Review Reports
- Aisheng Jiang1,2,3,4,
- Jinfu Zhao1,2,3,4,* and
- Pengcheng Cui1,2,3,4
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Dmitry Pavlovich Ilyashenko Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe peer-reviewed article “Effects of TiAlN coating thickness on machined surface roughness, surface residual stresses and fatigue life in turning Inconel 718 at initial tool wear stage” is a comprehensive study containing all the necessary elements: a review of literature sources, statement of a scientific problem, its solution (modeling and experimental research), justification of the resulting solution. The relevance of this scientific research is confirmed by the financial support of 5 grants.
There are recommendations for improving the presented material:
1. lines 149-150: argue what was the basis for adopting these processing parameters (The rough machining parameters were adopted as cutting speed 40 m/min, depth of cut 0.1 mm and feed rate 0.1 mm/r.);
2 develop recommendations for the practical (in production conditions) application of the theoretical data presented in the article.
Author Response
Dear respected reviewer,
Thank you for your email letter dated August 6th, 2024. We are pleased to know that our manuscript (metals-3152163) has been rated as major revision for publication in metals. Based on the instructions provided in your email letter, we uploaded the revised manuscript with the whole corrections highlighted by using the track changes mode in red color.
Appended to this letter is our responses for the comments referred in your email letter. The comments are reproduced and our responses are given directly afterward.
We hope that the revised manuscript could be accepted and published in the metals.
Yours Sincerely
Prof./Dr. Jinfu Zhao
Shandong University, China
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease refer to the reviewer report attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Moderate editing of English language required
Author Response
Dear respected reviewer,
Thank you for your email letter dated August 6th, 2024. We are pleased to know that our manuscript (metals-3152163) has been rated as major revision for publication in metals. Based on the instructions provided in your email letter, we uploaded the revised manuscript with the whole corrections highlighted by using the track changes mode in red color.
Appended to this letter is our responses for the comments referred in your email letter. The comments are reproduced and our responses are given directly afterward.
We hope that the revised manuscript could be accepted and published in the metals.
Yours Sincerely
Prof./Dr. Jinfu Zhao
Shandong University, China
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors- Title is very long, could you shorten it please?
- Abbreviation PVD is not defined in Abstract first.
- This can not be true: "[11, 12, 19–26]." Please make it more real like [19-21]....
- Last paragraph of Introduction is more like abstract. Please rewrite it. Add info about novelty of this manuscript, motivation, research gap, usage in practice, usage in some industry etc.
- Fig. 1(a) has not readable scale.
- All abbreviations must be defined first.
- In chapter 4. Results and discussion is not discussion at all. Please add rich discussion. Compare your results with results in other studies.
- Figs. 10 (b,c,e) are not focused. Please replace them with focused and sharp SEM pictures.
- Between number and unit is always gap.
Author Response
Dear respected reviewer,
Thank you for your email letter dated August 6th, 2024. We are pleased to know that our manuscript (metals-3152163) has been rated as major revision for publication in metals. Based on the instructions provided in your email letter, we uploaded the revised manuscript with the whole corrections highlighted by using the track changes mode in red color.
Appended to this letter is our responses for the comments referred in your email letter. The comments are reproduced and our responses are given directly afterward.
We hope that the revised manuscript could be accepted and published in the metals.
Yours Sincerely
Prof./Dr. Jinfu Zhao
Shandong University, China
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe authors have successfully revised their original work and therefore it may be further considered for publication.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMinor editing of English language required.
Author Response
Dear respected reviewer,
Thank you for your email letter dated August 14th, 2024.
Appended to this letter is our responses for the comments referred in your email letter.
Comments:
Minor editing of English language required.
Answer：Thanks for your kindness and good suggestion. We are pleased to say thanks for your hard work on reviewing our manuscript (metals-3152163). Necessary editing of English language has been modified in the revised manuscript with red color.
We hope that the revised manuscript could be accepted and published in the metals.
Yours Sincerely
Prof./Dr. Jinfu Zhao
Shandong University, China
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAuthor improved his manuscript.
Author Response
Dear respected reviewer,
Thank you for your email letter dated August 14th, 2024.
Appended to this letter is our responses for the comments referred in your email letter.
Comments:
Author improved his manuscript.
Answer：Thanks for your affirmation and kindness. We are pleased to say thanks for your hard work on reviewing our manuscript (metals-3152163). The response for you is maybe due to the sentence “Author improved his manuscript.” The English of this manuscript has been improved according to the other reviewers.
We hope that the revised manuscript could be accepted and published in the metals.
Yours Sincerely
Prof./Dr. Jinfu Zhao
Shandong University, China
Author Response File: Author Response.docx