Abstract
Buried pipelines represent critical lifeline infrastructure whose seismic performance is governed by complex soil–structure interaction mechanisms. In this study, a process-based numerical framework is developed to evaluate the pseudo-static seismic response of buried steel pipelines installed within a trench. A comprehensive parametric analysis is conducted using the finite-element software Rocscience RS2 (version 11.027) to examine the influence of burial depth, pipeline diameter, slope angle, groundwater level, soil type, and permanent ground deformation. The seismic loading was represented using a pseudo-static horizontal acceleration, which approximates permanent ground deformation rather than full dynamic wave propagation. Therefore, the results represent simplified lateral seismic demand and not the complete dynamic soil–structure interaction response. To verify the reliability of the 2D plane–strain formulation, a representative configuration is re-simulated using the fully three-dimensional platform Rocscience RS3. The comparison demonstrates excellent agreement in shear forces, horizontal displacements, and cross-sectional distortion patterns, confirming that RS2 accurately reproduces the dominant load-transfer and deformation mechanisms observed in three-dimensional (3D) models. Results show that deeper burial and stiffer soils increase shear demand, while higher groundwater levels and larger permanent ground deformation intensify lateral displacement and cross-sectional distortion. The combined 2D–3D evaluation establishes a validated computational process for predicting the behavior of buried pipelines under a pseudo-static lateral load and provides a robust basis for engineering design and hazard mitigation. The findings contribute to improving the seismic resilience of lifeline infrastructure and offer a validated framework for future numerical investigations of soil–pipeline interaction.