Next Article in Journal
Inflammatory Factors: Nonobese Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Adenotonsillectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Resting Energy Expenditure in Children: May Artificial Neural Networks Improve Our Accuracy?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Craniofacial Asymmetry from One to Three Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study with 3D Imaging
Open AccessArticle

Significant Factors in Cranial Remolding Orthotic Treatment of Asymmetrical Brachycephaly

1
Health Care Sciences, Prosthetics-Orthotics Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6011 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9091, USA
2
Applied Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 6011 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9091, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(4), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041027
Received: 9 March 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 5 April 2020
This retrospective chart review focuses on determining the most effective time to begin cranial remolding orthosis (CRO) treatment for infants with asymmetrical brachycephaly. Subjects with asymmetrical brachycephaly started CRO treatment between 3 and 18 months of age. These infants had a cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) ≥ 3.5 and a cranial index (CI) ≥ 90. Subjects were excluded if they had any comorbidities affecting growth, dropped out of treatment, were lost to follow-up, or were noncompliant. Factors which were found to statistically influence treatment outcomes were subject initial age, initial CVAI, and initial CI. Overall, younger subjects were more likely to achieve a corrected head shape. The presence of prematurity or torticollis had statistically nonsignificant effects on the success of treatment. Initial CI was found to be a stronger predictor than initial CVAI as to which subjects achieved correction. The less severe the starting CI, the more likely the subject was to achieve full correction. The clinical understanding is that it requires more cranial growth to “round out” a full posterior skull flattening than an asymmetry. Based on the study results, infants with asymmetrical brachycephaly should be treated as early as possible to increase chances of achieving full correction of the deformity. View Full-Text
Keywords: plagiocephaly; brachycephaly; asymmetrical brachycephaly; cranial flattening; cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI); cephalic index (CI); cephalic ratio (CR); cranial orthosis; cranial helmet plagiocephaly; brachycephaly; asymmetrical brachycephaly; cranial flattening; cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI); cephalic index (CI); cephalic ratio (CR); cranial orthosis; cranial helmet
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Graham, T.; Millay, K.; Wang, J.; Adams-Huet, B.; O’Briant, E.; Oldham, M.; Smith, S. Significant Factors in Cranial Remolding Orthotic Treatment of Asymmetrical Brachycephaly. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1027.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop