Next Article in Journal
An Overview of Antimicrobial Compounds from African Edible Insects and Their Associated Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of a Nosocomial COVID-19 Outbreak on a Non-COVID-19 Nephrology Ward during the First Wave of the Pandemic in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/antibiotics10060620
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hemisynthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cinnamylated, Benzylated, and Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from a Common Bio-Sourced Precursor

by
Anne Ardaillou
,
Jérôme Alsarraf
*,
Jean Legault
,
François Simard
and
André Pichette
*
Centre de Recherche sur la Boréalie (CREB), Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Séparation des Essences Végétales (LASEVE), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Boulevard de l’Université, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(6), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060620
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 19 May 2021 / Published: 22 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Novel Antimicrobial Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Several families of naturally occurring C-alkylated dihydrochalcones display a broad range of biological activities, including antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties, depending on their alkylation sidechain. The catalytic Friedel–Crafts alkylation of the readily available aglycon moiety of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone was performed using cinnamyl, benzyl, and isoprenyl alcohols. This procedure provided a straightforward access to a series of derivatives that were structurally related to natural balsacones, uvaretin, and erioschalcones, respectively. The antibacterial and cytotoxic potential of these novel analogs was evaluated in vitro and highlighted some relations between the structure and the pharmacological properties of alkylated dihydrochalcones.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dihydrochalcones (DHCs) are a class of natural phenylpropanoids derived from the biosynthetic pathway of shikimic acid [1]. They are the acyclic counterparts of flavanones and are found in several botanical families [2]. Their scaffold can feature various sidechains [3] resulting from C-glycosylation [4], C-cinnamylation [5,6,7,8], C-benzylation [9,10,11], or C-prenylation [12] (Figure 1). The structural diversity of DHCs translates into a broad range of biological activities such as antibacterial, antiviral, antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic properties [13]. Interestingly, DHCs may display different pharmacological properties compared to the corresponding chalcones. For instance, some recently described 4’-methyl DHCs were more active against S. aureus and less potent against E. coli than the corresponding chalcones [14]. While functionalized DHCs are commonly isolated in low yields, simpler derivatives can be found in high concentrations in plants. One of the most abundant natural DHCs is phloridzin, a DHC O-glucoside representing up to 14% of dry weight in apple tree leaves [15]. Some DHCs are also readily accessible by reduction of the corresponding chalcone or flavanone. This is for example the case of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, a sweetener widely used in the food industry which is obtained by hydrogenation of the citrus metabolite neohesperidin [16]. We recently demonstrated that abundant DHCs can serve as precursors in the hemisynthesis of balsacones [17], a class of cinnamylated antibacterial and anti-psoriatic [18] DHCs from the bud of Populus balsamifera that are active against resistant strains of S. aureus (MRSA) and did not induce resistance in treated MRSA [19]. In this context, the use of natural DHCs advantageously saved the steps which would have been necessary for the construction of a DHC scaffold from petrochemicals. Their conversion into balsacones was performed in a single-step, following a metal-free and protective group-free Brønsted acid-catalyzed Friedel–Crafts alkylation protocol [20]. Bio-sourced cinnamyl alcohols were privileged as the alkylation reagents as their utilization saved a harmful halogenation step, and their conversion generated water as the lone byproduct making the process overall green [21,22]. The use of natural precursors was also profitable from a drug discovery perspective, as these renewable polyfunctional templates constitute a valuable source of structural diversity [23]. On the other hand, the scope of sidechains which could readily be incorporated onto the framework of natural DHCs remains to be explored to access the wider sidechain variety found in DHCs.
Among these structures, C-benzylated DHCs have been found in the Annonaceae family, in particular in Uvaria species [9,10,24,25,26]. Uvaretin showed a considerable cytotoxicity against various human cancer cell lines with IC50 values in the low micromolar range [27]. Other 2-hydroxybenzyl-bearing flavonoids have also been found in nature such as the C-benzylated flavanone dichamanetin from Piper sarmentosum. Furthermore, C-prenylation is a relatively common modification in natural flavonoids that is considered to enhance their bioactivity by increasing lipophilicity [28,29]. C-prenylated and C-geranylated DHCs were notably found in the genus Piper. Recently, two prenylated DHCs, named erioschalcone A and B, were isolated in Eriosema glomerata and showed attractive antimicrobial properties against the pathogenic Gram-negative strains Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae [12]. It is worthy of note that erioschalcones were inactive against S. aureus, unlike balsacones, which stressed the role of the alkylation fragment of DHCs on their antimicrobial properties. Herein, we devise the catalytic single-step C-cinnamylation, C-benzylation, and C-prenylation of the readily accessible neohesperidin dihydrochalcone aglycon 1 as a useful method to access derivatives that are structurally related to naturally occurring balsacones, uvaretins, and erioschalcones, respectively. The antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of the synthesized compound is also discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Synthesis

2.1.1. Cinnamylation of DHC 1

Our first objective was to transpose the method developed for the hemisynthesis of balsacones to DHC 1 (Table 1). Briefly, the precursor 1 was treated with various cinnamyl alcohols 2a-e in the presence of a catalytic amount of 4-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) in acetonitrile. Cinnamyl alcohols were prepared from their carboxylic acid counterparts following a straightforward esterification-reduction sequence [30]. 4-hydroxicinnamyl alcohol (2a) reacted smoothly with DHC 1 at room temperature, providing the expected product 3a containing the same sidechain as natural balsacones in a good 69% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Analogues 3b and 3c were obtained from alcohols 2b and 2c in 49% and 61% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 2–3). Cinnamyl alcohol (2d) was less reactive and required heating to produce 72% of the derivative 3d (Table 1, entry 4). In the case of the chlorinated precursor 2e, the intended product 3e was obtained in a low 30% yield (Table 1, entry 5). This result was explained by the formation of several byproducts among which compound 3e’, resulting from the alkylation of the trisubstituted aromatic ring of the DHC, was isolated in 9% yield (see the Materials and methods section). Nonetheless, a sufficient quantity of product 3e was obtained for the biological assays.

2.1.2. Benzylation of DHC 1

The next step of the study was the hemisynthesis of benzylated DHCs that would be structural analogs of uvaretin and other naturally occurring DHCs and flavanones. The total synthesis of uvaretin was reported in 1985 by Malterud et al. [31] and considerably improved very recently by Dallman et al. [27]. The seven-step route involved the construction of a protected chalcone framework, followed by a Friedel–Crafts alkylation using a protected 2-hydroxybenzyl precursor prior to the removal of all the protective-groups, providing uvaretin in a 15% overall yield. In this multistep strategy, the use of protective groups resulted in a 72% carbon economy (CE) in the final deprotection alone. In sharp contrast, our goal was to perform the direct alkylation of unprotected DHC 1 with 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol 4a, providing a C-benzylated DCH in a single step and with a 100% CE (Table 2). Pleasingly, DHC 1 and benzyl alcohol 4a reacted cleanly in acetonitrile with a catalytic amount of PTSA, affording the alkylation product 5a featuring the same 2-hydroxybenzyl fragment as uvaretin in a good 61% yield (Table 2, entry 1). It is worthy of note that the solvent did not seem to interfere with the reaction, as no traces of acetamide that would result from a Ritter reaction were observed [32]. The benzylation of DHC 1 was further extended to various substituted precursors, providing several analogues 5b–d in yields ranging from 36% to 74% (Table 2, entries 2–4).

2.1.3. Prenylation of DHC 1

Finally, we envisioned the preparation of a C-prenylated derivative from DHC 1. The single synthesis of a prenylated DHC that we were able to retrieve was a chemoenzymatic transformation of phloretin involving dimethylallyltryptophan synthase that afforded a C-prenylated counterpart in a modest 14.5% yield [33]. On the other hand, several syntheses of various C-prenylated flavonoids and phloroglucinol derivatives have been reported. They mainly relied on the alkylation of acylphloroglucinol scaffolds using allylbromides [34,35], and only a few studies involved prenol (6a) or 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol (6b) as the alkylating agent. A representative example was xanthohumol. In the total synthesis [36] of this C-prenylated chalcone from hops (Humulus lupulus L.), prenol (6a) reacted with a protected acetophloroglucinol derivative under Mitsunobu conditions to provide an ether. A Claisen rearrangement then occurred upon heating to yield a C-prenylated intermediate. The chalcone scaffold was then constructed following a Claisen–Schmidt condensation with a protected aldehyde prior to a final deprotection. Overall, the total synthesis of xanthohumol required six steps from acetophloroglucinol with an 11% overall yield. Once again, an alternative method based on the direct prenylation of a natural DHC would be highly desirable in both terms of step- and atom-economy.
The reaction between DHC (1) and 1 equivalent of 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol (6a) in the presence of a catalytic amount of PTSA afforded a mixture of the expected C-alkylation product 7a, featuring the same alkylation motif as erioschalcones, along with an O-alkylation byproduct 7b with a 40% yield (Table 3, entry 1). This moderate yield was slightly improved to 48% when 0.50 equivalent of alcohol 6a was used (Table 3, entry 2). Pleasingly, replacing the prenol 6a with its isomer 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol 6b increased the yield to 58% (Table 3, entry 4). These results were considered as satisfactory as our single-step protocol was the first hemisynthesis of a C-prenylated DHC and provided a better yield than the conventional multistep procedures reported for the synthesis of related C-prenylated phenylpropanoids. Careful separation by reverse-phase chromatography provided pure samples of the two prenylation products 7a and 7b for biological assays. As O-prenylation is a modification found in antimicrobial natural flavonoids and acetophloroglucinols [37], the O-prenylated DHC 7b was also subjected to biological assays.
Extension of these experimental conditions to geraniol 6c (Scheme 1) led to a mixture of the C-geranylated DHC 8a with a byproduct 8b in a modest 31% yield. Yet, careful separation of the C-geranylated DHC 8a by reverse-phase chromatography enabled its isolation in sufficient quantity to carry out the evaluation of its biological properties.

2.2. Biological Evaluation of Alkylated DHCs 3a–e, 5a–d, 7a–b, and 8a

The antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of derivatives 3a–e, 5a–d, 7a–b, and 8a were evaluated in vitro and compiled in Table 4. The results of antibacterial assays, performed against Gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), were expressed as the minimal concentration inhibiting 90% of bacterial growth (MIC90) using gentamicin and balsacone A as positive controls. The cytotoxicity against two malignant (A-549 and DLD-1) and one healthy (WS-1) human cell lines was reported as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) using etoposide as a positive control.
The cinnamylated DHCs 3a-e displayed significant inhibitory properties against S. aureus, with MIC90 values ranging from 2.6 to 11.6 µM (Table 4, entries 1–5). They were inactive against E. coli, which was consistent with the recorded antibacterial potential of the naturally occurring cinnamylated DHC balsacone A [5] (Table 4, entry 12). They also confirmed our previous hypothesis that the substitution of the DHC scaffold had a limited impact on the antibacterial potential of cinnamylated DHCs [17]. Notably, the derivative 3a (Table 4, entry 1), featuring the same 4-hydroxycinnamyl fragment as balsacone A, was the least active among the five new compounds 3a-e. On the other hand, the chlorinated counterpart 3e (Table 4, entry 5) was slightly more active than balsacone A, which suggested that modulating the nature of the alkylation motif was a relevant approach to modulate the antibacterial properties of cinnamylated DHCs. The novel benzylated DHCs devised here were not cytotoxic against the three tested lines. These results contrasted with the reported activity of the natural C-benzylated DHC uvaretin that inhibited the growth of A549 cells with a 2.2 µM IC50 [27]. Therefore, the substitution pattern of benzylated DHCs played a pivotal role towards their cytotoxic activity. On the other hand, benzylated compounds 5a–d were active against S. aureus (Table 4, entries 6–9). Once again, the chlorinated derivative was the most active of the array (Table 4, entry 9) and surpassed balsacone A. Strikingly, the C-prenylated DHC 7a showed a marginal inhibition of E. coli (Table 4, entry 10), which did not match the reported activity of natural erioschalcones [12]. While the substitution of the DHC scaffold had a limited impact on the antimicrobial properties of cinnamylated DHCs, this result suggested that the substitution pattern of prenylated DHCs was an important feature towards their activity against E. coli. On the other hand, the geranylated DHC 8a was slightly more active than balsacone A against S. aureus (Table 4, entry 12). Further efforts towards the direct prenylation and geranylation of other naturally occurring DHCs could therefore highlight the structural features responsible for the antibacterial properties of this class of natural products.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

3.1.1. Chemistry

Unless otherwise noted, all starting materials and solvents were purchased from commercial sources (Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics) and used as received without further purification. Reactions were conducted under argon atmosphere, using anhydrous solvent, unless otherwise noted. All reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using normal phase silica gel 60 F254 0.25 mm or reverse phase silica gel 60 RP-18 F254s 0.25 mm precoated aluminum foil plates (Silicycle). Normal phase TLC were visualized under UV (254 nm) or revealed using H2SO4 under UV (365 nm), as for reverse phase TLC. Flash chromatographic purifications were performed using normal phase silica gel 60 (15–40 μm) or C-18 reverse-phase silica gel (17%) (40–63 μm) columns. NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz for 1H nuclei and 101 MHz for 13C nuclei, using deuterated acetonitrile or methanol as the solvent. Chemical shifts δ were reported in ppm relative to the solvent residual peak (CD3OD δH/C 3.31/49.00 ppm; CD3CN δH/C 1.94/118.26 ppm; CDCl3 δH/C 7.26/77.16 ppm) [38] and coupling constants J in Hertz (Hz). Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds are given in the Supplementary Materials. HRMS spectra were recorded on an Agilent 6224 MS-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray source.
Cinnamyl alcohols were prepared from the corresponding acids following a known procedure [30]. DHC 1 was prepared from neohesperidin dihydrochalcone according to a known procedure [39].

3.1.2. Antibacterial Assays

Gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Antibacterial assays were performed following a modified microdilution method [40]. Briefly, exponentially growing bacteria (density of 5 × 103 E. coli or 3.5 × 104 S. aureus) were plated in 96-well round-bottom microplates per well in 100 μL of nutrient broth. The tested compounds were solubilized in DMSO and then diluted in nutrient broth or Sabouraud dextrose so that the final concentration of DMSO was maintained below 0.1% (v/v) to avoid solvent toxicity. Bacteria were treated using increasing concentrations of tested compounds and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Absorbance was read using a Varioskan Ascent plate reader (Thermo Electron) at 600 nm and the results were expressed as the concentration inhibiting 90% of bacterial growth (MIC90).

3.1.3. Cytotoxicity Assays

A-549 (lung cancer, ATCC # CCL-185), DLD-1 (colon cancer, ATCC # CCL-221) and WS-1 (skin fibroblasts, ATCC # CRL-1502) cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Cell lines were grown. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in minimum essential medium containing Earle’s salt (Mediatech Cellgro, Herndon, VA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), 1 × solution of vitamins, 1 × sodium pyruvate, 1 × non-essential amino acids, 60 µg/mL of penicillin sodium, and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin (Mediatech Cellgro). Exponentially growing cells were plated at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well in 96-well microplates (BD Falcon) in culture medium (100 µL). Cells were allowed to adhere for 16 h before treatment. The tested compounds were solubilized in DMSO and then diluted in cell culture medium so that the final concentration of DMSO was maintained below 0.5% (v/v) to avoid solvent toxicity. Cells were treated using increasing concentrations of tested compounds and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. Cytotoxicity was assessed using Hoechst 33342 (bisbenzimide) fluorometric assay [41]. Briefly, after removal of the supernatant, cells were incubated at room temperature during 1 h with sodium dodecyl sulfate (100 µL of 0.02% solution in sterile distilled water) and then frozen overnight. After thawing, a solution of Hoechst 33342 dye in TNE 2x (10 mM tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 4 M NaCl) was added to reach a final concentration of 30 µg/mL. The plates were incubated at room temperature during 2 h in the dark and fluorescence was measured at 355/460 nm (excitation/emission) using a microplate fluorescence reader. The results were expressed as the concentration of drug inhibiting cell growth by 50% (IC50).

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds 3a–e

3.2.1. General Procedure for the Cinnamylation of DHC 1

A solution of 4-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (catalytic loading indicated in Table 1) in acetonitrile (0.1 mL) was added to a solution of DHC 1 (0.40 mmol) and cinnamyl alcohol 2 (0.10 mmol) in acetonitrile (1.9 mL or 2.9 mL). The mixture was stirred at the temperature and for the time indicated in Table 1. After dilution with 5 mL ethyl acetate, the mixture was quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was rotary evaporated. The expected cinnamylation product 3 was finally obtained after flash chromatography on reverse-phase (C18) silica gel using a gradient from 50% to 90% of methanol in water as the eluent.

3.2.2. Compound 3a

(E)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)allyl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.120 g, 0.395 mmol) and 4-hydroxycinnamic alcohol (2a) (0.0147 g, 0.0979 mmol) afforded the title compound 3a as a pale orange powder (29.5 mg, 69%). Rf = 0.60 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H24O7 [M − H]– 437.1595, found 437.1594; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7,13 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.69 – 6.62 (m, 3H), 6.26 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (dt, J = 6.4, 15.5 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.36 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 165.1, 163.9, 161.7, 157.3, 147.3, 147.2, 136.2, 131.3, 130.1, 128.0, 126.8, 120.5, 116.5, 116.1, 112.8, 106.6, 105.2, 94.9, 56.5, 47.2, 31.7, 26.4.

3.2.3. Compound 3b

(E)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(3-(4-methoxyphenyl)allyl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.130 g, 0.432 mmol) and 4-methoxycinnamic alcohol (2b) (0.0178 g, 0.108 mmol) afforded the title compound 3b as a yellow powder (23.8 mg, 49%). Rf = 0.46 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C26H26O7 [M − H]– 451.1751, found 451.1753; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.20 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.83 – 6.75 (m, 3H), 6.71 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 1.8, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dt, J = 6.4, 15.9 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.37 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 165.1, 163.9, 161.8, 160.0, 147.3, 147.2, 136.2, 132.3, 129.9, 128.0, 127.6, 120.5, 116.5, 114.8, 112.9, 106.5, 105.2, 94.9, 56.5, 55.6, 47.2, 31.7, 26.4.

3.2.4. Compound 3c

(E)-1-(3-(3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)allyl)-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.125 g, 0.412 mmol) and 3,4-dimethoxycinnamic alcohol (2c) (0.0201 g, 0.104 mmol) afforded the title compound 3c as a white powder (30.6 mg, 61%). Rf = 0.50 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C27H28O8 [M − H]– 481.1857, found 481.1859; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 13.81 (br s, 1H), 8.04 (br s, 1H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.86 – 6.78 (m, 3H), 6.72 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 1.9, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (dt, J = 5.8, 15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.36 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.0, 164.9, 162.4, 160.6, 150.1, 149.3, 146.8, 146.4, 135.9, 131.8, 130.0, 127.2, 120.4, 119.6, 115.9, 112.6, 112.5, 109.6, 106.2, 105.1, 94.9, 56.6, 56.2, 56.1, 46.7, 30.6, 26.0.

3.2.5. Compound 3d

1-(3-cinnamyl-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.122 g, 0.40 mmol) and cinnamic alcohol (2d) (0.0134 g, 0.10 mmol) afforded the title compound 3d as a white powder (30.1 mg, 72%). Rf = 0.63 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H24O6 [M − H]– 421.1646, found 421.1653; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.28 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.40 – 6.24 (m, 2H), 5.96 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.40 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 165.2, 163.9, 161.8, 147.3, 147.2, 139.5, 136.2, 130.4, 129.8, 129.4, 127.5, 126.9, 120.5, 116.5, 112.8, 106.2, 105.2, 94.9, 56.5, 47.2, 31.7, 26.5.

3.2.6. Compound 3e

(E)-1-(3-(3-(4-chlorophenyl)allyl)-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.0656 g, 0.216 mmol) and 4-chlorocinnamic alcohol (2e) (0.0184 g, 0.108 mmol) afforded the title compound 3e as a white powder (13.1 mg, 30%) and compound 3e’ as a white powder (4.2 mg, 9%). Rf = 0.40 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H23ClO6 [M − H]– 455.1255, found 455.1256; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.26 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (s, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 1.9, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.39 – 6.25 (m, 2H), 5.96 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.39 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.5, 164.0, 162.0, 147.2, 138.3, 136.2, 133.0, 130.9, 130.1, 129.4, 129.1, 128.6, 128.3, 120.6, 116.5, 112.9, 106.0, 105.2, 95.0, 56.5, 47.1, 31.7, 26.4.

3.2.7. Compound 3e’

(E)-3-(2-(3-(4-chlorophenyl)allyl)-5-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)propan-1-one.
Antibiotics 10 00620 i004
Rf = 0,40 (CHCl3/MeOH 9/1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.27 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.44 – 6.29 (m, 2H), 5.79 (s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.50 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), 3.25 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.2, 166.3, 165.8, 147.3, 146.0, 137.8, 133.9, 133.4, 132.0, 130.3, 129.9, 129.5, 128.4, 117.5, 114.7, 105.3, 95.8, 56.5, 46.6, 37.0, 28.5.

3.3. Synthesis of Compounds 5a–d

3.3.1. General Procedure for the Benzylation of DHC 1

A solution of 4-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (catalytic loading indicated in Table 2) in acetonitrile (0.1 mL) was added to a solution of DHC 1 (0.20 mmol) and benzyl alcohol 4 (0.10 mmol) in acetonitrile (1.9 mL or 2.9 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature (unless otherwise noted in Table 1) for 2 or 3 h. The mixture was then diluted with ethyl acetate (5 mL), quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted three times with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic layers were pooled together, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was rotary evaporated. The crude residue was chromatographed over reverse-phase (C-18) silica gel using a gradient of methanol in water (from 50% to 90%) as the mobile phase to afford the expected benzylation product 5.

3.3.2. Compound 5a

3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(2-hydroxybenzyl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.0602 g, 0.20 mmol) and 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol (4a) (0.0125 g, 0.10 mmol) afforded the title compound 5a as a yellow powder (25.0 mg, 61%). Rf = 0.40 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H22O7 [M − H]– 411.1435, found 411.1438; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.21 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.84 – 6.75 (m, 3H), 6.72 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (dd, J = 1.5, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.99 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.3, 163.9, 162.4, 161.2, 154.6, 146.8, 146.3, 135.8, 131.5, 128.2, 127.8, 121.1, 120.4, 116.1, 115.8, 112.5, 107.0, 105.1, 95.5, 56.6, 46.6, 30.6, 22.8.

3.3.3. Compound 5b

3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxybenzyl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.0608 g, 0.20 mmol) and 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol (4b) (0.0125 g, 0.10 mmol) afforded the title compound 5b as a yellow powder (30.3 mg, 74%). Rf = 0.30 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H22O7 [M − H]– 411.1437, found 411.1438; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.07 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H); 6.71 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.68 – 6.57 (m, 3H), 5.94 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.73, (s, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 165.2, 163.9, 161.7, 155.8, 147.3, 147.2, 136.2, 134.4, 130.4, 120.5, 116.5, 115.6, 112.9, 108.5, 105.2, 94.9, 56.5, 47.2, 31.8, 27.8.

3.3.4. Compound 5c

3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.129 g, 0.426 mmol) and 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol (4c) (0.0147 g, 0.106 mmol) afforded the title compound 5c as a white powder (16.4 mg, 36%). Rf = 0.46 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C24H24O7 [M − H]– 425.1595, found 425.1586; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.12 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 1.6, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.24 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 165.2, 163.9, 161.7, 158.9, 147.3, 147.2, 136.2, 135.5, 130.4, 120.5, 116.5, 114.2, 112.8, 108.3, 105.2, 94.8, 56.5, 55.6, 47.2, 31.7, 27.8.

3.3.5. Compound 5d

1-(3-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Following the general procedure above, a mixture of DHC 1 (0.0618 g, 0.20 mmol) and 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol (4d) (0.0143 g, 0.10 mmol) afforded the title compound 5d as a white powder (12.8 mg, 30%). Rf = 0.57; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 7.31 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 1.6, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.4, 163.9, 162.0, 147.3, 147.2, 142.8, 136.2, 131.8, 131.6, 120.5, 119.8, 116.5, 112.9, 111.4, 107.3, 105.2, 94.8, 56.5, 47.2, 31.7, 28.2.

3.4. Synthesis of Compounds 7a–b and 8a–b

3.4.1. Prenylation of DHC 1

A solution of 4-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (catalytic loading indicated in Table 3) in acetonitrile (0.1 mL) was added to a solution of DHC 1 (0.121 g, 0.40 mmol) and prenol 6a (10.2 µL, 0.10 mmol) in acetonitrile (1.9 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was then diluted with ethyl acetate (5 mL), quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted three times with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic layers were pooled together, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was rotary evaporated. The crude residue was chromatographed over reverse-phase (C-18) silica gel using a gradient of methanol in water (from 50% to 90%) as the mobile phase to afford a mixture of compounds 7a and 7b as a yellow powder (16.5 mg, 48%) with a ratio of 1.3:1 (7a:7b). Pure samples of 7a and 7b were obtained by thorough separation by chromatography over reverse-phase (C-18) silica gel.

3.4.2. Compound 7a

3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxy-3-(3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl)phenyl)propan-1-one. Rf = 0.50 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C21H24O6 [M − H]– 373.1639, found 373.1646; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 6.80 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 5.17 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.27 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (s, 3H), 1.64 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 205.1, 161.0, 145.4, 144.9, 135.7, 135.1, 121.8, 120.1, 114.8, 114.6, 110.8, 105.9, 104.9, 95.3, 56.1, 46.0, 30.3, 25.9, 21.7, 18.0.

3.4.3. Compound 7b

3-(4-methoxy-3-((3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl)oxy)phenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Rf = 0.50 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C21H24O6 [M − H]– 373.1640, found 373.1646; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 6.81 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 5.19 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.74 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 3.27 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 206.2, 166.4, 165.9, 147.3, 147.2, 136.7, 136.2, 121.3, 120.5, 116.5, 112.9, 111.4, 105.2, 95.8, 56.5, 47.1, 38.4, 31.6, 25.8, 22.4, 17.8.

3.4.4. Geranylation of DHC 1

A solution of 4-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (catalytic loading indicated in Table 3) in acetonitrile (0.1 mL) was added to a solution of DHC 1 (0.1123 g, 0.37 mmol) and geraniol 6c (16.7 µL, 0.092 mmol) in acetonitrile (1.9 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was then diluted with ethyl acetate (5 mL), quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (20 mL) and extracted three times with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic layers were pooled together, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was rotary evaporated. The crude residue was chromatographed over reverse-phase (C-18) silica gel using a gradient of methanol in water (from 50% to 90%) as the mobile phase to afford a mixture of compounds 8a and 8b as a white powder (13.3 mg, 31%) with a ratio of 1.4:1 (8a:8b). Pure samples of 8a and 8b were obtained by thorough separation by chromatography over reverse-phase (C-18) silica gel.

3.4.5. Compound 8a

(E)-1-(3-(3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl)-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Rf = 0.56 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C26H32O6 [M − H]– 441.2271, found 441.2272; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 8.16 (br s, 1H), 7.61 (br s, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.41 (br s, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 5.13 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.26 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 3.17 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (br s, 1H), 2.23 – 1.90 (m, 3H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.61 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 205.9, 164.7, 162.2, 160.2, 146.8, 146.4, 135.9, 135.6, 132.1, 125.2, 123.7, 120.5, 115.9, 112.6, 108.0, 105.1, 95.0, 56.7, 46.7, 40.3, 30.7, 27.3, 25.7, 21.8, 17.7, 16.2.

3.4.6. Compound 8b

(E)-1-(3-(3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl)-2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-1-one. Rf = 0.56 (CHCl3/MeOH 9:1); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C26H32O6 [M − H]– 441.2269, found 441.2272; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 10.90 (br s, 2H), 7.71 (br s, 1H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 6.25 (br s, 1H), 5.85 (s, 2H), 5.19 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.26 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.04 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.98 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H) 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.62 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ 205.9, 165.1, 164.7, 146.3, 145.1, 136.2, 133.2, 132.2, 131.8, 125.1, 124.7, 116.6, 114.0, 110.9, 105.2, 95.8, 56.7, 46.2, 40.3, 31.9, 27.5, 27.3, 25.7, 17.7, 16.3.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we devised the single-step hemisynthesis of C-cinnamylated, C-benzylated, and C-prenylated DHCs from the readily accessible aglycon moiety of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone 1. This protective group-free approach stood out from conventional multistep approaches and provided an efficient route towards several original derivatives that were structural analogs of naturally occurring balsacones, uvaretin, and erioschalcones. This study disclosed the influence of the C-alkylation pattern of the DHC 1 towards antimicrobial activity against S. aureus. Furthermore, it suggested that the substitution of the DHC had a critical impact on the anti-Gram-negative properties of C-prenylated DHCs and on the cytotoxicity of C-benzylated DHCs. The strategy reported here gave a better insight towards the bioactivity of C-alkylated DHCs and its extension to other naturally occurring precursors could pave the way to the discovery of novel analogs with improved antibacterial and cytotoxic properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10060620/s1, Figures S1–S12: NMR spectra of compounds 3a–e’; Figures S13–S20: NMR spectra of compounds 5a–d; Figures S21–S24: NMR spectra of compounds 7a–b; Figures S25–S28: NMR spectra of compounds 8a–b.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.; methodology, J.A.; validation, J.A., J.L. and A.P.; formal analysis, J.A., J.L. and A.P.; investigation, A.A., J.A. and F.S.; resources, J.L. and A.P.; data curation, A.A., J.A. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.; writing—review and editing, A.P.; supervision, J.A., F.S. and A.P.; project administration, A.P.; funding acquisition, J.L. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Materials and methods section and in the Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

C. Dussault (UQAC) is gratefully acknowledged for assistance with biological assays.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ibdah, M.; Martens, S.; Gang, D.R. Biosynthetic pathway and metabolic engineering of plant dihydrochalcones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stompor, M.; Broda, D.; Bajek-Bil, A. Dihydrochalcones: Methods of acquisition and pharmacological properties—A first systematic review. Molecules 2019, 24, 4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Veitch, N.C.; Grayer, R.J. Flavonoids and their glycosides, including anthocyanins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 1626–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Snijman, P.W.; Joubert, E.; Ferreira, D.; Li, X.-C.; Ding, Y.; Green, I.R.; Gelderblom, W.C.A. Antioxidant activity of the dihydrochalcones aspalathin and nothofagin and their corresponding flavones in relation to other rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) flavonoids, epigallocatechin gallate, and Trolox. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6678–6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lavoie, S.; Legault, J.; Simard, F.; Chiasson, É.; Pichette, A. New antibacterial dihydrochalcone derivatives from buds of Populus balsamifera. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1631–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simard, F.; Legault, J.; Lavoie, S.; Pichette, A. Balsacones D-I, dihydrocinnamoyl flavans from Populus balsamifera buds. Phytochemistry 2014, 100, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Simard, F.; Gauthier, C.; Chiasson, É.; Lavoie, S.; Mshvildadze, V.; Legault, J.; Pichette, A. Antibacterial balsacones J–M, hydroxycinnamoylated dihydrochalcones from Populus balsamifera buds. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Simard, F.; Gauthier, C.; Legault, J.; Lavoie, S.; Mshvildadze, V.; Pichette, A. Structure elucidation of anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) flavonoids from balsam poplar buds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 4188–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muhammad, I.; Waterman, P.G. Chemistry of the Annonaceae, part 18. Benzylated indoles and dihydrochalcones in Uvaria angolensis from Tanzania. J. Nat. Prod. 1985, 48, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nkunya, M.H.H.; Weenen, H.; Renner, C.; Waibel, R.; Achenbach, H. Benzylated dihydrochalcones from Uvaria leptocladon. Phytochemistry 1993, 32, 1297–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prawat, U.; Chairerk, O.; Phupornprasert, U.; Salae, A.-W.; Tuntiwachwuttikul, P. Two New C-benzylated Dihydrochalcone Derivatives from the Leaves of Melodorum siamensis. Planta Med. 2013, 79, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Awouafack, M.D.; Kouam, S.F.; Hussain, H.; Ngamga, D.; Tane, P.; Schulz, B.; Green, I.R.; Krohn, K. Antimicrobial Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from Eriosema glomerata. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rivière, C. Chapter 7—Dihydrochalcones: Occurrence in the Plant Kingdom, Chemistry and Biological Activities. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Rahman, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 51, pp. 253–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kozłowska, J.; Potaniec, B.; Żarowska, B.; Anioł, M. Microbial transformations of 4′-methylchalcones as an efficient method of obtaining novel alcohol and dihydrochalcone derivatives with antimicrobial activity. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 30379–30386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gosch, C.; Halbwirth, H.; Stich, K. Phloridzin: Biosynthesis, distribution and physiological relevance in plants. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Horowitz, R.M.; Gentili, B. Taste and structure in phenolic glycosides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1969, 17, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alsarraf, J.; Bilodeau, J.-F.; Legault, J.; Simard, F.; Pichette, A. Exploring the Biomass-Derived Chemical Space Emerging from Natural Dihydrochalcones through the Single-Step Hemisynthesis of Antibacterial Balsacones. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 6194–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bélanger, A.; Grenier, A.; Simard, F.; Gendreau, I.; Pichette, A.; Legault, J.; Pouliot, R. Dihydrochalcone Derivatives from Populus balsamifera L. Buds for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Côté, H.; Pichette, A.; Simard, F.; Ouellette, M.-E.; Ripoll, L.; Mihoub, M.; Grimard, D.; Legault, J. Balsacone C, a New Antibiotic Targeting Bacterial Cell Membranes, Inhibits Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Without Inducing Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sanz, R.; Martínez, A.; Miguel, D.; Álvarez-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Rodríguez, F. Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Nucleophilic Substitution of Alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1841–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bandini, M.; Tragni, M. π-Activated alcohols: An emerging class of alkylating agents for catalytic Friedel–Crafts reactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, R.; Van der Eycken, E.V. Recent approaches for C–C bond formation via direct dehydrative coupling strategies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1121–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rodrigues, T.; Reker, D.; Schneider, P.; Schneider, G. Counting on natural products for drug design. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hufford, C.D.; Oguntimein, B.O. Dihydrochalcones from Uvaria angolensis. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 2036–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hufford, C.D.; Oguntimein, B.O. New Dihydrochalcones and Flavanones From Uvaria Angolensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1982, 45, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hufford, C.D.; Oguntimein, B.O.; Shoolery, J.N. Angoluvarin, an antimicrobial dihydrochalcone from Uvaria angolensis. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5286–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dallman, J.; Lansakara, A.; Nguyen, T.; Weeramange, C.; Hulangamuwa, W.; Rafferty, R.J. The winding road of the uvaretin class of natural products: From total synthesis to bioactive agent discovery. MedChemComm 2019, 10, 1420–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Terao, J.; Mukai, R. Prenylation modulates the bioavailability and bioaccumulation of dietary flavonoids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 559, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Botta, B.; Vitali, A.; Menendez, P.; Misiti, D.; Delle Monache, G. Prenylated flavonoids: Pharmacology and biotechnology. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 717–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Quideau, S.; Ralph, J. Facile large-scale synthesis of coniferyl, sinapyl, and p-coumaryl alcohol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 1108–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malterud, K.E.; Undheim, J.; Erdal, J.E. Synthesis of uvaretin, an antitumour and antimicrobial flavonoid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 4807–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sanz, R.; Martínez, A.; Guilarte, V.; Álvarez-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Rodríguez, F. The Ritter Reaction under Truly Catalytic Brønsted Acid Conditions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4642–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, X.; Li, S.-M. Prenylation of Flavonoids by Using a Dimethylallyltryptophan Synthase, 7-DMATS, from Aspergillus fumigatus. ChemBioChem 2011, 12, 2280–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qi, J.; Porco, J.A. Rapid Access to Polyprenylated Phloroglucinols via Alkylative Dearomatization−Annulation:  Total Synthesis of (±)-Clusianone. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12682–12683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yu, Q.; Ravu, R.R.; Xu, Q.-M.; Ganji, S.; Jacob, M.R.; Khan, S.I.; Yu, B.-Y.; Li, X.-C. Antibacterial Prenylated Acylphloroglucinols from Psorothamnus fremontii. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 2748–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khupse, R.S.; Erhardt, P.W. Total Synthesis of Xanthohumol. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1507–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tran, T.D.; Olsson, M.A.; McMillan, D.J.; Cullen, J.K.; Parsons, P.G.; Reddell, P.W.; Ogbourne, S.M. Potent antibacterial prenylated acetophenones from the Australian endemic plant Acronychia crassipetala. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fulmer, G.R.; Miller, A.J.M.; Sherden, N.H.; Gottlieb, H.E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Goldberg, K.I. NMR Chemical shifts of trace impurities: Common laboratory solvents, organics, and gases in deuterated solvents relevant to the organometallic chemist. Organometallics 2010, 29, 2176–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gupte, A.; Buolamwini, J.K. Synthesis and biological evaluation of phloridzin analogs as human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hCNT3) inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Banfi, E.; Scialino, G.; Monti-Bragadin, C. Development of a microdilution method to evaluate Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 52, 796–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Rage, R.; Mitchen, J.; Wilding, G. DNA fluorometric assay in 96-well tissue culture plates using Hoechst 33258 after cell lysis by freezing in distilled water. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 191, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 10 00620 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of various dihydrochalcones, including the aglycone moiety of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (1).
Figure 1. Structure of various dihydrochalcones, including the aglycone moiety of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (1).
Antibiotics 10 00620 g001
Antibiotics 10 00620 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Catalytic Geranylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Scheme 1. Catalytic Geranylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Antibiotics 10 00620 sch001
Table
Table 1. Catalytic Cinnamylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Table 1. Catalytic Cinnamylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Antibiotics 10 00620 i001
EntryAlcohol 2 (R 1, R 2)Product 3 (Yield) 1
12a (OH, H)3a (69%)
22b (OCH3, H)3b (49%)
32c (OCH3, OCH3)3c (61%)
4 22d (H, H)3d (72%)
5 22e (Cl, H)3e (30%)
1 Isolated yield. 2 The reaction was carried out in 2 h at reflux.
Table
Table 2. Catalytic benzylation of dihydrochalcone 1.
Table 2. Catalytic benzylation of dihydrochalcone 1.
Antibiotics 10 00620 i002
EntryAlcohol 4 (R 1, R 2)Product 5 (Yield) 1
14a (OH, H)5a (61%)
24b (H, OH)5b (74%)
3 24c (H, OCH3)5c (36%)
44d (H, Cl)5d (36%)
1 Isolated yield. 2 The reaction was carried out in 3 h at room temperature.
Table
Table 3. Catalytic Prenylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Table 3. Catalytic Prenylation of Dihydrochalcone 1.
Antibiotics 10 00620 i003
EntryAlcohol 6 (Equiv)Product Ratio 7a:7b 1 (Yield) 2
16a (0.25 equiv)1:1 (40%)
26a (0.50 equiv)1.3:1 (48%)
36a (1.0 equiv)2.1:1 (46%)
46b (0.25 equiv)1.4:1 (58%)
56b (0.50 equiv)1.4:1 (44%)
66b (1.0 equiv)1.9:1 (26%)
1 The 7a:7b ratio was determined on the 1H NMR spectrum of the isolated mixture. 2 Isolated yield of the mixture of 7a and 7b.
Table
Table 4. Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activity of Compounds 3a–e, 5a–d, 7a–b, and 8a.
Table 4. Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activity of Compounds 3a–e, 5a–d, 7a–b, and 8a.
EntryProductMIC90 (µM) 1IC50 (µM) 1,6
E. coliS. aureusA-549DLD-1WS-1
13a>10011.6 ± 0.236 ± 328 ± 557 ± 4
23b>1005.7 ± 0.147 ± 626 ± 856 ± 5
33c>1006.0 ± 0.130 ± 336 ± 457 ± 6
43d>1005 ± 0.943 ± 435 ± 658 ± 3
53e>1002.6 ± 0.444 ± 344 ± 759 ± 5
65a>10012 ± 1>100>100>100
75b>10020 ± 152 ± 964 ± 560 ± 5
85c>1004.2 ± 0.525 ± 229 ± 339 ± 4
95d>1002.3 ± 0.138 ± 246 ± 344 ± 4
107a>10080 ± 3>100>100>100
117b>10098 ± 1>100>100>100
128a>1002.5 ± 0.328 ± 221 ± 335 ± 4
13Balsacone A 2>1003.3 ± 0.244 ± 431 ± 556 ± 4
14Gentamicin 20.083 ± 0.007 3 0.12 ± 0.01 3 n. d. 4n. d.n. d.
15Etoposide 5n. d.n. d.0.56 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.0810 ± 5
1 MIC90 and IC50 values ± SD (n = 3) are representative of two different experiments. 2 Used as a positive control for antibacterial assays. 3 Expressed in µg/mL. 4 N. d.: not determined. 5 Used as a positive control for cytotoxic assays. 6 Values > 20 µM were considered as non-toxic.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ardaillou, A.; Alsarraf, J.; Legault, J.; Simard, F.; Pichette, A. Hemisynthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cinnamylated, Benzylated, and Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from a Common Bio-Sourced Precursor. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060620

AMA Style

Ardaillou A, Alsarraf J, Legault J, Simard F, Pichette A. Hemisynthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cinnamylated, Benzylated, and Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from a Common Bio-Sourced Precursor. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(6):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ardaillou, Anne, Jérôme Alsarraf, Jean Legault, François Simard, and André Pichette. 2021. "Hemisynthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cinnamylated, Benzylated, and Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from a Common Bio-Sourced Precursor" Antibiotics 10, no. 6: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060620

APA Style

Ardaillou, A., Alsarraf, J., Legault, J., Simard, F., & Pichette, A. (2021). Hemisynthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cinnamylated, Benzylated, and Prenylated Dihydrochalcones from a Common Bio-Sourced Precursor. Antibiotics, 10(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop