation phase of SCID screening and that the use of standard definitions will facilitate international comparison. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 418 KiB  
Article
A Public Dialogue to Inform the Use of Wider Genomic Testing When Used as Part of Newborn Screening to Identify Cystic Fibrosis
by Suzannah Kinsella, Henrietta Hopkins, Lauren Cooper and James R. Bonham
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020032 - 09 May 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2492
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) has been included within the UK national newborn screening programme since 2007. The approach uses measures of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in dried blood spot samples obtained at day 5 of life. Samples which reveal IRT results >99.5th centile go on [...] Read more.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) has been included within the UK national newborn screening programme since 2007. The approach uses measures of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in dried blood spot samples obtained at day 5 of life. Samples which reveal IRT results >99.5th centile go on to be tested for a limited panel of CF mutations. While the programme works well and achieves a high level of sensitivity and specificity, it relies upon repeat testing in some cases and identifies probable carriers, both potentially provoking parental anxiety. In addition, the limited CF mutation panel may not fully reflect the ethnic diversity within the UK population. The use of wider genomic screening, made possible by next-generation sequencing to replace more limited panels, can be used to avoid these shortcomings. However, the way in which this approach is employed can either be designed to maximise specificity by limiting reporting to combinations of known pathogenic mutations or can maximise sensitivity by also reporting combinations of pathogenic mutations together with variants of uncertain significance. The latter approach also increases the number of Cystic Fibrosis Screen-Positive Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID) designations reported, resulting in uncertainty for parents. To help consider the design of the programme, a dialogue was commissioned by the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) to elicit the views of members of the public without direct experience of CF, to determine if there was a preference for maximising the sensitivity or the specificity of CF screening. The participants initially expressed a clear preference to maximise sensitivity and avoid missing CF cases, but after time to reflect and consider the implications of their choice, a number changed their views so as to tolerate some missed cases if this resulted in greater certainty of outcome; this became the majority view. It is proposed that it may be a generalisable finding that the public, when facing whole-population screening programmes, may require significant time and information to inform and make their choices and may attach great importance to clarity and certainty of outcome in the screening process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethical and Psychosocial Aspects of Genomics in the Neonatal Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 264 KiB  
Review
Towards Achieving Equity and Innovation in Newborn Screening across Europe
by Jaka Sikonja, Urh Groselj, Maurizio Scarpa, Giancarlo la Marca, David Cheillan, Stefan Kölker, Rolf H. Zetterström, Viktor Kožich, Yann Le Cam, Gulcin Gumus, Valentina Bottarelli, Mirjam van der Burg, Eugenie Dekkers, Tadej Battelino, Johan Prevot, Peter C. J. I. Schielen and James R. Bonham
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020031 - 06 May 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5710
Abstract
Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, [...] Read more.
Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, result in a low quality of life, disability and even premature death. Newborn screening (NBS) has the potential to detect a number of rare conditions in asymptomatic children, providing the possibility of early treatment and a significantly improved long-term outcome. Despite these clear benefits, the availability and conduct of NBS programmes varies considerably across Europe and, with the increasing potential of genomic testing, it is likely that these differences may become even more pronounced. To help improve the equity of provision of NBS and ensure that all children can be offered high-quality screening regardless of race, nationality and socio-economic status, a technical meeting, endorsed by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, was held in October 2021. In this article, we present experiences from individual EU countries, stakeholder initiatives and the meeting’s final conclusions, which can help countries attempting to establish new NBS programmes or expand existing provision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening in Europe: On the Brink of a New Era)
6 pages, 195 KiB  
Article
Introduction of a Protocol for Structured Follow-Up and Texting of Inadequate and Borderline-Positive Newborn Metabolic Screening Results
by Natasha Heather, Lisa Morgan, Detlef Knoll, Keith Shore, Mark de Hora and Dianne Webster
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020030 - 03 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1840
Abstract
A national protocol for structured follow-up and texting of repeat newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) sample requests was introduced. Repeat samples are needed where the initial sample is inadequate or the result borderline-positive. This protocol aimed to improve the timeliness and completeness of receipt [...] Read more.
