Nutritional, Functional and Microbiological Potential of Andean Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. in the Development of Healthy Foods—A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Methods and Design
2.1. Initial Search
2.1.1. Boolean Equation for Lupinus mutabilis
2.1.2. Boolean Equation for Amaranthus spp.
2.2. Systematic Search
2.2.1. Inclusion Criteria
- ✓
- They should be empirical research studies and not reviews, single-case studies, books, or manuals.
- ✓
- They must have been published between 2019 and 2025, inclusively.
- ✓
- Articles published in English or Spanish.
- ✓
- Open Access (OA) journal articles.
- ✓
- Lupinus mutabilis and/or Amaranthus spp. flours.
- ✓
- Research that includes analyses of chemical composition, functional properties (such as water absorption capacity, emulsification, antioxidant capacity, etc.), and microbiological safety.
2.2.2. Exclusion Criteria
- ✓
- Studies that present redundant information already covered by other selected articles.
- ✓
- Articles that do not provide detailed information on the physicochemical, functional, or microbiological characteristics of flour.
- ✓
- Review article.
- ✓
- Opinions, editorials, conference abstracts, letters to the editor, or articles without experimental data.
- ✓
- Research focuses exclusively on other products derived from these species (such as oils, isolated proteins, etc.) without addressing flour.
3. Results
3.1. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Compounds of Andean Grains
3.1.1. Superior Value of the Protein and Its Functional Justification
3.1.2. Fat, Fiber, and Carbohydrates: Metabolic Advantages and Comparative Applications in Andean Grains
3.1.3. Bioactive Compounds: Why Are They Relevant and How Are They Affected by Processes?
3.1.4. Functional Persistence of Andean Grains in Processed Foods
3.1.5. Critical Considerations for Industrial-Scale Processing of Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. Flours
3.2. Functional and Technological Properties
3.3. Applications in Food Development
3.3.1. Baking: Innovation for Nutrition and Technological Functionality
3.3.2. Dairy Products and Beverages as a Challenge for Plant-Based Innovation
3.3.3. Other Functional Foods: Public Health Perspective
3.4. Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Acceptance
Product/Food Matrix | Sensory Method Used | Number of Consumers/Panelists | Acceptance and Preference (Scale, % Acceptance, Highlighted Attributes) | Factors Influencing Sensory Perception | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gluten-free bread (Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp., Chenopodium pallidicaule, Lupinus mutabilis) | Hedonic scale with 9 points, CATA, GPA, ANOVA, MFA | 100–250 consumers (varies by study) | Optimal acceptability with ≤20% substitution; >30% decreases acceptance; key attributes: texture, color, flavor, fluffy crumb | Substitution level, texture, color, bitter taste of Chenopodium quinoa, type of preference, presence of phenolic compounds | [47] |
Panettone (Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp.) | CATA, 9-point hedonic scale, preference ranking, Friedman | 80 consumers | Acceptability like commercial with ≤15% substitution; preferred attributes: fluffy, sweet, moist, vanilla scent; preference for PE and PB samples | Type of preference, proportion of Chenopodium quinoa/Amaranthus spp., sensory attributes (smell, texture, sweetness) | [48] |
Gluten-free cookies (Chenopodium pallidicaule, Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp.) | Hedonic scale with 9 points, Sorting, CA, ANOVA | 102 consumers | Greater acceptance with 20–30% Chenopodium Pallidicaule; attributes: crisp texture, darker color, pleasant flavor; acceptability >7/9 in better formulations | Chenopodium ratio pallidicaule, texture (hardness, crispness), color, starch, and protein content | [49] |
Vegetable burger (Chenopodium quinoa, Lupinus mutabilis, Amaranthus spp.) | CATA, 5-point hedonic scale, CA | 132 consumers | High acceptability (mostly “like it a lot” or “like it”); attributes: easy to cut, soft, legume flavor, healthy | Proportion of ingredients, texture, flavor, color, perception of healthiness | [50] |
Vegetable yogurt (Chenopodium quinoa, Lupinus mutabilis) | Hedonic scale 9 points, JAR, ANOVA | 50–100 consumers | Acceptability decreases >3% Chenopodium Quinoa; attributes: flavor, creamy texture, color; optimal acceptability with ≤3% addition | Level of addition, texture, aftertaste, sweetness | [51] |
Fortified biscuits (Amaranthus spp. and Chenopodium pallidicaule) | 9-point hedonic scale, Sorting, CA | 102 consumers | Optimal acceptability with ≤30% Amaranthus spp./Chenopodium pallidicaule; attributes: crunchy texture, pleasant flavor, dark color | Proportion of fortifier, texture, color, flavor | [40] |
Bars/supplements (Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp., Chenopodium pallidicaule) | Hedonic scale 7–9 points, ANOVA | 50 consumers | Good acceptability (>6/9); attributes: flavor, texture, color, healthy perception | Proportion of ingredients, texture, sweetness, aftertaste | [52] |
3.4.1. Methodological Rigor and Diversity of Sensory Tools
3.4.2. Necessary Balance Between Innovation and Acceptability
3.4.3. Determining Factors in Sensory Perception
- Level of substitution/addition and type of processing: A key factor that modulates the manifestation of desirable attributes. High substitutions can accentuate phenolic compounds or saponins, responsible for undesirable flavors and dark colors.
- Texture: Characteristics such as crunchiness, fluffiness, cohesiveness, or hardness are determining factors for preference and usually respond to both the ingredient matrix and the technological treatment (extrusion, baking, fermentation), directly influencing acceptance.
- Flavor and aroma: A “leguminous flavor”, sweetness, nutty notes, or the bitterness typical of some Andean compounds act as limiting parameters and are subject to adjustments through pretreatments or mixtures.
- Color and appearance: For a large proportion of consumers, the “dark color” of Chenopodium pallidicaule or Amaranthus spp. represents a negative factor if it deviates from the traditional visual expectation associated with the reference food.
- Perception of healthiness: In functional products, the perception of “natural” ingredients and knowledge of the benefits can compensate for slight disadvantages in taste or texture.
3.5. Impact on Health and Functional Potential
3.5.1. Antioxidant Activity
3.5.2. Reduction in Metabolic Risk Factors
3.5.3. Fiber and Protein Intake
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chalampuente-Flores, D.; Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Ron, A.M.D.; Tapia Bastidas, C.; Sørensen, M. Morphological and Ecogeographical Diversity of the Andean Lupine (Lupinus Mutabilis Sweet) in the High Andean Region of Ecuador. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaquilla-Quilca, G.; Islas-Rubio, A.R.; Vásquez-Lara, F.; Salcedo-Sucasaca, L.; Silva-Paz, R.J.; Luna-Valdez, J.G. Chemical, Physical, and Sensory Properties of Bread with Popped Amaranth Flour. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2024, 74, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, L.M.; Faria, C.; Madalena, D.; Genisheva, Z.; Martins, J.T.; Vicente, A.A.; Pinheiro, A.C. Valorization of Amaranth (Amaranthus Cruentus) Grain Extracts for the Development of Alginate-Based Active Films. Molecules 2022, 27, 5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salazar, D.; Arancibia, M.; Ocaña, I.; Rodríguez-Maecker, R.; Bedón, M.; López-Caballero, M.E.; Montero, M.P. Characterization and Technological Potential of Underutilized Ancestral Andean Crop Flours from Ecuador. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Córdova-Ramos, J.S.; Glorio-Paulet, P.; Hidalgo, A.; Camarena, F. Efecto Del Proceso Tecnológico Sobre La Capacidad Antioxidante y Compuestos Fenólicos Totales Del Lupino (Lupinus Mutabilis Sweet) Andino. Sci. Agropecu. 2020, 11, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Ramírez, I.F.; Sotelo-González, A.M.; López-Echevarría, G.; Martínez-Maldonado, M.A. Amaranth Seeds and Sprouts as Functional Ingredients for the Development of Dietary Fiber, Betalains, and Polyphenol-Enriched Minced Tilapia Meat Gels. Molecules 2023, 28, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montserrat-De La Paz, S.; Martinez-Lopez, A.; Villanueva-Lazo, A.; Pedroche, J.; Millan, F.; Millan-Linares, M.C.; Martinez-Lopez, A.; Villanueva-Lazo, A.; Pedroche, J.; Millan, F.; et al. Identification and Characterization of Novel Antioxidant Protein Hydrolysates from Kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus L.). Antioxidants 2021, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paucar-Menacho, L.M.; Simpalo-Lopez, W.D.; Castillo-Martínez, W.E.; Esquivel-Paredes, L.J.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Schmiele, M. Optimization of Rheological Properties of Bread Dough with Substitution of Wheat Flour for Whole Grain Flours from Germinated Andean Pseudocereals. Ciência Rural. 2024, 54, e20220402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Rojo, C.; Paucar-Menacho, L.M.; Chuqui-Diestra, S.R.; Castro-Zavaleta, V. Dietary Fiber, Polyphenols and Sensory and Technological Acceptability in Sliced Bread Made with Mango Peel Flour. Braz. J. Food Technol. 2024, 27, e2023073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sindhuja, A.; Sudha, M.L.; Rahim, A. Effect of Incorporation of Amaranth Flour on the Quality of Cookies. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salim, R.; Nehvi, I.B.; Mir, R.A.; Tyagi, A.; Ali, S.; Bhat, O.M. A Review on Anti-Nutritional Factors: Unraveling the Natural Gateways to Human Health. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1215873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagai, N.F.; Marchetti, L.; Lorenzo, G.; Andrés, S.C. Comprehensive Study of Changes in Nutritional Quality, Techno-Functional Properties, and Microstructure of Bean Flours Obtained from Pretreated Seeds. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 4, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, H.; Shams, R.; Dash, K.K.; Dar, A.H. A Comprehensive Review of Pseudo-Cereals: Nutritional Profile, Phytochemicals Constituents and Potential Health Promoting Benefits. Appl. Food Res. 2023, 3, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parra-Gallardo, G.; Salas-Sanjuán, M.d.C.; del Moral, F.; Valenzuela, J.L. Characterising the Nutritional and Alkaloid Profiles of Tarwi (Lupinus Mutabilis Sweet) Pods and Seeds at Different Stages of Ripening. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, S.; Wani, I.A. Insights into the Basil Seed: Unveiling Its Composition and Promising Role in the Food Industry. Food Chem. Adv. 2025, 7, 100953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Antes, G.; Atkins, D.; Barbour, V.; Barrowman, N.; Berlin, J.A.; Clark, J.; et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Hosry, L.; Elias, V.; Chamoun, V.; Halawi, M.; Cayot, P.; Nehme, A.; Bou-Maroun, E. Maillard Reaction: Mechanism, Influencing Parameters, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Food Industrial Applications: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barba-Ostria, C.; Guamán-Bautista, J.; Tosi-Vélez, A.A.; Puente-Pineda, J.A.; Cedeño-Zambrano, M.A.; Teran, E.; Guamán, L.P. Recent Advances in the Therapeutic Potential of Bioactive Molecules from Plants of Andean Origin. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanasković, T.; Knežević, Z.; Jugović, K.-J.; Šekuljica, N.; Domínguez-Valencia, R.; Bermúdez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Purriños, L.; Benedito, J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Impact of Supercritical CO2 Treatment on Lupin Flour and Lupin Protein Isolates. Foods 2025, 14, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabios, E.; Zazpe, I.; García-Blanco, L.; de la O, V.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Martín-Calvo, N. Macronutrient Quality and Its Association with Micronutrient Adequacy in Children. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2024, 63, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ertaş, N.; Bilgiçli, N. Effect of Different Debittering Processes on Mineral and Phytic Acid Content of Lupin (Lupinus albus L.) Seeds. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3348–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pismag, R.Y.; Polo, M.P.; Hoyos, J.L.; Bravo, J.E.; Roa, D.F. Effect of Extrusion Cooking on the Chemical and Nutritional Properties of Instant Flours: A Review. F1000Research 2024, 12, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bird, H.; Heidrich, E.S.; Leicester, D.D.; Theodosiou, P. Pilot-Scale Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs): A Meta-Analysis Study to Inform Full-Scale Design Principles for Optimum Wastewater Treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 346, 131227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Ramón, F.; Sotelo-Méndez, A.; Alvarez-Chancasanampa, H.; Norabuena, E.; Sumarriva, L.; Yachi, K.; Gonzales Huamán, T.; Naupay Vega, M.; Cornelio-Santiago, H.P. Influence of Peruvian Andean Grain Flours on the Nutritional, Rheological, Physical, and Sensory Properties of Sliced Bread. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1202322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pipliya, S.; Kumar, S.; Gupta, R.K.; Das, R.S.; Meena, D.; Srivastav, P.P.; Tiwari, B.K.; Garcia-Vaquero, M. The Future of Algal Proteins: Innovations in Extraction and Modifications, Functional Properties, and Sustainable Food Applications. Future Foods 2025, 11, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purohit, P.; Rawat, H.; Verma, N.; Mishra, S.; Nautiyal, A.; Anshul; Bhatt, S.; Bisht, N.; Aggarwal, K.; Bora, A.; et al. Analytical Approach to Assess Anti-Nutritional Factors of Grains and Oilseeds: A Comprehensive Review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awuchi, C.G. HACCP, Quality, and Food Safety Management in Food and Agricultural Systems. Cogent Food Agric. 2023, 9, 2176280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Herrero, A.M. Sensory Analysis and Consumer Research in New Product Development. Foods 2021, 10, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, P.; Tsai, S.; He, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhen, D.; Yu, N.; Wang, Q.; Ahuja, J.K.C.; Wei, C.I. Large Language Models in Food Science: Innovations, Applications, and Future. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 148, 104488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamanca-Gonzales, N.C.; Ocrospoma-Dueñas, R.W.; Quintana-Salazar, N.B.; Jimenez-Bustamante, J.N.; Huaman, E.E.H.; Silva-Paz, R.J. Physicochemical and Sensory Parameters of “Petipan” Enriched with Heme Iron and Andean Grain Flours. Molecules 2023, 28, 3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Llontop-Bernabé, K.S.; Intiquilla, A.; Ramirez-Veliz, C.; Santos, M.; Jiménez-Aliaga, K.; Zavaleta, A.I.; Paterson, S.; Hernández-Ledesma, B. Production of Multifunctional Hydrolysates from the Lupinus Mutabilis Protein Using a Micrococcus Sp. PC7 Protease. BioTech 2025, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Pabon, K.S.; Roa-Acosta, D.F.; Hoyos-Concha, J.L.; Bravo-Gómez, J.E.; Ortiz-Gómez, V. Quinoa Snack Production at an Industrial Level: Effect of Extrusion and Baking on Digestibility, Bioactive, Rheological, and Physical Properties. Foods 2022, 11, 3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alarcón-García, M.A.; Perez-Alvarez, J.A.; López-Vargas, J.H.; Pagán-Moreno, M.J. Techno-Functional Properties of New Andean Ingredients: Maca (Lepidium meyenii) and Amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus). Proceedings 2020, 70, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vento, M.; Della Croce, C.M.; Bellani, L.; Tassi, E.L.; Echeverria, M.C.; Giorgetti, L. Effect of Sprouting, Fermentation and Cooking on Antioxidant Content and Total Antioxidant Activity in Quinoa and Amaranth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Pabon, K.S.; Parra-Polanco, A.S.; Roa-Acosta, D.F.; Hoyos-Concha, J.L.; Bravo-Gomez, J.E. Physical and Paste Properties Comparison of Four Snacks Produced by High Protein Quinoa Flour Extrusion Cooking. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 852224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda-Ramos, K.C.; Sanz-Ponce, N.; Haros, C.M. Evaluation of Technological and Nutritional Quality of Bread Enriched with Amaranth Flour. LWT 2019, 114, 108418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamanca-Gonzales, N.C.; Ocrospoma-Dueñas, R.W.; Eguilas-Caushi, Y.M.; Padilla-Fabian, R.A.; Silva-Paz, R.J. Technofunctional Properties and Rheological Behavior of Quinoa, Kiwicha, Wheat Flours and Their Mixtures. Molecules 2024, 29, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katyal, M.; Thakur, S.; Singh, N.; Khatkar, B.S.; Shishodia, S.K. A Review of Wheat Chapatti: Quality Attributes and Shelf Stability Parameters. Food Chem. Adv. 2024, 4, 100736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repo-Carrasco-Valencia, R.; Vidaurre-Ruiz, J.; Luna-Mercado, G.I. Development of Gluten-Free Breads Using Andean Native Grains Quinoa, Kañiwa, Kiwicha and Tarwi. Proceedings 2020, 53, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luque-Vilca, O.M.; Paredes-Erquinigo, J.Y.; Quille-Quille, L.; Choque-Rivera, T.J.; Cabel-Moscoso, D.J.; Rivera-Ashqui, T.A.; Silva-Paz, R.J. Utilization of Sustainable Ingredients (Cañihua Flour, Whey, and Potato Starch) in Gluten-Free Cookie Development: Analysis of Technological and Sensorial Attributes. Foods 2024, 13, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannas, M.; Pulina, S.; Conte, P.; Del Caro, A.; Urgeghe, P.P.; Piga, A.; Fadda, C. Effect of Substitution of Rice Flour with Quinoa Flour on the Chemical-Physical, Nutritional, Volatile and Sensory Parameters of Gluten-Free Ladyfinger Biscuits. Foods 2020, 9, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majhenič, A.Č.; Levart, A.; Salobir, J.; Prevc, T.; Pajk Žontar, T. Can Plant-Based Cheese Substitutes Nutritionally and Sensorially Replace Cheese in Our Diet? Foods 2025, 14, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Zhu, F.; Li, G. Beverages Developed from Pseudocereals (Quinoa, Buckwheat, and Amaranth): Nutritional and Functional Properties. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Dong, C.; Ren, G. Influence of the Nutritional Composition of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) on the Sensory Quality of Cooked Quinoa. Foods 2025, 14, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mironeasa, S.; Coţovanu, I.; Mironeasa, C.; Ungureanu-Iuga, M. A Review of the Changes Produced by Extrusion Cooking on the Bioactive Compounds from Vegetal Sources. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coţovanu, I.; Mironeasa, S. Features of Bread Made from Different Amaranth Flour Fractions Partially Substituting Wheat Flour. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguiar, E.V.; Santos, F.G.; Centeno, A.C.L.S.; Capriles, V.D. Defining Amaranth, Buckwheat and Quinoa Flour Levels in Gluten-Free Bread: A Simultaneous Improvement on Physical Properties, Acceptability and Nutrient Composition through Mixture Design. Foods 2022, 11, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamanca-Gonzales, N.C.; Ocrospoma-Dueñas, R.W.; Quintana-Salazar, N.B.; Siche, R.; Silva-Paz, R.J. Influence of Preferments on the Physicochemical and Sensory Quality of Traditional Panettone. Foods 2022, 11, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, S.; Suleria, H.A.R.; Rauf, A. Edible Insects as Innovative Foods: Nutritional and Functional Assessments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavarri-Uriarte, B.J.; Santisteban-Murga, L.N.R.; Tito-Tito, A.B.; Saintila, J.; Calizaya-Milla, Y.E. Evaluation of Sensory Acceptability and Iron Content of Vegan Cheeses Produced with Protein Legume Isolates and Cushuro Algae (Nostoc Sphaericum). Food Chem. Adv. 2025, 6, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, A.; Masala, C. Labeled Hedonic Scale for the Evaluation of Sensory Perception and Acceptance of an Aromatic Myrtle Bitter Liqueur in Consumers with Chemosensory Deficits. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rios, F.T.; Amaya, A.A.; Lobo, M.O.; Samman, N.C. Design and Acceptability of a Multi-Ingredients Snack Bar Employing Regional PRODUCTS with High Nutritional Value. Proceedings 2020, 53, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogueira, J.M.; Guiné, R.P.F. Textural Properties of Bakery Products: A Review of Instrumental and Sensory Evaluation Studies. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Species | Proximal Composition Parameters | Bioactive Compounds | Relevant Observations | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lupinus mutabilis | Protein: 52.8%, Fat: ~17%, Carbohydrates: 6.9%, Fiber: >10%, and Moisture: 5.94–18.87% | Antioxidants: Bittering reduces antioxidant capacity by 52.9%, and spray-drying reduces antioxidant capacity by an additional 8%. Phenols and flavonoids are present. | Lupinus mutabilis is notable for its extremely high protein and fat content. The bitterness reduces its antioxidant capacity. It meets the requirements for “high fiber.” Variability is attributed to geography and variety. | [4] |
Lupinus mutabilis | Protein: 41–45%, Fat: 16–18%, and Fiber: 9–13% | Polyphenols, antioxidant capacity. | Technological processes (bittering, drying) affect the antioxidant capacity and phenol content. | [5] |
Lupinus mutabilis (mixture with quinoa and sweet potato) | It does not report individual values, but the mix increases protein and fiber in extruded products. | Does not report individual values. | Being extruded with Lupinus mutabilis, quinoa, and sweet potato improves the protein and fiber profile. | [6] |
Amaranthus spp. | Protein: 13–17%, Fat: 6–8%, and Fiber: 7–10% | Total polyphenols: 80–180 mg FA/100 g. | High genetic variability. Amaranthus spp. is a relevant source of antioxidants. | [7] |
Amaranthus spp. | Protein: 13–16%, Fat: 6–8%, Dietary fiber, minerals | Polyphenols, flavonoids, saponins, antioxidants. | Germination increases bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity. | [8] |
Amaranthus spp. (germinated) | It does not report individual numerical values, but germination improves digestibility and nutritional profile. | Increase in polyphenol and antioxidant capacity after germination. | Use of Amaranthus spp. germinated in paste improves nutritional and functional potential. | [9] |
Amaranthus spp. (in baking) | Increasing protein and fiber in baked goods with Amaranthus spp. | Does not report individual values. | Improves the nutritional profile of baked goods. | [10] |
Species/Mixture | Functional and Technological Properties | Rheological and Textural Properties | Digestibility of Starches and Proteins | Effect of Technological Processes (Germination, Extrusion, Drying, etc.) | Relevant Observations | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lupinus mutabilis | High water and oil absorption capacity; gelling properties; high fiber (>10%), protein (>52%), and fat (~17%) content. | Viscoelastic gel-like behavior in doughs; high starch gelatinization temperature (68.4–81.5 °C) due to the presence of non-starch compounds; medium-sized particles. | Starch: low content (6.9%), but high proportion of amylose; high-quality proteins, rich in lysine. | Bittering reduces antioxidant capacity by 52.9%, and spray-drying reduces antioxidant capacity by an additional 8%; it maintains the integrity of starch and proteins after milling. | Meets the requirements for “high fiber” status; variability attributed to geographic area and variety; suitable for gluten-free products. | [30] |
Lupinus mutabilis | Functional capacity affected by processes; significant reduction in polyphenols and antioxidants after debittering and drying. | It does not report numerical values, but it is mentioned that processing affects texture and functionality. | Direct digestibility is not reported, but it is inferred that the reduction in polyphenols may affect bioavailability. | Bittering and drying reduce the antioxidant capacity and phenol content. | Technological processes can compromise the functional value if they are not optimized. | [31] |
Mix: Lupinus mutabilis + quinoa + sweet potato (extruded) | Increased protein and fiber content in extruded products; improved nutritional and functional profile; products with greater water absorption capacity. | Extrusion produces products with a crisp texture and good cohesiveness and expansion; it improves sensory acceptability. | Extrusion can increase the digestibility of proteins and starches by denaturation and gelatinization. | Extrusion improves texture, digestibility, and nutritional value; individual values are not reported. | Positive synergy between Andean ingredients; suitable for healthy snacks. | [32] |
Amaranthus spp. | High water absorption capacity; significant source of polyphenols (80–180 mg FA/100 g); genetic variability in functional properties. | Flours with fine particles; good gel formation; suitable for baking and extruded products. | It does not report direct digestibility but highlights the presence of high-quality proteins and starch with good functionality. | Genetic and environmental variability affect functional properties; specific processes are not assessed. | Amaranthus spp. is a significant source of antioxidants and fiber; suitable for functional products. | [33] |
Amaranthus spp. (germinated) | Sprouting increases polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity; it improves water absorption and protein solubility. | Germination reduces pastes’ viscosity but improves the elasticity and cohesiveness of doughs; it facilitates the formation of more homogeneous matrices. | Sprouting increases protein digestibility and mineral bioavailability; it improves starch’s digestibility. | Germination: Increased bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity; reduction in antinutritional factors; improved technological functionality. | Germination is an optimal process to enhance the functional and technological value of Amaranthus spp. | [34] |
Amaranthus spp. (germinated) | Use of Amaranthus spp. germinated in pasta improves the nutritional and functional profile; increases polyphenols and antioxidants in the final product. | Pasta with Amaranthus spp. germinated have better texture (greater firmness and elasticity) and sensory acceptability. | Germination improves the digestibility of proteins and starch in the produced pasta. | Germination prior to pasta production increases bioactive compounds and functionality; it improves the texture and digestibility of the final product. | Germination is key to the development of functional foods from Amaranthus spp. | [35] |
Amaranthus spp. (in baking) | Increased protein and fiber content in breads; improved nutritional profile; good water absorption capacity in doughs. | Breads with Amaranthus spp. They have a good crumb, greater volume, and acceptable texture; they improve the elasticity and cohesiveness of the dough. | It does not report direct digestibility, but baking can improve the bioavailability of nutrients. | Baking: Possible partial loss of antioxidants but improves products’ texture and acceptability. | Amaranthus spp. It is useful for enriching baked goods and improving their functionality. | [36] |
Mixtures: wheat, quinoa, Amaranthus spp. | Amaranthus spp. improves technofunctional properties (water absorption, swelling, apparent density); mixtures exhibit variability in color and microstructure. | Amaranthus spp. Pure: higher apparent viscosity and flow resistance; mixtures with wheat and quinoa: changes in pseudoplasticity and cohesiveness; microstructure: Amaranthus spp. provides a more homogeneous and finer matrix. | It does not report direct digestibility, but the fine and cohesive structure favors digestion in baked products. | Blending and fine grinding improve cohesiveness and texture; variations in color and microstructure depend on proportions. | Amaranthus spp. is key to improving functionality and texture in bread and pastry mixes. | [37] |
Mixtures: quinoa, Amaranthus spp., Lupinus mutabilis (in paste) | Mixtures improve functional and textural properties of pastes, increasing firmness, cohesiveness, and viscosity. | Pastas with a higher proportion of Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp.: greater firmness and cohesiveness; final viscosity and retrogradation increase with Amaranthus spp. | It does not report direct digestibility, but the combination of flours improves the texture and potential digestibility. | Blends allow for fine-tuning the texture and functionality of pasta; cooking improves structure and acceptability. | Positive synergy between pseudocereals and Andean legumes in aqueous matrices. | [38] |
Application/Product | Andean Grain/Mixture | Level of Substitution/Addition | Nutritional Composition | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Baking: gluten-free bread | Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp., Chenopodium pallidicaule, Lupinus mutabilis | 10–50% addition to starch/potato/corn | Increased protein (up to 13–16%), fiber, minerals, and bread volume (with 10–20% Chenopodium quinoa/Amaranthus spp.); improved texture (cohesiveness, firmness); optimal acceptability with ≤20%. | [39] |
Baking: cookies | Chenopodium pallidicaule, Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp. | 10–40% replacement | Increased protein (up to 12–15%), fiber, and minerals; optimal sensory acceptability with 20–30% Chenopodium pallidicaule; darker color. | [40] |
Baking: extruded snacks | Chenopodium quinoa, Lupinus mutabilis, sweet potato | 20–40% mix | Improved protein (up to 14–18%), fiber, expansion, and crispness; high sensory acceptability. | [35] |
Baking: panettone | Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp. | 10–20% replacement | Increased protein, fiber, and minerals; sensory acceptability like a commercial product with ≤15%. | [41] |
Dairy products: alternative cheese | Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp. | 10–20% replacement | Increased protein and fiber; acceptable texture; moderate sensory acceptability | [42] |
Others: supplements/bars | Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus spp., Chenopodium pallidicaule | 10–40% mix | Increased protein (up to 15–18%), fiber, and minerals; good sensory acceptability | [43] |
Others: fortified foods | Chenopodium quinoa, Lupinus mutabilis | 10–20% addition | Increased iron, protein, fiber, and phenolic compounds; variable sensory acceptability. | [44] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Meneses Quelal, O.; Pulles, M.B. Nutritional, Functional and Microbiological Potential of Andean Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. in the Development of Healthy Foods—A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14122059
Meneses Quelal O, Pulles MB. Nutritional, Functional and Microbiological Potential of Andean Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. in the Development of Healthy Foods—A Review. Foods. 2025; 14(12):2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14122059
Chicago/Turabian StyleMeneses Quelal, Orlando, and Marco Burbano Pulles. 2025. "Nutritional, Functional and Microbiological Potential of Andean Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. in the Development of Healthy Foods—A Review" Foods 14, no. 12: 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14122059
APA StyleMeneses Quelal, O., & Pulles, M. B. (2025). Nutritional, Functional and Microbiological Potential of Andean Lupinus mutabilis and Amaranthus spp. in the Development of Healthy Foods—A Review. Foods, 14(12), 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14122059