Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I really enjoyed this article and the way the authors unpacked the process of their project, articulating the transformative possibility that inheres in crip fashion hacking. I especially found it engaging to understand the limits of the project as it intersected with the constraints of the university, the structure of the classroom, and COVID. In terms of revisions, to my knowledge, Mel Chen uses 'they' pronouns but line 129 of the article uses 'she'. It is also unclear to me why the authors capitalize "Disabled" and "Disability Justice". This capitalization could benefit from a footnote explanation. 

Author Response

1. We have changed pronouns for Mel Chen to they.

2. We have included an endnote to explain why we have intentionally used capitals for Disability, Disabled and Disability Justice.

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper captured the core value of Disability Justice. It was written with clarity and cohesion. The authors offered rich contents and models for other practitioners in and outside of social science. The dialogue format worked well, and helped to further illustrate the arguments of the paper. This is a paper which I cannot to assign my students to read. 

One thing that I would like to see is the inclusion of image descriptions. I will be adding the same comments to the editors.

Author Response

1. We have added image descriptions to all figures in the article.