A national protocol for structured follow-up and texting of repeat newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) sample requests was introduced. Repeat samples are needed where the initial sample is inadequate or the result borderline-positive. This protocol aimed to improve the timeliness and completeness of receipt of repeat NBS samples. Under the structured protocol, all repeat sample requests were phoned or texted to the lead maternity carer (LMC), in addition to the standard written report issued. Weekly text reminders were sent until 4 weeks or the sample was received. National data were monitored following implementation of the protocol. The proportion of repeat samples received within 10 days of request improved after the introduction of the protocol, from 35.0% in 2013 to 81.4% in 2020 (p < 0.001). The proportion of requests lost to follow-up decreased, from 4.1% in 2013 to 1.3% in 2020 (p < 0.001). A structured NBS follow-up protocol that included SMS text messaging led to an earlier and more complete receipt of repeat samples. This is likely due to practitioners receiving the request more quickly, as well as the laboratory adopting a consistent approach to repeated reminders. SMS text messages are a useful adjunctive method for screening programmes to communicate with health care providers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening Follow-Up and Education)
9 pages, 247 KiB  
Article
Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Nebraska: Initial Experiences and Challenges
by Craig V. Baker, Alyssa Cady Keller, Richard Lutz, Karen Eveans, Krystal Baumert, James C. DiPerna and William B. Rizzo
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020029 - 26 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2629
Abstract
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by pathogenic variants in ABCD1 resulting in defective peroxisomal oxidation of very long-chain fatty acids. Most male patients develop adrenal insufficiency and one of two neurologic phenotypes: a rapidly progressive demyelinating disease in mid-childhood (childhood [...] Read more.
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by pathogenic variants in ABCD1 resulting in defective peroxisomal oxidation of very long-chain fatty acids. Most male patients develop adrenal insufficiency and one of two neurologic phenotypes: a rapidly progressive demyelinating disease in mid-childhood (childhood cerebral X-ALD, ccALD) or an adult-onset spastic paraparesis (adrenomyeloneuropathy, AMN). The neurodegenerative course of ccALD can be halted if patients are treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the earliest onset of white matter disease. Newborn screening for X-ALD can be accomplished by measuring C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine in dried blood spots. In Nebraska, X-ALD newborn screening was instituted in July 2018. Over a period of 3.3 years, 82,920 newborns were screened with 13 positive infants detected (4 males, 9 females), giving a birth prevalence of 1:10,583 in males and 1:4510 in females. All positive newborns had DNA variants in ABCD1. Lack of genotype-phenotype correlations, absence of predictive biomarkers for ccALD or AMN, and a high proportion of ABCD1 variants of uncertain significance are unique challenges in counseling families. Surveillance testing for adrenal and neurologic disease in presymptomatic X-ALD males will improve survival and overall quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening and Follow-Up for X-ALD)
14 pages, 232 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Impacts on Newborn Screening Public Health Surveillance
by Sikha Singh, Michele Caggana, Carol Johnson, Rachel Lee, Guisou Zarbalian, Amy Gaviglio, Alisha Keehn, Mia Morrison, Scott J. Becker and Jelili Ojodu
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020028 - 15 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3497
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) is an essential public health service that performs screening to identify those newborns at increased risk for a panel of disorders, most of which are genetic. The goal of screening is to link those newborns at the highest risk to [...] Read more.
Newborn screening (NBS) is an essential public health service that performs screening to identify those newborns at increased risk for a panel of disorders, most of which are genetic. The goal of screening is to link those newborns at the highest risk to timely intervention and potentially life-saving treatment. The global COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions within the United States public health system, revealing implications for the continuity of newborn screening laboratories and follow-up operations. The impacts of COVID-19 across different states at various time points meant that NBS programs impacted by the pandemic later could benefit from the immediate experiences of the earlier impacted programs. This article will review the collection, analysis, and dissemination of information during the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated by a national, centralized technical assistance and resource center for NBS programs. Full article
9 pages, 629 KiB  
Article
Newborn Screen for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy Using Flow Injection Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Negative Ion Mode
by Tarek A. Teber, Brian J. Conti, Christopher A. Haynes, Amy Hietala and Mei W. Baker
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020027 - 14 Apr 2022
Viewed by 2587
Abstract
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the ATP-binding cassette subfamily D member 1 gene (ABCD1) that encodes the adrenoleukodystrophy protein (ALDP). Defects in ALDP result in elevated cerotic acid, and lead to C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC) accumulation, [...] Read more.
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the ATP-binding cassette subfamily D member 1 gene (ABCD1) that encodes the adrenoleukodystrophy protein (ALDP). Defects in ALDP result in elevated cerotic acid, and lead to C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC) accumulation, which is the primary biomarker used in newborn screening (NBS) for X-ALD. C26:0-LPC levels were measured in dried blood spot (DBS) NBS specimens using a flow injection analysis (FIA) coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) performed in negative ion mode. The method was validated by assessing and confirming linearity, accuracy, and precision. We have also established C26:0-LPC cutoff values that identify newborns at risk for X-ALD. The mean concentration of C26:0-LPC in 5881 de-identified residual routine NBS specimens was 0.07 ± 0.02 µM (mean + 1 standard deviation (SD)). All tested true X-ALD positive and negative samples were correctly identified based on C26:0-LPC cutoff concentrations for borderline between 0.15 µM and 0.22 µM (mean + 4 SD) and presumptive screening positive at ≥0.23 µM (mean + 8 SD). The presented FIA method shortens analysis run-time to 1.7 min, while maintaining the previously established advantage of utilizing negative mode MS to eliminate isobaric interferences that could lead to screening false positives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening and Follow-Up for X-ALD)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 279 KiB  
Article
Need and Viability of Newborn Screening Programme in India: Report from a Pilot Study
by Arya Raveendran, Teena Joseph Chacko, Priya Prabhu, Raghava Varma, Leslie Edward Lewis, Pragna Rao, Prajna P. Shetty, Yajna S. Phaneendra Mallimoggala, Asha Hedge, Dinesh M. Nayak, Sudeep Moorkoth and Sudheer Moorkoth
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020026 - 29 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3149
Abstract
India, a country with the second largest population in the world, does not have a national newborn screening programme as part of its health policy. With funding support from the Grand Challenges Canada, a pilot newborn screening programme was implemented for the Udupi [...] Read more.
India, a country with the second largest population in the world, does not have a national newborn screening programme as part of its health policy. With funding support from the Grand Challenges Canada, a pilot newborn screening programme was implemented for the Udupi district of South India to study the need and viability of a national programme in India. Six disorders were selected for the study based on the availability of funding and recommendation from pediatricians in the district. Here, we report the observed incidence during the study. A cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing newborn screening in India was performed. It is evident from our analysis that the financial loss for the nation due to these preventable diseases is much higher than the overall expenditure for screening, diagnosis, and treatment. This cost-effectiveness analysis justifies the need for a national newborn screening programme in India. Full article
22 pages, 1396 KiB  
Article
A New Approach to Objectively Evaluate Inherited Metabolic Diseases for Inclusion on Newborn Screening Programmes
by Alberto Burlina, Simon A. Jones, Anupam Chakrapani, Heather J. Church, Simon Heales, Teresa H. Y. Wu, Georgina Morton, Patricia Roberts, Erica F. Sluys and David Cheillan
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020025 - 25 Mar 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3691
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) programmes are essential in the diagnosis of inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and for access to disease modifying treatment. Most European countries follow the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria to determine which disorders are appropriate for screening at birth; however, these [...] Read more.
Newborn screening (NBS) programmes are essential in the diagnosis of inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and for access to disease modifying treatment. Most European countries follow the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria to determine which disorders are appropriate for screening at birth; however, these criteria are interpreted and implemented by individual countries differently, creating disparities. Advances in research and diagnostics, together with the promise of new treatments, offer new possibilities to accelerate the expansion of evidence-based screening programmes. A novel and robust algorithm was built to objectively assess and prioritise IMDs for inclusion in NBS programmes. The Wilson and Jungner classic screening principles were used as a foundation to develop individual and measurable criteria. The proposed algorithm is a point-based system structured upon three pillars: condition, screening, and treatment. The algorithm was tested by applying the six IMDs currently approved in the United Kingdom NBS programme. The algorithm generates a weight-based score that could be used as the first step in the complex process of evaluating disorders for inclusion on NBS programmes. By prioritising disorders to be further evaluated, individual countries are able to assess the economic, societal and political aspects of a potential screening programme. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 648 KiB  
Article
Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy: Review of Data and Outcomes in Pennsylvania
by Jessica R. C. Priestley, Laura A. Adang, Sarah Drewes Williams, Uta Lichter-Konecki, Caitlin Menello, Nicole M. Engelhardt, James C. DiPerna, Brenda DiBoscio, Rebecca C. Ahrens-Nicklas, Andrew C. Edmondson, Francis Jeshira Reynoso Santos and Can Ficicioglu
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020024 - 23 Mar 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4162
Abstract
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is the most common peroxisomal disorder. It results from pathogenic variants in ABCD1, which encodes the peroxisomal very-long-chain fatty acid transporter, causing a spectrum of neurodegenerative phenotypes. The childhood cerebral form of the disease is particularly devastating. Early diagnosis [...] Read more.
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is the most common peroxisomal disorder. It results from pathogenic variants in ABCD1, which encodes the peroxisomal very-long-chain fatty acid transporter, causing a spectrum of neurodegenerative phenotypes. The childhood cerebral form of the disease is particularly devastating. Early diagnosis and intervention improve outcomes. Because newborn screening facilitates identification of at-risk individuals during their asymptomatic period, X-ALD was added to the Pennsylvania newborn screening program in 2017. We analyzed outcomes from the first four years of X-ALD newborn screening, which employed a two-tier approach and reflexive ABCD1 sequencing. There were 51 positive screens with elevated C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine on second-tier screening. ABCD1 sequencing identified 21 hemizygous males and 24 heterozygous females, and clinical follow up identified four patients with peroxisomal biogenesis disorders. There were two false-positive cases and one false-negative case. Three unscreened individuals, two of whom were symptomatic, were diagnosed following their young siblings’ newborn screening results. Combined with experiences from six other states, this suggests a U.S. incidence of roughly 1 in 10,500, higher than had been previously reported. Many of these infants lack a known family history of X-ALD. Together, these data highlight both the achievements and challenges of newborn screening for X-ALD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening and Follow-Up for X-ALD)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 348 KiB  
Article
Improving Recruitment for a Newborn Screening Pilot Study with Adaptations in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Julia Wynn, Norma P. Tavakoli, Niki Armstrong, Jacqueline Gomez, Carrie Koval, Christina Lai, Stephanie Tang, Andrea Quevedo Prince, Yeyson Quevedo, Katrina Rufino, Laura Palacio Morales, Angela Pena, Sharon Grossman, Mary Monfiletto, Erika Ruda, Vania Jimenez, Lorraine Verdade, Ashley Jones, Michelle G. Barriga, Nandanee Karan, Alexandria Puma, Safa Sarker, Sarah Chin, Kelly Duarte, David H. Tegay, Irzaud Bacchus, Rajani Julooru, Breanne Maloney, Sunju Park, Akilan M. Saami, Lilian Cohen, Natasha Shapiro, Michele Caggana, Wendy K. Chung and Dorota Gruberadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020023 - 22 Mar 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2906
Abstract
Seven months after the launch of a pilot study to screen newborns for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) in New York State, New York City became an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. All in-person research activities were suspended at the study [...] Read more.
Seven months after the launch of a pilot study to screen newborns for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) in New York State, New York City became an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. All in-person research activities were suspended at the study enrollment institutions of Northwell Health and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospitals, and study recruitment was transitioned to 100% remote. Pre-pandemic, all recruitment was in-person with research staff visiting the postpartum patients 1–2 days after delivery to obtain consent. With the onset of pandemic, the multilingual research staff shifted to calling new mothers while they were in the hospital or shortly after discharge, and consent was collected via emailed e-consent links. With return of study staff to the hospitals, a hybrid approach was implemented with in-person recruitment for babies delivered during the weekdays and remote recruitment for babies delivered on weekends and holidays, a cohort not recruited pre-pandemic. There was a drop in the proportion of eligible babies enrolled with the transition to fully remote recruitment from 64% to 38%. In addition, the proportion of babies enrolled after being approached dropped from 91% to 55%. With hybrid recruitment, the proportion of eligible babies enrolled (70%) and approached babies enrolled (84%) returned to pre-pandemic levels. Our experience adapting our study during the COVID-19 pandemic led us to develop new recruitment strategies that we continue to utilize. The lessons learned from this pilot study can serve to help other research studies adapt novel and effective recruitment methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop