Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilization and Irrigation Practices for Enhanced Winter Wheat Productivity in the North China Plain: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Priming Treatment on Improving Germination and Seedling Performance of Aged and Iron-Coated Rice Seeds Aiming for Direct Sowing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/plants14111685
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics and Chemometrics of Aloe vera Across Diverse Geographical Origins and Cultivation Practices

by
Attilio Anzano
,
Laura Grauso
,
Bruna de Falco
and
Virginia Lanzotti
*
Dipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, I-80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(11), 1685; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111685
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 31 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The chemical composition of Aloe vera leaves was investigated by using liquid chromatography–high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). Five A. vera samples were collected across diverse geographical origins and cultivation practices: PO (Botanical Garden of Portici, Italy), CAN (Gran Canaria, Canary Islands), CA, E, and MM (Marine Reserve of Torre Guaceto, Brindisi, Italy). Analysis of hydroalcoholic organic extracts revealed 77 organic compounds, including ubiquitous primary metabolites (i.e., sugars, amino acids, and fatty acids) and natural products (i.e., phenols and aromatics, terpenes, and anthraquinones). Principal component analysis (PCA) on the raw dataset indicated a clear separation of samples depending on their geographical origins. PO samples showed high amounts of citric acid, the anthraquinone aloe-emodin, and the alkaloids tropine and tropinone. CAN samples showed high content of malic, citramalic, citraconic, erucic, and 3-dehydroquinic acids. CAN and PO samples contained high amounts of jasmonic, quinic, and 4-methoxycinnamic acids along with aloesin, tyramine, coumarin, and saponarin. Among the Brindisi samples, MM contained high amounts of limonene and α-linolenic acid. CA, E, and MM samples presented high amounts of eritrose-4-phosphate, glucose-1-phosphate, and fructosyl valine along with ginsenoside, proline, and ascorbic acid. These findings indicate that geographical origins and cultivation practices affect to different extents the metabolite profile of A. vera plants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aloe vera (Figure 1) is a succulent plant well known for its medicinal and cosmetic benefits. It is native to the Arabian Peninsula, and it was introduced to China and various parts of southern Europe, including Italy, Spain, and Portugal, in the 17th century [1]. It is widely naturalized elsewhere, occurring in arid, temperate, and tropical regions on all continents. Its current distribution is the result of human cultivation [2].
This versatile plant is not only a common drug in traditional medicine but a popular ingredient in modern skincare, wellness, and food products [3,4,5,6,7]. In fact, A. vera contains several bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and amino acids, each contributing to its therapeutic effects [1,8,9]. Understanding the chemical profile of A. vera can shed light on how its components work synergistically to promote health, treat skin conditions, and support overall well-being.
Recent advances in metabolomics expanded our understanding of the plant’s chemical profile by studying the whole metabolome without long and expensive purification procedures. Recently, this approach has been applied to A. vera, identifying several metabolites including phenolics, saponins, terpenes, and anthraquinones [10,11,12]. Among these, aloin and emodin were shown to exhibit antibacterial, anticancer, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic activities [13,14,15].
In this article, we explored the chemical profile of samples of A. vera from diverse geographical origins and cultivation practices by using untargeted LC-HRMS. This method allowed the analysis of the whole plant metabolome through the detection of major and minor compounds in the plant extracts. The use of the mass tool program Compound Discoverer aided compound annotation by comparing the obtained data with those of standard mass libraries [16]. Further, chemometrics, including PCA, OPLS-DA, and hierarchical clustering analyses, were used to compare the different plant samples to evaluate differences in their metabolite profiles.

2. Results

Metabolomics Analysis and Compound Annotation

Our study focused on A. vera leaves from diverse geographical origins: PO (collected in the Botanical Garden of Portici, Italy), CAN (collected in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands), CA, E, and MM (collected in the Marine Reserve of Torre Guaceto, Brindisi, Italy). We performed a comprehensive analysis of the hydroalcoholic extracts of leaves using liquid chromatography–high-resolution tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-HRMS/MS). This MS-based metabolomic analysis allowed us to explore the metabolite profiles in detail, uncovering potential changes among the plants collected in different geographical origins and cultivations practices, and evidencing eventually unique features of each plant extract. The analysis was performed in positive ionization mode, and the raw dataset was analyzed using unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 2).
The resulting PCA score plot of A. vera samples, shown in Figure 2, accounted for 69.6% of the total variance, with principal component 1 explaining 46.9% and principal component 2 explaining 22.7%. The data indicated a clear separation of samples depending on the geographical origins. In fact, the first component clearly separated CAN (Grand Canaria, Spain) and PO (Portici, Italy) samples from CA, E, and MM (Brindisi, Italy) samples. The second component discriminated between CAN and PO samples. A minor difference in the second component appeared in two replicates of CA compared with the other samples from Brindisi.
The Brindisi samples differed in cultivation practices: CA samples were cultivated alone in open field conditions, E samples were cocultivated with Eucalyptus plants, and MM samples were cocultivated with mixed plants of Mediterranean area. Thus, the obtained data indicated a low separation of samples based on agricultural practices (Figure 2).
The data obtained by LC-MS were analyzed to obtain metabolite annotation to find the compounds responsible for the observed sample separations. This was performed using the Compound Discoverer 3.3 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Figure S1 shows a detailed description of the workflow used. Metabolite annotation was obtained by matching the accurate masses and the fragmentation patterns of the detected peaks in the LC-MS chromatograms (Figures S2 and S3) with data available from analytical standards and online libraries, including the mzCloud fragmentation database.
Confidence in metabolite identification was assigned from level 1 to 4 following the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) guidelines. Thus, metabolites identified using RT, m/z, and/or MS/MS from reference standards were assigned to level 1. Metabolites annotated using m/z and MS/MS from spectral libraries without reference standards were assigned to level 2, putatively characterized metabolite classes using m/z were level 3, and unknown metabolites, if any, were classified as level 4 [17].
A total of 77 organic compounds were annotated: 32 metabolites were identified using exact masses and RT of authentic standards (level 1); 24 metabolites were putatively matched based on MS/MS fragmentation patterns (level 2); and 21 metabolites were included in a class of compounds (level 3) (Table 1). The identified compounds included ubiquitous primary metabolites, i.e., sugars, amino acids, and fatty acids, and natural compounds, i.e., phenols and aromatics, terpenes, and anthraquinones, the latter being typically present in aloe species.
Then, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) (Figure 3) and variable importance in projection analysis (VIP) helped to further identify the metabolites with the highest discriminative power, highlighting the molecules that contributed most significantly to the observed differences among the samples.
Quantitative data on the identified metabolites were obtained by peak integration. Table S1 lists the average areas and the standard deviations for the detected metabolites.
The most abundant compounds in the extracts were sugars, on which the quantitative data are reported in Figure 4A. Fructosyl valine was the predominant sugar in CA and MM samples, while glucose-1-phosphate and eritrose-4-phosphate were present at higher amounts in CA, E, and MM samples.
The analysis of glycosides (Figure 4B) did not show significant variation among samples except for CAN and PO, which were found to be richer in saponarin than CA, E, and MM.
Amino acids (Figure 5) were generally found at higher amounts in CA and MM. The quantities of glutamine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine were significantly higher in CA than in CAN, E, and PO. The same trend was also observed for pyroglutamic acid and tryptophan. A high accumulation of methionine was noticed in the CAN sample, significantly more than in all the other samples.
The fatty acids (Figure 5) did not considerably impact the separation of the sample set. Palmitic acid did not show significant differences among the different samples. However, erucic acid was significantly higher in CAN than in the other samples, while palmitoleic and linolenic acids were predominant in MM, with palmitoleic acid being relatively lower in PO.
Regarding organic acids (Figure 6), CAN presented the highest content of them. Malic acid was the most abundant metabolite found in our analysis, and it was significantly higher in CAN than in the other samples. The same trend was found for citramalic acid, predominating in CAN. Quinic acid was significantly higher in CAN and PO than in MM, CA and E, while jasmonic acid methyl ester was significantly higher in CAN than in CA and E, but not when compared with MM and PO.
Among phenols and aromatic compounds (Figure 7), we observed significantly higher content of chlorogenic acid in PO than in E and MM and of coumarin in PO and CAN than in MM, CA, and E. Acetoamidobenzoic acid and eupatorin were the only two aromatic compounds less abundant in CAN and PO than in MM, CA, and E. Significantly larger quantities of styrene, tyramine, and methoxycinnamic acid were found in CAN and PO than in MM, CA, and E.
Concerning other compounds (Figure 8), the antraquinone aloe-emodin predominated in PO compared with the other samples, while the C-glycosilated chromone aloesin was more abundant in PO than in CA, E, and MM. Coniine and methyl aloesinyl cinnamate were both significantly more abundant in CAN and PO, since they were nearly absent in CA, E, and MM. The monoterpene limonene showed high abundancy in MM. The quantity of the vitamin B8 (biotin) was significantly higher in CAN.
The alkaloid lupinine showed significantly higher content in CAN and PO than in CA, E, and MM. The two alkaloids tropine and tropinone significantly predominated in PO. Finally, tropinone was more abundant in CAN than in CA, E, and MM.
The obtained quantitative data are shown in the heatmap reported in Figure 9, where the relative quantities of the 77 detected metabolites are displayed to easily compare the abundance of the metabolites in the different samples. To obtain a better visualization, the data used in the heatmap were log10 scaled. The hierarchical cluster analysis performed on the selected metabolites confirmed the sample discrimination observed in the PCA, highlighting the presence of the two separated groups of samples.

3. Discussion

Despite A. vera being a widely diffused commercial plant, there are only a few articles focusing on metabolomic analysis of the gel obtained from the plant leaves. Most works employed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and only a few performed untargeted analyses based on LC-MS/MS techniques. Two studies focusing on NMR spectroscopy reported relatively simple compounds, including amino acids and phenylpropanoids such as chlorogenic acid and benzoic acid [11,18]. However, LC-MS approaches were able to identify a wider variety of metabolites. An article published by Breaud et al. (2023) identified several compounds found by our study as well, such as chlorogenic acid, aloesin, linolenic acid, and apigenin derivatives [19]. Lee et al. (2013) employed UPLC-ESI-MS to identify several metabolites, reporting the anthraquinone aloe-emodin to vary among the treatments they applied to the plant [20]. In a previous work, Lee et al. (2012) used UPLC-Q-TOF-MS and identified several metabolites that were also found in this study, such as aloesin, malic acid, pyroglutamic acid, glucose, glucuronic acid, and sucrose (here found as sucrose oleate) [10]. In our work, 77 different metabolites were annotated and then used to highlight the differences between aloe plants from different geographical origins and cultivation practices.
Geographical characterization of plants grown in different areas through metabolomics has been used in the past, and the differences in metabolite profiles have been described. For instance, in the work of Lee et al. (2015), 284 samples of tea collected from different areas of China, Japan, and South Korea were chemically characterized through NMR spectroscopy, and the resulting PCA was able to correctly reproduce the three main geographical locations [21]. Another research group characterized the lipidome of tobacco leaves coming from three different regions of China and found correlations between the lipidome composition, the geographical position, and other environmental factors such as the growth temperature of the tobacco plant in that area [22].
Our work is in line with these findings. In fact, the data we obtained were able to clearly distinguish between plants that were grown in different geographical locations (Brindisi, Grand Canaria, and Portici). Fewer differences were found in relation to agricultural practices based on mixed cultivation within the same geographical area. Scientific literature about the impact of cocultivation of different plants on their metabolome is still lacking, as there are no studies that review the interactions between two or more plants from a metabolomic point of view. A study from Pedersen et al. (2013) found that 34 metabolites increased and 54 decreased, the latter including aromatic and branched amino acids, upon cocultivation of Arabidopsis thaliana with Trifolium repens, suggesting that T. repens was in some way responsible for a shift in the secondary metabolite content of A. thaliana [23]. However, our results did not highlight major differences among the primary and secondary metabolites of A. vera cocultivated with other plant species.
It is well known that origin affects the metabolic profile of plants. This aspect must be considered because it could influence the quantity of specific metabolites and therefore the biological activity of the extract. Knowing the composition of plant extracts of different sources could be a good starting point to obtain enriched natural extracts with higher biological activity. Thus, our study has shown the potential of applying an untargeted metabolomics approach to explore metabolomic differences in A. vera samples according to geographical regions of production.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

First-grade methanol and formic acid were purchased from Delchimica Scientific Laboratories Glassware (Naples, Italy). Pure standard amino acids, organic acids, phenolics, and nucleosides were used as references (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy).

4.2. Plant Material

Aloe vera samples were collected and analyzed in triplicates. The samples were harvested in different geographical areas and in different cultivation conditions.
CA: harvested in open field and collected at the organic farm MATER, Torre Guaceto Marine Reserve, Brindisi, Italy.
CAN: harvested in open field in Gáldar, Gran Canaria, Spain.
E: harvested in open field with mixed vegetation of Eucalyptus plants and collected at the organic farm MATER, Torre Guaceto Marine Reserve, Brindisi, Italy.
MM: harvested in open field with mixed vegetation of Mediterranean plants and collected in at the organic farm MATER, Torre Guaceto Marine Reserve, Brindisi, Italy.
PO: harvested in the Botanical Garden, Real Palace of Portici, Portici, Italy.
Three leaves were harvested in the field from 3 adult plants for each geographical location. The external green layer was removed using a kitchen knife, and the internal pulp (aloe gel) was collected in a tube and frozen until further extraction.

4.3. Metabolite Extraction Procedure

The frozen gels were lyophilized (Zirbus laboratory freeze-drier) for 2 days to remove the water content, and therefore, around 200 mg of gel was extracted using 50 mL of a methanol/water solution (70:30), continuously stirring for 1 h. Then, the extracts were centrifuged (4000 rpm for 10 min) and filtrated through filter paper, and the solutions were dried by using a rotary evaporator. An aliquot (10 mg) of each dried sample was collected in 4 mL glass vial, and the content was dried using a rotational vacuum concentrator (RVC 2-18 CDplus, CHRIST, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The vials were stored at 4 °C until the LC-MS analysis was performed. Three biological replicates were prepared for each sample group. Validation of the extraction protocol was obtained by using a standardized sample preparation protocol previously developed and applied for plant analysis [24,25,26,27]. This allowed building compound libraries that enabled effective compound identification and efficient dereplication. This protocol was based on the use of solvents (methanol and water) complementary for polarity, allowing a broad range of organic compounds to be identified. The use of blank samples and quality standard samples allowed the validation of the applied method by ensuring the reliability and accuracy of measurements.

4.4. LC-HRMS and LC-HRMS/MS Analyses

Liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HR-MS/MS) were performed using a Thermo LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Spa, Rodano, Italy) coupled to a Thermo U3000 HPLC system. 5 µL of sample were injected in a Kinetex C18 column (5 µm, 50 × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), with a flowrate of 0.2 mL/min, to separate the individual metabolites. The gradient elution, 0.1% formic acid in H2O (solvent A) and CH3OH (solvent B), was optimized as follows: 5% B at 1 min, 5–100% B over 40 min, held at 100% B for 10 min. HR-MS and HR-MS/MS spectra were acquired in positive ion mode selecting a m/z range of 100–2000 with 60,000 resolution to generate data-dependent scans for identification. The MS parameters were as follows: spray voltage 4.80 kV, capillary temperature 285 °C, sheath gas rate 32.0 units N2 (ca. 150 mL/min), auxiliary gas rate 15 units N2 (ca. 50 mL/min). To prevent the formation of cluster ions while causing no actual fragmentation, source fragmentation was enabled using a mild potential of 35 V to avoid formation of clusters and avoidance of ion fragmentation. The MS/MS spectra of the selected ions were collected with collision-induced dissociation (CID) fragmentation, wideband activation mode, using the following parameters: isolation width ±3.00 Da, collision energy 35 units, activation Q 0.250 units, and activation time 30 ms.

4.5. Data Analysis and Metabolite Annotation

The data obtained from LC-MS were analyzed through the software Compound Discoverer 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK). The annotation of the metabolites was performed by matching accurate masses and fragmentation patterns to analytical standards and online libraries, including the mzCloud fragmentation database. The confidence in metabolite identification was assigned into levels 1–4 following the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) guidelines [28,29]. The retention time (RT) range applied was 0–40 min, the mass range was m/z 70–1500, the mass tolerance for peak picking and metabolite annotation was set to less than 5 ppm for both precursor and fragment ions, and the maximum retention time shift was 0.25 min. The multivariate data analysis was conducted using SIMCA18 (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany). The datasets were log-transformed and Pareto scaled before model creation. The data were first explored using unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA). Subsequently, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was performed to highlight the metabolites causing the differences among the treatments. Scatter plots, loading plots, and variable importance in projection (VIP) score plots were generated and interpreted to identify significantly altered metabolites between the control and treatment groups. Metabolites with VIP scores greater than 1 were considered strong contributors. The quality of models was validated through cross-validation using the leave-one-out method, assessing the goodness of fit of the model (R2X) for PCA, (R2Y) for OPLS-DA, and predictive ability (Q2) values. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to define statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the untargeted LC-HRMS/MS metabolomics of A. vera from diverse geographical origins and cultivation practices highlight the remarkable diversity and complexity of its biochemical composition. Our study demonstrated that variations in metabolite profiles were greatly influenced by environmental factors, while less influence was found by cultivation practices. Therefore, our analytical approach could constitute a powerful model to analyze geographical distribution of plants. The differences observed in A. vera samples from different geographical areas could have implications for the plant’s medicinal and therapeutic properties, suggesting that region-specific formulations may offer distinct health benefits. Further research integrating metabolomics of A. vera with bioactivity studies can lead to a deeper understanding of its potential and pave the way for more targeted and effective use in both traditional and modern medicine. By integrating advanced technologies and cross-country studies, we can unlock the full potential of this versatile plant, ensuring its sustainable use and optimal exploitation for health and wellness applications worldwide.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14111685/s1, Table S1. Relative area of the compounds identified through LC-MS analysis. Data are shown as an average of three replicates and the relative standard deviation. Figure S1. Description of the workflow used in Compound Discoverer 3.3, including key nodes and parameters used to filter compounds. Figure S2. Representative LCs of A. vera extracts: PO (Portici, Italy); CA (Torre Guaceto, Italy); CAN (Gran Canaria, Spain); E (Torre Guaceto, Italy); MM (Torre Guaceto, Italy). Figure S3. EICs of identified compounds of A. vera extracts with their MS/MS fragmentations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G. and V.L.; methodology, A.A., L.G. and B.d.F.; validation, L.G., B.d.F. and V.L.; investigation, A.A. and L.G.; data curation, A.A. and L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A. and V.L.; writing—review and editing, L.G. and V.L.; visualization, A.A., L.G. and V.L.; supervision, V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tommasina Gengaro, Azienda MATER, Agricoltura Biologica e Turismo-Ecorurale, Riserva Marina di Torre Guaceto, Brindisi, Italy (http://www.mater-bio.it/ (accessed on 1 January 2025)) for providing Aloe vera plants. We are grateful to Riccardo Motti, University of Naples Federico II, for the copyright of the A. vera photo in Figure 1. The LC-MS analyses were performed at the Laboratorio di Tecniche Spettroscopiche, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Napoli Federico II. The technical assistance of Paolo Luciano is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Surjushe, A.; Vasani, R.; Saple, D.G. Aloe Vera: A Short Review. Indian J. Dermatol. 2008, 53, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klein, A.D.; Penneys, N.S. Aloe Vera. Therapy 1988, 18, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shelton, R.M. Aloe Vera Its Chemical and Therapeutic Properties. Int. J. Dertnatol. 1991, 30, 679–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vogler, B.K.; Ernst, E. Aloe Vera: A Systematic Review of Its Clinical. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1999, 49, 823–828. [Google Scholar]
  5. Catalano, A.; Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Marra, M.; Conforti, F.; Lupi, F.R.; Gabriele, D.; Borges, F.; Sinicropi, M.S. Aloe Vera―An Extensive Review Focused on Recent Studies. Foods 2024, 13, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.; Kuok, K.I.; Jin, Y.; Wang, R. Biomedical Applications of Aloe Vera. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, S244–S256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prakoso, Y.A.; Kurniasih. The Effects of Aloe Vera Cream on the Expression of CD4+ and CD8+ Lymphocytes in Skin Wound Healing. J. Trop. Med. 2018, 2018, 6218303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kahramanoğlu, I.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Wan, C. Chemical Constituents, Antimicrobial Activity and Food Preservative Characteristics of Aloe Vera Gel. Agronomy 2019, 9, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moghaddasi, S.M.; Kumar Verma, S. Aloe Vera Their Chemicals Composition and Applications: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Med. Res. 2011, 2, 466–471. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee, S.; Do, S.G.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Jin, Y.; Lee, C.H. Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolite Profiling and Antioxidant Activity of Aloe Vera (Aloe Barbadensis Miller) in Different Growth Stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11222–11228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, D.-M. Determination and Profiling Of Secondary Metabolites in Aloe Vera, Aloe Arborescens and Aloe Saponaria. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2021, 40, 32555–32563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Batra, N.; Dey, P. Untargeted Metabolomics of Aloe Volatiles: Implications in Pathway Enrichments for Improved Bioactivities. Heliyon 2025, 11, e42268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Park, M.Y.; Kwon, H.J.; Sung, M.K. Evaluation of Aloin and Aloe-Emodin as Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Aloe by Using Murine Macrophages. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 828–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brian, S.; Anna, M.R.; Sharon, G.; Tyler, C.; Reginald, H.M.; Steven, E.A.; Ashar, F.; Janet, K.; Lucas, C.L.; Johanna, L.; et al. Anti-Cancer Effects of Aloe-Emodin: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2017, 3, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, X.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, Y.; You, L.; Yin, X.; Fu, J.; Ni, J. Aloe-Emodin: A Review of Its Pharmacology, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetics. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aigensberger, M.; Bueschl, C.; Castillo-Lopez, E.; Ricci, S.; Rivera-Chacon, R.; Zebeli, Q.; Berthiller, F.; Schwartz-Zimmermann, H.E. Modular Comparison of Untargeted Metabolomics Processing Steps. Anal. Chim. Acta 2025, 1336, 343491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Çiçek, S.S.; Mangoni, A.; Hanschen, F.S.; Agerbirk, N.; Zidorn, C. Essentials in the Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Plant Metabolite Profiles. Phytochemistry 2024, 220, 114004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noorolahi, S.M.; Sadeghi, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Azadi, M.; Rahimi, N.A.; Vahabi, F.; Arjmand, M.; Hosseini, H.; Mosallatpur, S.; Zamani, Z. Metabolomic Profiling of Cancer Cells to Aloe Vera Extract by 1HNMR Spectroscopy. J. Metabolomics 2016, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Breaud, C.; Lallemand, L.; Mares, G.; Mabrouki, F.; Bertolotti, M.; Simmler, C.; Greff, S.; Mauduit, M.; Herbette, G.; Garayev, E.; et al. LC-MS Based Phytochemical Profiling towards the Identification of Antioxidant Markers in Some Endemic Aloe Species from Mascarene Islands. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, Y.S.; Ju, H.K.; Kim, Y.J.; Lim, T.G.; Uddin, M.R.; Kim, Y.B.; Baek, J.H.; Kwon, S.W.; Lee, K.W.; Seo, H.S.; et al. Enhancement of Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Aloe Vera Adventitious Root Extracts through the Alteration of Primary and Secondary Metabolites via Salicylic Acid Elicitation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, J.E.; Lee, B.J.; Chung, J.O.; Kim, H.N.; Kim, E.H.; Jung, S.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.J.; Hong, Y.S. Metabolomic Unveiling of a Diverse Range of Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) Metabolites Dependent on Geography. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, L.; Lu, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, C.; Xu, G. Lipidome and Metabolome Analysis of Fresh Tobacco Leaves in Different Geographical Regions Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 5009–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pedersen, H.A.; Kudsk, P.; Fiehn, O.; Fomsgaard, I.S. The Response of Arabidopsis to Co-Cultivation with Clover: Investigating Plant-Plant Interactions with Metabolomics. In Pest Management with Natural Products; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; Volume 1141, pp. 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Falco, B.; Grauso, L.; Fiore, A.; Bochicchio, R.; Amato, M.; Lanzotti, V. Metabolomic Analysis and Antioxidant Activity of Wild Type and Mutant Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) Stem and Flower Grown under Different Irrigation Regimes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 6010–6019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grauso, L.; Zotti, M.; Sun, W.; de Falco, B.; Lanzotti, V.; Bonanomi, G. Spectroscopic and Multivariate Data-Based Method to Assess the Metabolomic Fingerprint of Mediterranean Plants. Phytochem. Anal. 2019, 30, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. de Falco, B.; Adamo, A.; Anzano, A.; Grauso, L.; Carteni, F.; Lanzotti, V.; Mazzoleni, S. Self-DNA in Caenorhabditis Elegans Affects the Production of Specific Metabolites: Evidence from LC-MS and Chemometric Studies. Molecules 2024, 29, 4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grauso, L.; de Falco, B.; Bochicchio, R.; Scarpato, S.; Addesso, R.; Lanzotti, V. Leaf Metabolomics and Molecular Networking of Wild Type and Mutant Genotypes of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.). Phytochemistry 2023, 209, 113611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sumner, L.W.; Lei, Z.; Nikolau, B.J.; Saito, K.; Roessner, U.; Trengove, R. Proposed Quantitative and Alphanumeric Metabolite Identification Metrics. Metabolomics 2014, 10, 1047–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sumner, L.W.; Amberg, A.; Barrett, D.; Beale, M.H.; Beger, R.; Daykin, C.A.; Fan, T.W.M.; Fiehn, O.; Goodacre, R.; Griffin, J.L.; et al. Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis: Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI). Metabolomics 2007, 3, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 14 01685 g001
Figure 1. Aloe vera plants from the Botanical Garden of Portici, Italy (photo by courtesy of prof. Riccardo Motti).
Figure 1. Aloe vera plants from the Botanical Garden of Portici, Italy (photo by courtesy of prof. Riccardo Motti).
Plants 14 01685 g001
Plants 14 01685 g002
Figure 2. PCA score plot of A. vera samples.
Figure 2. PCA score plot of A. vera samples.
Plants 14 01685 g002
Plants 14 01685 g003
Figure 3. OPLS-DA of A. vera samples.
Figure 3. OPLS-DA of A. vera samples.
Plants 14 01685 g003
Plants 14 01685 g004
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of sugars (A) and glycosides (B) identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of sugars (A) and glycosides (B) identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Plants 14 01685 g004
Plants 14 01685 g005
Figure 5. Quantitative analysis of amino acids and fatty acids identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 5. Quantitative analysis of amino acids and fatty acids identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Plants 14 01685 g005
Plants 14 01685 g006
Figure 6. Quantitative analysis of organic acids identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 6. Quantitative analysis of organic acids identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Plants 14 01685 g006
Plants 14 01685 g007
Figure 7. Quantitative analysis of phenols and aromatics identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 7. Quantitative analysis of phenols and aromatics identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Plants 14 01685 g007
Plants 14 01685 g008
Figure 8. Quantitative analysis of other compounds, including alkaloids, anthraquinones, terpenes, and vitamins, identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 8. Quantitative analysis of other compounds, including alkaloids, anthraquinones, terpenes, and vitamins, identified in A. vera extracts. CA, E, MM (Torre Guaceto); CAN (Gran Canaria); PO (Portici). Displayed data refer to the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Plants 14 01685 g008
Plants 14 01685 g009
Figure 9. Heatmap representing the average peak area of the detected metabolites at each growing condition (log10 scaled, replicates = 3). Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed, and the dendrogram is shown on the upper part of the heatmap.
Figure 9. Heatmap representing the average peak area of the detected metabolites at each growing condition (log10 scaled, replicates = 3). Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed, and the dendrogram is shown on the upper part of the heatmap.
Plants 14 01685 g009
Table 1. Metabolites identified in A. vera samples through LC-HRMS analysis in positive ion mode.
Table 1. Metabolites identified in A. vera samples through LC-HRMS analysis in positive ion mode.
N.Compound ClassCompound AnnotationFormulaRT (min)[M+H]+ppmMS/MSId. Level
1AlkaloidsConessineC24H40N226.75357.3263−0.24n.a.3
2AlkaloidsConiineC8H17N14.90128.14340.0282.09/69.07/55.052
3Alkaloids(−)-LupinineC10H19NO16.51170.1539−0.23157.02/128.142
4AlkaloidsQuinolizidineC9H17N4.00140.14340.19102.55/58.062
5AlkaloidsTrigonellineC7H7NO24.10138.05500.10n.a.3
6AlkaloidsTropineC8H15NO2.41142.12270.42124.11/67.05/43.022
7Alkaloids(±)-TropinoneC8H13NO6.39140.1070−0.0198.09/81.072
8Amino acidsDL-GlutamineC5H10N2O31.50147.07650.20130.05/84.041
9Amino acidsL-MethionineC5H11NO2S1.62150.05840.13n.a.1
10Amino acidsIsoleucineC6H13NO21.97132.10190.2386.10/69.071
11Amino acidsPhenylalanylphenylalanineC18H20N2O315.61313.1546−0.14120.08/103.051
12Amino acidsL-PhenylalanineC9H11NO23.01166.0862−0.25120.08/103.051
13Amino acidsL-ProlineC5H9NO22.32116.0706−0.0899.05/84.04/56.051
14Amino acidsD-(+)-Pyroglutamic acidC5H7NO31.78130.04990.29130.05/84.041
15Amino acidsPyroglutamyl-histidyl-glycineC13H17N5O51.92324.1289−4.19n.a.3
16Amino acidsN-Tetradecanoylaspartic acidC18H33NO521.23344.2431−0.28n.a.3
17Amino acidsD-(+)-TryptophanC11H12N2O26.21205.0971−0.21188.07/146.06/91.051
18Amino acidsL-TyrosineC9H11NO31.99182.0811−0.18165.05/136.08/123.041
19Amino acidsL-ValineC5H11NO21.56118.0862−0.1272.08/55.051
20AntraquinonesAloe-emodinC15H10O525.81271.0601−0.03253.05/241.05/225.06 1
21AntraquinonesAloeresin AC28H28O1117.77541.1702−0.53275.09/147.041
22AntraquinonesAloeresin BC19H22O912.91395.1335−0.81233.08/191.071
23AntraquinonesAloesinC19H22O916.04395.1334−0.48233.08/203.08/115.041
24AntraquinonesMethyl aloesinyl cinnamate C29H32O1022.09541.2067−0.31497.18/217.06/131.051
25Aromatics4-Acetamidobenzoic acidC9H9NO33.58180.0630−13.85 1
26AromaticsCoumarinC9H6O215.51147.04410.13119.05/91.05/65.041
27AromaticsHypoxanthineC5H4N4O2.41137.04580.12119.03/55.031
28Aromatics4-Phenylaminobenzoic acidC13H11NO210.04214.0862−0.08203.09/180.061
29AromaticsStyreneC8H83.26105.0698−0.5695.05/79.05 1
30Fatty acidsErucic acidC22H42O235.77339.3257−0.30321.31/303.301
31Fatty acidsα-Linolenic acidC18H30O234.23301.2137−0.24 2
32Fatty acidsPalmitic acidC16H32O226.12274.2740 a−0.20256.26/88.071
33Fatty acidsPalmitoleic acidC16H30O230.67277.2162 b−0.20259.20/235.171
34Glycosides(3R)-β,β-Caroten-3-yl 6-O-(11-methyldodecanoyl)-β-D-glucopyranosideC59H90O739.60911.67822.43n.a.3
35GlycosidesConvallagenin A 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranosideC32H52O935.64581.3657−4.74n.a.3
36GlycosidesCucurbitacin SC30H42O625.69499.3053−0.3481.29/283.20/203.052
37Glycosides1′,2′-Dihydro-φ,ψ-caroten-1′-yl 6-O-tridecanoyl-β-D-glucopyranosideC59H88O738.856909.66353.55n.a.3
38GlycosidesEthyl glucuronideC8H14O72.38223.0812−0.34203.08/177.482
39GlycosidesGinsenoside Rg1C42H72O1436.27801.4961−4.23n.a.3
40GlycosidesSaponarinC27H30O1516.38595.16570.58n.a.3
41Organic acidsCitraconic acidC5H6O42.05131.03390.2086.10/71.012
42Organic acidsCitramalic acidC5H8O52.11149.0445−0.09113.02/103.04/71.012
43Organic acidsCitric acidC6H8O71.82215.0162−0.01203.08/170.81/72.081
44Organic acids3-Dehydroquinic acidC7H10O65.82191.0549−0.18105.01/87.00/69.032
45Organic acidsEicosadienoic acidC20H36O235.62309.27880.09n.a. 3
46Organic acidsGabapentinC9H17NO212.06194.1151−0.37150.01/144.99/113.102
47Organic acidsGentisic acidC7H6O42.98155.0339−0.14n.a. 3
48Organic acidsHomogentisic acidC8H8O411.61169.0495−0.44n.a. 3
49Organic acidsJasmonic acid methyl esterC13H20O311.86225.1485−0.29203.08/149.10/99.042
50Organic acidsα-Ketoisovaleric acidC5H8O31.79117.0546−0.0784.96/55.052
51Organic acidsMalic acidC4H6O51.58157.01080.08121.65/93.901
52Organic acidsOxoglutaric acidC5H6O51.85147.02890.33n.a. 3
53Organic acidsPantothenic acidC9H17NO53.88220.1179−0.44184.09/90.051
54Organic acidsQuinic acidC7H12O61.65193.0706−0.16n.a. 3
55Organic acidsSinapic acidC11H12O513.32225.07580.11n.a. 3
56PhenolsApigeninC15H10O523.46271.0601−0.11n.a.3
57PhenolsChlorogenic acidC16H18O912.18355.1022−0.26259.05/235.06/205.041
58PhenolsCinnamic acidC9H8O23.01149.0597−0.04n.a.3
59Phenols3′,4′-DimethoxyflavoneC17H14O419.89283.0964−0.16251.08/241.08/203.081
60PhenolsEthyl cinnamateC11H12O211.36177.0910−0.42157.25/149.02/109.732
61PhenolsEupatorinC18H16O716.39345.0968−0.16327.08/285.07/267.062
62PhenolsIsopentyl cinnamateC14H18O224.64219.1379−0.07230.08/177.09/164.081
63Phenols4-Methoxycinnamic acidC10H10O314.03179.0702−0.48123.04/105.03/95.041
64Phenols2,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic acidC12H14O510.29239.09160.91n.a.3
65PhenolsTyramineC8H11NO2.54138.09140.1696.07/94.06/80.042
66SteroidsCortisolC21H30O530.94363.2142−6.74331.22/203.082
67SugarsErythrose 4-PC4H9O7P1.39201.01600.54158.99/98.97/56.962
68SugarsGalactaric acidC6H10O85.65211.0444−2.12n.a.3
69SugarsD-(+)-GlucoseC6H12O61.43198.0972 a0.10145.04/127.02/85.021
70SugarsGlucose 1-PC6H13O9P1.59261.03700.09244.11/216.12/203.08/2
71SugarsFructosyl valineC11H21NO71.61280.1390−0.25262.12/244.11/216.122
72SugarsSucrose oleateC30H54O121.65304.1867−4.55n.a.3
73Terpenesβ-DamascenoneC13H18O11.71191.1430−0.64173.17/121.10/107.082
74Terpenes(R)-LimoneneC10H16O322.30207.0992−0.09149.09/97.022
75VitaminsAscorbic acidC6H8O62.68199.02130.04149.02/87.00/56.011
76VitaminsBiotinC10H16N2O3S12.88245.0954−0.33227.05/203.852
77Vitaminsα-TocopherolC29H50O237.45431.3883−0.32n.a.3
a [M + H2O]+; b [M + Na]+
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anzano, A.; Grauso, L.; de Falco, B.; Lanzotti, V. Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics and Chemometrics of Aloe vera Across Diverse Geographical Origins and Cultivation Practices. Plants 2025, 14, 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111685

AMA Style

Anzano A, Grauso L, de Falco B, Lanzotti V. Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics and Chemometrics of Aloe vera Across Diverse Geographical Origins and Cultivation Practices. Plants. 2025; 14(11):1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111685

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anzano, Attilio, Laura Grauso, Bruna de Falco, and Virginia Lanzotti. 2025. "Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics and Chemometrics of Aloe vera Across Diverse Geographical Origins and Cultivation Practices" Plants 14, no. 11: 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111685

APA Style

Anzano, A., Grauso, L., de Falco, B., & Lanzotti, V. (2025). Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics and Chemometrics of Aloe vera Across Diverse Geographical Origins and Cultivation Practices. Plants, 14(11), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111685

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop